Jump to content

User talk:C1MM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:C1MM-bot)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Thanks for your edits. Per MOS:, headings are not in all caps. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 03:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dmitry Neverovsky) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Dmitry Neverovsky, C1MM!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. It has beent agged as 'one source' and 'stub'.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have broken reference 5 with this edit. Not sure what your intent was here. Would you please look into it? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 07:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

[edit]

Is there a reason for making mass changes to all the maps without discussion? It's nice to be bold, but you need to make sure you have the consensus before making these kind of changes. Your version is against the Manual of Style in terms of appearance and format (Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) is always preferred over JPEG). Alex ShihTalk 13:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am sorry if my previous message may come off as blunt. It seems that you are interested in map-making. I am also involved in some map-making on occasion. I invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps if you haven't done so already. Regards, Alex ShihTalk 03:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ainu language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese, English and Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Munda population

[edit]

In this edit to Munda people you entered a total population figure that contradicts the sub-population figures, and doesn't match the cited sources (although it isn't clear that joshuaproject.net is a reliable source for population figures). Would you clarify where your figure came from, and if possible reconcile the sub-population figures? --Worldbruce (talk) 05:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: Yeah sorry about that. I was using Census of India datafiles for all the Indian states in which the Munda live. That was an incomplete number, and so I will revert that edit. However, I will probably make a full-scale population figure change after I had all data from censuses in all countries where Mundari live, as I should have done in the first place. That was an incomplete edit, I just wanted to save my work so that I did not lose it for a more accurate estimate. I will fix the issue soon, sorry for the inconvenience. The Joshua Project is not a very good source, and so I think replacement would be a good idea.C1MM (talk) 02:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, C1MM. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number of speakers Slavey-Hare language

[edit]

Hello, Last month you adjusted the number of speakers in Slavey language. But I think maybe your first figure (2120) is correct. You have changed it to 4335 but doesn't that involve a double-count? At the moment I'm translating the article on Slavey-people in Dutch and I would like to add some information on the language. Best regards, Koos van den beukel (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnologue data for KS languages

[edit]

Hi,

The Ethnologue data for many KS languages is spurious. The number for a language may be applied to its dialects, multiplying the total unrealistically, or ethnic populations may be used for speaker populations, etc. That's why I added the notes that you've been deleting. In general, Ethnologue is not a RS, though it's often all we have (or other sources may be even worse). It was not intended as a linguistic reference, though the editors are now making an admirable effort at making it more reliable now that it's linked to the ISO standard. — kwami (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

US Census data is not reliable

[edit]

I keep reverting your attempts to use US census data for speaker numbers on languages. I would think you'd get the hint. US Census data is not reliable for language speaker numbers because it is self-reported and not checked for accuracy by linguists. It includes everyone who knows two words and thinks "I speak the language". Please stop changing speaker numbers for Native languages of the US based on US census data. --Taivo (talk) 05:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bongan. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Mal Paharia people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 05:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Santa

[edit]

Hi C1MM, I just saw you did a clean-up at Santa language. Not so sure at this one - it was like this for several years, and it might have been left as a construction site for a little bit longer, so that I can make some improving edits without necessarily deleting untidy content. But there's another issue: Santa has some additional consonants (see Talk page!) that have not been integrated into the table since it doesn't contain the required lines. Also, velar comes before uvular. If you're comfortable with tables, it would be appreciated if you could take care of this. G Purevdorj (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for identifying that Puredvor, the source I used did say Santa had 29 consonants, but only put 22 (sorry). I have just added those last 7 consonants, and fixed the issues with the velar and uvular consonants. C1MM (talk) 01:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salt with censuses

[edit]

Hi, you might want to avoid citing census data about Australian languages. I'm not acquainted with how that census works, but it's extremely unlikely the data about speakers of languages to be anything by self-reported. This only tells us how many people chose the relevant option in the questionnaire, this doens't tell us how many people actually speak the language. There are usually discrepancies between the two because of the way language is seen as a marker of ethnic identity and people claim to "speak" the language of the community they're in (a claim recognised by others in that community) without having much (if any) knowledge of it. – Uanfala (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely see the issue with censuses of this type, especially due to discrepancies in census data between self-identified knowledge and actual fluency. The Australian census, from what I am reviewing, does seem to have that issue. Therefore, I will stop using census data, and start putting in info more in line with what I put on the Tharawal language page, which was that the speakers were self-identified. I absolutely see your point and will refrain from such activities in the future. In some cases, however, the census data does match up with actual data from the field, and so I think that instead of outright criticizing the census, we should evaluate its veracity based on previous field reports. C1MM (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kundal Shahi language

