Jump to content

User talk:Woja Emmanuel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Woja Emmanuel, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as John Apuruot Akec, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S Philbrick(Talk) 12:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Apuruot Akec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.africaportal.org/contributors/john-akec/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a new wikimedian i standto be corrected and the person on context John Akec is a famous and yet notable person in South Susan’s education and political arena. In case of anything I stand to work on the article , let me have it in my draft space and rather work on it Thanks Woja Emmanuel (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Please add messages to the bottom of a talk page, and sign them.

You said We acknowledged... we are working on... — who is "we"? You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

  • When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Jim but I would like to clarify something. I work under the umbrella of the Wikipedia user group South Sudan and with their guidance that's why my message had "we" but I actually create my articles alone. Woja Emmanuel (talk) 07:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promota Kay Two moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Promota Kay Two, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 10:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for raising that. I will rework on it and add as more reliable references as possible. Woja Emmanuel (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulino Lukudu Obede has been accepted

[edit]
Paulino Lukudu Obede, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Promota Kay Two (August 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Woja Emmanuel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Greenman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Paulino Lukudu Obede, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Greenman (talk) 11:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Mr. Greenman. You did not do any mistake, I will add the citation and necessary link Woja Emmanuel (talk) 12:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Kwaje (August 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Kwaje (August 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Kwaje (August 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 14:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wani Michael moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Wani Michael, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 13:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azande Kingdom has been accepted

[edit]
Azande Kingdom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wani Michael (October 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Mr. Greenman,
Thanks for reviewing the Wikipedia article I created Wani Michael. I noticed the concern and have made some few changes to it. Let me know if there is something more I need to address. Woja Emmanuel (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Union of Journalists of South Sudan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://u-joss.org/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 11:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon Adok Gai moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Napoleon Adok Gai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Also, please read edit summaries. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Kwaje (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wani Michael (December 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 08:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simon Mijok Mijak

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Woja Emmanuel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simon Mijok Mijak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wani Michael has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wani Michael. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 17:42, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wani Michael (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Concerns from Greenman not properly addressed after resubmitting.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Simon Mijok Mijak

[edit]

Hello, Woja Emmanuel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simon Mijok Mijak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Salva Kiir Mayardit. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch 15:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Promota Kay Two

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Woja Emmanuel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Promota Kay Two, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Woja Emmanuel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 19:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think what has been written under my user page "Woja Emmanuel", is not promotion but basic description of my profile. I believe it does not really have much harm on the policies and rules of Wikipedia Woja Emmanuel (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Promota Kay Two (February 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Achai Wiir (February 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 04:44, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Kwaje (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikieditor019 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikieditor019 (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Promota Kay Two (April 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Xclusivzik (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Achai Wiir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Terrible biography of a non-notable individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Alalch E. 00:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Adok Gai (July 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SportingFlyer T·C 10:40, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Lettherebedarklight. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to South Sudan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. lettherebedarklight晚安 13:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lettherebedarklight,
I changed the flag on the article of South Sudan because its not the right flag for the country.
The letter reads as quoted below;
"The Directorate of Protocol & Public Relations of the Ministry of Foreign affairs & International Cooperation have noticed that some of the missions / Embassies of the South Sudan abroad are using the South Sudan flag with wrong colors.
In this regards, the Ministry kindly would like to advise the missions/ Embassies of the Republic of South Sudan abroad to correctly consider presenting all six (6) colors of our flag in a right way, especially to use the right colors of the triangle with blue color that must be a sky blue (or light blue) with yellow bright star in the middle instead of navy blue color.
Please, accept the assurances of my highest consideration"
Therefore, the blue color on the flag is the wrong one. The flag I changed with is the correct flag. Woja Emmanuel (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Lettherebedarklight,
I changed the flag on the article of South Sudan because its not the right flag for the country. In October 2022, South Sudan's Foreign Affairs Ministry wrote a letter to all missions around the globe on the misuse of its flag colors.
The letter reads as quoted below;
"The Directorate of Protocol & Public Relations of the Ministry of Foreign affairs & International Cooperation have noticed that some of the missions / Embassies of the South Sudan abroad are using the South Sudan flag with wrong colors.
In this regards, the Ministry kindly would like to advise the missions/ Embassies of the Republic of South Sudan abroad to correctly consider presenting all six (6) colors of our flag in a right way, especially to use the right colors of the triangle with blue color that must be a sky blue (or light blue) with yellow bright star in the middle instead of navy blue color.
Please, accept the assurances of my highest consideration"
Therefore, the blue color on the flag is the wrong one.
Woja Emmanuel (talk) 05:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
can you link to the letter? lettherebedarklight晚安 06:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lettherebedarklight
Woja Emmanuel (talk) 12:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Woja Emmanuel, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Wakandara (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Curbon7 (talk) 21:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Curbon7,
I am not using multiple accounts. However, Wakandara and myself are from the Wikimedia Community User Group South Sudan. Due to inadequate equipment such as laptops where we operate, we often use the same computer for editing our work. This could have been the main reason as to why.
Let me know if there is anything I can do to fix this. Woja Emmanuel (talk) 05:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Kwaje (August 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The sources (the ones that work, that is) provide only passing mentions, or the subject commenting on things, and/or are primary, and therefore do not establish notability per WP:GNG. In light of this, and the earlier five declines, I can only conclude that the subject is not notable enough to warrant inclusion, and am therefore rejecting this to avoid further reviewer time being expended on this.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wani Michael

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Woja Emmanuel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wani Michael, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wani Michael

[edit]

Hello, Woja Emmanuel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wani Michael".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Promota Kay Two has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.sudanspost.com/who-is-promota-kay-two/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Woja Emmanuel! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Adok Gai (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nelson Kwaje

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Woja Emmanuel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nelson Kwaje, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Emmanuel Khamis

[edit]

Hello Woja Emmanuel, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Emmanuel Khamis, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Khamis.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cabrils}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cabrils (talk) 04:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Napoleon Adok Gai

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Woja Emmanuel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Napoleon Adok Gai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Napoleon Adok Gai

[edit]

Hello, Woja Emmanuel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Napoleon Adok Gai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You made a change on John Frog

[edit]

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at John Frog shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Bulis13 (talk) 12:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Denis Dumo

[edit]

Hello Woja Emmanuel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Denis Dumo for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

[edit]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Azande Kingdom, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nelson Kwaje

[edit]

Hello, Woja Emmanuel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nelson Kwaje".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]