Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Peer review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MainMembersDiscussionArticle Class, ImportancePeer ReviewRequests/TTDTemplatesResources
WikiProject North Carolina
This WikiProject is about the US state of North Carolina
ShortcutWP:WPNC
Wikimedia CommonsCommons:Category:North Carolina North Carolina
Parent
project(s)
U.S. states
Project banner template{{WikiProject North Carolina}}
Userbox{{User WikiProject North Carolina}}


General guidelines for peer review are found on the Wikipedia:Peer review/guidelines page. This entails putting the {{subst:PR}} on the talk page of the article.

There are other types of peer reviews, including:

When requesting a Good article review, a topic is required. Topics do not include North Carolina, so one of the following topics should be selected:

Agriculture, food and drink  · Art and architecture  · Computing and engineering  · Transport  · Geography  · Places  · World history  · Royalty, nobility and heraldry  · Language and literature  · Mathematics and mathematicians  · Film  · Television  · Media and drama  · Albums  · Songs  · Music  · Biology and medicine  · Chemistry and materials science  · Earth sciences  · Physics and astronomy  · Philosophy and religion  · Culture, sociology and psychology  · Education  · Economics and business  · Law  · Magazines and print journalism  · Politics and government  · Sports and recreation  · Video games  · Warfare

The page Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Article alerts shows the alerts for North Carolina articles requiring peer review and other actions. It includes the following:

Did you know

Articles for deletion

Proposed deletions

  • 10 Nov 2024Dye Branch (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by GamerPro64 (t · c) was deleted

Categories for discussion

Good article nominees

Good article reassessments

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be split

Articles for creation


Draft guidelines for North Carolina Project B Class articles

[edit]

Editors can self-assess articles against the (five B-class criteria listed below) up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department.[note 1]

  • B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
  • B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
  • B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  • B4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  • B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams


Notes:

  1. ^ This draft came from the Military History Project. It is a good starting point for North Carolina guidelines.