User talk:Viennese Waltz/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Bravo

[1] - Bravo sir, bravo! Hipocrite (talk) 12:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Viennese Waltz 12:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

iMac problem

Hi Richard RJ, I seem to recall that you have stated to be a Mac user in some old posting. I need a new hard drive for my my iMac (SMART status is failing) and wonder if you can recommend a local Mac service provider - reliable / not too expensive - in Vienna. Current info gives cost estimates from €250 to a whopping €500 (the latter being 25% of the original price of the iMac). Greetings from Vienna to Vienna. Helmut, aka --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 20:38, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Vietnamese translation

Are you looking for a professional translation of the Vietnamese story or are you just looking for the gist of it? If the latter, Google Translate would suffice. DHN (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm not a professional translator by any means and I use American English but I can give it a try. DHN (talk) 22:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Good article

This user helped promote Van der Graaf Generator to good article status.

I notice that you were involved in this article at some point. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

The Man Who Barked Like A Dog

Hello Viennese Waltz,

I haven't yet gotten the hang of finding my way around Wikipedia in search of information about this film, and I just happened to bumble into the link that brought me to your page. I have tried off and on for years with no success to research this film, and was pleased to see your response to my inquiry. I had tried, probably incorrectly, to contact the original responder, and today I noticed again that you also remember it. Is your recollection of it similar to mine?

So it was Peter Ustinov! Do you have any ideas about why there seems to be no trace of it on the Internet? It was not a low-budget production, which makes the lack of information all the more puzzling.

I'll appreciate hearing from you. As I don't trust my ability to retrieve your reply via Wikipedia, pleas email me at DnP@gmail.com.

Thanks,

Don (Curious in NYC)Curious in NYC (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

references found

I found some references. They're for NOLA Pay It Forward and 12/12/12 the Concert for Sandy Relief. You can go to [2] and [3] to find more information on NOLA Pay It Forward. You can go to [4] and [5] to find more information on 12/12/12 the Concert for Sandy Relief. I hope I've provided enough information on what could be notable events for articles. Please let me know. Thank you.142.255.103.121 (talk) 04:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Reference desk

You just commented on my pokemon question. I updated and clarified it some, so let's take it back to the desk, maybe you can help me out. Thanks, --174.79.50.132 (talk) 18:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Woman at Brandenburg Gate

I found her on this YouTube video at 2:50 - this piece misses out on the first part of the exchange. I'm astonished that it's not all over the web - it literally gave me goosebumps the first time that I saw it. If I find the full conversation, I'll get back to you. Alansplodge (talk) 16:56, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

She's also in this one at 1:05. Alansplodge (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. Alansplodge (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wow

Dang, you created the article on Burial?! I thought I had bragging rights because I created the Untrue article d: NIRVANA2764 (talk) 20:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haul girl

Hello Viennese Waltz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Haul girl for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhona43 (talk) 16:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Baseball Bugs at AN/I

You have been mentioned in an active discussion at WP:AN/I. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cut Hands

The article Cut Hands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musical project, fails WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 07:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	In recognition of your superior google-foo. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 10:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

stanley kirkby

Hi Viennese Waltz, many thanks for your help, however, I made a mistake with my info, it's the dear irish mother of mine that has the chorus. Also there is a Francis Day & Hunter stamp on the label [This may be standard ]. Also there is a paper stamp on the label stating A.J.S. A.J.Stasny music company Ltd with what looks like the price of 3/4 -d. Hope this is of interest to you, again many thanks for your help. p.s.There are also indented numbers on the inner of the record of 7161N Rose Dreams & 7156S ON the other side! Reg Hall78.149.92.18 (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Reg, as stated on reference desk entertainment page I'm not sure what more help I can be. It sounds like you have an interesting record and I advise you to hold onto it and contact an expert in old 78s to see what they have to say about it. You could also try posting on this website. --Viennese Waltz 08:33, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Are you still looking for this Carter review?

