User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive56

This is an archive of past discussions about User:CambridgeBayWeather. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas CambridgeBayWeather
	Hi CambridgeBayWeather, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, –Davey2010^Talk 19:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

This year passed slower than Christmas!

🔔🎁⛄️🎅🏻 Atsme 💬 📧 10:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Linguist111^talk 23:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Merry Christmas !

Hello CambridgeBayWeather: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasupati Group

Hello CambridgeBayWeather. Could you please consider re-opening this AfD to give it more time to reach consensus? So far there was only the author and one other person who participated, so I think some more time for others to give their opinions would be worthwhile. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

MrsSnoozyTurtle there were three people. You could start another AfD. Better than reopening. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Miminiska

The lodge and lake are named Miminiska, every other Wikipedia page mentioning the lake and lodge also say Miminiska, other than the Eabametoong page. AnOblongBox (talk) 06:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Everything is Going to be Alright, Martin Creed, 2015.

Thank you for all your edits and contributions this year. I wish you a happy holiday and good health!
Possibly (talk)

PS: I really enjoyed the Cambridge Bay pics. Stay safe. Possibly (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Jenna Coleman

Why did you protect the page "Jenna Coleman" while keeping wrong, unverified, and wrong tabloid rumours in there? None of the articles listed that claim that she had split from Tom Hughes provide any evidence whatsoever, while in contrast there is so much evidence to show that they did not split. Do you think Wikipedia is a place to support tabloid lies that have been proven to be wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EulerLagrange42 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello CambridgeBayWeather: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 18:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, CambridgeBayWeather!

Happy New Year!

CambridgeBayWeather,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010^Talk 00:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Deaths in 2021

Hi, happy new year and thanks for protecting the page. However, you set the protection to expire on 5 Jan 2021. The Deaths in XXXX pages are normally protected for the whole year, so could you please change the protection and set it to expire on 5 Jan 2022? Thanks and cheers. --Marbe166 (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year. That goes against WP:NO-PREEMPT. If they return it can be protected for longer periods. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Antifa full protection

Why have you put full protection on Antifa (United States)? Many editors have been working on that page constructively now we're almost all blocked because MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken was edit warring? That's not fair at all. Why not just block MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken for editwarring rather than blocking all of us from contributing? Surely that's a fairer way to approach this? Bacondrum (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Bacondrum. It was protected because CLCStudent made a request here and when I looked at the page I saw MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken and Doug Weller both reverting twice. All it needs is a few days discussion and it can be unprotected again. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:55, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for explaining. All the best. Bacondrum (talk) 23:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I would have blocked both of them but that Doug Weller is a Florida Man originally and is thus quite scary. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Do you reckon you could unlock the article now, I've filed an edit warring report. I don't think it's fair we are all locked out because MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken turned up one day and decided to edit war. Just block them. Bacondrum (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Bacondrum: They don't seem to have broken 3RR, they've only reverted twice. I doubt that they'll be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, that's one of the funniest things I've ever been called, thanks! Doug Weller talk 07:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

So why can't we edit the article. Collective punishment? If an editor can't stop reverting then stop them from editing, not all of us. This fella just turned up and started edit warring and now no one can edit, that seems insane to me. Bacondrum (talk) 08:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh shit! @Bacondrum: pardon my French, but not having edited that article in a long time I didn't realise it was at 1RR. I can see why CambridgeBayWeather mentions both of us being blocked. Maybe I should revert myself, but I still think it's a BLP violation and besides Admins shouldn't be editing a fully protected article without an excellent reason such as vandalism, copyvio, or BLP issues. Doug Weller talk 12:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I never thought about it being under discretionary sanctions either. There are too many notices, 13 or 14 boxes, at the top of Talk:Antifa (United States). I don't like fully blocking people in things like this because it stops any productive discussion, which was being held on the talk page at that time. I also forgot about the ability to block from individual pages. It's −37 °C (−35 °F) here and my brain is frozen. Looking at what has been said I don't think there will be any more edit warring so I'll unprotect the page and it looks like EC is there now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cambridge. Wouldn't it be usual to log your EC protection in WP:Arbitration enforcement log/2021 even though that's the same level of protection that was there before. EdJohnston (talk) 18:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Probably. Done it now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that. -37! Wow! Never experienced anything like that. Bacondrum (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome. It warmed up as it was −41 °C (−42 °F) last week. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

CambridgeBayWeather,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

You've got mail

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 12:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Administrator changes

Hammersoft

Andres • Brion VIBBER • Rkitko • Thatcher

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek • Primefac

Oversight changes

Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek

Joe Roe

Guideline and policy news

Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.

Technical news

You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.

Arbitration

By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Just FYI - Palagummi Sainath

Hi - I see you page protected Palagummi Sainath for vandalism. There hasn't been any vandalism nor any BLP violations. User:Anasuyas was concerned about edits being made by User:GreenBlueYellow. I was contacted by Anasuya on a non-wiki platform about it and I suggested that they work it out on the talk page, as she had not yet contacted GreenBlueYellow. I did see she asked for some assistance via BLP board, but, didn't think it was necessary. I took the initiative to clean up the article, as it was a mess, and myself and User:MumbaiMedia are now doing a bit of tweaking and clean up to improve. I don't think it needs page protection, but, that's just my opinion. Anyway, have a good day. Missvain (talk) 18:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Missvain No problem. Removed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Happy New Year! Missvain (talk) 19:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year. You are welcome. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Name modifying of the article Relax(collective)

Hello!

If it's not bothering you, I would like to ask you the reason why you change the name of the president article RELAX(chiarenza & hauser & co) to Relax(collective), as the artists of this collective called themself as RELAX(chiarenza & hauser & co) since 1997? And the recents articles talked about them also used their name RELAX(chiarenza & hauser & co). (ref:https://www.sikart.ch/KuenstlerInnen.aspx?id=11000024) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xinyi Fox Hu (talk • contribs) 14:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Xinyi Fox Hu I checked at http://www.relax-studios.ch/ and there was no indication of an unspaced ( being used. So is the correct name of the company "Relax chiarenza & hauser & co" as shown here or "Relax (chiarenza & hauser & co)" as shown here. It appears that everybody use the () except the collective itself. Wikipedia uses normal English rules so Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks would apply to the word "Relax". CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Reprotecting a page

Hi, on the 4th January you semi-protected the page Dream (YouTuber) with an expiration date of 18 January 2021, however the protection was removed when the page was deleted to merge the history with a draft. Is it possible for you to re-instate the protection? Kind regards, Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hemiauchenia. I was taking a break. Looks like it got fixed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your help and contribs! -- KindCowboy69 ☮ 02:53 AM January 11, 2021 02:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Cathy Areu

Hi, part of the point of semi-protection is to encourage the IP to create an account so that a discussion can be had about COI and how to request changes on talk. This can't be done when the IP address keeps changing, and pending changes is unlikely to achieve it. If you really are unwilling to add semi-protection, please add the page to your watchlist so that you can maintain it from now on, as I prefer not to work with pending changes. SarahSV ^(talk) 19:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

There is not enough activity at this time to require semi protection. In fact there isn't really much justification for pending but because of who you are I figured it was acceptable. However, you should stop with the attempts to guilt me into doing what you ask. Have you thought about a range block? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Taking the article off my watchlist is no skin off my nose, and it's not a question of trying to "guilt" you. It's that an editor asked for help at RfPP with a long-term problem, and an admin responded by making things harder for that editor (in that editor's opinion), then dug his heels in about it. That's just not a good use of RfPP.

