Jump to content

User talk:AhmadLX/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Ubed junejo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Phill24th (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif

Hi, I'm Phill24th. Ubed junejo, thanks for creating Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif which you created needs help in the style it has been written in, you can also help Wikipedia by improving it. That is, after you read the Wikipedia guidelines I've posted on your talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Phill24th (talk) 19:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

I've done some editing in means of style, formatting, and reference sorting. But you must rewrite some parts of the article so it wouldn't look like a personal essay rather then an encyclopedic material. Also, please include inline sources, as well as improving the sources that might be considered unreliable. I would also recommend deleting the material that could not be sourced. Everything else you need to know you can address at the Wikipedia Teahouse or my talk page. Thank you for your cooperation. Phill24th (talk) 21:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


Lots of thanks for improving the article. Yes I have added some inline citations.

Hello, AhmadLX. You have new messages at Ubed junejo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, AhmadLX. You have new messages at Phill24th's talk page.
Message added 12:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Phill24th (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your referencing style

Hi, Ubed junejo (talk · contribs), I just wanted to let you know that you aren't doing a very good job with the citation style you're using. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. References are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can remove unreferenced material, and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's advisable to also include a reference to say from where it came. If you need any assistance, let me know.

Formatting references using inline citations
Inline citation code; what you type in 'edit mode'
What it produces when you save
Two separate citations.<ref>Citation text.</ref><ref>Citation text2.</ref>


Multiple<ref name="multiple">Citation text3.</ref>citation<ref name="multiple" /> use.<ref name="multiple" />


==References==

{{Reflist}}

Two separate citations.[1][2]



Multiple[3] citation[3] use.[3]




References_________________

  1. ^ Citation text.
  2. ^ Citation text2.
  3. ^ a b c Citation text3.
Templates that can be used between <ref></ref> tags to format your references

{{Citation}} • {{Cite web}} • {{Cite book}} • {{Cite news}} • {{Cite journal}} • Others • Examples

Please use these methods in the future, thank you - Phill24th (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC).

I have done it the same way already. Are you talking about yesterday?--Ubed junejo (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

No. You should think about using templates like {{Citation}} or {{Cite web}}, so it would be clearer where the ref links will take you. Try it out, Phill24th (talk) 14:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC).

I have posted original text of sources and its English translation on your talk page. Kindly do it for me. Regards. --Ubed junejo (talk) 14:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC) If you give me your email address I can provide you with image of book with text of reference highlighted.--Ubed junejo (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ubed junejo (talk · contribs) (for your question on my talk): You can name the source and use it multiple time over the article. For more information please see Footnotes: using a source more than once. Thank you. Phill24th (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Dear Phill24th: I am very much thankful to you for your guidance and help. I am greatly indebted to you. Regards--Ubed junejo (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

A pie for you!

For the great job you did through your edits on Khawaja Muhammad Zaman of Luari, a very nice article. - Phill24th (talk). 15:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Yeah dear Phill24th, thank you very much for your appreciation. I hope I will be able to expand the article further. --Ubed junejo (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyrighted Image

Stop icon Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mike V • Talk 23:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Mike V : The image that I used was NOT a copy right protected image. Yes it was taken from a website but was not the property of that website. This image of the shrine is a general depiction of sufis of Luwari and can be found on many covers of books in local languages and on several websites. The copy right law DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS IMAGE. I humbly request you to restore the image.--Ubed junejo (talk) 22:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: 1139 in Norway

Hello Ubed junejo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 1139 in Norway, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:50, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

DearUser:Malik Shabazz: Did you visit the Talk page? The content included in the article does not deserve a new article. article is too short and its content should be included in article on Norwegian history. Regards --Ubed junejo (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:G1. The only articles that may be deleted under that criterion for speedy deletion are patent nonsense, not articles you don't deem worthy of inclusion. Try WP:PROD or WP:AfD instead of WP:CSD. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Aayal Tunia

Hello Ubed junejo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Aayal Tunia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Abad, Kandiaro Taluka

Hello Ubed junejo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abad, Kandiaro Taluka, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello. My brother User:Malik Shabazz I am from the geographical region the article belongs to. A very small village of 1 few hundred population is not important to have an article dedicated to it. Does it make sense that I creat an article for my street for example? --Ubed junejo (talk) 00:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:A1. The only articles that may be deleted under that criterion for speedy deletion are those that lack sufficient context to identify the subject, not articles you don't deem worthy of inclusion. Try WP:PROD or WP:AfD instead of WP:CSD. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)


Yes thank you for guidance. But whatsoever, the topic is not worhty of inclusion and it fact. this way or that way bro.--Ubed junejo (talk) 01:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined

