1928 United States presidential election in Wisconsin
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in Wisconsin |
|---|
 |
The 1928 United States presidential election in Wisconsin was held on November 6, 1928 as part of the 1928 United States presidential election. State voters chose 13 electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
Wisconsin had since the decline of the Populist movement been substantially a one-party state dominated by the Republican Party.[1] The Democratic Party became entirely uncompetitive outside certain German Catholic counties adjoining Lake Michigan as the upper classes, along with the majority of workers who followed them, completely fled from William Jennings Bryan's agrarian and free silver sympathies.[2] As Democratic strength weakened severely after 1894 – although the state did develop a strong Socialist Party to provide opposition to the GOP – Wisconsin developed the direct Republican primary in 1903 and this ultimately created competition between the "League" under Robert M. La Follette, and the conservative "Regular" faction.[3]
The beginning of the 1910s would see a minor Democratic revival as many La Follette progressives endorsed Woodrow Wilson,[4] but this flirtation would not be long-lasting as Wilson's "Anglophile" foreign policies were severely opposed by Wisconsin's largely German- and Scandinavian-American populace.[5] Subsequent federal elections saw the Midwest desert the Democratic Party even more completely due to supposed preferential treatment of Southern farmers,[6] and in 1920 Wisconsin's status as a one-party Republican state was solidified as James M. Cox won less than a sixth of the state's presidential vote and Democrats claimed only four state legislative seats, all but one of which would be lost in 1922. Conservative Southern Democrat John W. Davis would do even worse, winning less than one-twelfth of Wisconsin's 1924 presidential vote, and there would never be more than two Democrats in the state legislature between 1922 and 1928.
Nonetheless, in that 1924 election Wisconsin's popular long-time Republican Senator La Follette would via prevalent isolationist and progressive sentiment carry the state's electoral votes, and when La Follette died the following year his family did not endorse a Republican, but rather New York City Catholic Democrat Al Smith.[7] The nomination of Smith – inevitable with other Democrats sitting the election out[8] – had the effect of aligning the Democrats towards Wisconsin's sizeable Southern and Eastern European immigrant population, and Smith's Wall Street connections helped reconnect the isolationist, conservative German Catholic areas of eastern Wisconsin who had completely deserted the Democrats over opposition to Wilson's foreign policies.[9]
When Senator John J. Blaine endorsed Smith in late September,[10] it became clear that La Follette's endorsement of him had been shared by other prominent Progressives,[11] despite his son urging that sides not be taken.[12] Polls in October, after both candidates had campaigned in the state, viewed Wisconsin as close but leaning toward Smith.[11] However, when the polls closed, it became clear Hoover was showing greater strength than expected even in the pro-Catholic eastern region,[13] and when returns from Milwaukee came in later Smith did not receive the projected two-to-one majority.
