Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 October 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 6 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 7

[edit]

01:35, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Enter your username in wiki

[edit]

Hi, you declined my article for being not remarkable but it’s an encyclopedia everything belongs even weird cartoon shows. I am not trying to start a fight with you or anything but it’s just that if you can, please acept my article 🥹🐹. Enter your username in wiki (talk) 01:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Enter your username in wiki no... not everything belongs. We have articles on weird cartoon shows, sure, but only because they meet our notability guidelines. Your draft was deleted under G11 (unambiguous promotion), which is strictly forbidden. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Enter your username in wiki, congratulations! You have written content that is exactly the opposite of an actual encyclopedia article. Maybe if you write something that is also exactly the opposite of what you have already written, namely content that cites and summarizes the significant coverage that reliable, independent sources have devoted to the topic, your contributions may be accepted into this encyclopedia. Get to work. Cullen328 (talk) 08:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A.K.A. WP:42. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 10:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:23, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Limelight Lab Grown Diamonds

[edit]

My article is rejected. Can you please highlight where do you feel that this article is showing any promotional purpose? Limelight Lab Grown Diamonds (talk) 06:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Limelight Lab Grown Diamonds Please do not even consider using Wikipedia to promote your own business. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07:38, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Bizzyfan

[edit]

Hi - I worked very hard on my references and citations, and formatting them properly, but it turns out I didn't succeed, as my article was rejected because the references weren't formatted properly. My article was also rejected because the sources weren't considered reliable. I am flummoxed by that, as they are almost exclusively newspaper and magazine sources. One of the difficulties is that the news stories are quite old, hence I had to post the links to them via newspaper archive sites, such as Proquest. In every instance I listed the date, the newspaper, the headline, the page. How might I get some assistance in doing this properly - I did my very best already! Bizzyfan (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bizzyfan. Your draft was only declined, not rejected, meaning you are free to improve and resubmit.
You have formatted your references manually in plain text, but this unfortunately isn't how we reference on Wikipedia.
Check out the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE which shows how to reference using the visual editor. You'll end up with properly formatted inline citations with an automatically generated ref list.
Your sources are mostly reliable other than FindAGrave which is user generated so shouldn't be used.
Hope that helps, do resubmit for review once you've gone through all the references and formatted them correctly. Qcne (talk) 08:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! 64.114.211.53 (talk) 22:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again! Thank you again for helping me. One more question regarding the sources. I fully realize and accept that FindAGrave generally isn't accepted as a source. I used it because in that generation, often a woman's age wasn't referred to in news stories or other publications. Considered rude. So there aren't articles that refer directly to her date of birth - that I have found. Bizzyfan (talk) 17:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bizzyfan Instead of FindAGrave, which we can't used as it's user generated and so not considered reliable, there may be a primary source you could use such as local parish records or census details. If nothing, best to just leave the date of birth blank. We have an entire category for biographies with missing DOBs so it's okay to leave blank. Qcne (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! No problem. I was wondering about leaving it blank. I wasn't sure if census details would be considered too "original" and not secondary... Many thanks for replying, and so swiftly. I really appreciate it. Bizzyfan (talk) 18:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:25, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Vanishanihar14

[edit]

Hi im not sure how to add the referrences. For hos works are available in youtube. Vanishanihar14 (talk) 10:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanishanihar14: the method of referencing is explained at WP:REFB. As for what sources you need to cite, it's those ones that have provided the information in your draft. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11:48, 7 October 2024 review of submission by 64.253.215.212

[edit]

I really want this to be an article. But, how do I make it good? 64.253.215.212 (talk) 11:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comments left by reviewers. You need independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage of this airline to summarize in the draft. 331dot (talk) 12:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:14, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Finlay73

[edit]

If I edit this page to add additional information will this delay the review process? Finlay73 (talk) 16:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Finlay73: no, it won't; you're welcome to edit the draft whenever you want, including after submitting it, and doing so has no impact on when the draft will be reviewed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely not go ahead and improve the draft, it will increase the chances of a favourable review. Theroadislong (talk) 16:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:20, 7 October 2024 review of submission by 176.42.132.44

[edit]

why is this not notable? he has very reputable awards and thoughts for Turkish people. 176.42.132.44 (talk) 16:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awards do not contribute to notability unless the award itself merits an article(like Nobel Peace Prize or Academy Award). 331dot (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:15, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Jermelw323

[edit]

Can you check over my Wikipedia page and let me know which thing I need to change to make my article verified Jermelw323 (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb, Apple Music and Spotify are not independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 17:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jermelw323: Refer to my /Decode subpage (linked as "critiques" in my signature):
None of your sources are usable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:44, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Kevin kerrison

[edit]

Hello, I hope you're doing well.

Could you please let me know why my article was declined and guide me on how I can get it approved for publication? Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Kevin kerrison (talk) 17:44, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has been rejected and will not be reviewed further, see below. Theroadislong (talk) 18:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:52, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Kevin kerrison

[edit]

Could someone please explain why this article is not live yet? Kindly guide me and let me know the response as well. 



Kevin kerrison (talk) 17:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As it clearly says "After multiple declines for lack of coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources, a single primary and non-independent source was added. It's clear that the individual is in fact not notable". Theroadislong (talk) 18:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:15, 7 October 2024 review of submission by Syedkumail hs

[edit]

My Peronal arcle was not published Syedkumail hs (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Syedkumail hs: We have zero tolerance for promotion. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23:17, 7 October 2024 review of submission by KeithlCraig

[edit]

Hello Sir,

I hope you are doing well.

Could you please explain why my article is not getting approved? I would appreciate it if you could provide a reason for the rejection and guide me on what steps I can take to get the article approved, as well as the approval process.

Thank you. KeithlCraig (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Please see the above messages about the draft. If the other editor is your agent or representative, that must be disclosed, see WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@KiethlCraig: The reason the draft was rejected and will not be considered further is because the editor working on it couldn't/hasn't address(ed) the draft's issues in re notability as Wikipedia defines it. This is due to the sources not being in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-the-subject news/review/scholarly sources that discuss Craig at length and are subject to fact-checking and other forms of editorial oversight. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 01:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also answered at User talk:Kevin kerrison#Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith L. Craig (October 7). --bonadea contributions talk 11:34, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_October_7&oldid=1251349122"