User talk:Wikinium

Welcome!

Hello, Wikinium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Retrium Installer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Retrium Installer

The article Retrium Installer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable; Google for "Retrium Installer" gives no hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 18:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Retrium Installer for deletion

The article Retrium Installer is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retrium Installer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tassedethe (talk) 21:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adaptive tile refresh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adaptive tile refresh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptive tile refresh

Thanks for contributing the new article Adaptive tile refresh. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding sources to the article you created and by making it clear how the sources support the material. See here for how to do inline referencing. Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 22:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World of Xilm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on World of Xilm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dolescum (talk) 03:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Labyrinth Engine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Labyrinth Engine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 22:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of PC exclusive titles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PC, Action and 3DO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add see also

A category would be the closest thing acceptable for games to be linked to List of PC exclusive titles. Any more games linked to this page will be considered disruptive editing.Cky2250 (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Mantle (API) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! thanks for rephrasing that part. definitely clearer and more neutral. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 16:32, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RPCS3

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RPCS3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. gsk 22:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RPCS3

Hello Wikinium,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged RPCS3 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That video is not a reliable source, and the article still gives no indication of why being the first Playstation 3 emulator to run a commercial title is notable. Trivialist (talk) 04:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of PC titles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sandbox and Gothic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello, thanks for the kitten! However, I didn't make any additions to the list; I just history-merged it, to fix a cut-and-paste move that you made. In the future, please use the "Move page" feature to rename pages. Graham87 03:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank you for all of your contributions. Patrykq (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Personal computer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GOG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Video game console emulator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timescale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of free PC titles

Although it probably qualifies for speedy deletion, I have tagged List of free PC titles to be merged into List of freeware video games. Please begin merging your list into that one so that we can redirect your page to the existing one. I may do so if I remember. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- The contents of this list do not fit there. This is a list of freeware as well as free-to-play games for the PC only. Thank you for your recommendation, but doing so would be destructive to the knowledge contained in this list. Wikinium (talk) 23:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of free PS4 titles

Hello Wikinium,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of free PS4 titles for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 23:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but I plan on adding content to it later tonight. How does one create an article without a lot of content and avoid immediate deletion?Wikinium (talk) 23:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- You could work on it in your sandbox or as a draft article in the draft namespace before moving it over to article space. Sam Walton (talk) 23:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That sounds like it would work rather well. Thank you. Wikinium (talk) 23:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikinium/List of free PS4 titles

Moved it for you in lieu of deletion -- Y not? 00:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of PS4 exclusive titles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of PS4 exclusive titles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PS4 exclusive titles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WhereAmI (talk) 02:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hi there. I've seen your edits around the project, and a few things:

You definitely can't make an article like List of video game ROM repositories.
- First off, its a legal issue. You can't just make a list of websites where you can download illegal games. Not okay for Wikipedia.
- Secondly, you're not going to want to create lists that consist largely of subjects that do not have their own articles. Its probably going to fail WP:LISTN if you do.
- Thirdly, its never a good idea to, in general, create an article with no referenced. That's the fast track to get your article deleted, and I've seen yo do it more than once, beyond this article.

Second topic edits like this are not appropriate either. You may warn editors stop vandalizing articles on their user talk pages, but you should not be labeling them as vandals on their User page. You really shouldn't ever edit other people's User page, unless you're cleaning up vandalism from it. So please, no more comments like that, even if they are a vandal.

Third topic: This one is more advice - I'd recommmend not making any more "List of exclusive system x games" type articles. They're not necessary, when you can so easily just create an "exclusive" column at the prexisting list. See the List of Wii U software article as an example. If you want to see all the games that are Wii U exclusive, then just click on the "exclusive" heading, and it'll sort the titles automatically. It'd be better to clean up or create these columns than make new, very incomplete articles, like you've been doing. It looks like a bunch have been nominated for deletion as it is, so I know its not just me here either. Sergecross73 msg me 16:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See User talk:Anthony Appleyard#List of PC exclusive titles fornew message. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect blanking