Hoover thus carried Wisconsin by a comfortable 9.24 percentage point margin, still a remarkable transformation from 1920 when the state had been Cox's weakest and Harding won by over 55 percentage points. Smith recouped the Third Party System Democratic counties: in entirely Catholic Marshfield Township which typically gave pre-1916 Democrats over ninety percent but gave Cox only 4 percent, Smith won all but two percent.[9] Hoover's ability to take the La Follette vote in anti-Catholic Scandinavian areas of western Wisconsin was critical in winning him the state.[13] As of 2020[update], this is the last election in which Douglas County voted for a Republican presidential candidate.[14]
Results
[edit]| 1928 United States presidential election in Wisconsin[15][16] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes | |
| Republican | Herbert Hoover | 544,205 | 53.52% | 13 | |
| Democratic | Al Smith | 450,259 | 44.28% | 0 | |
| Socialist | Norman Thomas | 18,213 | 1.79% | 0 | |
| Prohibition | William F. Varney | 2,245 | 0.22% | 0 | |
| Independent Workers | William Z. Foster | 1,528 | 0.15% | 0 | |
| Independent Labor | Verne L. Reynolds | 381 | 0.04% | 0 | |
| Write-in | Scattering[a] | 41 | 0.00% | 0 | |
| Totals | 1,016,872 | 100.00% | 13 | ||
Results by county
[edit]| County[15][16] | Herbert Hoover Republican |
Al Smith Democratic |
Norman Thomas Socialist |
All Others Various |
Margin | Total votes cast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Adams | 1,624 | 62.95% | 914 | 35.43% | 24 | 0.93% | 18 | 0.70% | 710 | 27.52% | 2,580 |
| Ashland | 3,639 | 49.35% | 3,570 | 48.41% | 95 | 1.29% | 70 | 0.95% | 69 | 0.94% | 7,374 |
| Barron | 8,455 | 71.98% | 3,185 | 27.12% | 71 | 0.60% | 35 | 0.30% | 5,270 | 44.87% | 11,746 |
| Bayfield | 3,279 | 63.41% | 1,709 | 33.05% | 49 | 0.95% | 134 | 2.59% | 1,570 | 30.36% | 5,171 |
| Brown | 9,371 | 36.04% | 16,465 | 63.32% | 135 | 0.52% | 33 | 0.13% | -7,094 | -27.28% | 26,004 |
| Buffalo | 3,027 | 61.88% | 1,836 | 37.53% | 11 | 0.22% | 18 | 0.37% | 1,191 | 24.35% | 4,892 |
| Burnett | 2,742 | 74.71% | 880 | 23.98% | 31 | 0.84% | 17 | 0.46% | 1,862 | 50.74% | 3,670 |
| Calumet | 2,405 | 38.04% | 3,871 | 61.22% | 35 | 0.55% | 12 | 0.19% | -1,466 | -23.19% | 6,323 |
| Chippewa | 7,514 | 55.41% | 5,985 | 44.13% | 25 | 0.18% | 37 | 0.27% | 1,529 | 11.27% | 13,561 |
| Clark | 6,948 | 62.48% | 3,938 | 35.41% | 140 | 1.26% | 95 | 0.85% | 3,010 | 27.07% | 11,121 |
| Columbia | 7,615 | 60.70% | 4,819 | 38.41% | 50 | 0.40% | 61 | 0.49% | 2,796 | 22.29% | 12,545 |
| Crawford | 3,452 | 51.18% | 3,238 | 48.01% | 19 | 0.28% | 36 | 0.53% | 214 | 3.17% | 6,745 |
| Dane | 23,680 | 54.84% | 19,126 | 44.29% | 252 | 0.58% | 126 | 0.29% | 4,554 | 10.55% | 43,184 |
| Dodge | 9,660 | 49.71% | 9,536 | 49.07% | 180 | 0.93% | 58 | 0.30% | 124 | 0.64% | 19,434 |
| Door | 3,636 | 59.28% | 2,456 | 40.04% | 17 | 0.28% | 25 | 0.41% | 1,180 | 19.24% | 6,134 |
| Douglas | 11,280 | 61.20% | 6,762 | 36.69% | 87 | 0.47% | 303 | 1.64% | 4,518 | 24.51% | 18,432 |
| Dunn | 7,096 | 76.51% | 2,045 | 22.05% | 52 | 0.56% | 81 | 0.87% | 5,051 | 54.46% | 9,274 |
| Eau Claire | 10,079 | 69.25% | 4,385 | 30.13% | 49 | 0.34% | 42 | 0.29% | 5,694 | 39.12% | 14,555 |
