User talk:Meticulo

Hi,

Please post new comments at the bottom of the page.

Thanks,

Tim.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Meticulo. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! User:Anotherclown (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2015 (UTC) Anotherclown (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amalgamated Holdings Limited (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amalgamated Holdings Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Meticulo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Meticulo! I'm Kethrus. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. -- Kethrus |talk to me 12:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amalgamated Holdings Limited (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amalgamated Holdings Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Draft:Amalgamated Holdings Limited concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amalgamated Holdings Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amalgamated Holdings Limited has been accepted

Amalgamated Holdings Limited, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Exercise Croix du Sud has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Exercise Croix du Sud. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond the Walls (TV series) has been accepted

Beyond the Walls (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Dane ^talk 03:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingogo (company) (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Regardless of publication and name, there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else, and what's still listed here is too trivial for actual notability in Wikipedia policy; it's quite rare for such new companies to be notable simply because it's too soon in their life. When article is overfocused with what their own PR would emulate, it's simply not substance for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ingogo (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exercise Croix du Sud has been accepted

Exercise Croix du Sud, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 04:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PLW/Hakim Bey

Hi, I made some comments at Talk:Peter Lamborn Wilson you might be interested in–I quote Knight's book, and I found an academic paper discussing the same issue. (I don't want to edit the article myself, but feel free to incorporate the cites/quotes however you think fit.) 180.181.102.164 (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll have a look. - Meticulo (talk) 08:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Draft:Ingogo (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ingogo (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingogo (company) has been accepted

Ingogo (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:38, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ingogo (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ingogo (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingogo (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SwisterTwister talk 00:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ingogo (disambiguation) has been accepted

Ingogo (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Streetwear, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed on 12 January 2019. Meticulo (talk) 01:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sérotonine (novel) has been accepted

Sérotonine (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I’ve been wondering while reviewing certain pages in Wikipedia i’ve seen your name with a few downsides of losing points of being an editor. I’d like for you to fix it please Thanks! -Ihatetea Ihatetea (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point me to examples, please, Ihatetea? Also, I am wondering why you request that people not post on your own talk page. Thanks. Meticulo (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Jar of Cookie for You!

Thanks for your contributions to Chasing the Moon (2019 documentary) Bishal Shrestha (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Umbrella Entertainment" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Umbrella Entertainment. Since you had some involvement with the Umbrella Entertainment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Matthew hk (talk) 17:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EuroCyclingTrips - CMI Pro Cycling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EuroCyclingTrips - CMI Pro Cycling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EuroCyclingTrips - CMI Pro Cycling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the changes in Indonesia-Malaysia Confrontation article

Hello, My name is Zed Hyea, I want to talk about the changes I made in the Indonesia-Malaysia confrontation article. In that article I am making changes to the result of the war, actually, the results of the war can be written as "Indonesia-Malaysia peace agreement", This can be said this because the war ended not because of the inability of the Indonesian military to fight, but because Sukarno stepped down from the presidency due to the 30 September Movement led to Suharto's rise as president and ended the war with a conference in Bangkok that made the peace agreement on August 11 colored by Sukarno's objections even though he no longer had a position in the country. From this, we can see that the end of the war was not due to the defeat of Indonesia but because of the peace agreement by Soeharto. In that way, I beg you to accept the changes made to the results of the confrontation. Thank you for your Attention.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zed Hyea (talk • contribs) 10 June 2020

Thanks for posting, Zed Hyea. Sorry, but I should have written a clearer edit summary. When I wrote, "Please discuss rationale for this change on the talk page...", I meant at Talk:Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation rather than my own talk page. ~~Is it okay with you if I copy our discussion so far to that page? Other editors may also have something to contribute, and perhaps even help us find a solution to our edit conflicts.~~ Thanks, Meticulo (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

No reply, hence strikethrough. Meticulo (talk) 12:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)][reply]

Lars Pria

Nice job not bothering to notify me of the AFD.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 22:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Seacactus 13, firstly, it wasn't a planned ambush. I was whizzing through the steps at WP:AFD and skipped a couple of optional ones (you'll notice I forgot to list it at any WikiProjects). From memory, I glanced at the article history and made a quick decision, mistaken in hindsight, that recently active editors such as yourself most likely had the page on their watchlists. I'll try to be more diligent in future about notifying other users. In return, if you could read WP:CYC/N and think twice before adding blanket red links for cyclists such as those at Nero Continental. And if you think you have a case for the Lars Pria article being restored, try WP:DRV. Finally, it would be good if you could drop the sarcasm. Meticulo (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

George Pell "with good reason"

