Talk:Huaynaputina

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Huaynaputina article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Huaynaputina is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 2, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
March 26, 2021	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
April 12, 2021	Peer review	Reviewed
June 10, 2021	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 19, 2009, February 19, 2010, February 19, 2011, February 19, 2013, February 19, 2015, February 19, 2017, February 19, 2018, February 19, 2019, February 19, 2021, February 19, 2022, and February 19, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peru High‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Mountains High‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

1600 eruption

Should the 1600 eruption be moved to its own article like with many other significant eruptions? Given that it is a significant historical eruption and the article is lengthy, it makes perfect sense in my opinion. Mrmp2402 (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I think that since this volcano draws its importance almost entirely from that eruption, it can be left together. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IUGS heritage site

How much information do we take from this. I've put in a small paragraph here. This paragraph seems kind of excessive, especially since the IUGS site isn't actually the volcano that the article is about; rather, it's the archaeological site that is mentioned in passing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023 update

Mostly done, save for the following:

"Ekaykin, A. A., and A. N. Veres. "Temperature shifts in Central Antarctica after major volcanic eruptions in the second millennium of the Common Era." АРКТИКИ И АНТАРКТИКИ 69.3 (2023): 375" unknown source and do we need a discussion on temperature of Antarctica?

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geotourism section?

I am not sure whether this report on its own justifies a section on geotourism (maybe with a secondary source?), but if we want a section then it would be an eminently well-suited source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 update

This Spanish meta-discussion about the relative importance of religious and scientific interpretations may be worth citing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]