User talk:Warofdreams/2013

Archives
Warofdreams/2003 Warofdreams/2004/01-06 Warofdreams/2004/07-12 Warofdreams/2005/01-06 Warofdreams/2005/07-12 Warofdreams/2006/01-06 Warofdreams/2006/07-12 Warofdreams/2007/01-03 Warofdreams/2007/04-06 Warofdreams/2007/07-09 Warofdreams/2007/10-12 Warofdreams/2008/01-03 Warofdreams/2008/04-06 Warofdreams/2008/07-09 Warofdreams/2008/10-12 Warofdreams/2009/01-03 Warofdreams/2009/04-06 Warofdreams/2009/07-09 Warofdreams/2009/10-12 Warofdreams/2010 Warofdreams/2011 Warofdreams/2012 Warofdreams/2013 Warofdreams/2014 Warofdreams/2015 Warofdreams/2016 Warofdreams/2017 Warofdreams/2018 Warofdreams/2019 Warofdreams/2020 Warofdreams/2021 Warofdreams/2022 Warofdreams/2023 Warofdreams/Party candidate records

Future WFTDA rankings

Howdy. With the announcement that next year the WFTDA will be eschewing Regions in favor of a top-40 ranking system, it strikes me that the current system of regional ranking tables will be obsolete. You're one of the few people that edits roller derby articles with any frequency, so I thought I'd raise this with you. (Past attempts at organizing consensus on derby things have been met with silence.) Mu thought is that it will be worth keeping the old ranking tables in league articles to show historical value, and add new sections for the new methodology going forward. WFTDA Region articles will also be kept I guess, changing the "ares" to "weres", etc. Regional tournaments will be replaced by non-region-specific tournaments, and as such, I don;t foresee new playoff tournaments getting separate articles; but there would, in my mind, be a new article each year for that year's playoffs, which would cover the 4 tournaments. Such as "2013 WFTDA Playoffs". Thoughts? Echoedmyron (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good plan to me, although I don't know exactly how the ranking will work - it's implied that there will be divisional rankings, but I'm not sure whether the might also be some regional rankings. Warofdreams talk 22:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This just in! [1] Echoedmyron (talk) 21:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - looks like no more regions. Warofdreams talk 23:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, another editor - I think someone with a WFTDA affiliation - has posed the question about how to handle the rankings changes going forward: [2]. Thought I'd give you a headsup if you hadn't seen that yet. Echoedmyron (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So I had a little brainstorm today, and came up with a simple way to update the rankings tables in league articles going forward. See here: [3] Adding the region shortform suffix to the Q4 ranking when leagues were ranked regionally makes the distinction between former ranking systems and current. We may have to simply retitle the "Regional" column as "Playoffs", and not sure if it is viable to have articles for D1 and D2 tournaments going forward, since there's so many. What do you think? Echoedmyron (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And further, here's how I updated the table for Toronto, linking the former NC playoffs for the DNQs in 2011 and 2012, and changing the column header to "Playoffs": [4] Opinions? Echoedmyron (talk) 00:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crat statement draft

Hi Following the drama at BN, I'm trying to come up with a statement all Crats could agree to. Please take a look, below. I am quite content to do this onwiki -we have always worked transparently, except where secrecy is essential (ie RTV). I think we should be able to wordsmith a statement acceptable to all, and I think it's an important thing to do.

In my opinion, this issue has come about through an unfortunate proliferation of documentation: policy, guideline, how-to etc
I am not convinced that there is community consensus on all of the points encapsulated in those various pages
I am unhappy at what may be described as some or all of: inconsistencies, inaccuracies or lack of clarity in that documentation
I do not believe that any of the issues we have faced have been caused by Crats trying to widen their powers
I would like to see the issues clarified, based on consensus, and for the documentation to be updated accordingly
I'd like to thank Griot-de for generously withdrawing the rename request

Signed [crat sig] Lmk what you think. Many thanks, --Dweller (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Union of Textile and Allied Workers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia UK Images

Good afternoon! You uploaded - in 2009 - a few images to uk.wikimedia.org, such as this one. We're trying to track down the copyright status so that we can upload them to Commons. Are you able to clarify for us? Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 12:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

architecture and people
Thank you for quality articles on architecture, such as Unité d'Habitation, people as varied as Mary of Woodstock and Mo Sanders, and for lists, such as List of newspapers in the United Kingdom by circulation, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (9 February 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 391st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 391st recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Railway viaduct Herries Road

Hiya this page here gives the viaduct in S6 with a postcode of S6 1RH. However I've got no problem as I suspect the boundary goes right along the railway line on the top of the viaduct. Thanks Mick Knapton (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it in S5, but its up to you. Nice work, looking forward to Listed Buildings in S11, will always add photos and entries when I can. Mick Knapton (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of proposed move of Fouta Djallon to Futa Jalon/Jallon

