User talk:Boleyn/Archive 1

		The Original Barnstar
		Just wanted to show my support for your tireless contributions to hndis-cleanup, for both you and your alter-ego. The recent criticism is completely unjustified, I have always found your edits to follow WP:MOSDAB scrupulously. Editorial differences will always occur but this should never have gone beyond the pages concerned or your talk page. Keep up the good work! Tassedethe (talk) 08:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For just being you day after day Happydude 69ya (talk) 21:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thanks for all your help at Wikipedia:Suggestions for name disambiguation! Those dab pages may Wikipedia more useful and accessible for everyone, and your work is appreciated. – Quadell (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

We did it! Thanks so much for your help finishing off the missing disambiguation links. You made it happen! – Quadell (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Boleyn, you are a one-woman disambiguating machine! Thanks for your continuing remarkable effort. – Quadell ^(talk) 00:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Disambiguation Barnstar
		For all your hard work cleaning up disambiguation pages, and consistently tagging worthless pages for removal, I hereby award you this barnstar! Keep up the good work! --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Purple Star
		For being a great long-term contributor who had to deal with a really lousy block and all that unnecessary ANI drama. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For doing such a great job refining and standardizing disambiguation pages, especially ones I create! Jokestress (talk) 22:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Disambiguation Original Barnstar.png	Disambiguation Barnstar
	For your prolific work with creating dab pages and development. Keep up the great work! Henry would regret beheading you! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Dont logoff (talk) 22:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all the disambig work, including the recently created Andy Nelson page. Lugnuts (talk) 07:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.87 (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, that's very knid of you. Boleyn (talk) 16:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 12:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to send this to me. Boleyn (talk) 12:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Though it's been said before, it bears repeating, thanks for your recent disambiguation work! Rosiestep (talk) 02:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Disambiguator's Barnstar
		The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. There's hardly a dab page that I create where you don't show to improve things. Your diligence certainly deserves a barnstar. Schwede66 08:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Happy 6th Wikibirthday! Congrats on all the success and thanks for all the good work! MahmoudHashemi (talk) 11:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Unref template at 2018 Club Atlético River Plate season

Hi Boleyn, I added at least six references in the article, I would like to know when it would be properly to take the unref template out. FerchuJenson (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

I've removed it, thanks for your hard work. Boleyn (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

About your message of Exit (cupcakKe song)

sorry but I don't know how else to make a page on Wikipedia without it being a draft, don't delete the pages though until I find a way to get the on a seperate page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusipher (talk • contribs) 06:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Hi, Jusipher. The way you created it was fine, it's just that the topic doesn't seem to meet the relevant notability guidelines, WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. It's redirected, so if you have evidence it meets the criteria - for instance charting in a major chart, multiple reviews in good publications - then it can be undone at the click of a button and be a standalone article again. You can continue to work on it at User:Jusipher/sandbox or Draft:Exit (cupcakKe song) also. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you I appreciate it, I'll try to look for more sources, thank you! ~ Jusipher — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusipher (talk • contribs) 07:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Centering one column in a table

Hi Boleyn, may I ask you if there is any way of centering the text in one column the whole way down on Wikipedia, without the need of having to insert the "text-align:center" text on each row? --SportsAficionado (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi SportsAficionado, I'm afraid I don't know the answer. Might be worth asking at the WP:TEAHOUSE? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn, thank you for your help! Best, SportsAficionado (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Robyn Maby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robyn Maby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Maby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Shafie Ayar

I did give some thought to create-protection when I closed that AFD, but he does seem to be close to the border with regards to notability. On the wrong side at present, but it's possible foreign-language sources might tip the balance in future, so I don't want to make it impossible for a different editor to put something up if notability is ever properly established.
But hey, I'm just one guy - if you want to put it up at WP:RPP for salting I won't object! Yunshui <sup>雲</sup><sub>水</sub> 14:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

That makes sense, Yunshui, thanks for looking it over. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Punken

I created the page for Punken by Maxo Kream today. I created the page for #Maxo187 yesterday, and I will edit the rest of Punken today. Please do not delete or redirect the article. It will flesh out into a fully formed article soon. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebush007 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Ah, I see someone else edited this, Thebush007. If you think it does meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG, then you could create an article at [{Draft:Punken]] and submit through WP:AFC when it's ready. Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Boowelikada

You have corrected a page by the same editor. Please help.Xx236 (talk) 09:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I've messaged the editor and will keep an eye on whether they make adjustments. I'll see if I can improve the article myself too. Thanks, Xx236. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

