User talk:Warofdreams/2017
Next Rotherham by-election listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Rotherham by-election. Since you had some involvement with the Next Rotherham by-election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
WFTDA Divisions, again
[edit]Sigh. So the Divisions have been restructured again. Have a look at how I have inserted the update at WFTDA Championships, Women's Flat Track Derby Association, Women's Flat Track Derby Association Division 1 and Women's Flat Track Derby Association Division 2. As I have set up the Division articles and templates to include member teams as of a June 30 rankings update I don't think we need to update any of that stuff until that time, but thought I would run it by you. Echoedmyron (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Looks good! The changes to the structure make sense but unfortunately more work here to document it all. Warofdreams talk 00:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Redirect proposal
[edit]There is a proposal to redirect the recently created Far-left politics in the United Kingdom. As you previously commented on it you may want to [Talk:Far-left politics in the United Kingdom contribute] ----Snowded TALK 06:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
Administrator changes
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
Technical news
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
Obituaries
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
And then there's this mess
[edit]Hello again! I'm now working my way through updating/improving WFTDA Division 2 league articles - along with founding members of the WFTDA, sometimes it's the same thing! - and have come upon the article for Houston Roller Derby. It's an unholy mess, mostly due to the sporadic inclusion of past team rosters, which occupies more than half the article's size. None of them are sourced, and ideally don't belong here anyway - I've posted a comment on the article's talk page advising that it's going to get removed, and comment is appreciated. I further commented on a couple of talk pages that have previously added these rosters, including which includes the account that created the article. Really I suppose I can just be bold, but felt the right thing to do was post a headsup before I just went and removed all that. Echoedmyron (talk) 23:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jet City Rollergirls.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Jet City Rollergirls.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Paradise City Roller Derby
[edit]Me again, wanted to get your thoughts. At this point, I have now completed going through all the WFTDA Women's Flat Track Derby Association Division 1 and Women's Flat Track Derby Association Division 2 league articles and have brought them to a reasonable level of consistency and updated them, fleshing out histories and rankings and updated references. There's one last one that is stumping me, Paradise City Roller Derby from Australia. They qualified as a D2 team in 2016, but declined their invitation. They don't have an article, and finding sources to get such an article to pass GNG is nigh on impossible. Part of it is parsing through google results that point you at Paradise Roller Girls of Hawaii, and part of it is the lack of sources in general. Their own website is out of date, I can't even find a regular venue for them, and any press coverage is a passing reference to them being somewhere, I can't even find a general interest article about them, any third-party sources that proves when they formed. I can certainly source basic things to WFTDA and reportage on Derby Central about rankings, WFTDA membership and declining playoffs, but I suspect there's not enough to pass GNG for the article in the first place. Understanding of course that just because they exist doesn't mean they warrant inclusion, it still kills me that we have this one redlink in the D2 template. I'll leave it for now, but given your ability to often make miracles happen in this regard, wanted to get your thoughts. Perhaps there's something I'm missing. Cheers. Echoedmyron (talk) 23:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Good news, I've found some decent sources in the regional press: hosting a tournament, favourites for the same tournament the previous year, looking for a new venue (with a brief team history); from another paper, preparing for a trip to the US, and also an interview on ABC Brisbane. I reckon that should demonstrate notability and together with the sources you mention should allow a decent article to be written! Warofdreams talk 01:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oh awesome, that should help. (Although I note one of those links is a facebook link, but maybe I can dig up the original source?) I'll see if I can scrape something together this week. I'm on the verge of hitting my 10,000th wiki edit, so it would only be natural that it is a derby piece that likely does it. Echoedmyron (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- It's a Facebook link, but a cutting with all the details of the original story, so those details should be good for a reference - I couldn't find the original article online. Great work on all these articles, by the way, and congrats on your 10,000th edit! Warofdreams talk 15:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's been a slog, but I'm satisfied with the results, and hopefully it inspires others to stay on top of things; some articles hadn't been touched in over 3 years. I've just created the Paradise City article, didn't actually wind up using the facebook posted image, but it could possibly supplement. In the process hit 10K edits, which is also cool.
