User talk:Aboutnick

Hello Aboutnick! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 20:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

A lengthy welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 20:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maia Campbell ‎

Please find a reference for the content that you have been attempting to add, and make sure that the content meets all the content policies identified in WP:BLP. --Hipal (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Natalie Nunn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see MOS:SURNAME as well; we don't call encyclopedia subjects by their given names. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:JonathanBennett-2019.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JonathanBennett-2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maia Campbell edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Maia Campbell. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published source. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:44, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted it again. Please be more careful. --Hipal (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm FormalDude. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Trisha Paytas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ––FormalDude (talk) 14:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FormalDude

Hop off my top. Aboutnick (talk) 14:36, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

? ––FormalDude (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tila Tequila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The War at Home. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Maia Campbell. Thank you. --Hipal (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hipal hop off i didnt even make an edit other than her music video's and you reverted it. leave me alone and go to something productive Aboutnick (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] --Hipal (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Trisha Paytas. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 21:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Aboutnick! Your additions to From the Bottom Up (TV series) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Trisha Paytas 2015.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Trisha Paytas 2015.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 04:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Monique Samuels.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Monique Samuels.webp. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Gary Community School Corporation. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This should be included in the School Corporation and the schools listed should have year spans.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aboutnick! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Trisha Paytas. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ––FormalDude (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Trisha Paytas. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 16:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 14:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Valereee (talk) 16:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P-blocked from article space to see if we can convince this editor to start communicating. Valereee (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carlton Elizabeth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlton Elizabeth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlton Elizabeth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 18:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the page Carlton Elizabeth has violated any of WIKIPEDIA'S guidelines. I have strongly sourced sources. If you disagree with the way things are sourced or edited than you may edit it. There is no reason for it to be deleted as I followed the same background and outline as Eileen Davidson. Aboutnick (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #69876

is closed. Instructed user to respond here or at ANI. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved your message to Valereee

Hi Aboutnick, you posted your message on Valereee's User page rather than her talk page so I moved it for you (see User talk:Valereee). It looks like she is unavailable for a few weeks (early July or so) so it might be a bit before she responds. S0091 (talk) 17:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate it ;) Aboutnick (talk) 18:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Aboutnick! I'm so glad you figured it out, welcome to Wikipedia, and sorry for the delay, I've been mostly without internet for over a week and haven't logged in. Valereee (talk) 06:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at NOH8 Campaign, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.

Per MOS:SEAOFBLUE - FlightTime (open channel) 02:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN

Hello, Aboutnick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jenna_Lyons_2015.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Jenna_Lyons_2015.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ирука¹³ 18:05, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Whpq (talk) 18:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been given plenty of previous notifications about copyright issues and have persisted in adding copyright material to wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aboutnick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Whpq I see that I have been blocked "indefinitely" for violating the copyright policy, my previous warnings were from amateur mistakes when I was new to Wikipedia. Now as for this most recent block, I was under the impression that Flickr only allowed non-copyrighted imagery on their website, which was the solitary cause of uploading an image. I had seen other pages on Wikipedia that were from Flickr and followed the same outline I used for Jenna Lyons's imagery; specifically, Martin H.M. Schreiber. I can assure you that if I am unblocked I will never attempt upload any image that I can not verify to be 100% not copyrighted.Aboutnick (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Note that it's not always a good idea to pattern your edits after other articles, as if those too are problematic you would be unaware of it. (as seems to have happened here) I don't think that this request demonstrates the understanding of copyright needed to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 07:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Aboutnick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, 331dot I apologize for not elaborating on my request but yes, I now understand the rules of copyrighted content and how it is not allowed. I can also assure you it will not happen again.

Accept reason:

OK, I'm accepting this unblock request, in light of the discussion below. Aboutnick, I'm not filing a formal editing restriction, but you take it on yourself to learn about our image use policy before uploading any more images, and to ask for help before uploading if there is any doubt in your mind about the copyright status of an image. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 08:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aboutnick: I'm all for second chances, and would be willing to consider extending one to you here (subject to the blocking admin's approval), but your explanation that you were under the impression that Flickr only allows non-copyrighted imagery gives me pause. This is the link that you took the image from - if you follow that link, you will see a sizable 'copyright' symbol underneath the photograph, which says "All rights reserved". There's even a link from there to their page explaining their different licenses, which explicitly sets out that if you wish to use an image copied from Flikr with this tag, you need to contact the account holder first to obtain their permission. I don't think that it could have been any clearer that the image was not free to use - either you were exceedingly negligent in your checks to see whether it was free from copyright, or you didn't check at all, neither of which is acceptable. How will you ensure that in future you avoid making mistakes like this? Girth Summit _(blether) 10:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Girth Summit: Hello there, I appreciate your consideration. First off, I just started editing on Wikipedia late last year, I've learned how to edit and do a lot of stuff, added images is not one of them. I was very ignorant of the rules of adding imagery without checking if it was copyrighted or not. In this case, I simply did not even check to see if there were any signs that stated it was copyrighted, and for that, I apologize. As stated previously, I was under the impression any images on Flickr were non-copyrighted images, know that it has been made clear to me, I can definitely tell you it will not happen again. Once agin, I appreciate your leniency and willingness to hear me out.