I have also declined several WP:A1 deletions on Pakistan villages that clearly do not meet the criteria. Please familiarise yourself with the guideline. If you wish to pursue deletion then WP:AFD is the way to go but you should note that clearly defined inhabited settlements are generally kept irrespective of size or importance. TerriersFan (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you dear TerriersFan for guidance. Could you please explain what is meant by clearly defined inhabited settlement?
Kind regards--Ubed junejo (talk) 01:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, the guideline is available at WP:GEOLAND. TerriersFan (talk) 01:18, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear TerriersFan Kindly refer to Notability is not temporary and Article content does not determine notability. No source, not discussed outside wikipedia, not historically important place. Even then you want it included on wikipedia, thats great. I will consider creating an article on play ground near my house,hope you will love it--Ubed junejo (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletions are deletions without process and therefore the criteria must be strictly met. I have not stated that I wish any of these villages to be included in Wikipedia; indeed I have no view on that. As advised, if you consider that they do not meet WP:GEOLAND and you wish to pursue deletion then WP:AFD is the route. TerriersFan (talk) 01:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Sindh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 21:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. This material was previously deleted by somebody without mention of any reason(including copy right violation issue as well), so I found it suitable to restore it with some modification. If you think it is copyright violation, then it is okay. Thanks.--Ubed junejo (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't just think it is a copyright violation, it is a copyright violation, since the material is copied from http://panhwar.com. And judging by previous messages on your talk page it's not the first time something like this happens. Thomas.W talk 21:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Thomas.W can you please tell me when it hsppened previously?--Ubed junejo (talk) 21:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
There's a warning for a copyrighted image a bit up this page. Thomas.W talk 21:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Dear Thomas.W Yes but it is NOT really copyright violation as the image I used did not have any any copyrights as it was a very old image and is can be found on several book covers related to the subject and on several websites. Wikipedia's copyright violation rules simply do not apply to the image.--Ubed junejo (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Oh yes, they do. An image isn't free just because it has been used on book covers and on other websites. Which has very little to do with this matter, though. Thomas.W talk 22:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
if you wish I can show you similar images on Wikipedia, that are allowed--Ubed junejo (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Invitation

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around! 
Mar4d (talk) 12:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
You may also be interested in signing up for WikiProject Sindh. Cheers, Mar4d (talk) 12:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes thank you User:Mar4d. Ubed junejo (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Assalam Alaikum

Hello brother: are u sindhi please reply on my talk page please brother..--محمد مجیب (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

Wikipedia 15 event in Hyderabad Sindh Pakistan.

Hi dear Ubed junejo,Aoa,I have created a Wikipedia meetup event to celebrate Wikipedia 15, and discuss about Wikipedia and Wikimedia foundation at Hyderabad Sindh, Pakistan.You are requested to coordinate me in organizing this event, all possible help and guidance is requested, Expecting positive and dignified role from you.You are invited to join physically for this event.

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_15/Events/Hyderabad,_Sindh_Pakistan

Jogi 007 (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jogi 007, thanks for your invitation. It would have been great to meet and discuss with Wikipedians from Hyderabad, but unfortunately I am not in Pakistan and as such I'm afraid I will not be able to join the event. I wish you all the best for the event.

--ubedjunejo (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Please also contribute to Sindhi Wikipedia, Thanks Jogi 007 (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ubed junejo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tosanoides obama has been accepted

Tosanoides obama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ubed junejo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Messier 87

Congrads on the promotion. More please. Ceoil (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ceoil, thanks. As it turns out, a large number of your objections were not that subjective after all --AhmadLX (talk) 13:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Herbig–Haro object

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Herbig–Haro object you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Herbig–Haro object

The article Herbig–Haro object you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Herbig–Haro object for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HH 46/47

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HH 46/47 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Messier 87 scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Messier 87 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 18, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 18, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Ahmad, I'm so sorry, I'm partially to blame for this screw-up ... we can't run Messier 87 tomorrow because it's Nelson Mandela's 100th birthday, and that had been on the schedule for a year. Jim put this article on the schedule instead, almost certainly, because there was a mistake on Nelson Mandela's talk page, saying that that article had already run. Would you like for this article to run next month? Please let us know ... Ealdgyth will be scheduling the August TFAs soon. (We just found out about this today ... see the discussion at WT:TFA.) - Dank (push to talk) 22:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear Dank. Thanks for your message. Yes it is okay, I have no problem.AhmadLX (talk) 11:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Okay, if you have a preferred date for it to run, please let us know. - Dank (push to talk) 11:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I don't have any preferred date. Coordinators can decide on slot availability. Thanks. AhmadLX (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HH 46/47

The article HH 46/47 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HH 46/47 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HH 46/47

The article HH 46/47 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HH 46/47 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Messier 87 selected as TFA

This is to let you know that the Messier 87 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 1, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 1, 2018.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Precious