Pending changes is fiddly and adds to the workload. In addition, the problem is long-term, so looking at whether there's "enough activity at this time" for semi-protection missed the point. And if semi-protection can't be justified in your view, a range block certainly can't. The IP isn't doing anything wrong from their perspective; they simply need to be stopped from doing it at that article so they create an account, which will allow discussion to take place about apparent COI and how to request edits. The easiest way to achieve that was with semi-protection. But I'm repeating myself, so I'll leave it there. SarahSV ^(talk) 21:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

RFPP

Thanks a lot for going through the whole list (yet again), much appreciated.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Request to remove move blocks by User:BereanHunter

Good afternoon User:CambridgeBayWeather Wikipedia Administrator,

As a Cypriot Greek in Camden , London I noticed that trying to submit a draft on Theatro Technis on the Wikipedia EN page has been restricted to administrators by a User Berean Hunter, a) 04:20, 28 February 2020 Berean Hunter talk contribs protected Draft:Theatro Technis [Create=Require administrator access] (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated) which in reality means zero chance of it happening. b) I noticed on this User`s talk page that BereanHunter has been removed as a check user : changes to functionary team[edit] At his own request, the Oversight permission of Someguy1221 are removed. In addition, in accordance with the policy on CheckUser and Oversighter inactivity, the CheckUser rights of Berean Hunter are removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks Someguy1221 and Berean Hunter for their service as functionaries. For the Arbitration Committee, Katietalk 15:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § changes to functionary team c) I also have noticed that you have on a previous occasion removed his administrator access] (indefinite) on the Angelique Rockas article but still restricted its editing. d) There is something wrong here as Theatro Technis and Angelique Rockas are artistically linked , and suspicions arise as to whether this User was an ethno racist. e)Googling and binging the artist Angelique Rockas you can also see that there are serious omissions of her theatre work. Can this be attributed to User:BereanHunter and colluders? Can you remedy this? Thank you IPG adress recorded Keep safe! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.191.67.225 (talk) 11:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I can't make sense of this. It's just a non-stop, small wall of text. Berean Hunter is an administrator and call deal with your request but I suggest that you don't insult people. 12:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Good Morning @CambridgeBayWater

Sorry for the messy post and my inadequacy, and I apologize for the insult. Thank you for the link to Berean Hunter ,which on its contribution page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Berean_Hunter reveals that he has not operated as a Wikipedia administrator and contributor since October 1st 2020. Berean Hunter has also been removed by the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee from being a CheckUser. This leaves the problem that any submission of an article by the lay public on Theatro Technis (in red ) seen in the Angelique Rockas article is restricted to a draft only submitted by administrators. As previously indicated in reality this means zero chance of it happening. My request to you please is that you remove this block by the non operational Berean Hunter on the Draft Theatro Technis , as well as blocks to the lay public on the Angelique Rockas page and allow the lay public to do its job. On the Angelique Rockas page the connection to work at Theatro Technis is considerable , and the work related to Internationalist Theatre and work as an artist is in need of citation, text for the production photographs on this page, performances and reception et. It has not had any contributions for quite some time. As you are the most recent monitor on this artist`s page there is no need for blocks as you will be policing it for any fakery. Thank you Keep safe IPG address recorded — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.191.67.225 (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm not the moderator, nobody is, for Angelique Rockas and I don't think reducing the protection level is a good idea. As for the Theatro Technis there is nothing to stop you from creating an account and starting the article in you own user space. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Daniel Hannan

Thanks for semi-protecting Daniel Hannan for two weeks, but I'm afraid the IP edit warrior returned the instant the protection lapsed. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Jonathan A Jones OK. Try a month. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Rename Bhurgari to Bhurgri

Hello, its important we should rename Bhurgari to mostly spelled Bhurgri, more than 90 percent of people spell is t Bhurgri insted of Bhurgari. Kindly change it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asadbhurgri121 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Asadbhurgri121 go to Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves and follow the instructions. I have no idea what the correct name is. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Bold print in destination charts

Please note that bold print is used to mark seasonal routes in several hundred airport articles in this Wiki as it is stated like that in the airports content template for years. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A61:10B3:7001:306C:204C:9409:51C0 (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Except that Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#When not to use boldface says that it should not be there. Plus there is no reason whatsoever for bolding the airport idents in te infobox or the double ident. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Administrator changes

Hog Farm

Mattflaschen • Nandesuka • Savidan • Wangi

CheckUser changes

Berean Hunter • Xeno

Oversight changes

Someguy1221 • Xeno

Arbitration

The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous

Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Partial issues pending

Hi, thanks for removing WP:SALT from Neel Bhattacharya through request at WP:RfPP per this, but the salt of Talk:Neel Bhattacharya needs to be removed to edit it. Can you help regarding this. Thank you.

Amkgp Done. Sorry I missed that. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:02, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

CambridgeBayWeather, Thanks — Amkgp 💬 14:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Question re: article - Decentralized Trials and Research Alliance (DTRA)

Good morning,

Thanks for the guidance on the DTRA page. I just had two quick questions, and I'm hoping you wouldn't mind sharing your advice. Since the articles cited were publicly available, do I need to obtain the copyright permission to cite or quote from them, or was my use proper? In addition, were the quotes simply too long? I felt that I could make the point with much shorter quotes, but wanted to confirm if the length of the three quotes were problematic.

I edited a few articles some years ago, but this is the first article I've actually written for Wikipedia, so I'm looking for whatever guidance you can share. Thank you, in advance.

John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnobianchi (talk • contribs) 15:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi. Do you have a link to where the material was released under a licence compatible with Wikipedia. The original posting. Being freely available is not the same thing as being available as CC BY-SA and GFDL. It looked like a press release and as such shouldn't really be added. Short quotes are OK but need to be identified as such. Example "this is a quote" and a reference. Also the article shouldn't be built on what a company says about itself. It should be built on what others say. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Thank you - I'm not sure if this is the right way to respond, but can't figure out where else to respond. clearly, I'm having trouble. I'm not sure where I would find the link to where source material is released under license. Do I need to contact the webmaster at the publication's website to get that link? I'm sorry to be asking so many incredibly basic questions, but I'm really very confused by the process. Again, I appreciate your patience. John Jnobianchi (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi. Do you have a link to where you saw the material? No worries about the questions. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Thank you! Yes, I have.

