User talk:CiphriusKane

Welcome!

Hello, CiphriusKane! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Reverted edits

Why my edits got reverted? I was adding content related to leaked Titanfall 3 game to Wikipedia. 36.72.221.214 (talk) 21:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@36.72.221.214: The pages ye're editing, that are about actual real life guns, are unrelated to Titanfall 3. I'm unsure how Wikipedia handles leaks like that but I doubt it involves overwriting unconnected pages with fandom content and leaving out sources. Ye'd be better editing an appropriate fan wiki rather than overwriting information on German guns. CiphriusKane (talk) 03:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banchory

Although the information you removed from the article Banchory looks like a copyvio, it was added in this edit in 2007 and I don't think it would be beneficial to revision delete hundreds of edits on the basis of a "hunch" that it may be a copyvio. So, it's been removed, and let's leave it at that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair, I suspected that may have been the case CiphriusKane (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Pahunkat. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to James Scott Skinner—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Pahunkat (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was this a misclick? The edit wasn't reverted CiphriusKane (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willie Rennie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Better Together. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhona Brankin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livingston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iona Fyfe has been accepted

Iona Fyfe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liam Logan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Failure of CRIN

The subject does not fail CRIN, as the individual in question has made an appearance at List A level. For me the odd thing was as much that his biographical details had been changed and altered without me having seen. I hadn't realized this had happened nearly three years ago without me noticing. I see that one edit described him as a "ballsman"... I'm trying to work out what that means! Bobo . 04:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: the subject does indeed fail NCRIC/CRIN, which was updated a few months ago – LA appearances for a non-FC side no longer meet the criteria of the guideline and essay. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 15:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes, problems with citations on an article can be because the article says "External links" rather than "References". Please feel free to reformat if you see this as a problem as well. That was just how I did it back 12 years ago when I set articles up... Bobo . 04:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Hiya pal, just a note to say thanks for moving my George Watters comments to the right place! I'm shite at things like that! Very good of you to sort that, all the best, man, take care. Gusset Gusset (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Rarity has been accepted

Hannah Rarity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Azrael

Hello, which of the remaining text in Edward Azrael is in breach of copyright? WP:CSD#G12 says "...where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving...". Thanks, 2A01:4C8:A8:CC79:6037:21F7:E726:A720 (talk) 08:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The copyrighted text is still in the history and the page as it stands is completely unfit to be a Wikipedia article CiphriusKane (talk) 08:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted revisions in the history can be deleted by an admin, which I've requested at the page. What remains is a stub on a notable state politician. 2A01:4C8:A8:CC79:6037:21F7:E726:A720 (talk) 09:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Wilkie

Hi - references on the article page are authoritative for this leading international musician. Not sure what more you would want! I have removed the deletion notice. You are welcome to help improve the stub article. Millstream3 (talk) 07:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DRV:Stephen Hogan

Dear Sir, hope you have been well. A titan here has nominated the Stephen Hogan page we diligently put together for nomination to delete. And it's been deleted. Maybe I am a poor writer that I didn't bring in Dublin actor stars in fascinating new Amazon Prime film about Indian revolutionary - Dublin Live properly into the article to further demo notability. I know you are extremely busy, but could you please participate? Many thanks for your time and consideration. Supermann (talk) 03:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Supermann: I have left a comment, but I am genuinely unsurprised that this happened. I feel like I've done all I can for the article at the current time. If it's to be revived, then there will need to be more indepth coverage about Hogan rather than a play Hogan was in, or Hogan's uncle, or an upcoming project that Hogan's featured in. I apologise if ye were expecting a different reaction CiphriusKane (talk) 06:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your input. Have a good weekend, sir. Supermann (talk) 16:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I gotta say that I'm impressed with how you wrote up the ANI report--concise, good choice of details: very well done. It's a difficult thing to do, and you did it well. Drmies (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	For the reward board. I hadn't noticed you provided a source for the development section on the Slime Rancher article until just now, so here's the reward for doing so per my request on the reward board. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:51, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

APparently I had. My memory just failed me. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ashley Storrie

Hello, CiphriusKane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashley Storrie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ashley Storrie

Hello, CiphriusKane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ashley Storrie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Creative Scotlan

Hello CiphriusKane,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Creative Scotlan for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is a simple typo.

If you don't want Creative Scotlan to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 20:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lithopsian: It's nae a typo, it's Creative Scotland's name in Scots that they use themselves CiphriusKane (talk) 20:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deep Wheel Orcadia has been accepted

Deep Wheel Orcadia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 18:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hannah Rarity

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hannah Rarity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Danielcohens (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jock Duncan (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mattdaviesfsic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nearly enough sources to establish notability. Also needs sections and some expansion perhaps, if possible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jock Duncan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CiphriusKane! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jock Duncan has been accepted

Jock Duncan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mike Uyama

Hello, CiphriusKane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Uyama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mike Uyama

Hello, CiphriusKane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mike Uyama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:34, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]