Sindhi and astronomy

Thank you for quality articles around astronomy such as Messier 87 and Mensa (constellation), for Khawaja Muhammad Zaman of Luari, for improving articles such as Herbig–Haro object and Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, for peer reviews, - Ahmad, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2014 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Since I, somehow, missed to thank you last year, let me do it now: sehr vielen danke schön Form the message above, I take I was considered to be the creator of M87 and Mensa. I didn't create them, although I did improve M87 Casliber deserves the credit for Mensa. I have created/improved a couple article since then though. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you today for Herbig–Haro object, "a class of astrophysical objects that are by-product of star formation", and for modesty! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
... and for GA reviewing! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
And thanks to you too, for appreciation, Gerda Arendt. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Here's moar: thank you today for Second Fitna, "about an early inter-Muslim civil war that ensued after the death of the first Umayyad caliph Muawiyah I in 680 CE. It was a highly complicated and multi-faceted affair, that left a lasting impact on later Muslim governments and deepened sectarian divide. The core issue of the dispute was "who should rule the caliphate"."! - Open things to be reviewed are here ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, thanks Gerda ;) AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 20:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Wish

Hello. Help improve the quality of the article Maureen Wroblewitz on B-Class articles. Thanks you. 113.160.130.156 (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi! I'm sorry, I don't edit in this area. Kindly ask for help at respective project pages, such as WP:Women or WP:Arts. Thank you. --AhmadLX (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AhmadLX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AhmadLX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Earth as astronomical object

The Earth certainly is an astronomical object. Not only has it been known to be a planet since antiquity, but it can also be seen quite clearly in astronomical photographs taken from vehicles on Mars and in deep space: see, for example, the Pale Blue Dot. -- The Anome (talk) 12:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

@The Anome: Thanks for your message. Well in a narrow sense yes. But generally, from Earth based perspective "astronomical" means beyond Earth so Earth is not an astronomical object. If I take your strict definition, then Geology, Geography, Anthropology and many Earth specific disciplines would be sub-fields of astronomy.AhmadLX (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes, and it's that narrow sense that is what is at issue here. I've opened a discussion on this matter at Talk:Earth#"Astronomical_object". I agree that it makes no sense to re-categorize Earth-specific disciplines as sub-fields of astronomy; this goes against WP:COMMONNAME in any case. -- The Anome (talk) 11:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Huge thanks!

I had just reported user Snowsky Mountain on the vandalism page and was directed to make a report on ANI, but when I wanted to make a lengthy report there I just saw you and the others have pushed the work to its ultimate end! It was refreshing and I felt a need to thank you!
Bessiar mamnoon! Shukran jazilan!
P. S. Also know that they had already received 2 separate warnings before but have deleted them from their talk page. Just in case you lack enough warnings. NetBSDuser (talk) 18:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Brock Lesnar's weight

PPV that I used as a source is not good source. But WWE.com should have updated its information for Lesnar's weight. It's easy to see that he have lost weight recently. This is because he is going to fight on UFC with 265 pounds weight limit. But when it was said that Lesnar weighs 500 pounds? He clearly weighs now around 265 pounds. Zulrah —Preceding undated comment added 23:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

He didn't say he was 500 lbs;) It was just to show that what you say or what I say is no authority by itself. Plz check WP:Reliable sources. Thanks. AhmadLX (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

I did not invent it myself that Lesnar weighs now 265 pounds. That source which I used was a PPV event that was held recently, that you can check in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13gFK3y4aIc In about 8:50-9:00 Paul Heyman says Brock Lesnar weighs 265 pounds. But PPV event is not good source. Lesnar has lost weight recently for fighting in the UFC with 265 pounds weight limit. We need now to wait for wwe.com to update Lesnar's weight and then use it as a source for this new weight. Zulrah —Preceding undated comment added 03:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Mukhtar al-Thaqafi

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mukhtar al-Thaqafi has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN process.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Twofingered Typist:. Thank you for your diligence and meticulous effort in copy-editing the article. I have a couple concerns: first, shouldn't it be allegations levelled against him instead of allegations leveled against him? Secondly, Mukhtar-namas, elaborating the life and movements of Mukhtar gives me an impression of physical movement :D AhmadLX (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Leveled is the American spelling - either is correct. If you change it to levelled you should add the tag to the top of the article where the date tag is. The phrase "life and movement" I assume is meant to indicate it is about his life and his movements - where he traveled. So it is correct in this sense. Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
@Twofingered Typist:, okay. By movement I had originally meant "his revolt", I will change it then. Thank you very much again, much appreciated. Regards. AhmadLX (talk) 22:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Yazid 1

Hi

I am a Sunni from Pakistan and I added material to Yazid 1 after some research which you quite cunningly and silently removed under the pretext of copy paste from this and that. I have only 1 question, how much do you get paid by Yazid 1 and his father in this time and age? It must be quite a sum as you even removed clearly accepted facts of Husayn Ibn Ali's RA life for these two characters.