Jnobianchi (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi My apologies. I realised that there was only the one line, part of a sentence, from the official press release. I have restored the article at Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance as it doesn't need the (DTRA). I fixed the quote so that it is obvious. However, if you could rewrite that in your own words it would be better. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Thank you very much for restoring the article. My apologies for the delay in response. I will go back in and re-write that section in my own words. Thanks again! - john Jnobianchi (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Jnobianchi Welcome. Enjoy. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Miscellany Direct Differentiation and Integration of Logarithms

I searched the main space and I'm sure it's not covered at all. This is from historical time point of view. Differentiation and Integration remained unsolved for a long time since 80's and before at time of big Calculus. Now a days, it is solved and referenced, and all Mathematics Scientists are using it in their university classes from the highest level to high school levels. So this is famous and important topic showing time passed (on logarithms) while incomplete topic in mathematics. No any article in wikipedia shows this perspective of logarithms and mathematics. This is posted to all voters

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 15:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda I take it you are talking about Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Direct differentiation and integration of logarithms. If so what is your question? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

It is about voting about my article. I expect accepting my article when youbvoted, and not to delete it. It isn't in the main space at all and not in any other formats.

I searched the main space and I'm sure it's not covered at all. This is from historical time point of view. Differentiation and Integration remained unsolved for a long time since 80's and before at time of big Calculus. Now a days, it is solved and referenced, and all Mathematics Scientists are using it in their university classes from the highest level to high school levels. So this is famous and important topic showing time passed (on logarithms) while incomplete topic in mathematics. No any article in wikipedia shows this perspective of logarithms and mathematics. This is posted to all voters

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

It is about voting to accept my article. I answered the following:

I searched the main space and I'm sure it's not covered at all. This is from historical time point of view. Differentiation and Integration remained unsolved for a long time since 80's and before at time of big Calculus. Now a days, it is solved and referenced, and all Mathematics Scientists are using it in their university classes from the highest level to high school levels. So this is famous and important topic showing time passed (on logarithms) while incomplete topic in mathematics. No any article in wikipedia shows this perspective of logarithms and mathematics. This is posted to all voters

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 17:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda. You don't need to start a new section every time you post here. I didn't "vote" on your article. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Direct differentiation and integration of logarithms was a discussion about keeping or deleting the actual draft. I closed the discussion, having read and assessed all the points made, and deleted the article. This was in no way based on the non-existence of an article. The editors discussing felt that the topic was already covered in other places on Wikipedia and that this draft did not expand on that. If you wish I can restore it to User:Kkmal.Hamouda/sandbox where you can work on it and there will be less chance of it being deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda Thank you for the message. For drafts, consider consulting to the help desk or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics instead of sending a message to the talk page of all voters. Since it was the same topic, I will reply here.--SilverMatsu (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

About deletion of article above:

Kkmal Hamouda: Another point, my article is going to be deleted instead of accepted at this time. 5 of you are discussing the possibility to delete. 2 out of 5 are determining (weak delete) and not recommended. Do you think if one at least determined not to delete is enough. On the other hand, the reason to delete, my article contains several materials about this topic that are totally not in the main space. In the 2/3rd of the article from the beginning Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 10:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

I want to let you know my article contains several materials that are not in the main space as claimed not. One of these are:

${\begin{aligned}e^{\ln x}&=x\\\ln e^{x}&=x\\also.\end{aligned}}$

Additionally, another one mentioned in the debated deleted talk page. Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Mathematical History Overview

..... ${\begin{aligned}e^{\ln x}&=x\\\ln e^{x}&=x\\also.\end{aligned}}$ .....

In addition to what mentioned in the talk page for deletion.

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 00:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of article Draft:Direct Differentiation and Integration of Logarithms

About deletion of article Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 01:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC):

Kkmal Hamouda: Another point, my article is going to be deleted instead of accepted at this time. 5 of you are discussing the possibility to delete. 2 out of 5 are determining (weak delete) and not recommended. Do you think if one at least determined not to delete is enough. On the other hand, the reason to delete, my article contains several materials about this topic that are totally not in the main space. In the 2/3rd of the article from the beginning.

I want to let you know my article contains several materials that are not in the main space as claimed not. One of these are:

${\begin{aligned}e^{\ln x}&=x\\\ln e^{x}&=x\\also.\end{aligned}}$

Additionally, another one mentioned in the debated deleted talk page.

Kkmal.Hamouda (talk) 01:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Kkmal.Hamouda. I am not sure what your point is in posting here. The page is deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Please readd these credited sources. Due to vandalism they were repeatedly removed, and now I cannot readd them - page: Jake Angeli

In prosecution against him, prosecutors wrote that "strong evidence, including Chansley's own words and actions at the Capitol, supports that the intent of the Capitol rioters was to capture and assassinate elected officials in the United States government." The filing describes Chansley as "a self-proclaimed leader of the QAnon" and drug user who "demonstrates scattered and fanciful thoughts, and is unable to appreciate reality. He is the shaman of a dangerous extremist group, putting his beliefs into action by attempting to violently overthrow the United States government." ^[1]

Chansley has since disavowed his allegiance to Trump and has stated he would testify against him, claiming he feels "betrayed" Trump did not pardon him.^[2]

References

^ Hanlon, Greg. "Capitol Rioters, Including Man in Headdress, Sought 'to Capture and Assassinate' Politicians: Feds". People. People. Retrieved February 7th, 2021. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
^ Gerstein, Julie. "The QAnon Shaman says he's willing to testify at Trump's impeachment trial — against the president". Business Insider. Business Insider. Retrieved February 7th, 2021. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)

Wikiaccuracycheckerconfirmation you need to go to Talk:Jake Angeli and open a new section and make the request there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

template:Nudity marked "historical"

Hello. I do not understand this edit. No explanation given, and it is used on articles. Does seem historical. A mistake or? Christian75 (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Christian75 Thanks for catching that. It was from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Nudity portal subpages. I was using Twinkle and missed that Portal:Nudity/Nudity-related topics was a redirect to the template. I removed the historical tag and added it the portal page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Music 2021 Film

Would you mind simply keeping an eye on the page Music (2021 film) after protection expires to help keep an eye if an edit war were to reignite? 188.220.86.46 (talk) 00:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Will do. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

St. Paris, Ohio

Regarding this, thank you for protecting the one page, but I see you did not protect the other two. Do I need to create separate requests for each individual page? - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Adolphus79 sorry. I forgot the other two. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you... - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, protection expired today, and the user immediately returned to their disruptive editing. Is there any way you could re-protect these three pages? Thank you... - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Adolphus79 Semi-protected for 2 months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you again... - Adolphus79 (talk) 01:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hemiachuneia

I don't argue about the close, but note that R2 and U2 didn't apply because the redirect wasn't a cross-namespace redirect and U2 says that except [...] redirects from misspellings of an established user's user page. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I thought of that later but WP:IAR. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

And R2 was supposed to be R3. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please remove full protection on Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory

Hi, can you please remove the full protection you placed on this article Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. Those of us who regularly edit that article do so respectfully and without much conflict or disruption overall. Recently this user Jfraatz just turned up and started edit warring, there is no need to punish all of the regular editors because a single disruptive editor turns up launches into an editwar, the article should be open to non-disruptive editors, and Jfraatz should be blocked for edit warring. I don't see a full protection (which looks like collective punishment of non-disruptive and disruptive editors alike) as necessary, it seems like a massive overkill, why cant we just block the disruptive editor: Jfraatz? They turned up, started edit warring and never discussed anything at talk, why are we being punished for their behavior? Can you please remove the full protection and sanction the disruptive party rather than all of us? Bacondrum 01:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Kadir Mısıroğlu

The user Aybeg has reverted all credible news article sources with cheap, yellow journalism conspiracy theory reports. You might want to check out his recent edits and revert his POV inspired changes. He sounds very emotional. Careful. Thanks, 176.55.114.194 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss at Talk:Kadir Mısıroğlu. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Music (Sia) - Difficulty in reaching discussions...