| Florence | 993 | 64.27% | 540 | 34.95% | 2 | 0.13% | 10 | 0.65% | 453 | 29.32% | 1,545 |
| Fond du Lac | 12,593 | 51.36% | 11,719 | 47.80% | 126 | 0.51% | 81 | 0.33% | 874 | 3.56% | 24,519 |
| Forest | 1,918 | 52.82% | 1,677 | 46.19% | 13 | 0.36% | 23 | 0.63% | 241 | 6.64% | 3,631 |
| Grant | 10,052 | 59.85% | 6,630 | 39.48% | 37 | 0.22% | 75 | 0.45% | 3,422 | 20.38% | 16,794 |
| Green | 5,152 | 64.18% | 2,812 | 35.03% | 31 | 0.39% | 32 | 0.40% | 2,340 | 29.15% | 8,027 |
| Green Lake | 3,038 | 53.15% | 2,622 | 45.87% | 26 | 0.45% | 30 | 0.52% | 416 | 7.28% | 5,716 |
| Iowa | 5,484 | 63.26% | 3,129 | 36.09% | 20 | 0.23% | 36 | 0.42% | 2,355 | 27.17% | 8,669 |
| Iron | 1,274 | 40.68% | 1,724 | 55.04% | 16 | 0.51% | 118 | 3.77% | -450 | -14.37% | 3,132 |
| Jackson | 4,353 | 75.17% | 1,364 | 23.55% | 22 | 0.38% | 52 | 0.90% | 2,989 | 51.61% | 5,791 |
| Jefferson | 8,612 | 57.28% | 6,305 | 41.94% | 76 | 0.51% | 41 | 0.27% | 2,307 | 15.35% | 15,034 |
| Juneau | 3,777 | 57.74% | 2,708 | 41.40% | 34 | 0.52% | 22 | 0.34% | 1,069 | 16.34% | 6,541 |
| Kenosha | 11,330 | 50.66% | 10,638 | 47.57% | 276 | 1.23% | 119 | 0.53% | 692 | 3.09% | 22,363 |
| Kewaunee | 1,556 | 27.94% | 3,988 | 71.61% | 11 | 0.20% | 14 | 0.25% | -2,432 | -43.67% | 5,569 |
| La Crosse | 11,321 | 55.78% | 8,877 | 43.74% | 38 | 0.19% | 59 | 0.29% | 2,444 | 12.04% | 20,295 |
| Lafayette | 5,134 | 58.53% | 3,585 | 40.87% | 16 | 0.18% | 36 | 0.41% | 1,549 | 17.66% | 8,771 |
| Langlade | 3,715 | 47.15% | 4,078 | 51.76% | 45 | 0.57% | 41 | 0.52% | -363 | -4.61% | 7,879 |
| Lincoln | 4,025 | 56.06% | 3,091 | 43.05% | 28 | 0.39% | 36 | 0.50% | 934 | 13.01% | 7,180 |
| Manitowoc | 7,519 | 41.70% | 10,292 | 57.08% | 172 | 0.95% | 49 | 0.27% | -2,773 | -15.38% | 18,032 |
| Marathon | 10,127 | 48.02% | 10,675 | 50.61% | 221 | 1.05% | 68 | 0.32% | -548 | -2.60% | 21,091 |
| Marinette | 6,516 | 57.04% | 4,781 | 41.85% | 96 | 0.84% | 31 | 0.27% | 1,735 | 15.19% | 11,424 |
| Marquette | 2,554 | 65.44% | 1,313 | 33.64% | 15 | 0.38% | 21 | 0.54% | 1,241 | 31.80% | 3,903 |
| Milwaukee | 82,025 | 39.77% | 110,668 | 53.66% | 12,934 | 6.27% | 610 | 0.30% | -28,643 | -13.89% | 206,237 |
| Monroe | 5,936 | 60.83% | 3,709 | 38.01% | 59 | 0.60% | 55 | 0.56% | 2,227 | 22.82% | 9,759 |
| Oconto | 4,661 | 51.91% | 4,253 | 47.37% | 28 | 0.31% | 37 | 0.41% | 408 | 4.54% | 8,979 |
| Oneida | 3,100 | 54.32% | 2,504 | 43.88% | 75 | 1.31% | 28 | 0.49% | 596 | 10.44% | 5,707 |
| Outagamie | 12,378 | 49.58% | 12,474 | 49.96% | 65 | 0.26% | 50 | 0.20% | -96 | -0.38% | 24,967 |
| Ozaukee | 2,338 | 37.16% | 3,864 | 61.41% | 70 | 1.11% | 20 | 0.32% | -1,526 | -24.25% | 6,292 |
| Pepin | 1,839 | 58.57% | 1,276 | 40.64% | 16 | 0.51% | 9 | 0.29% | 563 | 17.93% | 3,140 |
| Pierce | 6,491 | 67.65% | 3,017 | 31.44% | 51 | 0.53% | 36 | 0.38% | 3,474 | 36.21% | 9,595 |
| Polk | 6,905 | 75.14% | 2,177 | 23.69% | 76 | 0.83% | 32 | 0.35% | 4,728 | 51.45% | 9,190 |
| Portage | 5,161 | 43.03% | 6,764 | 56.39% | 36 | 0.30% | 34 | 0.28% | -1,603 | -13.36% | 11,995 |
| Price | 3,210 | 57.92% | 2,223 | 40.11% | 48 | 0.87% | 61 | 1.10% | 987 | 17.81% | 5,542 |
| Racine | 17,423 | 56.56% | 13,021 | 42.27% | 258 | 0.84% | 104 | 0.34% | 4,402 | 14.29% | 30,806 |
| Richland | 5,685 | 70.87% | 2,262 | 28.20% | 32 | 0.40% | 43 | 0.54% | 3,423 | 42.67% | 8,022 |
