User talk:Zvonko

Welcome!

Hello, Zvonko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

--millosh (talk (sr:)) 12:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. JoaoRicardo^talk 00:34, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lovcenac

Hi - Thanks for adding the link to the news article - it's not often that Lovcenac is in the news. Could you just add a little bit in English as to what it's about - from what I understand it's about an ethnic Montenegrin women from Lovcenac, but my (let's call it) Yugoslavian's pretty limited. Also, do you know anything about the Montegrins' desire to build a Montenegrin Orthodox Church? See [1]. Thanks Adam Mathias 04:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC) No Comment!!!Boris from Lovcenac.[reply]

Bosnian Genocide

Because it had been a week and I felt like testing the waters would be ok. And 0 posts since I unprotected it. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 21:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I never unprotect blindly. If it got slammed with edits immediately I'd see where you are coming from, but quiet so far. It's not as if we cannot reprotect if need be. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 21:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)i naravno RAC ALEKSANDAR KRALJ LOVCENCA[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 8% for major edits and 58% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 12 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 03:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Hi Zvonko, I noticed you added Category:Serbian writers to Aleksa Šantić, who was already categorized into Category:Serbian poets. Please see WP:Categorization#Guidelines, esp. no. 3. In other words, don't duplicate categorization in both a category and a subcategory. When in doubt, place the entry in a "higher-level" category, but don't duplicate. Since Šantić was primarily a poet, he should go only to "poets" category.

Now, I admit the Category:Serbian writers is in disorder, but please don't add to the confusion :-). Also, as above, please use some more edit summaries – a mere "cat" would have pointed me that you changed a category rather than external links as indicated. See Wikipedia:Edit summary legend.

Regards & keep up on good work, Duja 14:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nsa convention img 9201.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nsa convention img 9201.jpg. I assume this image could be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 22:58, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:039100717.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading [[== Unblock review ==

Hello. I have looked over the block and determined that it was fair and called for. Bishonen is not one to throw around blocks for personal attack without reason. That whole discussion was full of snarky nasty remarks.

Before I am willing to reverse this block I need to be convince that you understand this was inappropriate and agree to act in a more civil fashion in the future I am willing the reverse this block. Your unblock request and conversation after show a lack of this understanding.

Regardless of if the block is reversed or not future incidences like this can lead to longer blocks. Chillum 05:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image:039100717.jpg]]. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thue | talk 11:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Image

I know. However the way it was being used was not consistant with the claim of fair use.Geni 05:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read the tag.Geni 06:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of those other scanned pages are copyvios as well and will be delt with. The problem is that the article does not comment on the specific image and issue.Geni 08:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it has to reference that specific photo So along the lines of; photo/ front page X is considered a claissic example etc etc. Of course this could be tricky to do but fiar use isn't meant to be easy.Geni 08:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Malo sam promenio clanak o Dobrici Cosicu

pa ako mozes da ne brises ponovo ono sto sam dopisao(ako ti ni prvi put nisi to radio,onda ti se izvinjavam)Dzoni 14:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Nuvolari Tazio monumento a Roma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nuvolari Tazio monumento a Roma.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Mihajlovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mihajlovic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Paspaljatlanta.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paspaljatlanta.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Jovanka partizanka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jovanka partizanka.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:BrozoviNiksonovi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrozoviNiksonovi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Color correction

I am kindly asking you not to revert images with colours corrected to previous lower quality versions.

Thank you Avala 12:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Cane29.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cane29.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mihajlovic.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mihajlovic.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kop12345634534.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kop12345634534.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jesic CSKA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jesic CSKA.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:DjukanovicBulatovic1991.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DjukanovicBulatovic1991.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Afrika paprika and Dado Prso

Please do not use {test} templates in cases like this where what the user is doing is clearly not Vandalism. While Afrika paprika is being disruptive and most likely violating policy, using a template like that does nothing to help the situation. The user is clearly not vandalising the article per the definition of vandalism, and should not be treated as a new user trying out editing in an improper way when it is rather obvious that he is trying to promote a particular POV. Please take the time to write a real warning, which takes into account the situation. --Philosophus ^T 11:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Belgrade