And yes I am a Sunni and please read Sunni books before using or removing such material. Infact I would also encourage you to read some Shia books as Bukhari uses Shia sources as well so not all Shia sources are wrong.~

@Dr Pukhtunyar Afghan: First of all, you might want to learn something about WP:Civil before leaving a message on someone's talk page. You added material on Yazid I in two phases. One is this, added in 2014 which was based on facebook and was not removed by me. Second is this. In this case, I did remove some of your additions and reason is given in edit summary. You mentioned "Oath by Ibn Abbas" in section on "Husayn uprising", where it did not belong. It should have been added in section "Oath of allegiance", where all such info is summarized. Go and check my eddit summary: rmv irrelevant info from this section. will add later in a reasonable place. Other stuff that you allege, was not added by you. It was added by somebody else and was reproduced word by word from Tabari volume 19. Go and check it before replying here. Secondly, if you are Sunni, does it add any weight to your position? You be Sunni/Shia/Ahmadi or whatever you like. Don't tell me that. Arguments count here, beliefs don't.AhmadLX (talk) 17:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

FAC

I think its probably ok at this stage, given the article is clearly FAC standard and doesn't need heavy lifting, to tap regular reviewers for input. However, given your account has a relatively low edit count and two FAC noms to its name, for credibility sake you might get mileage and bank goodwill if you participated in a few reviews there yourself. Ceoil (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

@Ceoil: Hi, thanks for the message. You are right. I also thought to do some reviewing, but I was hesitant as I have little experience with FAC reviews. I will try to do some source checks. I think asking Casliber and Jimfbleak for review of my nom won't be a bad idea ;) AhmadLX (talk) 03:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Every little helps, and having looked extenisvely at two of you pages, GOCE help or no, you are a very skilled writer for starters. And the process badly need those. Ceoil (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
PS, yes Casliber and Jimfbleak are both good blokes, and yes would ask. Ceoil (talk) 05:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
@Ceoil: It got promoted today AhmadLX (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Well done man; sincerely so. Twice you have excelled yourself in hugely difficult topics; you are obviously a very bright spark, very impressed, and trilled for you. Ceoil (talk) 00:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, much appreciated :)

2019

Hi there, For your kind information i only added Muhammad al-Tijani 's books. I think there is not any my point of view or my personal analysis on this. You warn me and that is your problem. I think you should more improve yourself and collect more information on this policy. Sharief123 (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@Sharief123: Hello. So in your opinion "A true story about how the light of truth was ignited in his heart" and "Every sincere Muslim is invited to read this book attentively..." are not the examples of your opinion or analysis. Cool. But in view of Wikipedia policies they are "your opinions" and "analysis", and are not allowed. This is not the first time you have done this. Your editing activity is largely limited to adding unsourced info, adding personal opinions & analysis and adding unacceptable sources like facebook and youtube to articles on religious scholars. You have been informed, then cautioned and then warned about these issue previously by several editors, bu you don't seem to care. If this continues, you may be reported.AhmadLX (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Yazid I

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edits on the article Yazid I. I wanted to let you know that I started a discussion about the lead section of the article on the talk page. You can view it at Talk:Yazid I#Introduction/Lead Section. Feel free to contribute to the discussion to help improve the article. Snowsky Mountain (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Syed Jawad Naqvi

Hi there, I am new in wikipedia. So, I didn't add any pic. So please latest picture to page Syed Jawad Naqvi . I will be your greatness. Thanks. Ayoub444 (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

I mean add pic to page Syed Jawad Naqvi.. Ayoub444 (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Discussion about your edits

Hello, this is to let you know that there is a discussion about your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated reversions by "AhmadLX". Snowsky Mountain (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

M87

Re: [1] could we reinstate the edit using the existing ref? The source states that they are refering to the core as M87* which could become a relevant searche term. --mikeu talk 15:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@Mu301: Hi, Yes feel free to. You don't need to ask anyone. Just make sure that duplicate info or sources are not added. Thanks. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 15:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
If you use a source already defined in the artilce, use <ref name="whatever the defined name is"/>. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 15:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Ah, there's already a discussion here. I wondered about the name "M87*". Is that an actual name that is likely to see further use, or is that just shorthand used in the article? Or some gray area between? Tarl N. (discuss) 15:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Tarl N.:As it appears in the paper, it is a shorthand-they write "M87* hereafter". But I remember seeing it in some sources a year ago, but can't find them right now. So I don't know if this paper can be used as source for this designation. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 16:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Tarl N.:Yes, during the press conference a journalist asked about the name. The spokesperson stated that the naming convention adopted was similar to Sagittarius A*. See at 43:15 into the video.[2] They also stated that it will later be given a proper name. M87* should probably be regarded as a Provisional designation in astronomy. --mikeu talk 16:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Mu301: Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for. We might update the article to replaced "named" with "provisionally designated', but I suspect given that background, the name will stick and the pattern of Galaxy* will be used for other central black holes. Tarl N. (discuss) 16:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Tarl N.:I agree. I'll followup on the M87 talk. --mikeu talk 16:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

FYI please {{ping|Mu301}} to get my attention. --mikeu talk 15:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

-- ferret (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Saudi nationalists are brigading wikipedia and are mobilizing their efforts on twitter

Hello AhmadLX, I hope you're doing well.