- It's a Facebook link, but a cutting with all the details of the original story, so those details should be good for a reference - I couldn't find the original article online. Great work on all these articles, by the way, and congrats on your 10,000th edit! Warofdreams talk 15:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oh awesome, that should help. (Although I note one of those links is a facebook link, but maybe I can dig up the original source?) I'll see if I can scrape something together this week. I'm on the verge of hitting my 10,000th wiki edit, so it would only be natural that it is a derby piece that likely does it. Echoedmyron (talk) 13:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Bureaucrat discussion - GoldenRing
[edit]I would be grateful for your input in the above discussion. Many thanks, WJBscribe (talk) 12:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Workers' Liberty Australia for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Workers' Liberty Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workers' Liberty Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Frickeg (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Ask for help
[edit]Excuse me, Can you help me? My friend AsharaDayne suffered a great injustice over two years ago. I seldom pay attention to English Wikipedia so I just know the Permanent Blocking of him in recent days. He was thought as a puppet of Greekboy12345er6. But this judge was very absurd.
AsharaDayne is Chinese and lives in Fujian Province and he has edited over 39,000 times in Chinese Wikipedia. I can ensusre that he and Greekboy12345er6 are not the same person although he and I both don't know who Greekboy12345er6 is. AsharaDayne is an Anti-stalinist communist and he made an edit war against Ukraine nationalists Ymblanter when he didn't understand the rules of wikipedia. After that he had realized his mistake but Mike V mistakenly judged him as a puppet of Greekboy12345er6 and closured him permanently. 南天星斗 and 伊欧玟 are puppets of him but he didn't violate Puppet policy. I think that Greekboy12345er6 can't be Chinese. Can you check these accounts' Using IP? Please let AsharaDayne can edit his own talk page first? Could you please deblock him?
Maybe my expression is not well. Hope you will understand me.--空间的拓荒者 (talk) 15:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
@Warofdreams:Excuse me, maybe you didn't pay attention to my ask above in recent days.--空间的拓荒者 (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Workers' Power (New Zealand) listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Workers' Power (New Zealand). Since you had some involvement with the Workers' Power (New Zealand) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Your view on copyvio
[edit]You seem to be experienced at Wikimedia questions and this concerns images on Wikicommons. There is currently a discussion on the FAC for Akira Kurosawa which shares several images from Wikicommons with several other editors and articles in different Wikipedia articles. One of the editors at FAC has expressed the opinion that copyvio works differently for peer review articles than for regular Wikipedia articles. My point was that copyvio remains copyvio whether for peer review articles or start articles, and once identified then the copyvio would need to be removed regardless if it is found on a peer reviewed article or a start article. Could you glance at the FAC for Akira Kurosawa? JohnWickTwo (talk) 02:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hi John - I've taken a look at this and can see there are some complex concerns regarding the copyright status of some of the images, including aspects of Japanese copyright law in which I don't have any knowledge. The copyvio rules are the same for all articles, but given that they are complicated, sometimes images are uploaded and used in good faith without it being clear that they definitely meet the requirements - part of the FAC process, frustrating as it is, is to check that they definitely are free to use here. Warofdreams talk 17:48, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Much thanks for looking at this. A new editor has entered the Kurosawa FAC in progress and is re-opening the question of the images used in this Kurosawa article based on WIAFA#3. Given this new information may I ask that, regardless of other editors at Wikipedia currently sharing the images in the Kurosawa article on other Wikipedia pages, that you simply delete any images currently used in the article which are deemed by the current stewards of the FAC page and process to be in any way unsuitable. Since you are familiar with the various complexities of copyvio, could you simply remove the images in the article which you deem the source of the good faith concerns for the integrity of the FAC process by the current stewards of the FAC process? JohnWickTwo (talk) 12:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- As I say, I'm not an expert on this area, so I will leave this to people with more knowledge of the law. Warofdreams talk 16:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Much thanks for looking at this. A new editor has entered the Kurosawa FAC in progress and is re-opening the question of the images used in this Kurosawa article based on WIAFA#3. Given this new information may I ask that, regardless of other editors at Wikipedia currently sharing the images in the Kurosawa article on other Wikipedia pages, that you simply delete any images currently used in the article which are deemed by the current stewards of the FAC page and process to be in any way unsuitable. Since you are familiar with the various complexities of copyvio, could you simply remove the images in the article which you deem the source of the good faith concerns for the integrity of the FAC process by the current stewards of the FAC process? JohnWickTwo (talk) 12:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for Mary Turner (trade unionist) article