Just wondering why you changed it back? Do you oppose using the actual name of the team? It seems UEFA officially uses FK Crvena Zvezda in English. --Lowg 02:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Stadion_CrvenaZvezda.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stadion_CrvenaZvezda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Anaivanovicmiami.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anaivanovicmiami.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Metros232 21:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Mihajlovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mihajlovic.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytny 08:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --Ytny 02:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have several more images that are missing the necessary source information. Please cite the source and copyright owners, etc. Thanks. Ytny 11:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In the case of a screenshot from a TV program, the copyright belongs to the broadcaster and you do not qualify as the creator of the image. I will remove the GFDL tag and resore the nsl tag, and you can add the proper source information, i.e copyright owner, day, information about broadcast, etc. Thaks. Ytny 21:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Film363-copy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Film363-copy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DejanStankovic.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DejanStankovic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ytny 02:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ytny 02:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NatasaMicic Apr15 2002.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NatasaMicic Apr15 2002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ytny 11:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ytny 11:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AnaIvanovicSession3a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AnaIvanovicSession3a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Ceca raznatovic 36.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ceca raznatovic 36.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 12:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:OliverMandic.png

Thanks for uploading Image:OliverMandic.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:State-of-EXIT1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:State-of-EXIT1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 22:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SekaAleksicindhadghex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SekaAleksicindhadghex.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ceca raznatovic 36.jpg

Ok, I'm listening.

As far as #1 of WP:FUC goes, I don't think a "free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information" in the sense that I didn't see one or don't have one at my disposal.

"I didn't see one or don't have one at my disposal".. this never implies that one couldn't be created. --Abu Badali 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for WP:FU#Counterexamples, it is fairly obvious that the purpose of putting this image isn't merely showing "what this person looks like". The entire turbofolk genre has a very pronounced visual component and this image showing the early look of turbofolk adds a lot to the quality and comprehension of the entire article.Zvonko 04:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This makes sense. This image seems ok to be used in the Turbo-folk article, but not in Ceca. --Abu Badali 15:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source

So, what should be placed as a source? And while, you're at it why were the other two images taken down in the middle of discussion? The source info may have been removed in the fair use discussion but there was no warning message or anything. Seeing that the source for this image has been listed by you as "missing", am I going to find it suddenly taken down too. Zvonko 01:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained in the edit summary, use the newspaper name and publication date. But if the newspaper is not this image's copyright holder, it must contain information on who is. But in this case, the tag is wrong and must be changed. --Abu Badali 01:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aug29 2004.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aug29 2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Meridianliga.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Meridianliga.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kodeksi

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Kodeksi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 04:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BrankaGlasovic07 BK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrankaGlasovic07 BK.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SDUlogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SDUlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Otpor, and the country's involvement

I know what you're saying, and you're not wrong. Montenegro under the DPS was not very active in the FR Yugoslavia; they were concentrating on building their own walls and finding their way alone. The actions were within Serbia and remain a Serbian phenomenon. The problem is that ever since the creating of the FRY, the national name of the country until its final day in SCG was Serbia half the time and the national name for the other half. When I attended the Anti-NATO protest in March 1999 in London, the thousands of locals were chanting "Sr-bi-ja...Sr-bi-ja", then a few minutes later; you'd hear "Ju - Go - Slavija, Ju - Go - Slavija". Clearly people were confused and could not distinguish that the two entities were in direct conflict with each other, where-by at a national level, you can be one, or the other. Be that as it may, that's how it was. Now my purpose for adding terms such as "the federation", "Yugoslav", "the national" etc. on this page as with all others: the basis for the popular dissidency was dissatisfaction with administration from the highest level. Millions felt that the key to a good future is a good relationship with the western states, and only the central government stood between the citizens and the rest of the western world. And ultimately, it was the Yugoslav presidency which was ousted, and legally, it did have powers over Montenegro, and Montenegrins in turn were elligible to contribute to running the republic whether these privileges were taken or not. I think it would be a good idea if one of us revise the page from top to bottom and restore Serbia in about half of the slots (in a way that people know); or introduce a new section explaining what we both know (this as I have written it). I just feel that to continue using "Serb, Serb, Serb" is sloppy and unofficial. Do you see what I'm suggesting? Evlekis 07:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Božidar (Boki) Milošević

Zvonko, I think that we should use full names of the persons we are writing about. For example, Milenko Stefanović, also a clarinetist, is better known as Mima Stefanović; however, article about him has been entitled Milenko Stefanović. I suggest to give this article its previous name - Božidar Milošević. --Andrija 13:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Natasamicic1.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Natasamicic1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Branislav Jovanovic 07:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Branislav Jovanovic 07:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Natasamicic1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Natasamicic1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BrankaGlasovic07 BK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrankaGlasovic07 BK.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2007, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ko to tamo peva.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Metals banka-v.gif.