I'm sure you have noticed the recent attempts to editorialize articles and distorting facts by some Saudi ultra-nationalists to suit their narrative. In fact I have found out about your wikipedia account from their twitter page. Needless to say they're a bunch of extremists (calling other Arabs as non-Arabs or 'Arabized') and are using ethnic scientific-racism as if we're still living in the 19th century..

They're so petty in fact user ArabianWE have edited the Arabian Peninsula article just to make Saudi Arabia name come out first in the list of articles. You can check out his edits on his contributions page. Clearly an act of editorialized war.

I came to you because surely the moderators in Wikipedia can stop this and reverse the edits? If they're not stopped now they will expand on other articles and it will be an endless misinformation war. Clearly Wikipedia was not intended to be a place for that..

This is their twitter page where you were mentioned by the ultra-nationalists and they called you an "امصاري" which is a derogatory word:

External link: https://twitter.com/272l7/status/1115136167870115840

AlOtaibi-1 (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

AlOtaibi-1: Thanks for your message. I visited the link and seems they are discontented with Wikipedia as a whole. They think that Wikipedians are conspiring against their nation and country and that Wikipedia policies are being misused to prevent them from editing (i.e promote their country) freely. Nationalism, just like religion, affects peoples' ability to comprehend. But there is nothing one can do about it. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Fitna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yazid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

TFA

This is to let you know that the Mukhtar al-Thaqafi article has been scheduled as today's featured article for June 10, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 10, 2019.—Wehwalt (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the article "about a controversial revolutionary from Second Islamic Civil War"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Sehr gerne Gerda ;) AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
You are welcome. - Selfish question: do you do GA reviews? I have some open noms, look on my user page under quality, in case of interest. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Yes sure, quality noms are always a pleasure to review, as they are easy to pass :) AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Great! - This one is an "old" article, which was nominated and didn't pass, and recently looked at again, - which may be not too easy. You probably saw that it's pictured on my user page, - not where I regularly perform in choir but occasionally. It's quite a unique building, as far as I know. Check for bias ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Yes, saw the GA1 page after creating the new review page. It was failed in haste with complete disregard of WP:GAREVIEW. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the GA review of Unionskirche, Idstein. You asked what I mean by TFA day? Franz Kafka today's featured article, and I one of the proud contributors of the most successful TFA ever - but that was for the first round in 2013 when the Google doodle helped. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

You are welcome. Thanks to you too for your cooperation. A million views (^_^) Impressive. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 16:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yazid I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yazid I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yazid I

The article Yazid I you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yazid I for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Second Fitna

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Second Fitna has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist, Thank you very much for the copy editing. Regards. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 01:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Ibn al-Ash'ath

Hi, and first of all, thanks a lot for your recent work on early Muslim articles. Glad to see someone else producing high-quality content in this neglected area! I was thinking about nominating Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash'ath to FA, and would like to know whether you had any comments in advance, seeing as you probably know the period better than I do. Any feedback, or even better, edits, would be greatly appreciated. If you don't have time, no worries :) Constantine ✍ 13:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Cplakidas: Thanks for the appreciation, in fact I came to this area because articles were being abused by religious POV pushers and there were very few unbiased editors (I could count 5 or so, including Al Ameer and You) who were doing pretty decent job, so I thought I would increase that team of neutral editors by +1 ;) The article is already A class, and the A class articles, you know more than me, are just a little short of FA-hood. Nevertheless, I will try to find some issues. Thanks. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 16:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Second Fitna

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Second Fitna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Mecca (692), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Marj Rahit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

RE: your warning about my "addition to Siege of Mecca (692) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material".

