1920 United States presidential election in South Dakota
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
Harding 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80%
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
| Elections in South Dakota |
|---|
 |
The 1920 United States presidential election in South Dakota took place on November 2, 1920, as part of the 1920 United States presidential election in which all contemporary forty-eight states participated. Voters chose five electors, or representatives to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
The 1918 mid-term elections had seen the Midwestern farming community largely desert the Democratic Party due to supposed preferential treatment of Southern farmers:[1] Democratic seats in the Midwest fell from thirty-four to seventeen,[2] whilst Scandinavian-Americans were also vigorously opposed to entering the war.[3] Moreover, Democratic fear of Communism seen in the Palmer Raids and "Red Scare" led to Cox, then Governor of Ohio, to ban German-language instruction in public schools in 1919.[2] Much more critical for German-Americans was the view that outgoing President Woodrow Wilson was deliberately trying to punish Germany and Austria for starting the war, especially via his disregard for the United Kingdom's continuing blockade of Germany.[4] Stressing Harding's German ancestry, the German press drummed up the view that "a vote for Harding is a vote against the persecutions suffered by German-Americans during the war."[5]
As the campaign began after the Republican Party had nominated U.S. Senator Warren G. Harding of Ohio and the Democratic Party former Ohio governor James M. Cox, a further blow to the Democrats occurred when the national economy suffered a major downturn following the wartime boom, resulting in plummeting agricultural prices that were especially problematic in the Midwest.[6] Whereas Cox travelled throughout the nation apart from the "Solid South" during September,[7] Harding, despite having four times the budget, campaigned from his home in Marion, Ohio. A poll by the giant Rexall drug store chain – which in 1916 had been accurate enough to predict Wilson's razor-thin wins in New Hampshire and California[8] – suggested Harding would win 382 electoral votes,[9] and at the end of October, although no more opinion polls had been published, most observers were even more convinced that the Republicans would take complete control of all branches of government.[10]
The late-October predictions of a complete takeover of the federal government by the Republican Party were entirely born out. So unpopular was Wilson that – although South Dakota was the only Plains state Wilson had lost in 1916 – Cox lost over half the Wilson vote from that election, and lost every county. In fact, Non Partisan League[a] candidate Parley Parker Christensen finished second ahead of Cox in twenty-nine counties and was only 1,231 votes behind the Democratic candidate in South Dakota as a whole. Aided by German Lutheran hostility towards Prohibition, Christensen gained over 41 percent in Hutchinson County, and over thirty percent in three other East River counties.