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sartid-Smederevo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images being disputed by User:BetacommandBot

Hello! I noticed that BetacommandBot had been heavily spamming your page with notices, and decided to start writing a script to allow me to quickly (but manually) consolidate the notifications into a single section, and am testing it on your user page, as it has been one of the hardest hit. The following note by BetacommandBot (I apologize for its accusatory tone) applies to each of these images:

Thanks for uploading (image name). However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot

Image:Sarlo1.jpg.
Image:Sarlo akrobata.gif.
Image:Laibach crowd.jpg.
Image:LSVlogogore.jpg.
Image:Nele03.jpg.
Image:LIBERALI-ls.gif.
Image:Kurir.jpg.
Image:Kurir logo.jpg.
Image:Hronika1234 1.jpg.
Image:Ta bi dao da si na mom mjestu.jpg.
Image:Pretucen.jpg.
Image:Press-Glava-RGB-Web7.jpg.
Image:PB SG.gif.
Image:Otpor FreeYourMind MTV jesen2000.jpg.
Image:LogoDanas.gif.
Image:Startlogo.jpg
Image:SSJ logo.gif
Image:SNPlogo.gif
Image:SDPlogo.jpg
Image:SDPlogo BELI.gif
Image:5 okt na MTV-iju.jpg.
Image:Baner LSCG 6.gif.
Image:Dan-logo.jpg.
Image:DSSLogo.gif.
Image:Dhss logo.gif.
Image:Dtplakat.jpg.
Image:Dtban.gif.
Image:Ekipa cover.jpg.
Image:Evropljanin.jpg.
Image:GoranBregovic album.jpg.
Image:Naslovnavelika16122005.jpg.
Image:Naslovna Blic.jpg.
Image:KAFANE-6.jpg.
Image:NINlogo.gif.
Image:Gzp logo.gif.
Image:Komercijalna Banka Beograds.png.
Image:KomBankBudva.gif.

Non-free use disputed for Image:VechernieNovOkFr.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:VechernieNovOkFr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 08:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Logo fortitudo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo fortitudo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Zurnal.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zurnal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Iggy00ve.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Iggy00ve.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OliverMandic.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OliverMandic.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 12:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zeta_grb_veliki.gif

I have tagged Image:Zeta_grb_veliki.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 20:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:WhenFather.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WhenFather.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Halasp.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Halasp.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 15:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MTELCG.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MTELCG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DSSLogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:DSSLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iggy00ve.jpg

I have tagged Image:Iggy00ve.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 16:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vecernje-novosti.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vecernje-novosti.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MTELCG.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MTELCG.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kurir logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kurir logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Naslovna34sm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Naslovna34sm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Evropa145.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Evropa145.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SNPlogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:SNPlogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ceca on Pink1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ceca on Pink1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ta bi dao da si na mom mjestu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ta bi dao da si na mom mjestu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Uspavanka za Radmilu M.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Uspavanka za Radmilu M.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslav First League, team HSK GRADJANSKI

Hello Zvonko

You in many places have written structures of a team of the winner championship Look years 1926, 1928 and others, the champion team HSK GRADJANSKI [2] Some players at you are missed Look page [3] Check up and add all players Gavrilov Sergey 22:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LIBERALI-ls.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:LIBERALI-ls.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gzp logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Gzp logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:03, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KAFANE-6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KAFANE-6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LSVlogogore.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LSVlogogore.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nele03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nele03.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Poster1234.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Poster1234.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WhenFather.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WhenFather.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sartid-Smederevo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Sartid-Smederevo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SDPlogo BELI.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SDPlogo BELI.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SDPlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SDPlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SSJ logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SSJ logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Stadion CrvenaZvezda.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Stadion CrvenaZvezda.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 15:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Iggy00ve.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Iggy00ve.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Time of the Gypsies.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Time of the Gypsies.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fathless.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fathless.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dan-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:State-of-EXIT1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:State-of-EXIT1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo fortitudo.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Logo fortitudo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SDPlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SDPlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Avalalogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Avalalogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foreigners in Ukraine

In your recent edit on list of foriegn footballers in Ukraine, you merged Kosovars and Albanians together. I don't support Kosovo's independence but put them separate since some users changed the flag icons to Kosovo and those players were born in Serbia. Why don't you want them in a separate category, since those Albanians are trying to call themselves Kosovars? (I don't think it is acknowledging the Kosovan independence but is just showing that those players are rebels that support Kosovan independence, what do you think?) --Shustfan (talk) 20:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

That works for me. Thanks for Replying. --Shustfan (talk) 19:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Rok mašina" & "Kraljevski apartman"

Zdravo, Zvonko!

