Jump to content

User talk:Bamyers99/Archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 20

15:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi editor

Hi can u suggest approval to this wiki page I’ve been waiting for a long time to see appear when I search for it

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1045490040 Fahad naji00 (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

20:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Pluto

Sorry about that, it was an accident. Maybe something went wrong when I tried to edit a huge page all at once and I should turn on the option to get an edit link for the lede section. :( Double sharp (talk) 07:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

20:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot/Children

If you want User:AlexNewArtBot/Children to collect articles about children, you should change it. Nobody born in the 1990s is a child, and it's missing the entire 2010s decade. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 05:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

@Lights and freedom: I have updated the search rules so that the years are no longer hardcoded. --Bamyers99 (talk) 22:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

CWB feature request: csv data to Commons

Hi @Bamyers99, love your CleanupWorklistBot (and have been using it for years!) Are you taking feature requests? Per the prior link, I've started graphing cleanup issue counts as a motivational tool. I think it would be a natural inclusion for most active WikiProject/noticeboard home pages and would have farther reach if it didn't have to be generated manually. If your bot could update .tab files at Commons, we'd be able to automatically generate these on-wiki using Template:Graph:Lines. Might you be interested or is this an idea for WP:BOTREQ? czar 00:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

@Czar: I am not interested in making the bot update a wiki. I have enhanced the history page to display a graph. Sample for WikiProject Michigan history. The rest of the graphs will get created during the run next Tuesday. --Bamyers99 (talk) 00:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Bamyers99,

I stumbled upon this report which apparently is issued by your bot and not AlexNewArtBot. I was wondering if you could tell me, briefly, what causes a page to be added to this report. I looked at the "rules" but it might as well have been in Greek and I didn't understand it. Thanks for any translation you can provide. I was just curious if, as an admin, I should be checking on the pages listed on the report as I do for other bot reports. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: InceptionBot is the third new article bot and it uses pages that the retired bots used to use.
I did not write the rules, so I don't know the reasoning behind some of them. It is looking for swear words, slurs, articles less than 25 characters, articles greater than 50,000 characters, the words "email" or "gmail". It excludes REDIRECTs and a template name that starts with "deleted". Edit filters may be doing similar checks.
A more thorough explain of rule creation can be found at User:AlexNewArtBot#Create the rules.
It might be easier to review the User:InceptionBot/NewPageSearch/Bad/log page which lists the rules that were matched. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Well, this helps a lot, thank you for putting it into words. I keep finding little-known bot reports that have compiled useful information, so thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

TemplateParametersTool report unique results

Hey Bamyers, I was wondering if there was a way to increase the amount of unique results shown in the TemplateParametersTool report, maybe shown in a sub-page? The list in the report is very helpful in quickly searching the values of some parameters for incorrect input but it currently does not show any values if there are more than 50 unique results. Gonnym (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

@Gonnym: The values are not stored in the database do to database size concerns. If you could give examples, than maybe an alternative could be derived. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm actively working on fixing incorrect input in television infobox templates (such as {{Infobox television episode}}) by identifying an issue and setting up tracking categories that could catch it. Being able to view at the inputs at a glance would have been helpful, but I understand that the size makes it impossible. Gonnym (talk) 14:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

20:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

20:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

CWB category request: generic titles and potentially dated statements

Hello! Two thoughts for you: (1) Would you consider adding Category:CS1 errors: generic title to the categories for which CleanupWorklistBot checks? It's a good category that doesn't appear to be covered. (2) Likewise, would you consider removing Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements? It's not a backlog category and mostly contains items that do not require action, so it winds up listing articles that do not need maintenance. czar 05:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Czar: 1) All Category:CS1_errors sub-categories are automatically included. Example: WikiProject Michigan#CS1 errors: generic title. 2) There is no way for me to know if anybody is using the "potentially dated statements" report. --Bamyers99 (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. For #1, I think I confused "generic title" with Category:CS1 maint: archived copy as title, unless there's a reason Category:CS1 maintenance cleanup tags would be excluded? For #2, if the intent is to use the report to create an actionable work list, that category is unactionable. (And anyone who wants that intersection could look it up the same way they'd look up any other WikiProject intersection.) czar 21:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Coordinates for rivers

Re edits like this and this, I'm not sure if adding a single set of coordinates is particularly useful for a length, curvy feature like a river. If you're willing to take a couple minutes to add {{Infobox river}}, it allows multiple coordinates (source, confluence, mouth), and tells the user which part of the river the coordinates are pointing to. The ideal is to also add {{Attached KML}} so the user can pull up a map, but that takes some time to create the KML file. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

22:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Football - bot results - missing articles

Greetings, Today I discovered a possible error with WP Football bot results.

For these, they have Talk pages with WP Football, so that looks okay. At https://bambots.brucemyers.com/cwb/alpha/Football.html, I switched over to the Alpha list (insead of by Category), and these articles are still missing. JoeNMLC (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@JoeNMLC: WP Football has so many articles that multiple pages are used. See https://bambots.brucemyers.com/cwb/bycat/Football3.html . There is a "Next page" link at the bottom of a page when there are multiple pages.--Bamyers99 (talk) 01:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks - still learning, sorry I missed. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

20:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

21:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, December 2021

Bots Newsletter, December 2021
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

Our last issue was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.

Overall

  • Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful (Dark red X symbolN2 3 denied, Blue question mark? 3 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

September 2019

Look! It's moving. It's alive. It's alive... It's alive, it's moving, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, IT'S ALIVE!
  • Green checkmarkY Monkbot 16, DannyS712 bot 60, Ahechtbot 6, PearBOT 3, Qbugbot 3 · Dark red X symbolN2 DannyS712 bot 5, PkbwcgsBot 24 · Blue question mark? DannyS712 bot 61, TheSandBot 4
  • TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput: Beeblebrox noted that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Wikipedia", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot [...] but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
  • Article-measuring contest resumed: The list of Wikipedians by article count, which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by GreenC following a bot request.

October 2019

November 2019

Now you're thinking with portals.

December 2019

In the next issue of Bots Newsletter:
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?

  • What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
  • What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
  • Will reFill ever get fixed?
  • What's up with ListeriaBot, anyway?
  • Python 3.4 deprecation? In my PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

22:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

22:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

"Anyone can edit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anyone can edit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Anyone can edit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

"Cleanup templates" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cleanup templates and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Cleanup templates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 10:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
good work Kaka Kel (talk) 13:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

21:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, January 2022

Bots Newsletter, January 2022
BRFA activity by month

Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.

After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.

Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost two years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.

Overall
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFAs. Of these, Green checkmarkY 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with Dark red X symbolN2 8 denied, Blue question mark? 2 withdrawn, and Expired 2 expired).

January 2020

A python
A python
A python
0.4 pythons
Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.

February 2020

Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, Listeria went wild in February

March 2020

April 2020

Listeria being examined

Issues and enquiries are typically expected to be handled on the English Wikipedia. Pages reachable via unified login, like a talk page at Commons or at Italian Wikipedia could also be acceptable [...] External sites like Phabricator or GitHub (which require separate registration or do not allow for IP comments) and email (which can compromise anonymity) can supplement on-wiki communication, but do not replace it.

May 2020

We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots

June 2020

A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos

Conclusion

  • What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
  • Will Citation bot ever be set free to roam the project?
  • What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
  • Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
  • What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?

These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out!

Signing off... jp×g 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)