[edit]Could not believe she didn't have a article. Was going to do one last night but family matters prevented it. Bashereyre (talk) 08:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks - I'd looked at creating one before but, amazingly, there was a bit of a shortage of reliable sources on her life. It does highlight difficulties with the Wikipedia definition of notability for a figures like her who clearly are well-known and significant. And thanks for writing the article on Terry Duffy, that's one I'd been meaning to create at some point. Warofdreams talk 17:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Dame Margery Corbett Ashby
[edit]Hi Warofdreams, I just wondered if the image that you uploaded of Dame Ashby is in the public domain? Its one of her taken in 1923? I'm in the UK. Thanks MF2018 (talk) 11:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message - I'm confident that it is public domain in the UK, my understanding is that as it was first published in the UK in 1923, without the creator being identifiable (it will be one of the photographers I've listed, but there is no way of telling which one), copyright expired in 1973. I believe it's also public domain in the U.S., it appears to be under the description of the law here, but the description of the law on Wikimedia Commons creates some uncertainty, so I've only uploaded it here. Warofdreams talk 16:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of David Overend for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Overend is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Overend until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:17, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Nigel de Gruchy for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nigel de Gruchy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel de Gruchy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sport and politics (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to Admin confidence survey
[edit]Hello,
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.
We really appreciate your input!
Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.
For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red
[edit] You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would just like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.09% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Happening in September: | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 16:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hello there, Warofdreams. I'm very pleased to see you've become a member of Women in Red. It's not often we have such experienced new members. I'm sure you'll be a great asset to our project. If you have any advice or suggestions about how we can improve our coverage of women, you could share them with us on the WiR talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 06:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm very supportive of the aims of the project and hope I can contribute usefully. Warofdreams talk 00:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red October editathon invitation
[edit].jpg)  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Janette Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability challenged several weeks ago and no reply
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:C16 year in topic
[edit]
Template:C16 year in topic has been nominated for merging with Template:C17 year in topic. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Daily Gazette (Colchester) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daily Gazette (Colchester) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily Gazette (Colchester) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GR (Contact me) (See my edits) 14:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Lazar Bach
[edit]
On 25 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lazar Bach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Latvian-born Lazar Bach became chair of the Communist Party of South Africa, but died in a Gulag? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lazar Bach. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lazar Bach), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
The article English People's Liberation Army has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
all statements presented without citations. citations given provide no page numbers or anything.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sasattack (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
WiR December highlights
[edit]  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Warofdreams. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
An exceptional barnstar for you
[edit]
|
The World Contest Laurels |
| Thankyou for the work you put into the Women in Red World Contest!! -♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC) |
I make it $12.50 that you've won. Please double check. If you would like to donate any of your winnings into the Women in Red Book Fund to raise money to buy books for editors of women topics who need them on demand please add your name and the amount you'd like to donate in the sub section below the prize winners on the main contest page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ICT Roller Girls.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ICT Roller Girls.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Contest Prize
[edit]Please email me and state your user name, email address and how much I owe you in your preferred currency.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)