There are two users, Ssilvers and Peterpie123rww who are proving, difficult to actually get into discussions with. I think they have a rather strong bias against IP editors, and I did let myself get caught up in the heat of the moment in some of the earlier edits of the page a bit (my fault there).

Myself, and other editors really, have tried to open discussions, provide reasoning, and so forth, but these two editors are proving rather difficult to actually properly discuss things with, whenever I raise points they are rather quick to just accuse me of edit warring and sockpuppetry and not actually address the edits. I did try to open a RfC, but they largely refused to participate. The protection period did help things cool down, but it seems to be picking up pace again gradually.

I'm not familiar with all of the different disciplinary and advisory channels, and I'm hesitant to go accusing them of meatpuppetry or some other nefarious activity, but it really does seem like we have a slight problem here.

I guess I'm asking you as a far more senior individual who hasn't really been involved in the page, but is aware of it, to perhaps help sort this mess out a little bit, either opening up an actual discussion with them, or if you feel it's necessary, taking some action in the matter.

Likewise if I'm still making any missteps, I'd love to know so I can fix it out, I am doing my best on learning different bits, but wikipedia does have a tremendous amount of rules, regulations, and community consensuses!

188.220.86.46 (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

So interesting to be pinged here by this edit warrior! Yes, please do look into the history of edits on that page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

At it with the name-calling again. I won't get into an argument on Cambridge's page, but honestly, I'm just trying to actually foster some reasonable communication and discussion, so some actual productive editing can happen, and we can avoid any nasty edit wars or other such incidents. As stated, the RfC failed to move things forward much, my hope is Cambridge if they are up to it might act as an unbiased witness to this all so we can civilly sort it out and work out what needs to be done. 188.220.86.46 (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Take a look at the remedies listed at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. They should be of some help. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Will do, cheers. 188.220.86.46 (talk) 12:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

2A00:23C5:7186:8001:8D9:F7C0:990:4F39

Could you please block user:2A00:23C5:7186:8001:8D9:F7C0:990:4F39 user:69.31.162.234 for vandalism? CLCStudent (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy in edit summaries

Hello, and thank you for applying semi-protection status to the article, Little Nightmares II. I wish to inquire your view of the summaries being applied to edits most of which occurring 20 February 2021 (some later). I have left a message on the user's talk page, asking them (kindly) to please refrain from using vulgar and abusive remarks in edit summaries; I have not issued an official reprimand. I'm writing because I would like to know your stance on them, that is to say, that the rude remarks are currently visible to all. Should the summaries remain as typed, or should they be adjusted accordingly? I'm not asking for any action to be taken, but I am wondering what the Wikipedia policy is regarding leaving the summaries, however rude they appear, as typed? Thank you in advance for the clarification. — Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

DeNoel. The summaries are unpleasant but don't really rise to the level of blocking or needing to be removed. Your warning was good and I added one for the personal attack. There is more information at Help:Edit summary#What to avoid in edit summaries and Wikipedia:Civility#Edit summary dos and don'ts. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 05:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I had to revise my original comment because of this edit. — Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 07:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

ping

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, your input would be welcome at User_talk:ToBeFree#Full_protection_for_a_COVID_page? - thanks in advance :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

TJMSmith

Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect.
A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news

When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.

Miscellaneous

Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Newton-le-Willows IP attack

Hi CambridgeBayWeather... the ip is back changing the lead of Newton-le-Willows. Might need to add a extended users edit only for it similar to Bradford and Leicester pages...RailwayJG (talk) 14:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

New Delsort for Nunavut

Hello from Montreal. It's the former ThatMontrealIP here.

I noticed recently that several provinces and territories did not have a deletion sorting list. I've created one for Nunavut: (Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nunavut). Hope all is well.--- Possibly (talk) 04:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks re: IP editor's flag infractions

Hi CBW. Thank you for the efforts to revert the flag icon infractions of the IP editor that seemingly has a keen interest in rural municipalities/equivalents. While most of the IP edits appear to be in good faith, many have similarly been problematic, and the fact that the editor is unregistered and hops from IP address to IP address, sometimes on a daily basis, there is no watchlist for this person at the IP addresses for the editor to view the edit summaries conveying reasons for reversions. Communication is therefore difficult. What recourse is there to compel an editor that regularly hops IP addresses to at least stop hopping and remain at just the one IP address? Ideally the editor would just register. I'm semi-retired on here and can't keep up with fixing all the erroneous edits, sometimes in good faith and other times intentionally (edit warring).

The IP editor was first brought to my attention in 2020 (see final two paragraphs here). There has been a fury of edits at six other IPs in the past two weeks. I regretfully think the IP editor is actually a registered user that isn't logging in so as to do mass editing that aligns to their point of view and not previously established consensus or facts that the editor wants to suppress for some reason.

Anyway, a list of at least seven IP that appear to be the same editor is listed below. They all geolocate to the same location in either northern Calgary, Airdrie or in between.

2604:3D09:37F:E110:C43A:A1BB:25C9:F0D3 May 16, 2020
2604:3D09:37F:E110:C192:9FB0:C2A7:E75C Feb 26-27, 2021
2604:3D09:37F:E110:75EE:3CF9:7252:DCA Feb 27-28, 2021
2604:3D09:37F:E110:CC09:48B3:8053:8F41 Feb 28-Mar 1, 2021
2604:3D09:37F:E110:B570:DAB6:8E60:8595 Mar 1-2, 2021
2604:3D09:37F:E110:A46C:760A:DECC:32DF Mar 1-4, 2021 (also Feb 23-26, 2021 and intermittently between May 18, 2020 and Jan 16, 2021)
70.77.224.98 Mar 5-6, 2021 (also intermittently between Jan 4, 2019 to Jun 19, 2020)

I might add other IPs to the above list as I retrace my steps. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 06:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hwy43. There's nothing can be done to stop the jumping. From what I understand IPv6 address change frequently. Range blocks help. They make good edits at the same time so they can't just be rolled back. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