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fouta Djallon, has been proposed to be moved to either Futa Jalon or Futa Jallon. If you are interested in this discussion, please participate by going to the disussion page and adding your comments. Thank you.--A12n (talk) 03:43, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Labour Party (UK) leadership election, 2010

I am contacting you because you have participated in prior discussions at the above article, and it would be appreciated if you gave your views on an current dispute. One editor wants to add a gallery of images for people who declined to stand for the leadership. Another editor objects on the grounds that doing so puts undue weight on the people who did not participate. -Rrius (talk) 14:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to include David North as Key Trotskyist

Could you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Trotskyism#Proposal_to_include_David_North_as_Key_Trotskyist ? Thanks! --Duncan (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Midgley edits

Can I ask why you reverted my edits to this article? The included text was not sourced from a NPOV and was stated as fact. Dreamboat55 (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ceolwulf of Wessex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceolwulf of Wessex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceolwulf of Wessex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 13:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Warofdreams! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures and other contributions

Hi thanks for the compliment. Yes, I'd like to think we could finish all the photos for S6 some time soon, although there are usually certain ones that are difficult to find, difficult to photograph or just private (I did manage to find the Magazine at Hillsborough Barracks when on a shopping trip to Morrisons !!) but I'll see how it goes. I was out Fulwood the other day and can add some for S10 including the church, war memorial, cottages on Fulwood Road in the next few days. Also planning an article for Christ Church at Fulwood. Cheers Mick Knapton (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Warofdreams. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Architecture.
Message added 07:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mat ty.007 07:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grade I listed buildings in South Yorkshire

Hi Warofdreams. The UK is participating in Wiki Loves Monuments for the first time this year, and the preparation involves updating the lists of listed buildings so they're complete and use templates that fit with the upload tools. You did great work on Grade I listed buildings in South Yorkshire, and I don't want to step on your toes so I'm checking with you before I touch it. The tables can be seen in action at Grade I listed buildings in Greater Manchester so we wouldn't lose any information from the list. The links in the 'list entry number' act as references, but I can copy across the references your list currently uses if you want. Would it be ok if I rolled out the templates on the South Yorkshire list? Nev1 (talk)

Thanks very much, I'll sort something out over the next few days. I hadn't seen the list for Sheffield City Centre etc. It may be that in the short term we don't need to update those lists and people may stick to the counties, but we'll see how it goes. Nev1 (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a go at the new format for South Yorkshire in a sandbox, what do you think? Nev1 (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! The Rotherham Minster image is by Doncaster Minster instead, but that's a minor detail - in all other respects, I'm happy! Warofdreams talk 20:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I've moved the list over to the main space. Nev1 (talk) 21:07, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Username change

Can you please change my username? Link → Vijay ^[talk] 21:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Darnall Works

On 14 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Darnall Works, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Darnall Works in Sheffield (heat treatment workshop pictured) is the only remaining works to have produced crucible steel on a large scale? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Darnall Works. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Amalgamated Society of Painters and Decorators

Hello, Warofdreams, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Amalgamated Society of Painters and Decorators, appears to be directly copied from http://archiveshub.ac.uk/data/gb152-mss.78/nasohspd. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Amalgamated Society of Painters and Decorators if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 23:06, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Research Project

I recently uncovered an organization that is posting false information on wikipedia and then using that credibility to sell 'courses' of self improvement.

In ther research (Hundreds of citations at this point), we've found some fascinating tid bits, but they run directly against what this goup has been promoting since the 1950's (and to some degree since 1918). Given the duration of the organization and the fact that they ar still leveraging lies for personal gain, I expect there to be some attempts to undermine our effort.

Are there any preventative measure to take, awareness or pre-flagging the article so that administrators are aware? Also, is there a way we can connect with reliable editors that might be interested in helping us, especially with formating these citations so that they are easily and clearly accessible. Many references are from newspapers that are over 50 years old.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckWingate (talk • contribs) 18:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dunfermline

Hey WoD.

I have tried and failed to colour the background of Dunfermline to light red over on List of by-elections to the Scottish Parliament. Do you know how to do it, the table keeps breaking when I try doktorb _words^deeds 08:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Africa topic

Template:Africa topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Volunteer Marek 17:58, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield area articles

Hi pal, thanks for adding the infobox for the Storrs, South Yorkshire article. I was wondering, in your role as an administrator who is interested in Sheffield articles, could you please have a look at the latest edit on the Stanedge Pole page, as I think it is personal opinion, unencyclopedic and also unreferenced. I have undone it once but it has been reverted by another ip address (probably the same person), could you give your opinion as I don't want to get into an edit war.

On another subject, there are only three photos needed to complete the Listed buildings in S6 page, Holdsworth Cottage is fairly private but I think a photo is possible, the boiler house at King Edward's is very private and access is by keypad, so that is probably not possible and lastly High Lea Cottage and Farmhouse, should be possible although I'm not 100% sure where it is and anyway I was wondering if it's in S35, as per this link here which gives it a postcode of S35 0DB. Look forward to your reply, Regards Mick Knapton (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]