Results
[edit]| Presidential Candidate | Running Mate | Party | Electoral Vote (EV) | Popular Vote (PV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warren G. Harding | Calvin Coolidge | Republican | 5[11] | 110,692 | 60.74% |
| James M. Cox | Franklin D. Roosevelt | Democratic | 0 | 35,938 | 19.72% |
| Parley P. Christensen | Max S. Hayes | Non Partisan League | 0 | 34,707 | 19.04% |
| Aaron S. Watkins | D. Leigh Colvin | Independent | 0 | 900 | 0.49% |
Results by county
[edit]| County[12] | Warren Gamaliel Harding Republican |
James Middleton Cox Democratic |
Parley Parker Christensen Nonpartisan League |
Aaron Sherman Watkins Independent |
Margin | Total votes cast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Aurora | 1,004 | 49.19% | 445 | 21.80% | 589 | 28.86% | 3 | 0.15% | 415[b] | 20.33% | 2,041 |
| Beadle | 2,852 | 56.54% | 925 | 18.34% | 1,240 | 24.58% | 27 | 0.54% | 1,612[b] | 31.96% | 5,044 |
| Bennett | 220 | 48.67% | 199 | 44.03% | 30 | 6.64% | 3 | 0.66% | 21 | 4.65% | 452 |
| Bon Homme | 1,872 | 53.23% | 960 | 27.30% | 676 | 19.22% | 9 | 0.26% | 912 | 25.93% | 3,517 |
| Brookings | 2,743 | 68.64% | 564 | 14.11% | 613 | 15.34% | 76 | 1.90% | 2,130[b] | 53.30% | 3,996 |
| Brown | 5,581 | 56.54% | 1,364 | 13.82% | 2,893 | 29.31% | 33 | 0.33% | 2,688[b] | 27.23% | 9,871 |
| Brule | 1,036 | 51.03% | 671 | 33.05% | 310 | 15.27% | 13 | 0.64% | 365 | 17.98% | 2,030 |
| Buffalo | 200 | 59.70% | 101 | 30.15% | 30 | 8.96% | 4 | 1.19% | 99 | 29.55% | 335 |
| Butte | 1,722 | 54.51% | 672 | 21.27% | 741 | 23.46% | 24 | 0.76% | 981[b] | 31.05% | 3,159 |
| Campbell | 1,128 | 71.26% | 67 | 4.23% | 383 | 24.19% | 5 | 0.32% | 745[b] | 47.06% | 1,583 |
| Charles Mix | 2,021 | 50.17% | 1,305 | 32.40% | 696 | 17.28% | 6 | 0.15% | 716 | 17.78% | 4,028 |
| Clark | 1,753 | 60.24% | 437 | 15.02% | 692 | 23.78% | 28 | 0.96% | 1,061[b] | 36.46% | 2,910 |
| Clay | 1,885 | 61.88% | 907 | 29.78% | 248 | 8.14% | 6 | 0.20% | 978 | 32.11% | 3,046 |
| Codington | 2,706 | 59.84% | 867 | 19.17% | 929 | 20.54% | 20 | 0.44% | 1,777[b] | 39.30% | 4,522 |
| Corson | 1,448 | 60.89% | 484 | 20.35% | 424 | 17.83% | 22 | 0.93% | 964 | 40.54% | 2,378 |
| Custer | 784 | 60.82% | 383 | 29.71% | 116 | 9.00% | 6 | 0.47% | 401 | 31.11% | 1,289 |
| Davison | 2,605 | 54.16% | 1,105 | 22.97% | 1,073 | 22.31% | 27 | 0.56% | 1,500 | 31.19% | 4,810 |
| Day | 2,739 | 59.82% | 436 | 9.52% | 1,378 | 30.09% | 26 | 0.57% | 1,361[b] | 29.72% | 4,579 |
| Deuel | 1,569 | 69.95% | 159 | 7.09% | 498 | 22.20% | 17 | 0.76% | 1,071[b] | 47.75% | 2,243 |
| Dewey | 880 | 63.31% | 335 | 24.10% | 172 | 12.37% | 3 | 0.22% | 545 | 39.21% | 1,390 |
| Douglas | 1,247 | 63.49% | 386 | 19.65% | 325 | 16.55% | 6 | 0.31% | 861 | 43.84% | 1,964 |
| Edmunds | 1,486 | 60.36% | 283 | 11.49% | 681 | 27.66% | 12 | 0.49% | 805[b] | 32.70% | 2,462 |