I see that you've blanked the redirect List of PC games. If you wish to delete the redirect, please bring it up at WP:RFD. I've undid the blanking for now. KJ^Discuss? 07:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of PC games, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Horror and Scott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of PC exclusive games/E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited G-Sync, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proprietary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vulkan (API), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khronos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vulkan API logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vulkan API logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently used in Vulkan (API) Wikinium (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FreeSync, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page APU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of acclaimed PC games (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This is a completely unnecessary list. The List of PC games already has a column for ranking, and just looking at the As you've already missed out on a dozen games (including six with higher scores). The main list is more than satisfactory for someone looking for highly-ranked games, as their tables are sortable and thus it is easy to find that information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of acclaimed PC games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PC Master Race

Please do not mark constructive and well-sourced edits as vandalism. The history of the term "Master Race" is germane and discussed by reliable sources directly, some of whom think the term is benign and others who consider it cringeworthy or inappropriate. — TPX 10:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule

Your recent editing history at PC Master Race shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — TPX 10:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

An incident in which you are involved has brought up on the Administrators' noticeboard. — TPX 20:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Socket FM3 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 07:52, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your 'games by title' pages

I think it'd be cleaner if you condensed it into one page with sub-headings. Dakar^yammer
_{stuff done} 03:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was originally set that way, but the list grew so large that it needed to be split into multiple pages. I am in the process of completing the split. Did you mean something else? Wikinium (talk) 03:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually- it's just that it takes quite a while for me to load pages, so I thought some impatient people could be annoyed by the split. Dakar^yammer
_{stuff done} 03:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the bright side, these pages are small enough to load on older devices. The previous list was so large it couldn't even be easily edited or viewed on older/slower devices and connections. I think (and hope) the navigation bar I just ported to every page might make it easier to switch between lists. Wikinium (talk) 03:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

True, true. Mind if I help with making the numerically sorted page? Dakar^yammer
_{stuff done} 03:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Just copy from existing pages if you're stuck. Wikinium (talk) 04:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Socket FM3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AM4. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your revision at Gamergate controversy

My apologies for undoing you, and I understand your impulse to add citations. But after much consternation, an unsteady consensus has been reached to not use inline citations in the lead and instead to save them for the corresponding sections of the body of the article. Thanks. Dumuzid (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry Altman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listing non PC games on our List of PC games

Please point me to the discussion where consensus was reached to include Nintendo games on List of PC games. It is clearly something we should not be doing. — TPX 19:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The talk pages are scattered, but I think the only place it was ever actually mentioned was in "edit reasons" (in many deletes and undoings over the years) and in the main talk page itself. I see that nobody actually replied to my discussion until a few minutes before you made the first edit relating to it. Maybe it would be a good idea to re-start the discussion on the main talk page. Your reasons are that they weren't originally released on the PC, which I understand. My reasons are, the list is much more complete if games *playable* on PC are included, even if that means emulation. After all, Xbox One lists are beginning to include some of their "backwards compatible" titles as well, which are quite literally emulated Xbox 360 games. My argument is the same for the PC list: games that are directly playable on the PC's hardware should be included, which may actually mean excluding OnLive and other cloud services. Wikinium (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which Xbox One list are you referring to? List of Xbox 360 games compatible with Xbox One is a separate article. There should be no backward compatible Xbox 360 titles listed on the List of Xbox One games page. These emulated games are approved by Microsoft and their partners, whereas Nintendo has not granted permission for people to emulate their games on PC. They regard it as copyright infringement. Naturally, our List of PC games should concern itself with PC games, and nothing more. — TPX 20:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case, would it make sense to make a separate page that lists console games that are playable on the PC via emulation? It would be more appropriate than inserting them into the PC games list. Wikinium (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend you put that question to the WikiProject Video games community. Nintendo disapproves of emulation. They consider it piracy. [1] For this reason, Wikipedia may frown upon the idea. — TPX 07:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware that Nintendo probably isn't too keen on the idea of emulation, but I would hope that Wikipedia would side with the openness and freedom of information rather than siding with a corporation's best interests. There's a lot of information on Wikipedia that corporations and individuals don't like being available to the public, and Wikipedia seemed alright with that. Fingers crossed. I'm thinking List of PC games playable via emulation would be a good name. Wikinium (talk) 07:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I would run this idea past the folks on WikiProject Video games. I never once saw List of copyrighted works available on Napster, so you may encounter difficulty, or you may not. — TPX 08:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to chime in here. Yes, one can play, say, Super Mario World on PC using an emulator, but one could also play it on PSP or Android to use but a couple of examples. Legally isn't even the issue there, and even "Nintendo considers it piracy" is irrelevant (Nintendo wouldn't acknowledge Super 3D Noah's Ark as a SNES games despite it being one, for instance). And why single out Nintendo games? What about almost other console from the Gamecube and earlier (on top of the Wii)....on TOP of which arcade games are playable on PC through emulation as well. An overwhelming percentage of these games are "playable on PC" but such a notion is really a pointless consideration. They weren't /released/ on PC, which is what matters. Honestly it really boggles me to see anyone could even fathom such a notion that "emulateable on PC should be on a list of PC games" without being a troll. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 14:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I should mention that it never singled out Nintendo games, nor implied they were released for PC. Ever since the article was started, it has always said "playable on the PC" rather than "released on the PC". Games originally released for DOS and other older operating systems also require emulation via DOSBox, so there was always an exception for emulated games on this list. Wikinium (talk) 18:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of PC games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emulation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of acclaimed PC games concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of acclaimed PC games, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:PC gaming