1995–96 FC Basel season

Hallo Boleyn, please do not start an editor war. The Basel team squad is at 1995–96 Joggeli.ch, their results (cup and league) and league tables can be seen at 1995–96 RSSSF, every single game is summarised at Joggeli.ch and futher infos are at fussballstarbasel.ch. The Intertoto Cup is referenced within that article with linguasport (and therefore, is not needed on this page). Further information can be found on FC Basel official site. What more do you want? What else can I put in? I thank you in advance for your positve input. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 21:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, Huligan0. I added an inline tag as when looking at the references/sources section, it lists several sources but they are not inline, except one. It has sources, which is great, but it is very difficult to see which source backs up which piece of information. Are you confused by what I meant by inline? Please see WP:INLINECITE. Please let me know if I can help you further. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Boleyn, no, I know what is meant, but others don't. I've been writing similar articles here for years, over 60 FC Basel seasons. But I don't agree to the use of such tags. An author spends weeks, hours and hours on end, gathering the info, reading books, searching for inline infos. You're not going to find many inline citations for a football match that was played 20, 50 or 80 years ago. An author spends weeks writing, adding wikilinks, linking sources and references, formating tables. Hurray :-) Finished. Put it on line and within hours somebody adds a tag This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear or then This article needs additional citations for verification or even This article is a Stub or even better, all three at the same time. I know the article is only going to get read five or ten times a month, but if these tags are at the beginning, nobody is going to read it at all. I think that this sort of tag should be on the talk page (perhaps within the references/sources section) but not at the beginning of the article. I don't mean just your tag, but also many, many others. I don't find that these tags are motivating or inspiring, that they are encouaging or helpful. I think that such tags dis-encourage authors and editors. I need positve input, but I'm going to carry on writing anyway. Greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Sorry: but can these tags be added to the talk page? Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Huligan0, no, they go on the article, so anyone can see the issue and improve it. I think you're overestimating how difficult it is to inline cite. You just add your paragraph of information, then at the end of it write what your source was - same for the next block of information you add. It would only take about two mins before. Without it, it's really unclear what information is verified and what is unverified. Thanks for your hard work on articles. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

request for deletion of draft for 1911 Milan-San Remo

Hello, Boleyn. This is Lincoln555. I have written in the past a draft for the article 1911 Milan-San Remo. An article version was written by EP111 just today. I would like for my draft to be deleted for being a duplicate. Lincoln555 (talk) 10:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Y Boleyn (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Daedalus (Major Deus Ex) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Daedalus (Major Deus Ex). Since you had some involvement with the Daedalus (Major Deus Ex) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. <sub>ZXCVBNM (TALK)</sub> 13:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I've recommended deletion at the discussion. Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Edward Lyman Abbott

Thanks for the editing help you gave to Edward Lyman Abbott, several years ago. I have made substantial edits that I thought you might enjoy. Cheers! Flibirigit (talk) 23:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Well done, Flibirigit, it's looking really good now. Hope you're well, Boleyn (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Caesar Bacarella

Hi, It's JRicciMotorsports. I just wanted to tell you that I counldn't find a way to contact you. Also, I have 5 sources on my Caesar Bacarella page.

Thanks, I've responded at your talk page to keep the discussion together. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Early members of parliament

I have noticed the new page John Penkestone. You say in the lead that he "was an English politician". Please bear in mind that almost none of these early members of parliament was that. Being a member of the House of Commons of England in the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries was a short-term commitment for a few days or weeks of the year, with a new election held every time a parliament was summoned, and not in itself a career. This man is reported as one of the members for Southampton in 1386, 1394, and 1406, so he was a rather occasional member of parliament, and there is no sign at all that he was a politician, a concept which did not really exist at that time.

The same comment applies to page names. To include the word politician (or the letters MP) in a page name before the 18th century is usually misleading, as most of these men had some other main occupation or status, such as barrister, merchant, courtier, which defines them far better. Moonraker (talk) 04:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Moonraker, I will bear this in mind and adjust my template. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Mate4Malta

Can you goddamn leave me alone and stop suggesting to block me? I'm a 14 year old kid who's trying to contribute something to Wikipedia, which I already did with a few articles that I have created, such as Sikhism in Poland. I added some citations in them, the rest is YOUR or other Wikipedia editors' job. Please.