[edit]

Hi, I'm not sure I get the point of what you did at Kundal Shahi language. Is there any benefit in separating out the aspirates like that? To me it looks a bit jarring to have one phonation type (aspiration) interleaved into the manner columns, and the other two (voiced and voiceless) remaining as rows. – Uanfala (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Takelma language / Consonants

[edit]

Hi, I have seen that you have restructured the consonant chart of Takelma in various ways. Which is good but unfortunately, the original data in the table as you have found it was partially incorrect in the first place. So I hope you won't mind that I have replaced the whole thing with a new chart based on Sapir, similar to the one in Golla's "California Indian languages". Especially, I have placed the stops and the affricate together in a single row, just to avoid the lone ejective affricate, and also to be more in line with the phonemic system of Takelma. Austronesier (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting in correct data. I understand putting stops and affricates together, although most consonant charts on Wikipedia also separate the lone palatal approximant /j/ from postalveolar consonants, so having one consonant in a row is fine. I don't think it will be weird to have the lone ejective affricate there, since there are multiple other consonants that fill up the space. C1MM (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahom people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kachari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

9564

[edit]

Thanks a lot for the table about 9564 in Executive Order 13780! Do you happen to know if the exceptions of 13780 (close business or family ties) also apply to 9564? Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valmiki & Malhar

[edit]

Hi,

I tried finding the discoverer's paper online, but the only linguistic treatment I could find was this. That certainly has an agenda, but it's the only thing I've seen that references the lit, so I redirected the articles accordingly. If you know of anyone who's reviewed Dr Mohanty's data (it doesn't seem that Dr Dash has), please let me know. — kwami (talk) 08:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting me. Weird then that the discovery was cited in Atlas Obscura. C1MM (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New speaker numbers

[edit]

Please be more careful when replacing {{Infobox language}} references to Ethnologue with references to the Census of India. Don't break references elsewhere in the article, as you did in these edits at Santali language or this edit at Kukna language.

Other editors have raised concerns about using census data instead of linguist's data for number of speakers. Using Census of India also has the disadvantage of ignoring speakers outside India, such as the Santali speakers in Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Nepal. It's wise on Wikipedia to use in infoboxes a conservative source like Ethnologue that facilitates apples-to-apples comparisons. In the body of the article you can explore the range of numbers with a full explanation of differences in timing, methodology, and scope. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polynesian languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Futuna Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/92/51/76/92517671153173021158961843673965748124/A_grammar_of_Ik_Schrock_T_2014.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 03:35, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re-arranging phonetic charts

[edit]

Hello C1MM, Can you please stop rearranging the consonant and vowel sound charts? I had to revert a bunch of pages that you rearranged because the way you had fixed the charts had taken way to much space on the Wikipedia pages. The reason why some charts have some abbreviated words in them (ex. palatalized; pal.) is strictly to save space on the pages. Also I am aware that I tend to differentiate the terms bilabial and labiodental, as bilabial and labial. It just makes the charts look less awkward as well as the pages themselves. It's also less awkward for other viewers to view the charts. Please leave the already-added charts alone so it looks less awkward. Fdomanico51997 (talk) 05:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

extinction dates in Unesco's AWLD

[edit]

Hi,

Re. this edit, that just means that the language was extinct in 2007, not that it went extinct then. Since there were no full speakers in 1965, it's more likely it went extinct before then.