| Fall River | 1,236 | 61.01% | 680 | 33.56% | 106 | 5.23% | 4 | 0.20% | 556 | 27.44% | 2,026 |
| Faulk | 1,341 | 65.51% | 346 | 16.90% | 353 | 17.24% | 7 | 0.34% | 988[b] | 48.27% | 2,047 |
| Grant | 1,813 | 59.99% | 350 | 11.58% | 856 | 28.33% | 3 | 0.10% | 957[b] | 31.67% | 3,022 |
| Gregory | 1,833 | 57.61% | 744 | 23.38% | 601 | 18.89% | 4 | 0.13% | 1,089 | 34.22% | 3,182 |
| Haakon | 713 | 49.65% | 393 | 27.37% | 321 | 22.35% | 9 | 0.63% | 320 | 22.28% | 1,436 |
| Hamlin | 1,322 | 63.68% | 337 | 16.23% | 398 | 19.17% | 19 | 0.92% | 924[b] | 44.51% | 2,076 |
| Hand | 1,511 | 61.08% | 655 | 26.48% | 291 | 11.76% | 17 | 0.69% | 856 | 34.60% | 2,474 |
| Hanson | 1,001 | 51.87% | 418 | 21.66% | 508 | 26.32% | 3 | 0.16% | 493[b] | 25.54% | 1,930 |
| Harding | 648 | 58.43% | 213 | 19.21% | 241 | 21.73% | 7 | 0.63% | 407[b] | 36.70% | 1,109 |
| Hughes | 1,313 | 68.31% | 433 | 22.53% | 172 | 8.95% | 4 | 0.21% | 880 | 45.79% | 1,922 |
| Hutchinson | 1,873 | 51.15% | 243 | 6.64% | 1,528 | 41.73% | 18 | 0.49% | 345[b] | 9.42% | 3,662 |
| Hyde | 710 | 68.53% | 233 | 22.49% | 92 | 8.88% | 1 | 0.10% | 477 | 46.04% | 1,036 |
| Jackson | 595 | 70.58% | 206 | 24.44% | 42 | 4.98% | 0 | 0.00% | 389 | 46.14% | 843 |
| Jerauld | 1,038 | 57.03% | 357 | 19.62% | 397 | 21.81% | 28 | 1.54% | 641[b] | 35.22% | 1,820 |
| Jones | 609 | 62.33% | 255 | 26.10% | 110 | 11.26% | 3 | 0.31% | 354 | 36.23% | 977 |
| Kingsbury | 2,344 | 71.66% | 481 | 14.70% | 429 | 13.12% | 17 | 0.52% | 1,863 | 56.96% | 3,271 |
| Lake | 2,333 | 69.98% | 398 | 11.94% | 590 | 17.70% | 13 | 0.39% | 1,743[b] | 52.28% | 3,334 |
| Lawrence | 2,986 | 68.50% | 1,201 | 27.55% | 151 | 3.46% | 21 | 0.48% | 1,785 | 40.95% | 4,359 |
| Lincoln | 2,790 | 73.54% | 441 | 11.62% | 555 | 14.63% | 8 | 0.21% | 2,235[b] | 58.91% | 3,794 |
| Lyman | 1,050 | 59.63% | 463 | 26.29% | 244 | 13.86% | 4 | 0.23% | 587 | 33.33% | 1,761 |
| Marshall | 1,557 | 55.97% | 266 | 9.56% | 954 | 34.29% | 5 | 0.18% | 603[b] | 21.68% | 2,782 |
| McCook | 1,864 | 60.52% | 565 | 18.34% | 623 | 20.23% | 28 | 0.91% | 1,241[b] | 40.29% | 3,080 |
| McPherson | 1,470 | 72.92% | 112 | 5.56% | 415 | 20.59% | 19 | 0.94% | 1,055[b] | 52.33% | 2,016 |
| Meade | 1,894 | 58.37% | 894 | 27.55% | 436 | 13.44% | 21 | 0.65% | 1,000 | 30.82% | 3,245 |
| Mellette | 533 | 63.53% | 261 | 31.11% | 44 | 5.24% | 1 | 0.12% | 272 | 32.42% | 839 |
| Miner | 1,450 | 56.73% | 651 | 25.47% | 448 | 17.53% | 7 | 0.27% | 799 | 31.26% | 2,556 |
| Minnehaha | 8,290 | 63.15% | 2,534 | 19.30% | 2,220 | 16.91% | 83 | 0.63% | 5,756 | 43.85% | 13,127 |
| Moody | 1,667 | 63.55% | 371 | 14.14% | 570 | 21.73% | 15 | 0.57% | 1,097[b] | 41.82% | 2,623 |
| Pennington | 2,568 | 64.23% | 1,205 | 30.14% | 212 | 5.30% | 13 | 0.33% | 1,363 | 34.09% | 3,998 |
| Perkins | 1,326 | 60.41% | 417 | 19.00% | 441 | 20.09% | 11 | 0.50% | 885[b] | 40.32% | 2,195 |
| Potter | 1,073 | 72.30% | 255 | 17.18% | 140 | 9.43% | 16 | 1.08% | 818 | 55.12% | 1,484 |