Portal:PC gaming, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:PC gaming and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:PC gaming during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 17:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zen (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AM1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zen (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Testing1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Template:Testing1, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —PC-XT+ 08:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked in the template, I usually make test templates as subpages in my userspace. You can transclude these subpages like templates, just include the User: prefix or add a colon for a :user: prefix. When you are done with test templates, you can tag them with {{db-author}} or {{db-test}}. —PC-XT+ 08:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cites on PC Master Race

New edit is a lot better. Please fill out the cite templates though, and move the references into the Reflist template. Guidelines ask that reference styles be uniform within an article. If you use reFill, be sure to check over it, as it will often miss authors or dates and you'll need to add them by hand. -- ferret (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should do it. I used another as a template, so there may be some potentially usable variables that were left out of the citation. Wikinium (talk) 18:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMD 2015-2016 Desktop Roadmap.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMD 2015-2016 Desktop Roadmap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMD 2015-2016 Desktop Roadmap.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMD 2015-2016 Desktop Roadmap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:StarFox64 Emulated with Project64.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:StarFox64 Emulated with Project64.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Cynosure Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Cynosure Group does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:53, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AMDGPU, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GCN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMD Zen premeir slide.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMD Zen premeir slide.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rpix86) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rpix86, Wikinium!

Wikipedia editor Darylgolden just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Perhaps add more secondary sources to assert notability

To reply, leave a comment on Darylgolden's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wikinium. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Talent stack

Hello, Wikinium,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Talent stack should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talent stack .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Robert McClenon (talk) 03:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMD Zen premeir slide.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMD Zen premeir slide.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Zen (microarchitecture) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 14:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of gaming platforms

The article Comparison of gaming platforms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article was made via canvasing, serves no encyclopedic value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 21:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparison of gaming platforms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of gaming platforms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of gaming platforms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wikinium. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old School Runescape gameplay, Lumbridge May 2018.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old School Runescape gameplay, Lumbridge May 2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old School Runescape gameplay, Lumbridge May 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old School Runescape gameplay, Lumbridge May 2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old School Runescape gameplay, Lumbridge May 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about RenderDoc

Hello, Wikinium,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether RenderDoc should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RenderDoc .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Xevus11 (talk) 15:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:AMD Zen premeir slide.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AMD Zen premeir slide.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 Talk 18:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wikinium. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old School RuneScape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Open source (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Text

Why did you add "Since the illness is caused by a virus, there is no direct cure."[2]

HIV is a virus and has a direct treatment? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to explain that it's not something that can be "cured" and just purged from someone's body. It may need better wording. Wikinium (talk) 00:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enrique Tarrio portrait.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enrique Tarrio portrait.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RenderDoc for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RenderDoc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RenderDoc (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Falador Massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Falador Massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falador Massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CiphriusKane (talk) 13:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMD GPUOpen Logo, Jan 2016.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AMD GPUOpen Logo, Jan 2016.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]