Primetio sam da si imena članaka "Rok Mašina" i "Kraljevski Apartman" promenio u "Rok mašina" i "Kraljevski apartman".

thumb|

Ovo je omot prvog albuma grupe Rok Mašina. Na omotu se nalazi i njihov logo (ne samo ispisano ime benda, već logo, jer se nalazi i na omotu njihovog drugog albuma Izrod na granici, kao i na omotu singla "Vatra" / "Bilo mi je bolje"). Primetićeš da je slovo "M" jasno napisano velikim slovom. Da ne bih bez potrebe uploadovao neki omot Kraljevskog Apartmana (još ne razmiščjam da počnem rad na člancima o njihovim albumima), mogao bi da posetiš njihov zvaničan sajt: www.kraljevski-apartman.com. Iako je sajt pomalo zastareo, već pri njegovom otvaranju ćeš primetiti da je početno slovo u reči "Apartman" napisano veliko. To je logo Kraljevskog Apartmana, ali kako je logo nastao tek pre par godina, nalazi se samo na omotu albuma Ruka pravde, Best Of Live i DVD-a 10 godina sa vama - Live SKC. Bez obzira na to, na omotu albuma Rocker "Apartman" je napisano sa velikim početnim "A". (Izuzetak su omoti albuma Long Live Rock 'n' Roll i Izgubljen u vremenu, na kojima su sva slova u imenu benda velika.)

Nekim mojim drugovima i meni (a mi smo, kako smo do sada zapazili, najangažovaniji oko članaka koji se tiču srpske rock muzike) smeta što se prema našim rock bendovima često odnosimo sa nekom vrstom nepoštovanja. Jer, ako se imena bendova The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Deep Purple, Black Sabbath, Sex Pistols itd. (zapravo svako dvočlano ili višečlano ime) pišu sa svim velikim početnim slovima (i toje praksa u čitavom svetu!), zašto takav slučaj ne bi bio i sa našim bendovima (a naša rock scena nije nešto što postoji nekoliko godina, složićeš se)? Istina je da se u našoj štampi dvočlana i višečlana imena bendova često pišu malim početnim slovom (to radi čak i Petar Janjatović u svojoj kapitalnoj Ilustrovanoj ex-Yu rock enciklopediji!), mada ja (kao u ostalom i većina ljudi) smatram da je to greška. Čak i kada je ovo pitanje diskutabilno, kao kod, recimo, Riblje Čorbe ili Bijelog Dugmeta, gde su sva slova u logou mala, ili Kerbera i Azre gde su sva slova u logou velika, čini mi se da je u slučaju Rok Mašine i Kraljevskog Apartmana reč samog benda dovoljna, i da bend može najbolje da govori u svoje ime (bar što se njegovog imena tiče).

Dakle, ja bih lako mogao da imena bendova vratim u "Rok Mašina" i u "Kraljevski Apartman" (kako sam ih prvobitno i napisao :)), ali bi ih ti verovatno vratio u "Rok mašina" i "Kraljevski apartman", pa bi ih ja ponovo vratio... I tako bez kraja i konca. Ali ovo prepuštam tebi, i nadam se da ćeš ispraviti svoju grešku.

Pozdrav! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ostalocutanje (talk • contribs) 09:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FRY in Eurovision SC

The election was held as if it was the SFRY that would be represented. Preformers from Slovenia, Croatia and Macedonia had cancelled their appearances but preformers from Bosnia and Herzegovina have not cancelled. In that time 1992 Bosnia and Herzegovina considered it a part of SFRY and I think even had the orriginal name Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (like SR Montenegro until 1993).

So the representative has been elected under the red star and competed in the main ESC 1992 without the red star. This means a fact which should be represented in Wikipedia. Yugoslavia despit sanctions competed but this was a preformance for the old SFRY.

PFRY and SFRY are one the same but SFRY/FRY in 1992 is not the FRY after 2000 which stopped claiming that it was the sole successor of SFRY. Before 2000 FRY claimed just that the complete successor for SFRY.

Stop your revertments. Please.