~~2604:3D09:37F:E110:75EE:3CF9:7252:DCA 2604:3D09:37F:E110:75EE:3CF9:7252:DCA~~

Hello again. Thanks for the above reply. Can you remind me of the process to request an editor be blocked if they continue to disrupt following a fourth warning? I've just applied a fourth level warning to 70.77.224.98, who reverted me after the editor finally reached out and I responded, conveying the consensus. I fully expect the editor won't stop. Is it ANI? I edit much less frequently than I once did so I forget some of the processes. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

In this case I would say yes ANI. You need a range block and I'm unsure how to do that. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Kurdistan Islamic Group/Kurdistan Justice Group article lost

Hi. A few weeks another user moved the page Kurdistan Islamic Group to Kurdistan Justice Group, citing a Rudaw article saying the party had changed its name. Shortly afterward you deleted the new page and redirected both the original article and the new one to Ali Bapir, the party's leader, citing WP:R3. I'm not sure I understand why. What about the new name seems implausible? If there needs to be a discussion before moving the article to a new name, then shouldn't the original article at least be restored? Thanks for your time. Bulbajer (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Bulbajer. Not quite like that. 5hw4n moved Kurdistan Islamic Group] to Wikipedia:Kurdistan Justice Group (note the Wikipedia at the start). They realised their error and moved it to Kurdistan Justice Group. I then deleted the redirect, Wikipedia:Kurdistan Justice Group, as the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#R3. Implausible typos as people don't normally type Wikipedia:Article. Several hours before I did all that Onel5969 redirected Kurdistan Justice Group to Ali Bapir as being poorly sourced for years. To finish the clean up I redirected Kurdistan Islamic Group to Ali Bapir as well. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah okay, I didn't realize someone else had redirected the article to Ali Bapir due to poor sourcing. Thanks. Bulbajer (talk) 05:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Sagi Satya

Did you mean to move this into mainspace as it is? There are no inline citations, I don't know if any of the ELs are RSs, and there are no cleanup tags. I did a little cleanup, but it's bypassed AFC and NPP. MB 18:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I have reviewed this and moved it to Draft:Sagi Satya. It was not ready for mainspace in its current form. - Ahunt (talk) 19:58, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

MB and Ahunt. I found it at User:Sagi Satya and moved it. I forgot to ~~MfD~~ AfD it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see. As long as it just sits in drafts it will disappear in six months anyway. The article reads like a hoax, though. - Ahunt (talk) 22:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Reference errors in Kudafari

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, in this edit to Kudafari you introduced three undefined ref tags. I can't figure out where they came from, so could you please take a look and try to figure out what they were supposed to be? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 08:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Mx. Granger Sorry about that. It was from when I merged the two pages. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Elandas (company)

Hi CambridgeBayWeather -

Would you be able to help me delete a page I made: "Elandas (company)"?

Best regards, Aaron. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twendai (talk • contribs) 12:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Twendai Do you mean Elandas (company) which is a redirect or Elandas. The redirect serves a useful purpose. If you want the article deleted go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to nominate a single page for deletion and follow the instructions. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Request

I request to move Talk:Lego Overwatch (theme) to Talk:Lego Overwatch without leaving a redirect: to retain page history. Striker2020 (talk) 07:57, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Striker2020. Done but as "Lego Overwatch (theme)" is a redirect I left the talk page as one. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:03, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Striker2020 (talk) 08:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Alberg 30 again

Sorry to trouble you about this issue again, but after the previous two months protection our IP immediately came back and has been generally vandalizing the article. Can we "semi" this article for a longer period, perhaps a year? - Ahunt (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Ahunt Trying 6 months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Super, thank you! - Ahunt (talk) 17:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

copyright of picture

Hello there, I posted a picture for which I am the rightful owner, but someone else posted that picture before me on the web and took credit for it. You requested that my picture be deleted from wikipedia. First, here is the picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flying_dodo_brewery_inside.jpg and here is the link you sent me: https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/11/mauritius-at-50-25-things-to-see-and-do-while-youre-on-the-indian-ocean-island-7372334/ To prove that my picture is the original, you can look at the logo on the bar. You will see the logo is a signage found on the actual bar itself. On the picture on metro website you will see that the logo has been edited plus another one has been added on top as well. This picture was actually taken from the website of the Flying Dodo itself: http://www.flyingdodo.com/flying_dodo_1.jpg. But when you compare all the pictures, you can see that my version is the original. I would greatly appreciate if you could leave my picture on wikipedia then. Thank you! And good day ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mauritianbeerguy (talk • contribs) 05:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Mauritianbeerguy. I'm a bit unclear about this. Is the picture at http://www.flyingdodo.com/flying_dodo_1.jpg the one you took? If so that is still a copyright violation as there is no evidence that it was released under a licence that is compatible with Wikipedia. What about the other two pictures you uploaded? Also are you associated with the brewery? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

CambridgeBayWeather. Thanks for reverting back! I'm new, and a bit lost here. Anyway, so I gave the original picture to the brewery back in 2016 who edited it by adding their logo on it and posted it on their website. Hence, I posted on wikipedia the original and unedited picture, whilst the brewery posted an edited picture. The reporter on metro then copied the same picture from the brewery's website and posted it on metro and put her name on it. The other 2 pictures are also mine. I am not related to the brewery but I follow them since day 1 and I am a hardcore fan! --Mauritianbeerguy (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

As long as you are not related to the company it should be good. You may want to talk to User talk:Túrelio on Commons and ask about the deleted picture. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

AN/I Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sudipto Surjo - template disruption, unilateral page moves and disregard for collaboration. Thank you. DÅRTHBØTTØ_(T•C) 08:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Nunavut articles

Hello. I can't tell if Draft:Hitmakerz, Draft:Shauna Seeteenak and Draft: Angela Amarualik are hopelessly promotional or potentially promising, so I thought I would point them out to the only editor I know north of 60. Hope all is well up there.--- Possibly (talk) 09:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Possibly. I looked. Of them Draft: Angela Amarualik looks possible. However, it contained some direct copyright material and an album cover. Draft:Shauna Seeteenak is too soon. Draft:Hitmakerz looks spammy and had copyright material. However, it could be OK. They had Kelly Fraser as an artist. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Angela Amarualik Photo

Hello, I apologize for using your photo. I am trying to hang of this platform, How can I delete the photo? I'm not sure if you already requested for it to be deleted. Once again, my apologies. Is there a way to upload photos to give you credit?

Timathioye. No worries. It can be difficult being here. The image isn't mine so I can't take credit. I have nominated it for deletion at Commons and it will get taken care of over there. If you look at the section above this I have given some information on the problems with the three drafts. I was going to go to your talk page and explain but I got called out. If you want more explanation please let me know. Have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (music) for some indication if they can be suitable for Wikipedia. At the moment Shauna Seeteenak isn't notable enough. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Can you explain this deletion?

Hi CambridgeBayWeather. I'm a newbie looking to work on the Burden of Disease pages. I noticed you were involved in removing some ~~[work]~~ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators of a user for their work on "Animal Charity Evaluators", which triggered an investigation into the rest of their work. I have some questions on this before I contribute - can you help me answer them here or elsewhere?

Thanks for considering!