From this, it looks like reading the AWLD may be like trying to interpret population dates in Ethn -- that is, that you need to check their source.

kwami (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, C1MM. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

[edit]
I just came across your additions to Meyah language. It's great to see such content created about Papuan languages! – Uanfala (talk) 01:40, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
For super Santali edit Rocky 734 (talk) 04:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

extinction date Lower Nossob language

[edit]

Hey. Your link to the UNESCO site isn't working, and isn't archived. Do you know the current URL? Thanks. — kwami (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah UNESCO took down their atlas for some reason. But the source is vetted and accurate. Can you find where they've stored all the languages? C1MM (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DBigXray

[edit]
Hello, C1MM. You have new messages at Talk:2019_Hyderabad_gang_rape#Why_do_people_want_to_delete_this%3F.
Message added 07:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXray 07:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Navageethan moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Pavel Navageethan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gana Stephen for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gana Stephen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gana Stephen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 23:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Madhya Pradesh languages

[edit]

Hi, in this edit, you didn't provide a new source that would support the change. Kindly do that. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source is still the Census of India, this was simply taking out Regional Languages classified under Hindi. The previous chart only showed the Hindi macrogroup on the 2011 Census, which includes languages like Bagheli and Bhojpuri.C1MM (talk) 01:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I get it, would you mind linking the XL sheet from where you got those numbers. The older numbers can be sourced from other means like NCLM reports, put these new numbers should be verifiable. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Language map

[edit]

Hello, Your Magahi language map is incorrect. Get your facts correct, Magahi language not spoken in Latehar district and Ranchi district. Also Magahi language not spoken in Whole Palamu district, Chatra district. Sadri/Nagpuri language spoken in Latehar, Palamu, Chatra and Ranchi district. Correct your map. Dev0745 (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 03:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove short descriptions

[edit]

as you did at Mehrgarh. That appears to be a violation of the sanctions above. Doug Weller talk 10:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR

[edit]

Don't pass your own judgement in violation of WP:OR like you are frequently doing here [1][2]. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 17:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content

[edit]

Hey, Recently i have seen Your activities on Kushwaha article where you removed sourced content.If you do this again i will complaint to administrator noticeboard Heba Aisha (talk) 07:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Heba Aisha: All the edits I made were minor grammar edits, condensing some longer sentences and rearranging of the article. Please tell me what sourced content I edited, I just modified the intro to say that the Kushwahas are a grouping of related castes. Or, if you want, you can say "Kushwaha is a term used to refer to several communities" or something like that. See Yadav or Thevar for a similar group. C1MM (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SerChevalerie (talk) 03:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated violations of WP:BLP

[edit]

In this edit from yesterday (which was reverted, stating the appropriate policy) and this one from today, you have clearly violated WP:BLP, specifically WP:BLPCRIME. Please note that if this continues, you will be banned. SerChevalerie (talk) 03:09, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SerChevalerie: All I was saying is he was arrested, does NOT mean he is guilty AT ALL. It is mentioned in plenty of sources that he was the one arrested, and his name. Please tell me whether it is incorrect to name anyone who has been arrested. I make NO JUDGEMENT AT ALL ABOUT HIS GUILT. Do you understand? C1MM (talk) 05:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but adding his name to Wikipedia is a controversial area, unless he has been convicted of the crime (which is what WP:BLPCRIME says). This particular article is about the violence that occurred, not about his post, so WP:DUE also comes into play (since he didn't start the violence, he was simply the reason behind it). SerChevalerie (talk) 05:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SerChevalerie: Sorry for that outburst, I realize what the issue is. I reinstated all my changes without naming any of the accused. C1MM (talk) 05:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's good. I just want to reinforce what's been said - Wikipedia policy places a lot of emphasis on what we say about living people - arrests, lawsuits, etc are too often done for political reasons, so we always need to be cautious. Doug Weller talk 10:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

I really appreciate and thank you for your edits on maps of state election results pages. I have eagerly waiting for someone to create maps, and now it's created. Once again I thank you very much Nahtrav (talk)

But In rajasthan assembly, constituency no.30 won by BSP, so I request u to change that constituency's colour from Orange to blue Nahtrav (talk)

@Nahtrav: Done! C1MM (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very muchNahtrav (talk)

@User:C1MM , if you have more free time,please expand to other state elections like Odisha, Uttarakhand goa himachal etc.. regards Nahtrav (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's my plan C1MM (talk) 16:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:C1MM, pleasure User:Nahtrav

@User:C1MM, Thankyou for UK,H.P,Odisha election edits, only 2014 Kashmir and 2017 Goa is remaining hope you do it soon so, regards Nahtrav (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Kindly refrain from making sweeping changes without gaining consensus. - Debitpixie 💬 12:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kushwaha article

[edit]