Dear Meticulo, be a bit more meticulous and read the article before interfering. For example this passage: "In his preliminary remarks during sentencing, [Chief Judge] Kidd mentioned examples of a "witch-hunt" or "lynch mob" mentality in relation to Pell during the lead-up to his conviction." So what is your point?Retal (talk) 13:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that adding the phrase "With good reason" so the sentence commences "With good reason, Pell has complained..." makes it read as editorialising, almost as much as if you'd added "And he is correct". See WP:IMPARTIAL, particularly "The tone of Wikipedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view." Meticulo (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lords of Brancion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Sevastopol. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Meticulo (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Encanto

"The directors, producers and screenwriters were named." That statement sounds way too ambiguous. That's why I deleted it. Maxbmogs (talk) 15:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's ambiguous about it, Maxbmogs? Those are specific roles. And the people in those roles are named earlier in the article or in the infobox. Meticulo (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Banner headline tags not helpful

You recently placed a "more citations needed" tag at Radio-frequency identification which had 141 footnotes at the time. I'm genuinely curious, where do you see a need for more citations? If anything, this article needs less citations as it is over-detailed and over-fixated with industry trivia. Your opinions would be of interest. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response here, at talk page of article in question. Meticulo (talk) 11:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 3801, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flying Scotsman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected.Meticulo (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name of island before European invasion was 'Haiti'. Not sure why wikipedia is washing the culture of natives that lived on the island first. https://gsp.yale.edu/case-studies/colonial-genocides-project/hispaniola

Other users have made similar edits only to see them removed. Why would reaching consensus need to come from the side that is correct per History? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.249.119 (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You say you're correct. Others disagree. That's why we discuss things and try to reach a consensus. For a good approach, see WP:BRD. Meticulo (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to discuss why you are opposed to the changes. Your name suggest spanish heritage (meticulo), and I wonder what your connection to this article is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voice For The Unheard (talk • contribs) 16:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge, I don't have any Spanish heritage at all. My username is the result of taking the word meticulous, something to which a Wikipedia editor should aspire, and turning it into the name of a character who might appear in a Shakespearean comedy. As for my connection to the article, I was checking the Recent Changes page last night, and among the problematic edits I happened to see and revert was this one. Let's go to Talk:Hispaniola and discuss it further there. Meticulo (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button

Your edit: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Divorce Court, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it. The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Meticulo (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

My response: I am aware of that button. It's just a bad habit of mine. Sorry! You think its bad on here, try being a friend of mine and texting me. You ain't seen nothing. Lol! I will work on that. :) JudgeJudyCourthouse25 (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TULI KUPFERBERG IN THE WOBBLIES

Hello, Meticulo. Thank you for reaching out.

Your edit: I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Industrial Workers of the World, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Meticulo (talk) 10:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

As matter of fact, I know Tuli joined the Wobblies around the late 30's. I'm working on a Kupferberg biography and know more about him than Wikipedia does. This information has been confirmed by friends and family of my subject and you can find a quick source of it in an article written by journalist Benito Villa on pleasekillme.com . So please, put my edit back on the page (even if it's lightly sourced on the internet, it has been heavily sourced by human connections). Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micheal Giuditta (talk • contribs) 11:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding and adding citation, Michael. Meticulo (talk) 10:43, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI - User 47.157.129.133

You may want to contribute to the ANI discussion about user 47.157.129.133 since you were previously involved in the user's talk page with warnings or notices. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:4425:751C:D9BD:7885 (talk) 04:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Tate (author) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tim Tate (author), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 19:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orgone Warriors

Hello, Meticulo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Orgone Warriors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended content

Concern regarding Draft:Tim Tate (author)

Hello, Meticulo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tim Tate (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tim Tate (author)

Hello, Meticulo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tim Tate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Western Australia highest temperature

It's a bit much to accuse someone of vandalism for just changing a temperature when the sentence immediately prior says "The highest observed temperature of 50.7 °C (123.3 °F) was recorded in Onslow on 13 January 2022." Steelkamp (talk) 14:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my defence, I looked for a citation in the template itself, found nothing, and took it to be a case of subtle vandalism. I've added a secondary source to the template to guard against others making the same mistake. Meticulo (talk) 08:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Gance

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Gance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see the request for speedy deletion has been declined, with the reason 'The page disambiguates two articles (not zero or one) both of which mention "Jack Gance"'. So I'll ignore this for now. Meticulo (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Albert Camus

The quote is accurate (Cambridge Professor in Science), though for verification I have written to the Alliance Francaise, to obtain the exact references. These will be included in the main article. JohnEC Jr (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is here on the internet https://graciousquotes.com/albert-camus/ JohnEC Jr (talk) 04:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]