--Whiskiz (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Whiskiz. I deleted them because consensus agreed that they should. As to the specifics I can't recall. But you can ask me some questions. Here for now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! Indeed, I read [thread] in which the votes to delete were taken. Apologies in advance if some of these questions are very silly:

·What was the ultimate reason that Riceissa [blocked?]

·You claimed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riceissa/Global_Burden_of_Disease_Study was an example of a [article]. Ethanbas and DGG seemed to think this was a permissable example of writing a draft with the intention of getting others to collaborate on it on his page and then post it. Can you help me understand how to draw the line between when a draft to collaborate is permissible on one's user page, and why this example was NOT permissible?

·Riceissa also indexed other articles, which caused a lot of uproar according to the thread I linked. As one editor commented, " “The additions of the "INDEX" code are clear indications that the intention is to host "articles" on userspace in violation of policy." In short, what is up with that?

Cheers for the guidance & taking the time!

Whiskiz (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Whiskiz. I think you may have a bit of a misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works. None of the comments should be counted as votes in that discussion. VQuakr made a proposal that Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators should be deleted and gave a explanation as to why. Other editors then had their say and, for the most part, provided a valid reason why. After nine days I reviewed the comments and, based on the valid remarks, felt that the consensus was to delete. I personally had no opinion one way or the other as to the validity of the pages but was guided by consensus. If I had made a comment as to keeping or deleting then I would have not been eligible to close the discussion.

As to the blocking of Riceissa. That was down to them being a paid editor. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948#Vipul's paid editing enterprise, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948#Riceissa, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive949#Vipul, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive288#Vipul's paid editing enterprise, again and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive953#Ethanbas, Riceissa, and Vipul. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of I Wayan Arka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Wayan Arka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Wayan Arka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

"Temporary structure" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Temporary structure. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26#Temporary structure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 19:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Scooter Braun reduction in page protection

I am requesting a reduction in the page protection of Scooter Braun. There doesn't seem to be any vandalism anymore. Braun's COI editors were banned so they are no longer an issue, but law-abiding editors (like me) can't get in to revert their abusive edits. Please reduce to semi protection. Thx Ezpeazylemon (talk) 02:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

I've reduced to semi for a year. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

WHY

HELLO, THIS IS MATHEW MUNNA AKSHAY. I WANT TO ASK ONE THING.WHY YOU LOCKED MY BROTHER ASHWIN KUMAR LAKSHMIKANTHAN'S WIKIPEDIA PAGE FROM EDITING.PLEASE GIVE A RESPONSIBLE ANSWER. MATHEW MUNNA AKSHAY (talk) 16:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

I've taken the liberty of blocking this sockpuppet. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I just got here and didn't have time to look at this yet. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Block request

Can you block Elizabeth Stanton for Representing a well-known Television host? LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 22:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

The only edits they made were in 2007 and are deleted. It could be their real name or perhaps they are a fan of Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Not much point in blocking. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

re Richard Anbudurai

Since the RFPP entry got archived, I can answer here - I first moved it to draft thinking it was just your run-of-the-mill undersourced/somewhat COI article (I didn't first check deletion logs). After seeing that I realized that more action was probably necessary, since there was no value in keeping the draft around, so I speedy tagged it as well as requesting salting of the mainspace article title. I wasn't sure if moving the draft back to mainspace would've made sense - since although I never should've moved it to draftspace (and simply speedied it), reverting to bring something not article-worthy back to mainspace didn't make sense to me.

Hope that explains it, sorry if I was a bit rambley. Thanks for salting the title! Elli (talk | contribs) 01:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Recreating Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba

Hello CambridgeBayWeather, I searched for the name of one of Nigeria's newly appointed ambassadors Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba for AfC and discovered a submission has been made on the subject before and was deleted. A search of the subject in Wikipedia shows he has been associated with other Wikipedia articles. How can I recreate this article with your help? Thanks. Bibihans (talk)Bibihans

Bibihans There was also a draft article at Draft:Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba. It was deleted but you can start a new one there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

More of the same

Khotyn1071 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) looks strangely familiar... FDW777 (talk) 11:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news

The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Super Bowl LVI

May I suggest you re-protect Super Bowl LVI? It took less than a day from the protection lapsing to the first problematic anonymous edit. The upcoming superbowl has always been a target of daily and increasingly frequent vandalism in the months running up to the actual event. I'd suggest protecting it until 28 February 2022, which will be enough time for the hoopla to die down after the event. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 03:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Tarl_N. Just the one edit. I'll keep an eye on it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Mary in Islam

Your protection lapsed, IP-fest resumed their same edits:( DMacks (talk) 17:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

DMacks I'll keep an eye on it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Stupid Stuff

Thank you. I know that guideline, but I didn't know that that redirect went to it. Anyway, that stupid item is now in the bit bucket. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Robert McClenon it didn't until I created it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Then we needed it and now we have it. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Very long term IP edit warring

Hi CambridgeBayWeather. After studying WP:AN3#User:168.245.155.5 reported by User:Firefangledfeathers (Result: ) I am thinking of doing an indefinite semiprotection on List of Hail Mary passes in American football. Would you disagree? It looks like the same guy has been trying to insert his material for the last five years. EdJohnston (talk) 18:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Other than the template and ARBCOM required I'm not a fan of indefinite. Regular editors know the what that means but others don't always see the difference between "indefinite" and "infinite". I prefer a set time, such as 5 years, but I won't object if you do make it indefinite. I have a concern over things like Women's rights, protected in 2007, Buttocks, protected in 2008. Now there may be vandalism on Women's rights if unprotected and I would certainly expect it on buttocks but I think they should be given a chance. Then there are articles like John Michell (writer), only ever protected once in 2008. Straight from nothing to indefinite and he died in 2009. There are others like that where a person may have had some polarising action once but years ago. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

OK, I have now semiprotected the article five years. That's how long the IP has been doing his thing. Thanks for your reply, EdJohnston (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Kolb Firestar

Hi there. We seem to be having a persistent IP vandalism issue with this article. I was wondering if we could get perhaps 30 days "semi"? - Ahunt (talk) 16:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

It seems slow at the moment. I went with 30 days pending. If it increases let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! - Ahunt (talk) 18:38, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

ANI discussion involving you

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:DeNoel's sig. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Incident 24 May 2021

I sincerely apologize to you, for having dragged you into a discussion that became more heated than I had anticipated. As you took part in the discussion during the course of the incident, I feel obligated to append this notice so that you are aware of the discussion. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 20:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hopefully this is a Good block request

There's this user called What the hell god That violates WP:Username policy, he/she has created his/her Userpage, which means that He should be blocked by You. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 14:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism

Thanks for your protection on Pencilo. Pls revert this personal attack by vandalism. 117.18.230.152 (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Is a RM necessary for List of Columbus SC head coaches?

Hi, I know you recently closed the RM request at Columbus Crew, and I was wondering whether or not a RM would be necessary at this page as well. I can't just move this as is because there is a redirect there, so I was wondering if you would move that as well. Thanks! Jay eyem (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Done. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Wow that was very fast, thank you! Jay eyem (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Nicholas L. Bissell Jr.