Can you make further copyedit so that we remove the tag put on it.tq Heba Aisha (talk) 09:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 2020 Bengaluru drugs raids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable current news event

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 14:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I DON'T KNOW how to remove the maintenance tag. What changes to bring. Plz helpHeba Aisha (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mala (caste), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of country from leads

[edit]

Please don't remove countries from leads as you have done at multiple geographical and social group articles, such as here and here. This against WP:MOS and MOS:GEO, any mention of a subnational entity should be preceded by the country in your case India should be there before you mention the states or geological areas. You have already been reverted over this, please detest otherwise this will be considered serious disruptive editing. Gotitbro (talk) 02:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images

[edit]

Hello C1MM, Please stop immediately the infobox changes you are making to large numbers of pages. All infobox changes require WP:CONSENSUS and your edits with cursory uninformative summaries, with no justifications provided, can be quite harmful. So, please stop! If you would like to make a change to an infobox of a subject you know well, please make a proposal on its talk page, explaining your reasons, and invite comments. You should only be making such changes after you are confident that there is a consensus for them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: Sorry for doing an edit blitz, but my edits have not been harmful or damaging to the pages in any way, and it is often obvious what I am doing: especially when I mention "updated map:" the only map on the page is that in the infobox. Please tell me how adding more accurate locator maps is harmful, although I should have posted more detailed edit summaries. To your second point, that these changes require consensus and making a full proposal, comment, consensus then edits, I think you are being slightly too dogmatic without thinking of the practicalities. For an article on a state or major city that will have significant traffic, of course edits of the kind I am doing should have consensus and comments. But topics like the district pages of India have very few editors in the first place looking at them and even less at the talk pages, and so waiting say a few weeks for a response or maybe months for people who actually take the time to look at the talk page and write responses is counterproductive especially when the edits I am proposing are not malicious or harmful in any way. Response rates on these talk pages are quite low: I have added several talk page posts to far more important articles such as that on Babasaheb Ambedkar, but have not received a response in months. If you put a limit, for instance, that you have to get consensus from 3 or 5 other editors for each somewhat significant change (adding an image, updating population figures or demographics) on these far less traffic-heavy pages you will not be able to make any changes in a meaningful amount of time. If you oppose all the edits I have been making for Assam, then ban my account or go through my entire edit history and revert every single change I have ever made to articles about India's districts. I have done similar things for all the districts of Karnataka, most districts of Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and hundreds of other district articles and have never had people reverting my edits over, for instance, a lack of consensus over the image map I added, until now. C1MM (talk) 03:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, probably most of your edits in the blitz were benign. But the first edit I ran into is this one, which had an edit summary of "changed image", whereas in reality it removed a map showing the course of the river and inserted a photograph of the river in the plains. This, for a river that flows through the High Himalayas, passing through two countries, with active border disputes, water disputes and so on!
Please remember that all edits to Wikipedia are subject to review by other editors. The reviewing editors will generally look at diffs. Changes of images won't be apparent in the diffs. So your edit summaries need to state clearly what has been changed and why. Even "updating map" is not clear enough. Why does a map need "updating"? Has its territory changed? Are there reliable sources documenting the change? (By the way, districts often get split, merged or reshuffled and it is a nightmare to deal with them.)
Infobox images are often controversial. The image needs to be truly representative of the place. If you don't think there is anybody available to discuss, you can at least leave a note on the talk page explaining your choice. I also dare say that you are displaying extreme naivety if you equate Arunachal Pradesh with Chattisgarh, Tamil Nadu and Telangana. There is no comparison. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would probably be an idiot to think the situation with Arunachal Pradesh or J&K is the same as much of the rest of India. That edit you mentioned was a mistake I should not have made, and I'm sorry for that. I have dealt with those district splittings and reshufflings and that is the main reason I was updating those infoboxes. I had just batch uploaded a lot of new locator maps displaying all current districts of Assam, even Bajali which was formed a few months ago, and was making those changes for that reason.
Also, for many districts, it is very hard to get images of the district in the first place so giving those who see the page at least a decent idea of what the district looks like, either topographically or culturally is not a bad idea. But you're right on the representative part, and I will be mindful to leave talk page messages in the future. Thanks for reminding me. Also sorry for the slightly belligerent tone in my last talk post. C1MM (talk) 03:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add Notable people

[edit]