Mate4Malta, I'll respond at your talk page to keep the whole discussion together. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Ian Allison (disambiguation)

Hi. Thanks for the "heads up".
What I'd like to do is:

1. move Ian Allison to Ian Allison (basketball) - done
2. move Ian Allison (disambiguation) to Ian Allison - needs an admin
3. update Ian Allison (disambiguation) in preparation for move to Ian Allison - done
4. modify the template {{Footer 1936 Olympic Silver Medalists Basketball Men}} - done

and anything else I may have missed. However, I need to be an admin to move Ian Allison (disambiguation) to Ian Allison.
Anyway, what do you suggest? Pdfpdf (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

It looks like you've fixed it. Thanks! Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

A new user still not following the guidelines

Hello Boleyn, this user's still creating reams of messy new articles (lead sections with no context, half-done or wrong dates both inline and in-reference, half-empty tables, no reference sections, etc.) such as 1920 Tour of Flanders, and is continuing to ignore the ones you've already asked them to fix. I'm starting to consider it WP:DIS to my own workflow. As you dealt with it first, would you like to follow up on it? EP111 (talk) 18:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, EP111, I've left them a message and will continue to monitor. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. EP111 (talk) 07:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

P.s. If they do eventually get taken to WP:ANI, please feel free to notify me. EP111 (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Will do, Boleyn (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I initiated an ANI last night, and before I'd got around to messaging you, it had been closed as an indefinite block. You might want to watchlist their talk page if you haven't already, in case they object and there's something you'd like to add. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I've only just logged on, after 18 hours or so. That was quick, I'll go and take look at what happened. It certainly seemed like a case of WP:CIR, to me. EP111 (talk) 10:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Discussion found and read. I've nothing further to add at this point, but offer my thanks to yourself and Swarm for dealing with it and I'll watchlist the user's talk page. EP111 (talk) 11:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Atsme. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kaldighi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

<sup>Atsme📞📧</sup> 23:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Original programs

Can you userfy? -Inowen (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

This was deleted before I was next online, but I would have been happy to help. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

Please look at Talk:Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Rhadow (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. It is now in the mainspace, and you've tagged Joe Decker, so they can look it over and see if they think it's OK to stay there. You can take information from the other draft and add it in at any time. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Boyar Debbarma

Hello, Boleyn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boyar Debbarma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I think I probably moved this from mainspace to draft, it's not my creation, so happy for it to be deleted. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Boleyn, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

List of Lorne Greene's New Wilderness episodes

It looks like I created this page the wrong way. I cut & pasted the episode list from the Lorne Greene's New Wilderness to the new page. As a result, the edit history isn't showing on the List of episodes page. Is there anyway to fix this? AspenSavannah (talk) 20:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, AspenSavannah, I'm really sorry, I seem to have missed this message. I don't know the answer, but perhaps someone at the WP:TEAHOUSE could help? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Arcarius

Hi Boleyn! In view of your past interactions with him, you might be interested in this. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 09:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Cplakidas, Boleyn (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Spirce for Haas VF-18

Sources added Real tlhingan (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Boleyn (talk) 21:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 1000 reviews (2058) during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

		Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears
		For maintaining a streak of at least 100 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the asymmetric epicyclic gears. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for all your hard work and good ideas, Insertcleverphrasehere, you're invaluable to the project. Boleyn (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

The unresponsive editors

One down! Thank you for warning the user about editing logged out, that was obviously what pushed them into starting to talk. I've unblocked one more, RafaelRL1905, where the back-and-forth was by e-mail. I hope they both become constructive contributors now — they obviously mean well. Bishonen | talk 07:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC).

Thanks, I think many of them just think that the messages indicate a difference of opinion and don't properly read the messages. Language and culture seem to be big issues too - after a poor attempt at editing Latin Wikipedia, I have some sympathy. Thanks for taking the time to unblock them. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Diekirch Women's League

...was consigned to draft space by you last year and has now popped back out in scarcely improved form. One ref but no content; I'd suggest shunting it back? Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look it over, Elmidae. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Chanelle McCleary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chanelle McCleary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chanelle McCleary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Dont't know why Twinkle did this, since looking at the page history you don't seem to be the perp. Regards,TheLongTone (talk) 16:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, TheLongTone, I'll comment at the AfD. Notifying ChristmasCrackers, who made my redirect into an article. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Ah, ChristmasCrackers is a blocked sock, never mind. Boleyn (talk) 16:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

A blocked sock? sounds painful!TheLongTone (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Šljivovica (disambiguation)

Hello, Boleyn. Thanks for the notice. I created the article and added some links. Is it better now? Super Ψ Dro 15:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

==  Proposed deletion of Bek (family) ==

The article Bek (family) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Tenor (website)