Imbris (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your futile attempts of trying to wash away the past of FRY. FRY participated in ESC 1992 with a song that was elected to represent a part of SFRY (B & H, Montenegro, Serbia). Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia opted not to vote nor to send their representatives to Belgrade. The sittuation around FRY should be separated from the SFRY and also separated from the SCG. -- Imbris (talk) 21:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslavian names at birth

Hi! Sorry to disturb you, I've got a question for you: people born in SFR Yugoslavia's Republics (SR Slovenia, SR Macedonia...I think you were born in the SR Bosnia and Herzegovina) had their names in their ID in original (slovene, macedonian cyrillic, bosnian...) script or in the Serbian one? For example: Josip Katalinski was born as Josip Katalinski (and in the ID or at the register office is written Josip Katalinski), or was he born Јосип Каталински (so the transliteration "Josip Katalinski" is a later adaptation)? Thank you! --necronudist (talk) 18:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahahah, thank you really much! So: people born in Macedonia were registered in Macedonian Cyrillic, the others... randomly. Maybe Latin, maybe Cyrillic. You say you are referred in Latin in certain documents, and in Cyrillic in others. Is the same for people born in post-Yugoslavia countries? If you were born in today Croatia would you have been referred also in Cyrillic in certain documents? I mean: you're known in Cyrillic in certain documents 'cause at the time Serbian Cyrillic was official language through the Kingdom. So it's correct to refer people born in Yugoslavia mainly with Serbian Cyrillic... am I right? --necronudist (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be sorry Zvonko! We all have our tasks to do! Thank you for your amazing explanations... I asked you about this issue 'cause I was interested time ago in Soviet Union players, and I was wondering if they were born in their original "birth nations" scripts or in the Russian one. A Belarusian person told me that in Soviet Union IDs there was a row with the name in Russian, a line below, and the name in native script. So he had his name on the ID both in Russian Cyrillic and Belarusian Cyrillic. The Yugoslavian way is different: only one script is used, and it can be different from case to case. Now, a little recap:

Bosnians: both Serbian Latin and Serbian Cyrillic were official scripts. (I think) higher probability of being registered in Serbian Cyrillic script.
Croats: both Serbian Latin and Serbian Cyrillic were official scripts. Higher probability of being registered in Serbian Latin script.
Macedonians: Macedonian (Cyrillic script) was the official language. People registered in Macedonian Cyrillic.
Montenegrins: both Serbian Latin and Serbian Cyrillic were official scripts. (I think) higher probability of being registered in Serbian Cyrillic script.
Serbians: both Serbian Latin and Serbian Cyrillic were official scripts. Higher probability of being registered in Serbian Cyrillic script.
Slovenes: Slovene (Latin script) was the official language. People registered in Slovenian Latin.

Is this recap right?

Sorry Zvonko if I torment you :-) but, what about Kosovo and Vojvodina Autonomous Provinces? I'm being really interested in this issue...your explanations are really really really interesting! I'm learning a lot and I will never thank you enough! --necronudist (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magomed Ibragimov

Hi Zvonko! I have also read your explanations about the Macedonian names - very interesting! So please allow me to ask you also for some help? It would be great if you can also add the Macedonian name to Magomed Ibragimov the only Olympic medalist for Macedonia? Many thanks in advance and kind regards Doma-w (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslavia at Euro92

Hi Zvonko! Do you know where I can find the list of players called up for the tournament before the UEFA ban? 18 players left for Sweden, before they were forced to come back. Do you know anything more? Thank you!--necronudist (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Imbris

I noticed that you too had a problem with User:Imbris. There is currently a discussion about his edits here. Grk1011 (talk) 20:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Milo prez kampanja 1997.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Milo prez kampanja 1997.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nele03.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Nele03.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 03:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Emotion Production

A tag has been placed on Emotion Production requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mifter (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jovan Guzijan

A tag has been placed on Jovan Guzijan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. [roux » x] 03:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Serbian Superliga 2008–09 scorers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Serbian Superliga 2008–09 scorers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Long and sprawling list of statistics per WP:NOT#STATS, which already exists in suitable way at Serbian Superliga 2008–09

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hockey-holic (talk) 16:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pink BH.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pink BH.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo-pink.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Logo-pink.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Pravda.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Pravda.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wikl cut.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Wikl cut.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Nele03.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Nele03.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Wikl cut.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikl cut.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Ajs cut.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Ajs cut.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Zaduzbina Ilije Kolarca.jpg

File:Zaduzbina Ilije Kolarca.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Université Ilija Kolarc Belgrade.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Université Ilija Kolarc Belgrade.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nemanja Vidic

Nemanja Vidic was born in the town known as Titovo Uzice in the Serbia SR. The town did not come to be known as Uzice until after that. – Pee Jay 22:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ratko Knežević