Best Regards, User:Aboutnick (talk) 09:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]

Aboutnick: The other thing I would ask you to do is to consider the amount of time that violations like these take to identify and put right. Our volunteers invest oceans of time combing through people's contributions checking for copyright issues, because of the legal jeopardy violations put us in, whether they're done intentionally or thoughtlessly. Folk are often unwilling to unblock people with a track record of ignoring copyright guidelines, because of the risk that they will repeat their mistakes and do the same thing again. If you are unblocked now, and do the same thing again, you will be very unlikely to be able to convince anyone to unblock you again. In short: do not make any assumptions about copyright. If you are uploading an image that you did not take yourself, take time to identify the license that it is released under. If you cannot find that license, assume that all rights are reserved and that you cannot use it. If you can find the license, check that it is compliant with our requirements before you upload it. If you aren't sure, ask for help at the Teahouse. Uploading images you didn't take yourself is one of the harder things to get right around here - if in doubt, don't.
Whpq - in light of the above discussion, would you be willing to consider an unblock? Perhaps with a TBan restricting them from uploading images, if you are still concerned about their competence in that area? Best Girth Summit _(blether) 18:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A simple promise to not upload images would suffice. I'll add that I would not view that as a permanent restriction. I encourage Aboutnick to read through our WP:image use policy and learn more about copyright. They can ask questions at Media Copyright Questions if they find an image they feel could be used in an article. Experienced editors there would be able to provide appropriate answers before any upload were to be made. -- Whpq (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Girth Summit. Yes, I promise to not use any images that are copyrighted. You have my word. Aboutnick (talk) 22:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Damnit, Aboutnick - it just came to my attention that the whole time you were discussing unblock conditions with me, you were evading your block and editing - edit warring, in fact - while logged out. You also didn't disclose your alternate account, DidyouknowthattheresatunnelunderOceanBoulevard which at least you haven't edited through. You can't tell me that you thought it was alright to carry on editing while you were blocked; I've reblocked you, and I suggest you read WP:SO. Courtesy ping to Whpq. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well alright then. Aboutnick (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
side note, it amazes me how you all have nothing else better to do then blocking me over nothing on this website, yall are broke so get your money up first. I understand that 98.21% of you have no friends and no life but this is so unnecessary. I'm going to continue editing, whether you know about it or not. This is so humiliating for all of you who put in the time of day just to check to see if i was still editing (which i was and will continue to do). I tried to be nice and be very lowkey with my editing but since yall are broke yall are haters so yea im going to continue editing while not logged in and thats just that.

Sincerely, Me. Aboutnick (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, well, I guess we've got the measure of you then. I'm not broke, FWIW - I'm not particularly rich either, but I manage to hold down a full time job as a teacher while also volunteering here. I've almost paid off the mortgage on my house, and am planning for early retirement in a few years (which will be nice). I have plenty of friends - a few of whom I met through my editing here, but most of whom I met in the normal course of life. So, ranting about how I'm a broke loser with no friends is all water off a duck's back. Here's something you ought to know however: I didn't actually run a check on your account before I reblocked you - I came across your IPs investigating another case, because an editor thought that your logged-out edit warring was somebody else: in other words, you almost got somebody else blocked with your irresponsible conduct, and it's a good thing I ran a check to see who was behind the IPs. So, you're right that we can't technically prevent you from editing - you can go and find a new internet connection, and we won't recognise you. If you don't cause any problems, I guess we'll never know it's you (but if we do trace it back to you, you'll be blocked again). What I don't understand is why you would want to do that. Why would you want to contribute your time to volunteering for a project that gave you the boot? Why wouldn't you go and do something else with your time? I'll never understand folk who want to do that. Anyway, best wishes, whatever you do going forward. Girth Summit _(blether) 18:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Closed Schools in Gary, IN

Hello, Aboutnick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Closed Schools in Gary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stunna Girl moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stunna Girl. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to better support the contents. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of When the Dark Man Calls for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article When the Dark Man Calls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When the Dark Man Calls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 21:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]