The edit was from three months ago. I do a lot of editing and do not remember what this particular edit said. You've annihilated the wikipedia history of its so I can't check that. Any way I can find out what it was? this alleged copyright violation? --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, revisions from introduction of the copyvio till its removal have been hidden by an admin per my request. In case you want to find out what it was, just check: Dietrich, A. (1971). "Al-Hadjdjadj b. Yusuf". In Lewis, B.; Ménage, V. L.; Pellat, Ch.; Schacht, J. (eds.). The Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.), Volume 3: H–Iram. Leiden: E. J. Brill. p.40. Here is what you copied: "He advanced unopposed as far as .... continued during the Pilgrimage." Then again "After the siege had .... /October 692)." 18 lines in total. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 17:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Tony Cucolo

Hey I am authorized to do the change on the page of Tony Cucolo from him. He wish his bio to be updated ! Thanks sv — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara Vermont (talk • contribs) 20:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Sara Vermont: No, we don't need authorization of anybody to update articles here, but we need reliable sources to do so. If you have a such a source which supports changes you want to make, please use it. Otherwise adding unsourced info to living person's article will result in warnings from other users. Also, when you add a new message to a talk-page, click "New section" on top, and sign your message with ~~~~. Thanks. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 20:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;">'''[[User:AhmadLX|<font color="teal">''AhmadLX''</font>]]'''-[[User talk:AhmadLX|<font color="turquoise">'')¯\_(ツ)_/¯)''</font>]]</span> : AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

to

<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;">'''[[User:AhmadLX|<i style="color:teal">AhmadLX</i>]]'''-[[User talk:AhmadLX|<i style="color:turquoise">)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)</i>]]</span> : AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
@Anomalocaris: Thanks to you too for suggesting changes. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 15:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Ayn al-Warda

The article Battle of Ayn al-Warda you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Ayn al-Warda for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Le Petit Chat -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for all your edits and replies. I added a few more comments on the GAN page.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 19:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
My last remark about adding a map may take some time. I think the article will pass the GA label without the map, but it would improve the article significantly.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 18:08, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm faster than the bot but congratulations for your article. It passed the review and I wish you to continue to create articles of this quality.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
@Le Petit Chat: Thank you for the review and useful suggestions. Yes the bot has got confused since you had put the article directly on hold and the bot hadn't had the chance to transclude the review page to the article's talk page and it doesn't know if the article passed or failed :D No problem, I will fix that, but you should normally save the review page at-least once before putting it on hold so that the bot can work things out. Again, thanks for the review and passing. Regards. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 22:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Last question (Second Fitna)

I have another question after going through the article again. The article mentioned part of the opposition against Yazid was due to the unprecendented nature of hereditary succession, but how about Hasan's succession of Ali that happened just a few decades before? Did that happen by shura, appointment, or? Could this part be clarified: "Ali's eldest son Hasan became caliph, " HaEr48 (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

@HaEr48: Thanks for the message. Actually this is somewhat complicated as at-least two versions of his election/selection have been reported 1) Kufans elected him when Ali was injured and the latter neither approved nor disapproved the election 2) Ali appointed him.
Most modern sources affirm the first account (see for example "Hasan b. Ali" in EI2 or Iranica), although some have argued that Hasan's appointment was a precedent available to Muawiya for Yazid's appointment (will have to search for these, can't recall which ones). AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 18:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Karbala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mawal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Mecca (692)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Mecca (692) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Siege of Mecca (692)

The article Siege of Mecca (692) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Mecca (692) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks AhmedLX, for reviewing my edit at Imam Husayn page. The material is not an OR and, was as per citation mentioned in the subject para above. However I shall reconsider if not looking proper.Md iet (talk) 16:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

@Md iet: If you add anything, you are supposed to provide a reliable source, unless it is a clear and well known fact. Nobody will know that your addition is supported by a source cited somewhere else in the article. Also, of the two sources that you talk about, one is unverifiable. It seems to be a primary source, even if it comes to be verified. The other one may be okay, although I don't know if it supports the claim. Secondly, we don't write just anything. That inscription doesn't add anything meaningful to the article. Instead of adding those fragmented words, you could just write that the inscription states "Husayn's head was hidden here by XYZ, and discovered by ABC.[source]" --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 17:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Ok, Thanks.Md iet (talk) 06:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The brief as suggested by you "Husain's head was hidden here by XYZ, and discovered by ABC.[source]" is some what mentioned in the article. My purpose was to exactly quote words present in the inscription. I am quoting the words in following manner, making it meaningful adding some additional value to the article.

".. the miracles..a major glory .. wishes of Allah, is .. recovery of.. Head ... Husain .. at .. Ashkelon, .. hidden by..tyrants(.) They tried to conceal.. Allah has promised to reveal(.) Allah wishes to hide it from the enemies..to show it to Awliya..(.) ... to relieve the heart of ‘Devotees’ of.. Husain, as Allah knew their … heartedness …(.)

...Commander.. Badr.. has discovered Raas al Imam al Husain in .. Mustansir’s period, and has taken it out from its hidden place(.)He.. built a Minbar for the Mashhad, at the place where this sacred Head lay buried(.) ......"