A tag has been placed on Ratko Knežević requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Merlion 444 05:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Greece-Germanypicture1291pw.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Greece-Germanypicture1291pw.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 04:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MTV Adria.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MTV Adria.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JaGa^talk 20:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Otpor FreeYourMind MTV jesen2000.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Otpor FreeYourMind MTV jesen2000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Zvonko! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Branislav Simić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lidija Vukićević - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Žarko Zečević - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lola Novaković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Goran Vejvoda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Slavoljub Muslin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 06:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JovanaJankovic07 RTS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antic after winning LaLiga 1996.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Antic after winning LaLiga 1996.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 01:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:LjubinkoDrulovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LjubinkoDrulovic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fathless.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fathless.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 03:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oralno doba

The article Oralno doba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marko Živić Show

The article Marko Živić Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hi there ZVONKO, VASCO here,

As you did in Tomislav Ivković and many MANY other players, please stop changing - incorrectly - the name of the country to "Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia", it is not the name of the WP article, and so creates a redirect.

Please respect other people's work, so the same can be done to yours. Attentively, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloko leto.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Bloko leto.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo fortitudo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo fortitudo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goran Vejvoda

The article Goran Vejvoda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to pass WP:COMPOSER. Seems to only get incidental mention in articles about Enki Bilal or Angelin Preljocaj

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sailsbystars (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of association football club rivalries by country

Hi Zvonko, thanks for fixing the Večiti derbi section in that article. Some time ago I found that article having only the basic info included and the second paragraph, so I added the text found in the first paragraph. I did it in a rush and afterwords I forgot about it. Many articles related to football in Serbia need expansion from the historical perspective as many concentrate only in recent events, so all help is welcome. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Djokovic mess, sorry

When I said mess I had meant the 17 or so edits before yours. You had added onto a mess of a page and the only way to correct it was to revert back to a non-messy version. Yours just got caught in the fixup. Sorry about that. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic names

Hi there ZVONKO, VASCO here,

please add the players' name in the other alphabet in INTRO, but not in BOX, let's keep boxes compressed shall we?

Attentively, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomislav Karadžić

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tomislav Karadžić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomislav Karadžić

The article Tomislav Karadžić has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Claims by Mitrovic

Will you please see the discussion page? --Jesuislafete (talk) 06:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also "you are pushing a heavy personalised POV": please tell me how. Make sure sure you mention why it is personal, and why it is POV. I will remind you of the first line of the POV lede: "Editing from a neutral point of view (NPOV) means representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by published by reliable sources. Those are heavy accusations to throw around, so you should back them up" --Jesuislafete (talk) 06:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

nice job

nice job on The Parade (film) Decora (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zvonko, you are invited!

You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region.

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited List of newspapers in Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Informer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ranko Rubežić

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danilovic

You can't just say that someone is "thuggish" or "surly". There's no way to justify that in terms of WP:NPOV. Stick to the facts, and let readers judge for themselves. (Though if you're going to list various incidents, every sentence needs to be clearly sourced. See WP:BLP.) Zagalejo^^^ 07:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is Blic even a reliable source? The article on the paper mentions a couple of accusations of libel. I'm sorry if I'm annoying you with this, but we have to be very, very strict about any negative information about living people. Zagalejo^^^ 07:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I started a discussion here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Blic. Some of the content you added might be salvageable - it's clear that he was punished for his altercation with the ref - but I want to make sure that we are totally accurate and neutral. Just bear with me. Zagalejo^^^ 07:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do think the incident with the referee is worth mentioning, since a two-year suspension is a pretty big deal - even if the punishment was eventually modified. I added a little bit about it in the "Administrative career" section, using a different source. Zagalejo^^^ 03:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlavOrkestar cover of Svijet June 1985.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PlavOrkestar cover of Svijet June 1985.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rtbilejritma.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rtbilejritma.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceca raznatovic 36.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ceca raznatovic 36.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 21:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NATO bombing of the Radio Television of Serbia headquarters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested for consensus

Please comment over at Draft talk:Abby Martin#Requested move 04 March 2014. Viriditas (talk) 02:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Consider this a formal warning that further misbehaviour on any other article will lead to a block. By misbehaviour, I am talking about the constant revert of other users' edits without discussing on the talk page. You reverted four times on RT (TV network), clearly breaching WP:3RR. However, I assume good faith that you might not be aware that it was a violation, and as such I expect you to be aware of that from now on. Cheers. → Call me Hahc21 06:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Milan Gurović may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Partizan-mora-da-padne.html Gurović za MONDO: Partizan mora da padne];MTS Mondo, 28 Decembar 2006]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrey Illarionov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Srđan Šaper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gordana Suša, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal Executive Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Koča Popović does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Otpor! without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 22:28, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Zvonko. You have new messages at 331dot's talk page.
Message added 22:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