Hello, can you please review this new page.--Joseph 14:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, 991joseph, I'm just back online and it looks like this was done. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it's done. Thank you!--Joseph 03:02, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Re: sources (Valentina Bergamaschi bio)

Ok, I know, the sources are all in the it.wiki article, so because but since I find it rather difficult to write in English rather than read it, I limited myself to creating a definitely encyclopedic bio stub (it is for us in it.wiki that we are much more restrictive than you in en.wiki ...). As you probably understand I'll write you these two lines with the help of Saint Google Translator while I'm continuing to fix the hundreds of rumors about women's football in my native language. In conclusion, I try to import some source in Italian, hoping that for you in en.wiki are sufficient, because I would be sorry to be put in obliteration due to lack of sources even if I can not pretend that you can do it (being admin in it. wiki I know how things work). Sorry again for the use of the translator or I would have spent much more time writing this message. Ciao :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I forgot, if you go in the entry it.wiki of Bergamaschi you will notice that in it.wiki for a while 'we have implemented a semi-automatic system that imports wikidata external links, if you could promote this practice in en.wiki many bio they would be automatically enriched at least by giving a little more authoritativeness and reassuring the patrollers about its verifiability. Thanks again for your patience.--Threecharlie (talk) 09:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

I translated part of the bio from it.wiki but I assume that he made several mistakes, you do me the courtesy of wikify that? Thakns :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 10:06, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

This looks much better now. If it has no sources, we have no idea if the information is correct or made up, but now it seems much clearer. Thanks for your work on the article, Threecharlie, Boleyn (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Article protection

Hey Boleyn, is there any chance to protect the article of AC Omonia's, as I noticed there are some kind of vandalism from users using their IP address. Thanks, Nick Rokk 96 (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2018 (BST)

Hi, Nick Rokk 96, I hope you're well. I'm not an admin so can't help you personally, but I've looked it over, and I would suggest you ask for it to be protected at WP:RPP. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

I am grateful for your kind post at my WP:AN#Topic ban appeal. Your words of support for my return to editing dabs are much appreciated. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 01:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

No problem, we all deserve a second chance with things. Boleyn (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Double tag?

See [1], thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Reverted it, thanks :) Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:Communication?

Hi i don't understand what does this message mean. Can you please explain it? What messages should i reply? Is List of libraries only problem?

Please be aware that WP:Communication is required on WIkipedia. Please respond to my previous messages. You may also want to see WP:SourceList, WP:BURDEN and WP:V. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Can you please respond? By refusing to communicate with an editor raising a concern, you are risking a block. Boleyn (talk) 09:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Best regards. --Rt788 (talk) 05:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

If you look at your talk page, you will see I have sent you four messages; thanks for finally responding. See User talk:Rt788#Ways to improve List of libraries in Azerbaijan and User talk:Rt788#Sources and communication. Yes, they are about a library list - just read them over. You do have other articles, like Stone Chronicle Museum, where other editors have raised concerns about your referencing, but I have just contacted you about the list I linked to in my message, List of libraries in Azerbaijan. Please add your sources. Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for all your great review work. You appear on my watchlist pretty much every day and I'd never taken the opportunity to say thanks :) Dr. Vogel (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC):Thanks, DrVogel, I really appreciate you taking the time to send me this message. Your work is much valued too. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Seo Hoon

Hi Boleyn, Please check the reference and remove the notice. Thank you for your reminder. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 08:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. You are able to remove a prod yourself, and an unref tag, but I've now removed them. Thanks for finishing the article off. Boleyn (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

New page review requested

Hi am requesting if you could review Mulenga Kapwepwe for me. Thank you Chabota Kanguya (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

This isn't the type of page I tend to patrol, but don't worry, the backlog's not too bad at the moment. Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi Boleyn!

Hello, Boleyn. You have new messages at Kmw2700's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page about ways to improve the article Seth M.R. Jaipuria School, Hardoi

Hi, Boleyn. I'm Aniruddha Mishra .123. I have already given the reference. I didn't understand the notability issue. Can you tell me about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aniruddha Mishra .123 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Aniruddha Mishra .123, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Pages should usually have reliable sources independent of the subject - the one source it has is not independent of the subject, but thanks for now adding it. For a school to be notable, it should meet WP:GNG - so several reliable sources independent of the subject. I wasn't able to find them, but perhaps you or others can. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

NPL pages

Boleyn, I think maybe we should the delete the season pages of the NPL, because maybe it will take too long to to make them all and for other reasons.

