User talk:Ronjon Das Gupta

You don't editing wrong economy of West Bengal . You submit wrong information about West Bengal I can block you , is a warning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MADdutta (talk • contribs) 14:53, 11 Jun 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Your recent editing history at Economy of West Bengal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 15:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 10:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is my responsibility to tell people the truth by deleting all the information that is irrational and fabricated. Ronjon Das Gupta (talk) 10:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why???? PLEASE UNBLOCK 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 Ronjon Das Gupta (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because you broke the three revert rule, and because your attitude indicates that you would break it again if your editing privileges were restored. —C.Fred (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are in peril of being blocked again based on your actions at Economy of Kolkata. —C.Fred (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]