Hope this is fruitful.Md iet (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Herbig-Haro object scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 21, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 21, 2019. Thanks!—Wehwalt (talk) 08:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

There's a question for you at WP:ERRORS#Tomorrow's FA. Are HH objects found in almost all stellar nurseries? Are they found throughout the nurseries? Black Kite is claiming that the source he's looking at doesn't support the idea of "ubiquitous". - Dank (push to talk) 13:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the message Dank, I have replied at the page. Thanks. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 19:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For your excellent contributions to (controversial) Caliphate-related articles in a neutral and stylish manner. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you HistoryofIran. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 00:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your continuous contributions to Islam-related articles. Keep up the good work! Alivardi (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Alivardi. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 21:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Karbala

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Karbala you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sa.vakilian -- Sa.vakilian (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Referencing and footnotes assistance

Hi Ahmad, I'm helping out on an article on Abū_al-Faraj_al-Iṣfahānī with quite complex references and footnotes. I think that separate 'references' and 'sources' (e.g. in the style of this article) would work better for it, but I'm not familiar with how to implement it (I usually stick to science articles where just referencing with cite_journal is pretty simple). Given your experience with articles using that sort of referencing, as well as arabic historical sources, would you be able to drop by and lend a hand? Thanks in advance for any assistance! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 09:43, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

@Evolution and evolvability: The referencing in the article in question is different from the one we normally use with books here. I don't know of standard reference formatting in Wikijournals. At Wikipedia, Sfn tags are used for books where multiple pages are to be cited and we provide full bibliographic data. For example:

Statement A.{{sfn|Wellhausen|1975|p=85}} Statement B.{{sfn|Wellhausen|1975|p=17}}


==References==

{{Reflist}}


==Sources==

*{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Wellhausen |first=Julius |year=1975 |title=The Religio-political Factions in Early Islam|translator1=Ostle, Robin|translator2=Walzer, Sofie |publisher=[[North-Holland Publishing Company]]|location=Amsterdam |url=https://books.google.de/books/about/The_Religio_political_Factions_in_Early.html?id=p7klNgAACAAJ |isbn=978-0720490053}}

I have changed a couple citations there, but I don't know if the author or you will be happy with that. If the changes are unwanted, sure revert. If you want the footnotes to be presented in this format, I can change the formatting of a few more. Thanks. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 15:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

That's perfect, thank you! Having seen the example, I'll try to do a couple more today. If you're happy to do some as well that'd be very helpful, but no worries if you are too busy. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 23:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
I think I've converted the ref formatting over. If you have a moment, would you be able to have a quick look and check if I've misformatted any? Some of the historical references, I've used name and title, rather than name and year in line with how they were originally submitted in plaintext. As a final thing, would you be able to suggest translations for any of the historical books that don't have translations for their titles? Thanks again! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 00:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

@Evolution and evolvability:

  • There are ref errors (undefined ref) in Notes.
  • Page range should be represented as pp. instead of p.
  • Dashes in page range should be en dashes and not hyphens.
  • Titles, AFAIK, are kept as original, unless a translated work is used.
  • Parameter names (such as volume) and values should be spaced (vol. 9 instead of vol.9).
  • At some places (eg. 13, 86, 89) several refs have been combined into one. They should be separated so that consistent formatting becomes easier.
  • Page values separated by comma should also have space (pp. 29, 51 instead of pp.29,51); see for example fn 120.
  • If you use work name instead of year (common in academic books on the subject and journal articles), it should be consistent throughout the article, whether classic or new works.
  • At places, (eg. 174) page numbers are given without identifier (p.).

Hope that helps. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Very much appreciated. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 23:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Good Article Backlog Drive Barnstar

The Invisible Barnstar
Thanks for your participation in the September 2019 GA Backlog drive. Your 2 reviews made a difference, as did your willingness to review particularly old nominations. The work of editors like you helped bring down the unreviewed backlog by over 35%. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Barkeep49. Also for starting the drive.--AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 20:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Karbala

The article Battle of Karbala you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Karbala for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sa.vakilian -- Sa.vakilian (talk) 04:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Second Fitna scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Second Fitna has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 7 November 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 7, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 21:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Apology, for my incorrect edit of the "Herbig-Haro Object" article

When I changed invisible to visible in the "Herbig-Haro Object" article, I'd made the same mistake as Cas Liber, in missing that the explanation lay in the later development of more sensitive instruments, and so forth, as you had already addressed during your work on making the article Featured-worthy.

I apologize, to you, for my own sloppy work, in that I should have caught this on the article's "Talk" page, before I'd committed to my own edit.

