Jump to content

User talk:Afroditeiraq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Afroditeiraq, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afroditeiraq, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Afroditeiraq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro-Saudis (July 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro-Saudis (July 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro-Saudis (July 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You are improving the article rapidly!! Should be ready for acceptance soon :) I see two issues:

1) Please remove the quora.com reference, it is not a reliable source.

2) Source #4 says only that 10% of the population is of African origin, to do the math and arrive at the figure of 3,538,622 is original research - please revise to just say that the population is estimated at 10%, without including the precise number.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 09:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afro-Saudis has been accepted

[edit]
Afro-Saudis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Meticulo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Afro-Iranians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Meticulo (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to FaZe Rug. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Prctr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to FaZe Rug have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Prctr (talk) 19:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Afroditeiraq! Your additions to Oan Ali Mohammed have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:32, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ubadah moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ubadah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 05:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammed Hegazy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ubadah (August 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hawar Mulla Mohammed, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nehme1499 14:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Khanaqin, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 21:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Al-Mashahida

[edit]

Hello, Afroditeiraq,

Thank you for creating Al-Mashahida.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references are not displayed in Arabic. It is OK to have Arabic script for references. Please re-enter the references. Thank you.,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Violence against Palestinians in Iraq for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence against Palestinians in Iraq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence against Palestinians in Iraq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Persecution of Kurds for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persecution of Kurds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Kurds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 02:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tel Keppe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Black Syrians

[edit]

Hello Afroditeiraq. After you repeatedly attempted to change the Black people of Yarmouk Basin article, I would seriously advise you to simply create a new article called "Black Syrians". As of 2021, several groups of Blacks live in Syria, all with different identities and origins. The Yarmouk Basin people are just one group with a unique background; they deserve their own article. In a new article about "Black Syrians" you can add all the information about the other groups as well, instead of overwriting an existing article. You can just edit the redirect which was created by your move. Applodion (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the misunderstanding, I thought it would be better to just make it into one article since Black people of Yarmouk Basin and black people from other parts of Syria are all Syrians at the end of the day. Afroditeiraq (talk) 15:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need for apologies; you just intended for the best. I should have simply raised the idea of creating a new article on Black Syrians instead of reverting you. In this regard, I was less cooperative than I should have been; accordingly, this misunderstanding was also my fault. Applodion (talk) 15:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s no problem at all. As a matter of fact, I am working on a Black Syrians article right now. Afroditeiraq (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great! In regards to which groups can be regarded as "Black Syrians", I know the following: There are the Black people of Yarmouk Basin (of course), but also the Sudanese Sysrians (more recent emmigrants; see an interview about them here; the West African Shias of Syria (more infos here); and Blacks of Iraqi origin living in eastern Syria. This book mentions the presence of Black slaves in Syria as far back as the early Muslim period, predating most modern Black Syrian communities. Applodion (talk) 15:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamzah Hawsawi for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamzah Hawsawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamzah Hawsawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bapinghosh (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Iran, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 11:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Iranian Embassy siege has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Loafiewa (talk) 18:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Saladin, you may be blocked from editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ezidxan Region, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Semsûrî (talk) 22:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurds. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AN

[edit]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 21:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert and warning

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please stop with the un-discussed moves, Afroditeiraq. One of your edit summaries, which reads: Because Iraq is our home and Kurds in Iraq makes us sound foreign (diff) makes me think that perhaps you're too close to the subject matter. El_C 02:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Last warning, if I catch you engage in WP:TENDENTIOUS again I will file a report against you in WP:ANI. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arab-Kurds, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iraqi and Diyala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flag of Feylis

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flag of Feylis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Semsûrî (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oan Ali Mohammed moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Oan Ali Mohammed, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afro-Iraqis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 10:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. You've continued with questionable edits prompted by ethno-national advocacy (expressly so), even after my warning to you above against doing that (a warning to which you did not respond).
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 12:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afroditeiraq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m continuously being targeted by these same Wikipedians

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock please

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afroditeiraq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you unblock me, I will never edit another page again. I will only create pages and maybe edit ones that I created, it will all be sourced. Afroditeiraq (talk) 04:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We'd prefer that you get comfortable editing articles before creating them, which is the harder task. This doesn't really address the reasons for the block. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]

{unblock|reason=I promise I’ll never do disruptive editing again, If I ever make the same mistake, you can delete my account.} Afroditeiraq (talk) 03:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Accounts cannot be deleted. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afroditeiraq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You guys are declining every one of my requests, what can I do to get unblocked??

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to craft a reasonable unblock request, unlike the ones you are making here. Note that you'll likely get at most one more unblock request, so make it count. Yamla (talk) 10:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afroditeiraq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I finally understood what I did was wrong and I apologize for taking all the chances I had for granted. I love making and editing wikipedia articles and I’ve only been here for 2 months and I’m still learning. After getting indefinite block, I’ve learned from my mistake, and I assure you that this’ll never happen again. Afroditeiraq (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's clear you haven't read WP:GAB. Your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 18:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Al-Sawatra for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Sawatra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Sawatra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 11:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al-Mashahida for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Mashahida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Mashahida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al-Rabt for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Rabt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Rabt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bani Rekab for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bani Rekab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bani Rekab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 15:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ubadah for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ubadah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubadah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 15:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afroditeiraq. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brawadis for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brawadis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brawadis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 21:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arab-Kurds moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Arab-Kurds, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anthony Jabro

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Afroditeiraq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthony Jabro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oan Ali Mohammed

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Afroditeiraq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oan Ali Mohammed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oan Ali Mohammed

[edit]

Hello, Afroditeiraq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oan Ali Mohammed".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Arab-Kurds

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Arab-Kurds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This made up article (full of unsourced nonsense that is falsely attributed to ransom sources) was created by a blocked user (Afroditeiraq) and has since been edited by two other socks, namely Nplprcn and Wikiraqi

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. M.Bitton (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Anthony Jabro

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Anthony Jabro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Afroditeiraq&oldid=1098164098"