User talk:Cerium4B

You've got mail

Hello, Cerium4B. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Cerium4B (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajarbag Police Lines School and College, Dhaka (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced, not neutral.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajarbag Police Lines School and College, Dhaka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cerium4B! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Police Lines School and College, Bogura (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced, not neutral.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Police Lines School and College, Bogura and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahid Mamun Mahmud Police Lines School and College, Rajshahi (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced, not neutral

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shahid Mamun Mahmud Police Lines School and College, Rajshahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm আফতাবুজ্জামান. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shahriar Kabir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@আফতাবুজ্জামান

রেফারেন্স সহ অ্যাড করেছিলাম !! Cerium4B (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information Adding

You can add information on this article Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's cult of personality. Niasoh (talk) 11:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Testing signature

62837 Cerium4B • Talk? • 21:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G VN IG - Cerium4B • Talk? • 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cerium4B - could you make your signature the default size? It's currently far larger than everyone else's signatures. Thanks! BugGhost 🦗👻 23:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it mandatory to use the default size?

Ive made it quite larger so that the other users can read easily. - Cerium4B • Talk? • 04:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check out WP:SIGAPP. At the default size everyone can still read your name easily. BugGhost 🦗👻 06:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cerium4B • Talk? •

Check the default size.

It so small. - Cerium4B • Talk? • 12:02, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decreased the size! - Cerium4B • Talk? • 17:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cerium4B. I came here to say exactly the same thing as Bugghost. Even in the new "decreased" size, your signature is larger than necessary or usual, it tends to create irritating gaps between lines of text, and i can tell you from experience, that such a signature is often seen as attempting to draw attention to yourself and your statements, and can certainly have to the opposite effect. The default size is perfectly readable, especially as you have given it quite eye-catching colours; i suggest you just go with the default ~ Lindsay^Hello 17:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hey @Cerium4B. I've noticed you've been reverting my edit, and I wanted to explain why is it better to include that era detail, it helps to distinguish this article from that article (which is mainly used for the individual's born after that era). The individual in question was born in that era, and adding this context provides little more accuracy and relevance (you can also see other articles i.e. Abu Bakr and many more that use the same context). I’d be glad if we can reach a consensus and do not further edit war. Thank you! Omani8678 (talk) 17:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Omani8678

Thank you for explaining ! - Cerium4B • Talk? • 13:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bold, revert, discuss

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barisal Division. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce, you Come here to blame me without verifying everything! 😂

There was no other users except him, That user is doing sockpuppetry.

I have filled a report against him.

He is using various devices to revert those edits.

I have also warned him in Usertalk - Cerium4B • Talk? • 13:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I’m updating the 8 divisions of Bangladesh.

In Barisal, I removed not related, not famous or not a tourist place and poor quality images.

Then added images which represents the division much like famous place or tourist place.

If you see Barisal, It’s a division connected with the bay of Bengal. Example: The Kuakata beach is very famous. So I kept the photo at the top.

But i don’t know why that unregistered user is reverting my every edit.

He also doesn’t reply in his talkpage.

after filling a report against him, i warned him in his usertalk. But he cleared the topic from another ip address.

(& sorry, my English is not so good) @Worldbruce - Cerium4B • Talk? • 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce, please check his IP addresses and geo-location.

Requesting to take necessary steps.

2607:FEA8:571E:CE00:D81A:9C9D:4833:65A4 (talk · contribs)
2607:fea8:571e:ce00:d8c:6de5:ff66:5c6c (talk · contribs)
76.68.24.171 (talk · contribs)

- Cerium4B • Talk? • 13:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]