User talk:Retal

Welcome

Hello, Retal, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Geniac 17:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 19:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Geniac 14:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: new articles by retal

You wrote: "I have written two new articles: Maya Maize God and Howler Monkey Gods. What will happen to them? They seem still to be in limbo somehow." You don't need to use the Articles for Creation process now that you are registered. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wizard-Already Registered. You could create Maya Maize God just like you did Howler Monkey Gods. --Geniac 15:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{helpme}I wrote an article (stub) on the Maya Moon Goddess, applied the necessary formulas, and dit not get the opportunity to preview it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Retal (talk • contribs)

Hi, the article you wrote never got saved. Once you write anything on any page in the edit mode, you do get the opportunity to preview it. Simply click on Show Preview tab below the edit box. Once you are satisfied, then click on Save page. Does this answer your question? — Lost^(talk) 09:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

requested move

Bacab → Bacabs —(Discuss)— Bacabs links up with non-English Wikipedias and the plural is more common than the singular —86.87.62.150 21:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Retal. You have new messages at Talk:Treblinka trials.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV and WP:V

Hello. Please be cautious with expressions that may introduce bias or lack precision and refrain from inserting contentious unsourced statements to Wikipedia articles: [1][2][3]. Such additions do no service to the project of building an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Omnipaedista (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J. Eric S. Thompson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrea Joyce Stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maya religion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tun and Katun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Retal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Benito Mussolini. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 20:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Retal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Classic Veracruz culture, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yugo and Hacha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Realdania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Retal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Australian english

No usage of plural of museum(s) is found in Australia - they are museums, thanks... JarrahTree 10:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Maya art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Bartolo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

If you keep reintroducing that content at SJW article, you'll eventually get a block.

Your recent editing history at Social justice warrior shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bacondrum (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

personal attacks

You're testing your luck. Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Article. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Bacondrum (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to George Pell. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Meticulo (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Maya art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You should know better by now but also you should realize that your point would be better made without attacking other editors, including me. Keep it up and my next comment will be at ANI where I will be requesting a block of your account for personal attacks and obvious trolling. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will second that. If you cannot carry on a civil conversation with others without resorting to insults, you will be sanctioned. Primefac (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the insult? My opponent signs with Praxidice, defined as "goddess of judicial punishment and the exactor of vengeance", so I jokingly responded to this provocative name by exchanging it for Lyssa, defined as "spirit of mad rage, frenzy, and rabies in animals...closely related to the Maniae, the spirits of madness and insanity." Should I really be lectured and threatened because I tried to bring some humor into the discussion? Be an adult.Retal (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, equating a user to "mad rage, frenzy and rabies" and "insanity" is very mature, so funny. You know what you're doing and I suggest you stop. Ironic you're whining about being lectured when you yourself made a comment without any context and expected users to sus it out without any details and then further insulted editors because you have an issue with pronouns. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But then be so decent as to restore my initial remark regarding "Wikipedia English Language Policy".Retal (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not hat it, @Primefac did. And as you failed to actually elaborate on what the issue is, I doubt it'll be restored. Also you can't seriously ask other people to be "decent" and do you favors when you've still left personal attacks up and are continuing to engage in combative behavior. But either way, you'll have to ask the admin who hatted it. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to un-hat the conversation because it is not going to go anywhere. The current consensus on Wikipedia is to use the pronouns preferred by the subject (if known), and trying to get a single article changed by means of a post that I can only quantify as falling somewhere between sealioning and concern-trolling is not going to change things, nor will it win you any debates. Primefac (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac: You seem to like insulting people by throwing ludicrous terminology at their heads, but I understand the controversial issue of pronouns has been "pacified" by allowing jargon to take the place of understandable English. What a pity.Retal (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Mulvaney

When I reverted this edit I though I was dealing with a new account here to vandalize the article, but I see you've been here for some time. I see you are aware of the contentious topic surrounding gender and sexuality, but consider this a refresher. Edits like that one are considered disruptive. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 09:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Flounder fillet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Cass Review seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flounder fillet (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retal, you've been warned about WP:NPOV many times over the year, and you're aware that gender and sexuality controversies are a contentious topic. Don't insert your own commentary into articles. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing other people's comments

Oh dear, please don't mess with other people's comments like this. It's terribly impolite and leaves a confusing mess to boot. It's also one of the things our etiquette guideline explicitly calls out as not done. I'm reverting that, but feel free to place a new comment below, rather than inside of, void's. Going forwards, if you must reply to every point, please quote void's comment in your own reply, rather than doing what you did there. --Licks-rocks (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it seemed the most efficient thing to do. No impoliteness intended. Retal (talk) 20:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No intended impoliteness assumed 😉. Advanced tip: if you want to quote someone and keep their text separate from yours, you can use the template {{tq|(quoted text here)}} to create a nicely visually distinguishable quoted segment. Have a nice day!

(example: "this is what that looks like") --Licks-rocks (talk) 20:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]