Thanks. Couldn't see where the BLP had been added. Unprotected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

All I saw was this nonsense about someone's aunt --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Ooohhhh! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Deepfriedokra that was followed by two editors reverting it in and out. But I think that was an accident. I thought there was more but I can't find it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Question

Hi,

I am just wondering how best to add the information. I have created the source material. Following your message, I think it would be better to copy only a small amount of summarised text. Would this be ok? and what pitfalls should I avoid to bring it in-line with Wikipedia rules?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincs EUS (talk • contribs)

Lincs EUS. You should rewrite it in your own words. Yes summarised. A bit difficult I suppose if you wrote the original material. You could if necessary include small quotes but they should be marked as such. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Peter Daszak

Disruption is resuming already and the SP has expired less than a week ago... Mind putting indef semi for the time being per WP:GS/COVID? Given the involvement of this person as a prominent mainstream scientist, they're likely to keep getting attention for the duration... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

I've gone with a year. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 01:47, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Someone who's talking about drugs

Review this user named LoriBelle706, she's been asking a User about drugs, And it may not be suitable enough for Wikipedia's policies. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 03:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Warned. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Måneskin

Thanks for protecting the article. Please revert the current revision to the one which is not contested by editors. The current revision doesn't have a consensus on the talk page and the user broke WP:3RR for which was also reported to the administrators.--ParoleSonore (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

ParoleSonore I see two people discussing but that does not make a consensus. Perhaps you and Nemo_bis should look at WP:Dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

No, we are not the only one who are discussing. IvanScrooge98 and Markworthen had their say and the user is ignoring them as well.--ParoleSonore (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

I also asked for additional comments from users active at the WikiProject Rock music if their say will change the consensus anyhow. Please reinstate the previous revision which is not contested by the editors (the section style was also part of the dispute). The user Nemo bis's edit needs to have a consensus but doesn't and exactly because of that was edit warring on the article breaking the three revert rule (WP:TALKDONTREVERT). That revision cannot stay on the article, it's against the WP:CONSENSUS. Sorry, now see that the most controversial part cannot be seen by the public. You have done a good job.--ParoleSonore (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

OK. I looked through the whole thing. Somebody else will need to deal with the WP:3RR. The bit that is under dispute seems to be hidden. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

The article of their band member Damiano David is under persistent IP vandalism since your protection expired on 7 June. I was right in the last report when stated that the article will be under persistent attack. JPxG requested new protection. If you see this please make much longer protection.--ParoleSonore (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Vugar Jamalzadeh

Hi — I came across two nearly identical articles created by a new user Manistro74, both unreferenced BLPs: Vugar jamalzadeh and Vugar Jamalzadeh. I was going to move them to drafts, and ask the creating editor to pick one to keep and add sources, but then I noticed that you had moved the latter into the mainspace, so thought I'd better check with you first in case I'm missing something? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:46, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

DoubleGrazing It got moved to draft. I only moved it to article space because I found it at User:Vugar Jamalzadeh and I wasn't sure if he was notable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay thanks; in that case I will do as I first intended, draftify both (unless you've a better idea?). Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Someone else moved it to Draft:Vugar Jamalzadeh. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Yamina

Can you WP:ECP (WP:A/I/PIA) Yamina, vandals have been attacking that page for past few days. --Vacant0 (talk) 10:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Vacant0. Agree and done. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! --Vacant0 (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Deletion review for Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:COVID-19 lab leak hypothesis

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:COVID-19 lab leak hypothesis. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Signature

Thanks for the note regarding my signature. I had mistakenly left the "use as markup" box checked without providing any markup. - toh (talk) 02:15, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Such Pretty Forks in the Road

Seems to be the target of one persistent, dynamic IP (compare Special:Contributions/133.18.196.56; Special:Contributions/133.18.202.69; Special:Contributions/133.18.198.222; Special:Contributions/133.18.201.215; Special:Contributions/36.232.54.208; Special:Contributions/36.232.47.50). Range-blocks might be an option, but given that this one appears to have no interest in stopping it might just be better to SP both the above linked page and [[Alanis Morissette]. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:52, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

It looks like someone else got there first. The Alanis Morissette page looks OK for now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

I don't see any (range-)blocks or page protections, unless I've missed something. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry. I saw the check mark at Such Pretty Forks in the Road and mistook it for semi. I've changed it to semi now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless

Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

Technical news

Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration

After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Possible WP:Username policy violation?

The user is GrubHubHater1123. He also has a Possible purely disruptive Userpage. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 19:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

List of serial killers by number of victims

Might want to revdel the edit summary before my removal as well, as it contains the name. Not sure if the talk page needs looking at too. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

ScottishFinnishRadish The edit summary yes but the talk page looks OK. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm still new enough to be uncertain on what exactly requires a revdel, or I would have requested it on those edits. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad Dahlan

You have prevented me from adding material on the relationship between Turkey and Mohammed Dahlan, protecting a reversion that removes some very well sourced information (I could add significant additional sources if that was even an issue). There is no material now on the relationship between Turkey and Dahlan. This is despite the Turkish Government seeking his arrest via Interpol, twice, despite allegations made by the Turkish Government on his connections to the attempted Coup, and despite allegations made by the Turkish Government about his connection to the murder of jamal Khashoggi - None of these things are related to Israel in any meaningful way, but you've reverted them and prevented me from re-adding them. The man is a key player in what the ECFR says is the Turkey-UAE rivalry that is "remaking the Middle East", but there is no sign of that in the page, and now I can't add it. This is significant information that is separate from the Israeli Palestinian Conflict. Can you please explain why ? Do you not want this info there ? Berocca Addict (talk) 08:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Berocca Addict It has nothing to do with me wanting or not wanting any information in the article. A request was made for protection. I looked and the tag on the talk page has been there since 2012. So take it to Talk:Mohammed Dahlan. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

But, you took the decision to effectively prevent updated information being added to the page about Non I/P conflict items - no one has added extremely pertinent information, the article is seriously out of date, and you have locked out updates. Can you either undo this protection for as long as no one is editing the I/P conflict information, or, review the edits you have locked out and add them yourself. If additional sources are required, they can be provided. Berocca Addict (talk) 17:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Berocca Addict Part of protecting is not taking a side. I know nothing about him except that he falls under Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles and as such "All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict." CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

The decision you took was to protect a page that was being updated on issues not connected to the I/P conflict, using the I/P conflict as the reason. Now the pertinent material to the significant and ongoing issues relating to Dahlan and Turkey, and indeed Dahlan and his role as the "fixer" for the UAE simply aren't there. I can't fix this, and they have little if anything to do with the I/P conflict. I am asking you to, so, review your actions and either remove the protection as it's not relevant to the edits being made, or, make the edits yourself using the numerous sources provided, and I can provide more if required. Because of the action that you took, the article reads the same as it could have done almost a decade ago. Berocca Addict (talk) 13:13, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

See Talk:Mohammed Dahlan. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:49, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