Kudos, to you, and keep up the excellent work. catsmoke (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @Catsmoke:. And no worries; mistakes like these happen. It was fixed anyway. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 17:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Marwan

You might be interested in observing the featured article nomination of Marwan in the Indonesian Wikipedia, although I expect it to be passed in the coming days. Mimihitam (talk) 13:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mimihitam: From google's translation it seems to be same standard as the recently promoted en:wp article, so based on that I think it is ready w.r.t en:wp criteria. However, I don't know id:wp FAC criteria nor do I know the language, so I'm afraid I'm not in a position to provide feedback over there. Thanks. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 20:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Second Fitna Good topic

Hello my friend. It took a while but Battles of Harura and Madhar has passed its GAN. I think we’re good to nominate for Good topic status. Would you do the honors? —Al Ameer (talk) 02:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Al Ameer son:. Nice to hear from you and thanks for reminding me that. I have been a bit busy and forgot about it . Anyway, yes sure, I can do that in coming few days. Or, if you like, you can also nominate it. Thank you. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 13:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
I insist that you nominate since it was your initiative if I recall, and I (and I'm sure Cplakidas of course) will be of help during the review. Cheers, --Al Ameer (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Indeed, I wholeheartedly agree with Al Ameer :) Constantine ✍ 21:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

In appreciation

The Teamwork Barnstar
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present AhmadLX, Constantine and Al Ameer son with this barnstar jointly and severally, in recognition of the excellent job they have made of Second Fitna. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
"By the authority vested in me by myself" . @Gog the Mild: Thank you .--AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 21:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive

Harrias talk 06:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khawarij, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Nahrawan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Nahrawan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for completing 7 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 07:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

Look at today's Main page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda. Pretty cool article, although didn't read beyond lead:p Do they keep FA for more than one day on main page these days? Anyway, I never got more than 35k views from main page; you seem to be doing very well;) AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 19:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This one was good. They are listed for the three consecutive days, just by title as "recently featured", - with results that amaze me. The link goes to the archive of yesterday, written mid-day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Yeah but the article is still on main page as TFA. It was there yesterday too. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 21:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
No, click on Main page left. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020 GAN Backlog drive!

-- Eddie891 Talk Work 16:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Nahrawan

The article Battle of Nahrawan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Nahrawan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Nahrawan

The article Battle of Nahrawan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Nahrawan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 12:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Al Ameer son -- Al Ameer son (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

GOCE review of Yazid I

@Tdslk: Thank you very much for the CE. Regards. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 10:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr

The article Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Al Ameer son -- Al Ameer son (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr

On 10 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr, the Zubayrid governor of Iraq during the Second Fitna (680–692), fought the Umayyad army at the Battle of Maskin almost alone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Abu Bilal Mirdas

On 14 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abu Bilal Mirdas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kharijite leader Abu Bilal Mirdas defeated a 2,000-strong Umayyad army with his band of forty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abu Bilal Mirdas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abu Bilal Mirdas), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Ummayad dynystay

Hello, You have delete the article i wrote about the Umayyad dynasty. I hope there is a reason or a spelling mistake Historicalxz (talk) 03:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Historicalxz Yes there were both actually. Umayyad dynasty did not rule over "the entire world of its time", their first capital was not Harran, "and established the Umayyad Caliphate are Arabians..." is grammatically wrong, "latter Damascus" is also wrong. There were other errors as well. --AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 16:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai

On 25 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai is considered the greatest Sufi poet in the Sindhi language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus

Hello, AhmadLX. You have new messages at Talk:Huaynaputina.
Message added 15:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of Yazid I

Congratulations, AhmadLX! The article you nominated, Yazid I, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations

The Epic Barnstar
Overdue recognition for the tremendous work you have done for coverage of the Early Islamic period. Special nod for bringing Yazid I, one of the most controversial caliphs, to Featured status. Keep up the excellent work!

And let me know if and when you are ready to bring Mu'awiya I to the next level ;) Regards Al Ameer (talk) 02:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Al Ameer. This article had consistently been a target of polemics for over a decade. I hope it will be stable now and won't deteriorate into rubbish again. Thanks to you too for pointing out missing details, adding information and sources, and helping in prose. Yes I will be glad to participate in bringing Mu'awiya I to GA/FA. It is a level 4 vital article and gets about a thousand hits a day. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 15:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Peer review/Huaynaputina/archive1 § AhmadLX. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus

Hello, AhmadLX. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Peer review/Huaynaputina/archive1.
Message added 12:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Noting that I've replied to your reply. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
At the risk of sounding inpatient, but I think I got the last two comments. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Thanks for the message. I have seen your responses over there. I do not have anything new to add at the moment. When the article comes at FAC, I will give it another read and do some spot-checks. Thanks. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 15:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
That's now done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Uthman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ansar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kharijites

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kharijites you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kharijites

The article Kharijites you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kharijites for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kharijites

The article Kharijites you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kharijites for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Yazid I scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 26, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or for Featured Articles promoted recently from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AhmadLX/Archive_1&oldid=1107854020"