I don't have access to Vanniyar page. Please add Auto Shankar under Notable people section in Vanniyar page. Citation 3 in Auto Shankar supports this claim Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add the practice of polyandry in Vanniyar page

[edit]

http://journals.du.ac.in/humsoc/pdf/SONI%2520Draupadi.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjBuILnmI_uAhWQWX0KHecRB9sQFjACegQIHhAB&usg=AOvVaw2tvLeQ1k6PdQg_-2EacCxw The above link is of a journal paper that notes the fact that Vanniyar's approval and practice of polyandry concords with their worship of Draupadi- polyandrous deity. Please add this fact as I don't have access to edit. Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

www.drbgrpublications.in/IJBER%2520-%252000011.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwioiKLdwo_uAhUYwTgGHRFwDiAQFjADegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw15-UARsh_V7QScuXAPd3TU

Please use this as citation Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 18:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, File:Thailand relief map.svg, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Can you please create a election results map for 2014 Maharashtra assembly elections and if you are free please create it for all 2013-2014 state assembly elections. Glad to see that Nahtrav (talk)

Information icon Hello, C1MM. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2020 Bhainsa violence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 02:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2020 Bhainsa violence

[edit]

Hello, C1MM. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 Bhainsa violence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fandry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assam election results map

[edit]

Please change the Raijor Dal from the map to Independent according to eci official website Goswami21 (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will change C1MM (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Nadu change

[edit]

Please change MDMK won seats colour to red in Tamil Nadu assembly results map as mdmk contested on DMK symbol Nahtrav (talk)

Assam election results map

[edit]

Change United Progressive Alliance into Mahajot Goswami21 (talk) 14:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lumbini Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tharu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for your response at Talk:Andhra Pradesh

[edit]

@User:C1MM, I made a request at Talk:Andhra_Pradesh#Language_demographics_after_Telangana_separation and have been waiting for several days. Hope you received notification about the request through Echo. Kindly respond in a day or two. Thanks.--Arjunaraoc (talk) 04:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

East Singhbhum district
added a link pointing to Sarna
Seraikela Kharsawan district
added a link pointing to Sarna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Singhbhum district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bandipore district
added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir
Budgam district
added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir
Kupwara district
added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir
Srinagar district
added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jharkhand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please re-add your slimmed plot summary from here? I was trying to restore an earlier good version of the article, but did not want to meddle with the plot of a film I'm trying to find time to watch. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amravati district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korku.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajkot district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gondal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Kondagaon district has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Karachi Central District
added a link pointing to Sindhi
Karachi East District
added a link pointing to Sindhi
Karachi South District
added a link pointing to Sindhi
Karachi West District
added a link pointing to Sindhi
Korangi District
added a link pointing to Sindhi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dera Bugti District
added a link pointing to Balochi
Kohlu District
added a link pointing to Balochi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Districts of Gilgit-Baltistan

[edit]

Kindly update and create the maps of Districts of Gilgit-Baltistan they are outdated and 4 new districts has been established by the government in 2019[1] Now total numbers of districts are 14 but their maps still not been updated yet.

References

West Karbi Anglong

[edit]

How are you getting into the language percentages. As per the census 2011 excel sheet, the Bhojpuri and the Nepali figures are well below the Bengali and Assames figures in teh undivided Karbi Anglong district. Please provide the exact link(s) otherwise I'll remove it per WP:SYNTH. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is for the total district, but Karbi Anglong was divided in 2016. Donka circle became West Karbi Anglong district. See "Donka" subheading under Karbi Anglong. Similarly I updated language data for most divided districts except Sibsagar (because the district was not divided on the lines of revenue circles that appear in the 2011 census). C1MM (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK.. Then we have to explain it in the article. And what about Nagaon district district? How did its percentages change? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was fixing vandalism. Someone had changed Assamese to Bengali and same in Opposite direction in the pie chart but did a bad job. Sorry I used a default edit summary rather than a more specific one. The Nagaon figures were arrived in the exact same way as the rest of the divided districts. If you want a template on how to include the fact that the demographics are for the separated district you can look at Purba Bardhaman district article.C1MM (talk)
Thanks, The 2011 census Nagaon district had a population of 2,823,768. Now it seems it has 1,892,550. I want to know which blocks, circles, sub-districts got separated. I'd quote/note it int he article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Or we have to mention that the figures are from the then undivided Nagaon district of 2011. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All figures are from the divided district. C1MM (talk) 16:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I got it the first time. I want to know the sub districts/circles etc that are part of it now, so that I can make a quote and efn note in the article since the 2011 source could get readers to different population figures not matching with the source, ergo it is getting into synthesis territory. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Everything in Nagaon except Hojai, Doboka and Lanka circles. C1MM (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khasi people