| Rock | 21,497 | 70.75% | 8,726 | 28.72% | 81 | 0.27% | 80 | 0.26% | 12,771 | 42.03% | 30,384 |
| Rusk | 3,524 | 63.62% | 1,925 | 34.75% | 51 | 0.92% | 39 | 0.70% | 1,599 | 28.87% | 5,539 |
| Sauk | 7,496 | 58.89% | 5,151 | 40.47% | 35 | 0.27% | 47 | 0.37% | 2,345 | 18.42% | 12,729 |
| Sawyer | 1,882 | 61.44% | 1,129 | 36.86% | 29 | 0.95% | 23 | 0.75% | 753 | 24.58% | 3,063 |
| Shawano | 5,198 | 57.34% | 3,779 | 41.69% | 52 | 0.57% | 36 | 0.40% | 1,419 | 15.65% | 9,065 |
| Sheboygan | 12,640 | 51.17% | 11,439 | 46.31% | 535 | 2.17% | 87 | 0.35% | 1,201 | 4.86% | 24,701 |
| St. Croix | 6,855 | 62.16% | 4,083 | 37.02% | 56 | 0.51% | 34 | 0.31% | 2,772 | 25.14% | 11,028 |
| Taylor | 2,648 | 54.61% | 2,095 | 43.20% | 88 | 1.81% | 18 | 0.37% | 553 | 11.40% | 4,849 |
| Trempealeau | 5,596 | 64.96% | 2,963 | 34.40% | 16 | 0.19% | 39 | 0.45% | 2,633 | 30.57% | 8,614 |
| Vernon | 6,596 | 71.28% | 2,559 | 27.65% | 35 | 0.38% | 64 | 0.69% | 4,037 | 43.62% | 9,254 |
| Vilas | 1,609 | 58.11% | 1,083 | 39.11% | 46 | 1.66% | 31 | 1.12% | 526 | 19.00% | 2,769 |
| Walworth | 9,846 | 69.36% | 4,253 | 29.96% | 45 | 0.32% | 52 | 0.37% | 5,593 | 39.40% | 14,196 |
| Washburn | 2,898 | 70.03% | 1,192 | 28.81% | 36 | 0.87% | 12 | 0.29% | 1,706 | 41.23% | 4,138 |
| Washington | 4,163 | 41.13% | 5,827 | 57.57% | 115 | 1.14% | 17 | 0.17% | -1,664 | -16.44% | 10,122 |
| Waukesha | 12,218 | 60.15% | 7,846 | 38.63% | 168 | 0.83% | 79 | 0.39% | 4,372 | 21.53% | 20,311 |
| Waupaca | 8,928 | 72.32% | 3,307 | 26.79% | 68 | 0.55% | 42 | 0.34% | 5,621 | 45.53% | 12,345 |
| Waushara | 4,068 | 75.42% | 1,260 | 23.36% | 34 | 0.63% | 32 | 0.59% | 2,808 | 52.06% | 5,394 |
| Winnebago | 16,191 | 61.10% | 9,995 | 37.72% | 201 | 0.76% | 114 | 0.43% | 6,196 | 23.38% | 26,501 |
| Wood | 6,655 | 51.24% | 6,167 | 47.48% | 131 | 1.01% | 35 | 0.27% | 488 | 3.76% | 12,988 |
| Totals | 544,205 | 53.52% | 450,259 | 44.28% | 18,213 | 1.79% | 4,195 | 0.41% | 93,946 | 9.24% | 1,016,872 |
Counties that flipped from Progressive to Republican
[edit]- Adams
- Ashland
- Barron
- Bayfield
- Buffalo
- Burnett
- Chippewa
- Clark
- Columbia
- Crawford
- Dane
- Dodge
- Door
- Douglas
- Dunn
- Eau Claire
- Fond du Lac
- Forest
- Grant
- Green
- Green Lake
- Iowa
- Jackson
- Jefferson
- Juneau
- La Crosse
- Lafayette
- Lincoln
- Marquette
- Monroe
- Oconto
- Oneida
- Pierce
- Polk
- Price
- Rusk
- Sauk
- Sawyer
- Shawano
- Sheboygan
- St. Croix
- Taylor
- Trempealeau
- Vernon
- Vilas
- Washburn
- Waupaca
- Waushara
- Wood
Counties that flipped from Progressive to Democratic
[edit]- Brown
- Calumet
- Iron
- Kewaunee
- Langlade
- Manitowoc
- Marathon
- Milwaukee
- Outagamie
- Ozaukee
- Portage
- Washington
Electors
[edit]Starting with this election, voters in Wisconsin no longer chose presidential electors directly. For the 1928 election, Wisconsin adopted the modern "short ballot" whereby one votes for the presidential candidates by name with the understanding that a vote for a candidate is a vote for that party's entire slate of electors. These were the names of the electors for each ticket in 1928.[15]
| Herbert Hoover & Charles Curtis Republican Party |
Al Smith & Joseph T. Robinson Democratic Party |
Norman Thomas & James H. Maurer Socialist Party |
William F. Varney & James A. Edgerton Prohibition Party |
William Z. Foster & Benjamin Gitlow Workers Party[b] |