| Roberts | 2,335 | 49.73% | 447 | 9.52% | 1,889 | 40.23% | 24 | 0.51% | 446[b] | 9.50% | 4,695 |
| Sanborn | 1,125 | 49.89% | 517 | 22.93% | 594 | 26.34% | 19 | 0.84% | 531[b] | 23.55% | 2,255 |
| Spink | 2,923 | 65.09% | 785 | 17.48% | 760 | 16.92% | 23 | 0.51% | 2,138 | 47.61% | 4,491 |
| Stanley | 598 | 56.79% | 394 | 37.42% | 58 | 5.51% | 3 | 0.28% | 204 | 19.37% | 1,053 |
| Sully | 542 | 62.95% | 147 | 17.07% | 170 | 19.74% | 2 | 0.23% | 372[b] | 43.21% | 861 |
| Tripp | 1,819 | 59.33% | 968 | 31.57% | 275 | 8.97% | 4 | 0.13% | 851 | 27.76% | 3,066 |
| Turner | 2,703 | 67.59% | 604 | 15.10% | 689 | 17.23% | 3 | 0.08% | 2,014[b] | 50.36% | 3,999 |
| Union | 1,942 | 66.17% | 841 | 28.65% | 142 | 4.84% | 10 | 0.34% | 1,101 | 37.51% | 2,935 |
| Walworth | 1,411 | 61.40% | 478 | 20.80% | 398 | 17.32% | 11 | 0.48% | 933 | 40.60% | 2,298 |
| Yankton | 2,555 | 61.80% | 1,147 | 27.75% | 420 | 10.16% | 12 | 0.29% | 1,408 | 34.06% | 4,134 |
| Ziebach | 507 | 65.42% | 177 | 22.84% | 87 | 11.23% | 4 | 0.52% | 330 | 42.58% | 775 |
| Totals | 110,692 | 60.74% | 35,938 | 19.72% | 34,707 | 19.04% | 900 | 0.49% | 74,754 | 41.02% | 182,237 |
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ In the other eighteen states where Christensen was on the ballot, he was listed under the label of “Farmer-Labor” or “Labor”.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac In this county where Cox ran third behind Christensen as well as behind Harding, margin given is Harding vote minus Christensen vote and percentage margin Harding percentage minus Christensen percentage.
References
[edit]- ^ Morello, John A.; Albert D. Lasker, Advertising, and the Election of Warren G. Harding, p. 64 ISBN 0275970302
- ^ a b Hough, Jerry F.; Changing Party Coalitions: The Mystery of the Red State-Blue State Alignment, pp. 86-87 ISBN 0875864090
- ^ Saldin, Robert P., 'World War I and the System of 1896' (2010); Political Science Faculty Publications, Paper 1, pp. 825-836
- ^ Lichtman, Allan J.; Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928, pp. 102, 115
- ^ Lubell, Samuel; The Future of American Politics, p. 135 Published 1952 by Harper and Brothers, New York
- ^ Goldberg, David Joseph; Discontented America: The United States in the 1920s, p. 47 ISBN 0801860059
- ^ Faykosh, Joseph D., Bowling Green State University; The Front Porch of the American People: James Cox and the Presidential Election of 1920 (thesis), p. 69
- ^ Pietrusza, David; 1920: The Year of the Six Presidents, p. 398 ISBN 0786721022
- ^ Bagby, Rexby; The Road to Normalcy: The Presidential Campaign and Election of 1920, pp. 158-159 ISBN 0801800455
- ^ 'Republicans Going to Win: Prospects of a Complete Victory'; The Observer, October 31, 1920, p. 13
- ^ Dave Leip. "1920 Presidential General Election Results – South Dakota". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
- ^ South Dakota Secretary of State; Official Vote November, 1920 Presidential Electors (highest elector)