331dot (talk) 22:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Otpor! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Danas

Stanko Subotić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Montenegrin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otpor!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watchdog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3rr at Milorad Mažić

Your recent editing history at Milorad Mažić shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --VeryCrocker (talk) 09:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrey Illarionov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hi, Zvonko. I was very struck by your insults and bad-faith assumptions against User:Joy in this ANI thread, which I have just read. You have been editing the encyclopedia since 2005, and so have no possible excuse for not being aware that such toxic attacks on fellow editors are not allowed here. I have blocked you for 48 hours for egregious personal attacks. Your block log was previously clean, or I'd have made the block longer. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 13:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

No need to call on me: that I didn't see them doesn't mean they weren't there. It is entirely possible that Bishonen is a much better reader of passive-aggressiveness or bad-faith assumptions than I am: I have faith in her judgment. Drmies (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewing admin should feel free to unblock without consulting me, if they want to. I thought the sneering way you attacked the person and their integrity and good faith was beyond the pale. That said, I agree Joy was unwise to challenge your Oppose, and to continue to reply to you. I just don't think it's any excuse. It appears however that User:Drmies is of a different opinion; perhaps he'd like to comment here. (Adding after edit conflict: ah, I see he already did. Well, all three of us had better wait for an uninvolved admin to review your unblock request, then.)

I thought at first it might help the reviewing admin if I added a few quotes from your input in that thread to point up what I mean, but probably not, as they will in any case have to form their own opinion of the thread, and context matters. It's not that long of a thread, anyway (only the subthread, that I link to above, is relevant).

Incidentally, no, the block had nothing to do with Joy's post on Drmies page. I do watch Drmies' page, and seeing Antidiskriminator's rather surprising post on it turn up on my watchlist, I went to read the long ANI thread. It took a while, and it convinced me that you had passed the limits of decency. I only saw Joy's post on my watchlist when I had already typed my block notice. The timing is a false friend; I'd been away from the computer for a while, as one is. Bishonen | talk 17:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Alright, I appreciate you refraining from swaying the reviewing admin's mind further with your specific quote-based thoughts and analysis. Once the decision has been made, if you don't mind, I will request your personal input on what specifically made you have such a strong reaction to what I wrote to Joy and how you think a situation like this one should be handled in the future.Zvonko (talk) 21:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should have read all of this lengthy unblock request--like, where it says "his vindictiveness, fragile ego, and litigious nature....his baseless accusations and harassment". That should be enough for any admin to turn this down. Drmies (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So, you first make a claim on your talk page that I wasn't uncivil on the ANI thread, but then you support my block for being uncivil, something you didn't think I was, on the grounds that you're no good at reading and judging this kinda thing anyway and that you defer to the judgement of a person who did think I was uncivil.

Then hour and half later, you (hour and a half before that self-admittedly not that good at "reading passive-aggressiveness or bad-faith") suddenly feel comfortable making a suggestion to the reviewing admin that it's essentially OK to turn down my unblock request without bothering to read more than one sentence.

May I ask how do you imagine me getting a fair hearing by an untainted set of admin eyes now that you (another admin) suggested that several words "should be enough for any admin to turn down this request"? Context, order of cause and consequence, who initiated this, the validity of initial accusations... I guess none of that plays a role.Zvonko (talk) 21:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock review

Hello. I have looked over the block and determined that it was fair and called for. Bishonen is not one to throw around blocks for personal attack without reason. That whole discussion was full of snarky nasty remarks.

Before I am willing to reverse this block I need to be convinced that you understand this was inappropriate and agree to act in a more civil fashion in the future. Your unblock request and conversation after show a lack of this understanding.

