User talk:Warofdreams/2023

Archives
Warofdreams/2003 Warofdreams/2004/01-06 Warofdreams/2004/07-12 Warofdreams/2005/01-06 Warofdreams/2005/07-12 Warofdreams/2006/01-06 Warofdreams/2006/07-12 Warofdreams/2007/01-03 Warofdreams/2007/04-06 Warofdreams/2007/07-09 Warofdreams/2007/10-12 Warofdreams/2008/01-03 Warofdreams/2008/04-06 Warofdreams/2008/07-09 Warofdreams/2008/10-12 Warofdreams/2009/01-03 Warofdreams/2009/04-06 Warofdreams/2009/07-09 Warofdreams/2009/10-12 Warofdreams/2010 Warofdreams/2011 Warofdreams/2012 Warofdreams/2013 Warofdreams/2014 Warofdreams/2015 Warofdreams/2016 Warofdreams/2017 Warofdreams/2018 Warofdreams/2019 Warofdreams/2020 Warofdreams/2021 Warofdreams/2022 Warofdreams/2023 Warofdreams/Party candidate records

Happy New Year, Warofdreams!

Happy New Year!

Warofdreams,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat chat - invitation to participate

The RfA for MB has gone to a bureaucrat chat. Please join in the discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023 Labour Edit-a-thon

2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon

Hello, Warofdreams/2023!
During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour

Myotus (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Listed parks and gardens in the East Midlands - as an example

Hello, War of Dreams, I don't think our paths have crossed previously. I have been doing some work on the Monmouthshire gardens recorded on the Cadw/ICOMOS Register of Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Wales. It started to occur to me that what might be helpful is to have by-county lists (and corresponding Categories) for each Welsh county, which would follow the approach used for [[Category:Lists of listed buildings in Wales]] and [[Category:Lists of Scheduled Monuments in Wales]]. I then thought I'd see what England had done, and I find you are doing something rather similar. So, my first question is, did you intend to do the same for Wales at some point? If you do, I shall leave well alone. But if you don't, would you be willing to advise on my attempting it? I have to confess that many of the more technical aspects of Wikipedia are beyond me and I would certainly need help in setting up the lists and categories/sub-categories. Grateful for any advice. KJP1 (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for messaging! I've not yet finished work on the parks and gardens in England, so I haven't got as far as thinking about Wales. I'd be happy to help and advise - it doesn't necessarily have to follow the model I've used for England, which is based on the articles on grade I and grade II* listed buildings - e.g. Grade II* listed buildings in the City of York. Warofdreams talk 00:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind. I have made a start, and it seems to have worked out ok. However, I made an initial mess by giving the sub-cat an inappropriate title. I've made, and used, a new one, [[Category:Registered historic parks and gardens in Monmouthshire]] ~~but the first failed attempt continues to lurk here,[1]. Does your mop allow you to zap it? If not, I'm a bit unsure where to flag it. AfD doesn't seem quite right?~~ I shall now create sub-cats for the other Principal Areas (counties), and shall then shamelessly copy one of your lists to create Listed parks and gardens in Monmouthshire. Thanks again for your time and help. KJP1 (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, looks like it's all going well at the moment, just let me know if and when I can help. Warofdreams talk 00:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - some good progress has been made, which you can see, here. Any suggestions based on your own experience would be very gratefully received. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Hurt

There's a name I haven't heard for awhile. Brough back memories of two decades ago... thank you. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 11:27, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glad the article was of interest! Warofdreams talk 00:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brian Renfroe

The article Brian Renfroe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One article in a local news outlet is not sufficient to show notability (WP:NBIO), not seeing much else out there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brian Renfroe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Renfroe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Renfroe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Left-wing terrorism

Hi, I've listed Left-Wing terrorism in Articles for Deletion. You were involved previously when it was discussed and you may be interested. AlanS^talk 09:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of UK by-elections (1979 - present)

The article List of UK by-elections (1979 - present) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This contents of this list are already covered in the much more expansive and useful page Lists of United Kingdom by-elections. I don't think replacing it with a redirect would be appropriate in this case, as it would be inconsistent with the redirects List of UK by-elections (1979–2010), List of UK by-elections (2010–present), and the other redirects to the list pages which do not redirect to the list of lists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pppery/Bureaucrat chat

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pppery/Bureaucrat chat and join the discussion when you have an opportunity. Maxim (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Crawford (trade unionist)

The article Joseph Crawford (trade unionist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject of this article is of questionable notability and much of the article is not backed up by valid sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epa101 (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South Riding of Lindsey

The article South Riding of Lindsey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered in Parts of Lindsey

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:54, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IWCA (disambiguation)

The article IWCA (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Radical Party of Great Britiain" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Radical Party of Great Britiain has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 24 § Radical Party of Great Britiain until a consensus is reached. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings!

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:50, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]