[edit]

Hi, it is regarding this change. Would appreciate very much you can correct teh percentages based on proper sources. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siang district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Sathya Sai district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorantla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You C1MM!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank You C1MM for your work in updating the location and locator maps of each Pakistani province and district! As well as updating the Wikipedia page of every Pakistani district with current infoboxes and demographic information! Your work has helped many people and is treasured by all the rest of us! Abbasi786786 (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Koraput district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gadaba language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajbanshi people

[edit]

@C1MM: The frontier region was "not" known as Pragjyotisha rather it was known as Kamarupa Bhaskarvarman took legitimacy from Pragjyotisha located to the northwest of the Indian subcontinent, please look ito it Somadrink (talk) 08:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix that. Thanks for reminding me. C1MM (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darjeeling Pulbazar (community development block), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhotia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Udupi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khowai district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Odia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Garhwal Division

[edit]

Garhwal Division Please Update Images TheManishPanwar (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C1MM-bot

[edit]

[3] --DB1729talk 04:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, I will make sure this doesn't happen again. C1MM (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

[edit]

Can you please link me to your WP:Bot approval? PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I came here from UAA; it appears that you have been running the bot despite lack of authorisation from the bot approvals group, which is prohibited by policy. I have blocked the bot until this matter is resolved. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:India Odisha Angul.svg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:India Odisha Angul.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:India Odisha Bargarh.svg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:India Odisha Bargarh.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:India Odisha Balasore.svg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:India Odisha Balasore.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:India Odisha Balangir.svg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:India Odisha Balangir.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need source for Rajasthan Assembly constituency basemap

[edit]

Where did you get the base map for File:2018 Rajasthan Assembly elections.png? The constituencies for Jaipur city don't seem to be present in File:Wahlkreise_zur_Vidhan_Sabha_von_Rajasthan.svg. I tried to make an svg version of the jaipur constituencies from your png, but was unsuccessful. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed that map. Now it contains accurate maps of Jaipur constituencies from ECI data. C1MM (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Kaushambi district and a similar one to Faizabad district‎ in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the changes you made. According to your edit summaries you "Added religion bar chart and languages pie chart", but these were already there. What you really did was to make a load of changes to the infobox, change some URLs and delete lots of content. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see your problem. The 'deleting of lots of content' was that the languages section describes major languages, but nearly all languages in the tables I deleted are spoken by at most a few thousand people out of a population of millions. But I will make sure to change my edit summaries which do better at describing changes. C1MM (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanniyar Page

[edit]

I have made an edit request on Vanniyar talk page. I have tagged you there as well. Please make that change. 103.158.244.149 (talk) 17:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanniyar new edit

[edit]

I have made a new request on Vanniyar talk page. No one has attended the request. Please review it and make the requested edit. Regards 24thHusbandofDraupathi (talk) 13:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BAGBot: Your bot request C1MM-bot

[edit]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/C1MM-bot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 15:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalimpong II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lepcha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Need semi-protection on Vellalar

[edit]

Hello sir,

The page has many flaws and authors pov. It's most of the information (including summary) was contributed by 2 editors only. The two were fighting like kids in the talk page as you can see. You can compare the page with Rajputs, Khatri, Vokkaliga and many dominant society of Indian regions. These pages are well constructed by genuine editors from various backgrounds. Literally, The Vellalar page summary is author's pov (their claim starts "seems to be rather"). The page need major improvements, cleanups and more sources.