Verne L. Reynolds & Jeremiah D. Crowley Socialist Labor Party[c] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ The Scattering votes are not listed directly by county in the 1929 Blue Book, but they are included in the total vote per county. Thus, the breakdown of the Scattering vote can easily be deduced. The Board of Canvassers report shows the Scattering vote in its own column, separate from the total vote.
- ^ The Workers ticket had only two electors
- ^ The Socialist Labor ticket had only four electors
- ^ Had Thomas won the state, Berger would have been disqualified as an elector due to being a sitting member of the United States House of Representatives. However, Berger simultaneously lost reelection in 1928 so he could have subsequently resigned prior to the end of his term to maintain eligibility as a presidential elector.
References
[edit]- ^ Burnham, Walter Dean; 'The System of 1896: An Analysis'; in The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, pp. 178-179 ISBN 0313213798
- ^ Sundquist, James; Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson Years, p. 526 ISBN 0815719094
- ^ Hansen, John Mark; Shigeo Hirano, and Snyder, James M. Jr.; 'Parties within Parties: Parties, Factions, and Coordinated Politics, 1900-1980'; in Gerber, Alan S. and Schickler, Eric; Governing in a Polarized Age: Elections, Parties, and Political Representation in America, pp. 165-168 ISBN 978-1-107-09509-0
- ^ Crews, Kenneth D.; 'Woodrow Wilson, Wisconsin, and the Election of 1912'; Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 3: 'Presidents, Vice Presidents and Political Parties: Performance and Prospects' (Summer, 1982), pp. 369-376
- ^ Leary, William M. (jr.); 'Woodrow Wilson, Irish Americans, and the Election of 1916'; The Journal of American History, Vol. 54, No. 1 (June 1967), pp. 57-72
- ^ Morello, John A.; Albert D. Lasker, Advertising, and the Election of Warren G. Harding, p. 64 ISBN 0275970302
- ^ Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, p. 59 ISBN 0786422173
- ^ Warren, Kenneth F.; Encyclopedia of U.S. campaigns, elections, and electoral behavior: A-M, Volume 1, p. 620 ISBN 1412954894
- ^ a b Baggaley, Andrew R.; 'Religious Influence on Wisconsin Voting, 1928-1960'; The American Political Science Review, Vol. 56, No. 1 (March 1962), pp. 66-70
- ^ 'La Follette Chief Out Against Hoover: Senator Blaine Say No Republican Owes Allegiance to Him'; The New York Times, September 24, 1928
- ^ a b 'Party Lines Fade in Wisconsin: Straight Ticket Is Non-Existent in the Criss-Cross of Politics. Betting Even on the State but Odds Should Be Given on Smith, the Republicans Say'
- ^ 'La Follette Shuns Aid to Either Party: Principles Forced Into Campaign by Progressives Are Only Hope of People, He Declares'; The New York Times, October 27, 1928, p. 9
- ^ a b 'Wisconsin Starts Hoover with Lead: Republican Shows Strength in Smith Territory'; Daily Boston Globe;
- ^ Sullivan, Robert David; 'How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century'; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
- ^ a b c Wisconsin Historical Society, Certificate of Board of State Canvassers Relative to Presidential Electors - November 6, 1928
- ^ a b "Summary Vote For President". The Wisconsin Blue Book 1929. Madison, Wisconsin: State Printing Board. p. 815.