FastCube (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)FastCube

Hi FastCube, I wouldn't worry about whether it would take a long time to make them all, there's no deadline. I've created thousands of articles on English MPs, but there are many thousands more waiting, redlinked for now. They'll get done eventually. If you don't think they meet WP:NSEASONS then it's worth tagging them for deletion but otherwise they just need to have it in the article which source you got your information from. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

How to improve page references

Hello there. May I have some tips to improve the pages I have created. Thanks.

Hello, Qifahs17. The way you've added sources to 2018 Terengganu F.C. II season is absolutely fine. Please just do that for the other pages I sent you messages about. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

categories

How can I add categories to River Eresma? There is no option under insert!! 2Joules (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, 2Joules. I went to edit and typed two into the bottom of the article. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Story of Lee Hee-beom.

Because need to know how to create a story about Lee Hee-beom as President of the Pyeongchang Organizing Committee for XXIII Olympic Winter Games in Pyeongchang 2018 in South Korea. I just put in the reference. A Chris80 (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Your message to List of awards and nominations received by Peter Gabriel

First, I put the content which was from the Peter Gabriel article before. Second, if you click on the links, for example the nomination for British Album you find the information in the wikipedia article behind. Third, I put the Grammy, AMA, Brits, MTV Video Music Awards, Oscar, Golden Globe sources as External Links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schorsch.landmann (talk • contribs) 16:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Schorsch.landmann, I've replied on your page, so the conversation is all in one place. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

NBA season transactions

I do not know how to make the tables of other transactions because it is complicated. (talk) 20:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Kev519, I don't understand your message, I contacted you about references and communication, not tables. Please comment at the ANI. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

szabiao

I'm created page:Fulin Station, and I add external links in this page.I'm so sorry I doesn't send a message to you in few day.Thank you. Szabiao (talk) 05:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Szabiao. It has 'external links' which means 'suggestions for further reading' but it doesn't say what your sources were. Are they the same? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Sources from List of awards and nominations received by Peter Gabriel

Now most of the sources have been put into correct citation I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schorsch.landmann (talk • contribs) 11:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

21 March, 2018

Hello Friend! I did not understand what are you saying.If there is my mistake on the article of Khanian Village, So please remove it. Thanks You.Regards; User:Shoaib74444 (talk) 09:45 21 March,2018(UTC)

I have replied at your talk page to keep the conversation together. Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

23 March, 2018

Hi, thank you for reviewing my 2018 New York Cosmos season article. Now I just need to know what that means lol. Does that mean it now has protection against being deleted? If so, thank you again! lol

User:Tychu9 (talk) 22:04 23 March 2018(UTC)

Hi Tychu9. It means it is accepted in the mainspace and can be indexed by Google. It doesn't mean that an article can't be later judged not to meet WP:NSEASON or WP:GNG, but it means I didn't see any major issues with it being in Wikipedia. Thanks for creating it, Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: Sources

Hi, about your message on my talk page, I haven't put anything that needs sources. The current season is about to end, and mathematically, only 5 teams are sure to be in the next season's Ligue 1 (1st League of Tunisia). When I add other information (for example the date on which the season will begin) I will put sources, just like I did for all the articles I created :)
Thank you :)
Alexsd27 (talk) 00:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Alexsd27, all articles need to be sourced and thus has lots of information which is unverified. It details which teams have already qualified, that this is the 93rd season, stadium capacity for those who have already qualified and other facts. Where did you get all that information from? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Boleyn, 93rd season, source : http://www.rsssf.com/tablest/tunchamp.html and I put the stadium capacity, and since I am from Tunisia, there is a lot I know about football here, but I'll try to add reliable sources. Cheers. Alexsd27 (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claire Maytham

The article Claire Maytham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jo Sarjant

The article Jo Sarjant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Louise Gamman

The article Louise Gamman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jane Thackray

The article Jane Thackray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of independent notability, failing WP:GNG. Has not played in a fully professional league or in the Olympics, also failing WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 04:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

your 4 basketball articles

I don't think they should be deleted, so I've tried to expand them a little bit and also added some references. If they get taken to AfD I'll be happy to contribute my opinion. Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, DrVogel, I appreciate that. Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

List of Nostalgia Critic episodes (2018)

Recreated, no improvement in sources at all or writing; just letting you know just in case my G4 is declined (the creation note calls us 'small-minded' for the deletion and unironically uses the term 'making new dialogues'). Nate • (chatter) 19:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on it. Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft is up; still one-primary sourced and poor. Nate • (chatter) 22:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Boleyn, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

• ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

• Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

• The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

• While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

• The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Houghton (died 1559) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Houghton (died 1559) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Houghton (died 1559) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)