The Wikipedia's purpose is to benefit readers by acting as a widely accessible and free encyclopedia that contains information on all branches of knowledge. If the page can be edited by admins only, what's the need of wikipedia editors? The information should be contributed by volunteers and genuine editors without any restrictions and opinionated moderators rivalry. I hope you understand my concern. Thanks :) Exhistorian (talk) 18:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I can't file protection request. Admins do have that power, and I agree that Vellalar and other community article needs Protection. File protection request with Admin and they should help. You can find a list of administrator here. C1MM (talk) 03:05, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gazole (community development block)
added a link pointing to Santali
Manikchak
added a link pointing to Kisan language
Old Malda (community development block)
added a link pointing to Santali

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manikchak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kisan language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lahaul and Spiti district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhotia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion on Vanniyar edit request

[edit]

I have tagged you in a new discussion on Vanniyar page regarding a new edit request. I would request you to address it.Thanks 24thHusbandofDraupathi (talk) 02:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colours for Linguistic Data

[edit]

Hi C1MM, I noticed you've changed a lot of pie chart colours for language data on district pages of Odisha. It seems you're using some kind of specific colour scheme. I'm creating linguistic maps for Odisha, and would like to see if I can use these same colours in my maps, so that all linguistic data on an article could be in line with each other. Can you please help me with which exact colors you use for different languages? — g0d0 talk contribs 20:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Go into source code for any such Pie chart and you will see the colours. Saddle Brown is for Odia. C1MM (talk) 04:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhagabanpur I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khortha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics

[edit]

Hi C1MM, thanks for fixing the demograpics sections for Manipur districts. I notice demographics is not covered at all for the Churachandpur district. I wonder if you can fill one in? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to that eventually I think. C1MM (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since Churachandpur district was split recently and existing circles were bifurcated during the split, there is no accurate census data on language/religion for this, Pherzawl or Tamenglong/Noney districts. C1MM (talk) 17:32, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I know, But that problem is the same as for the other districts too. Almost every district was bifurcated in 2016. Let us continue to document the 2011 data. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Named reference errors in upazilas

[edit]

Please try not to leave a trail of named reference errors in your wake as you edit upazila articles, for example Bamna Upazila, Bhola Sadar Upazila, and Lalmohan Upazila in the past few days. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And this week: Barguna Sadar Upazila, Betagi Upazila, and Islampur Upazila (someone tried to fix the last for you, but now the inline citations don't connect to sources that support the content). --Worldbruce (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

[edit]

Have a look at these changes. It is a banned sock with Telugu POV, as demonstrated by their previous edits from another IP that is currently blocked. But, have a look at the percentages. Thanks. And do ping me. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk Yes, these percentages are completely wrong. The ones I put up were correct. Will fix this. C1MM (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you have a look at the census figures Anupgarh district article as well as Ganganagar district article? Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Figures are correct since Chhatargarh and Khajuwala were removed from dist Anupgarh (see Dainik Bhaskar article in page). I will update language figures to match. Need to change demographics for dist Bikaner as well it seems. C1MM (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Udaipur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rajasthani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lakshmichhari Upazila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look

[edit]

Hi, can you check the religious affiliation percentages (census 2011) in the Gondi people article? I believe the article has gone through ethnic POV pushes, resulted in changes to these percentages. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Tandwa block, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kurukh and Khortha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Baharagora block
added a link pointing to Mundari
Ichagarh block
added a link pointing to Mundari

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pune City taluka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marwari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for removing particular biased content

[edit]

@C1MM Hi men I need an quick insight regarding the specific disputed section retard to the Jats article which is highly debatable and should be removed with an dedicated discussion regarding the section of Jat Varna status under bhramnical system which is not fully applicable on the Jat people whereas the jat form largest population under sikh ethno religious subsets I want to conclude Jat hierarchy is neutral irrespective of Hindu cult never fell under an umbrella status of Hinduism respectively Truthfindervert (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please post any issues like these on the article talk page. C1MM (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upper Kohistan District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kohistani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look 2024

[edit]

Hi, it is regarding these changes by a new user. If you have time could you verify these? Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. C1MM (talk) 14:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix your named reference errors

[edit]

Please fix the referencing errors your recent edits have created:

And in the future, please use the preview button before you save an edit; this helps you find any errors you have inadvertently introduced. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review your edits on Bangladeshi places

[edit]

In many of your edits on Bangladeshi districts or places, you have mentioned that majority of hindus are Rajbongshi people. But are the rajbongshi and hindus same? According to the main article - Rajbongshi people, there are less than 15000 rajbongshi people in Bangladesh, so logically they cannot be a majority here. Please review those edits again. - Cerium4B • Talk? 20:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]