Regardless of if the block is reversed or not future incidences like this can lead to longer blocks. Chillum 05:20, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I understand I used tone and level of sarcasm deemed inappropriate on Wiki and agree to keep that in mind going forward as I have during the previous almost a decade without any similar past issues. I let the emotions of anger get the better of me this time while defending from a false accusation and while I consciously took care to curtail my anger by avoiding profanity it definitely seems like I wasn't as receptive to the overall unpleasant tone.Zvonko (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zvonko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sure whether Bishonen's decision to block me has anything to do with this post User:Joy left on User:Drmies' talk page (the timing would suggest so), but I'm appalled by this action, or rather its limit to me alone. Every individual has his/her criteria (cultural, gender, and upbringing related) when it comes to what they find uncivil in terms of the tone and manner of communication, but if Bishonen was, as he/she says, "struck" by my conduct on that thread and found me to be "toxic" and "egregious" then how Joy can escape censure is beyond me and really leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I've been on Wiki 10 years now and have always tried to be constructive. I remind you that Joy is the one who initiated this back-and-forth on that ANI thread after I placed my vote. He did so by lobbing a baseless accusation my way of supposed bad 'behaviour' on another talk page. Perhaps I made an error in judgement by even engaging him in a discussion, seeing that he was clearly baiting me, though my initial response to his harassment was extremely calm. He didn't let up and it was only after he expanded on his initial harassment that I explained to him in detail why his charges were baseless and I also brought up his conduct on Talk:Dado Pršo where he ignored references. His response to this was to basically dismiss it as "being 8 years old", suggesting some kind of axe-grinding exercise in all of this. He then even went to the Dado Pršo page itself, deleting content for which references clearly existed all along on the article's talk page (and Joy was aware of them at some point in the past). I do not think much of Joy's admin conduct. I come across his edits from time to time on different Balkans-related topics, but always avoid engaging with him as his vindictiveness, fragile ego, and litigious nature do not allow for much productive to occur. However, this time I had to respond to his baseless accusations and harassment, especially in light of his conduct on Dado Prso that I became aware of recently. In closing, yes our back-and-forth that he initiated was warm-blooded, but I don't think it crossed over into uncivil territory and I see that User:Drmies, the closing admin of that ANI thread, agreed with that assessment. Zvonko (talk) 17:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I have unblocked you on your word, and based on the permission of the blocking admin. I see that you have a very long history of good editing and that was your first block. I hope this remains an isolated incident and you continue the good work you do here. Chillum 07:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apology to Joy

Hello. Joy is still feeling insulted by this whole thing and is resenting the lack of apology.

It is not really my place to force an apology but if you did apologize I think it would go a long way to restore the peace.

Thank you, Chillum 17:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jesse Brown (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CFCF

CFCF-DT has never been a Global affiliate — it's always been a CTV affiliate since the day it was launched, and Global's affiliation in Montreal has always only ever been on CKMI-DT. Bearcat (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ABA Liga Category

Hi! I'm just dropping by to let you know about the new user category I think you might be interested in joining, ABA Liga supporters. Keep up the good work with your basketball-related contributions! --OxymoronNBG (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Presumption of Justice

You wrote comprehensive, intelligent and common sense comments on The Presumption of Justice talk page regarding the threats controversy. Very nicely written, my respect. However, when it comes to Pincrete, it seems to me that he fits the description of a Wikipedia troll. He either speaks one of the Yugoslav languages and is pretending to be Enlgish to hide his bias when editing Balkans-related topics, or speaks none of these languages and is using Google Translate to troll Balkans-related pages on Wikipedia. Either case, it really is a pain editing Malagurski-related articles since Pincrete apparently has some kind of beef with Malagurski and his work and is here with an agenda - his goal is not to make these articles more informative and neutral, but to present Malagurski and his work in the worst possible way. If you have any helpful advice regarding the issue, that would be great. Happy editing, --UrbanVillager (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ko to tamo peva.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ko to tamo peva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Time of the Gypsies.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Time of the Gypsies.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nele2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nele2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KK FMP roster

Template:KK FMP roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zvonko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurir.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dan-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dan-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lav Pivo logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lav Pivo logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zvonko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PINK M (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PINK M (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zvonko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RTV Pink television programmes

A tag has been placed on Category:RTV Pink television programmes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Novak Djokovic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eurobank a.d. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eurobank a.d. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurobank a.d. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 04:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:VechernieNovOkFr.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:VechernieNovOkFr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Klopka1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Klopka1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ključ (talk show)

The article Ključ (talk show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2004 Serbian television series debuts

A tag has been placed on Category:2004 Serbian television series debuts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kurir.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kurir.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Enter TV

The article Enter TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV channel. Unreferenced since its creation in 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Natg 19 (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Start (newspaper)

The article Start (newspaper) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long time unreferenced, unclear notability (just three months of publication)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy (talk) 21:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Start (Serbian newspaper)

The article Start (Serbian newspaper) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long time unreferenced, unclear notability (just three months of publication)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Naslovna Blic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naslovna Blic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]