It is a laregly ignored space, and isn't the encyclopedia. The action that you took responsibility for has resulted in the article being out of date, and missing large quantities of relevant information from the past decade. I've posted additional sources on the talk page. Can you please review and either add the text to the article page, or remove the protection so someone who is willing, can. Berocca Addict (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

I am not going to review it. The fact that no one has added it is an indication that nobody wants to. Have you used {{Request edit}}? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

GDP of West Bengal

Sir, I am an employee of the Ministry of Finance of India. I know the GDP of West Bengal. As of 2020, the GDP of West Bengal is 143 billion US dollars. But some people are making wrong edits to increase their GDP. Correct it quickly. West Bengal's GDP is 143 billion US dollars.. Meltry Filok (talk) 03:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

GDP of West Bengal

West Bengal's GDP is 143 billion US dollars, edit it quickly. Ronjon Das Gupta (talk) 03:41, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

GDP of West Bengal

West Bengal's GDP is 143 billion US dollars. But some people are making wrong edits to increase GDP, fix it quickly. The actual GDP of West Bengal is 143 billion US dollars. Gopal bosu (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Economy of West Bengal

Given the recent spate of socks have been blocked, you can probably lower the protection at Economy of West Bengal to semi-protection?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Sungai Batu

Can I ask why you history-merged Civilization of Sungai Batu into Sungai Batu? I can't find any discussion or request for it anywhere. – Joe (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

I was being bold. The article Civilization of Sungai Batu wasn't about the civilization really but about the archaeological site and mostly duplicated by Sungai Batu. So I merged them and moved it to Sungai Batu. It could have been at Sungai Batu archaeological site or Sungai Batu Archaeological Site but Civilization of Sungai Batu was the wrong title. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

But we don't usually use history merge for ordinary text merges, do we? The article was in a passable state before but the merged text is poorly-written and poorly-sourced, so this seems to have created a mess that nobody can now undo? – Joe (talk) 04:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes I made an error there but anything added can be removed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	A Personal Award of Inspiration delivered to CambridgeBayWeather by myself You inspired me to make edits and pages on Wikipedia. I would love to see more of your work. :) Thank you for being you. Acryptex (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Page deletion

Hello im kind of new to how wikipedia works. I wanted to ask why my page was deleted? Is there something i can do to prevent deletions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techno274721 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Techno274721. The page you created wasn't encyclopedic. It looked like an invitation/advert to join a reply thread and not an informative article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Sunshine

		Sunshine!
		Hello CambridgeBayWeather! Interstellarity (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding `{{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}}` to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Interstellarity (talk) 19:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Happy first day of summer, CambridgeBayWeather!! Interstellarity (talk) 19:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Vandal

Hello. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/85.216.157.248 this user has constantly vandalized the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2022_Hungarian_parliamentary_election. He has been doing it for months on end, calling the United Opposition the united traitors of Hungary, removing polls favoring the opposition or changing the numbers to make it more favorable for the current governing party. After months of this endless vandalism, he needs to go. 21:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC) 2607:FEA8:88A0:420D:39B9:9AA9:67AB:B36 (talk) 21:54, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

I've blocked them for 31 hours. If they return let me know. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Slave catcher

I broke Slave catcher to Slave catcher (Brazil) and Slave catcher (United States) to resolve a many-year-old {{Globalize}} tag.

Now that you moved "Slave catcher (United States)" to "slave catcher", the article is even more US-focused (without Brazil).

How can we resolve this?–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

CaroleHenson. I saw that. However "Slave catcher" was a redirect to "Slave catcher (United States)". So as per Wikipedia:Article titles I moved it. I couldn't see the need for the disambiguation in the title when the redirect was free. I'll edit the opening to make sure it is obviously about the US. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! If I had known that created a redirect would have caused a problem, I wouldn't have created it. I thought about making "slave catcher" as a disambig page, but it would just have 2 entries, which is a problem. Much appreciated, it's good to know the Article titles issue.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

No worries. I figured the US article was the main and making a disambiguation at "slave catcher" wasn't necessary. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Mari Stull

Can you explain why you accuse me of "persistent disruptive" Stull has never been a "blogger" although the column she wrote for a local newspaper in a Washington suburb was online. SHe is an international food policy expert as can be recognized from her work on food policy at the US Department of Agriculture, the Food and Agricultural Organization, various western hemisphere inter-governmental agricultural organizations. Wine is an agricultural product but her range of professional activities is not limited to that. This guy "Horse Eyed Jack" maligns her by refusing to allow anyone to say anything favorable about her, it's libel through Wikipedia. I suspect he paid to do this by someone who is trying to destroy Ms. Stull -- who I have never met but I object to anyone being ruined by this Horse Eyed Jack, Horse Eye's Back, or any of the other multiple identities he is using. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:180:C101:7430:A061:2445:5934:4AC3 (talk) 15:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

It says here that she was a blogger. Removing sourced material is disruptive. However, you need to discuss your concerns at Talk:Mari Stull. In doing so you need to stop suggesting that Horse Eye's Back is running sockpuppets and throwing around words like "libel" as that is disruptive and will lead to your blocking. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Tablighi Jamaat Good Article Reassessment

Tablighi Jamaat, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

COVID-19 lab leak hypothesis page

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, there have been many political developments with the COVID-19 lab leak hypothesis, and statements from the US President Biden, the 13 other governments, and the European Union, as well as a lot of reputable scientists. There have been many discussions across all our COVID-19 pages about how to cover this controversy and CNET just wrote an article about us [1], which I added to Wikipedia coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic. I am working with Dream Focus to write a new draft on the controversy [2], because editors say that many of its intricate details are not WP:DUE for the more general COVID-19 pages. Please can you advise if we should first request to undeleted the old draft that was deleted [3] or use the article page that was redirected [4]? Thanks. CutePeach (talk) 09:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_lab_leak_hypothesis&oldid=1009196063 was never sent to AFD. Was the deleted draft by the same name the same thing or something different? If its something else, then just restore that article, and we can work from there. I didn't know it existed when I started my draft. Dream Focus 15:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

CutePeach & Dream Focus. Parts are identical but others, such as the lead, are different. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

CambridgeBayWeather the main difference is that the newer page omits The Daily Mail and other non RS as sources, and is also named "hypothesis" instead of "theory", both of which are big differences. What do you advise? CutePeach (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

CutePeach. If you want I can email you a copy. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aw Abdille Ibraahiim

A tag has been placed on Draft:Aw Abdille Ibraahiim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

g6, drafts are usually cleaned up, and the page it was originally linked to no longer exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Heesxiisolehh (talk) 19:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

[1] Hanlon, Greg. "Capitol Rioters, Including Man in Headdress, Sought 'to Capture and Assassinate' Politicians: Feds". People. People. Retrieved February 7th, 2021. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)

[2] Gerstein, Julie. "The QAnon Shaman says he's willing to testify at Trump's impeachment trial — against the president". Business Insider. Business Insider. Retrieved February 7th, 2021. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)

[1]

[2]