I came across Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive_25#Review by Angela Carter of Iain Sinclair's novel 'Downriver', clicked, and the link worked for me. I'll e-mail you a copy if you like. Choor monster (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

• Sent Choor monster (talk) 15:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Fatal Italian movie

I would offer you a torrent of gratitude if you can help me get Circuito chiuso. If the first demo tape recorded by Van der Graaf Generator with Peter Hammill might interest you, I can also offer that. caleb.bradley@getmail.no

(talk page stalker) This one? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Not exactly that one, Dear Potato, but thanks, I'll watch it anyway. @Viennese Waltz thanks a torrent for helping me get the 1978 movie with the same name. I have another request: please email me the website again! I lost the URL and much more in a disk crash. Best regards, Caleb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blooteuth (talk • contribs) 10:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Reference Desk

Our racist friend was persistent this morning. Rojomoke (talk) 13:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Greetings

Sorry, I took a look at the reference desk page and it seemed similar questions were asked. Where can I find help for new users--JanitorioMacG (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Help_with_Android_app

I got Dmitry Brant, the Senior Software Engineer of Wikimedia Foundation, to respond to your question at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Help_with_Android_app. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 20:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Ref desk

What gave you the idea that this was a joke? The discussion was about "real" names, and those comments were about some public figures with varying approaches to their "real" names. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

They were irrelevant to answering the question, which is why I marked the hat as "irrelevant". Do you disagree that they were irrelevant? --Viennese Waltz 08:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Re Mr Mister piped link

Hi. According to WP:NOTBROKEN, it is better to use the redirect when it works fine, such as in my edit. Anyway, I will not undo your latest edition since it does not break anything and, for sure, I am not into starting an edit war over such a trivial matter. Cheers.--Gorpik (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

"Not patronising"

"There's a few choices you have if you need help dealing with the article. First, you can just fix it yourself. The qualifications for fixing in article at Wikipedia are 1) You have a computing device you are capable of using to enter text and 2) You care about fixing it. That's it."

Seriously? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

If someone's regular style is patronising (I don't agree it is, btw) that doesn't stop it being patronising, in the same way that if someone's regular style is kindly that doesn't stop it being kindly. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

His regular style is not patronising and neither was that post, is my point. --Viennese Waltz 10:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

This edit...

...seems to have triggered some confusion.[6] ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 23:52, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I left a note on his talk page. --Viennese Waltz 06:51, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I wondered why you deleted on obviously relevant content and, more importantly, something obviously missing (should had been the first answer!). You did what you had to do according to this policy, now just take the content I inserted (back) as coming from me (a legit user with no link whatsoever with whoever is the banned user) ;-). I will add my signature. Someone may also apply some sanction upon the rule breaker who shouldn't have put the content (even as good as it was), but that is none of my business or ref-deskers. I have no problem at my using some jesuitism, do you?Gem fr (talk) 09:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Congrats on 10k edits

Good work, Willbb234 (talk) 11:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for answering

		The Original Barnstar
		Your kind efforts [7] are appreciated.

86.20.193.222 (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Fill your boots

"vxfc"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For dealing with this pest so often...it's a thankless job. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	We very much appreciate your efforts to keep the ref desks clear of unwanted debris. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 11:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Banned user socks on Refdesks (etc.)

Hi, Viennese Waltz. You may recognise me as a long-time (+15 years) IP user who regularly contributes on the Reference, Help and Teahouse desks (as well as more occasionally in Article and Talk page space).

I might mention that I can recognize and generally ignore obvious trolling, and I am inclined to give borderline cases, especially if from apparent non-EFL posters, the benefit of AGF and answer straightforwardly with references.

In a recent Misc RefDesk thread "Augustine's Oak", you commented that the IP querant was [a sock of] a banned user and their post should have been deleted on sight. I don't want to encouraged banned users, but I also have no particular interest in focussing most of my efforts on their detection and extirpation. In view of this, I would like to ask how users like myself can easily recognize "on sight" that a particular poster is actually a sock of a banned user?

The post in question had no hallmarks of trolling, but was a purely factual query about an obscure point of railway operations. I myself didn't happen to know the answer, but was interested to learn it from other responders and would have answered myself had I been able.

[Edited to add] I see you have added a duplicate of your remark to another post thread, "Time capsule" on the Humanities Refdesk, from a different IP. Again, the question itself is innocuous, I myself would have answered if others had already not done so, and the answers seem of possible interest to a wide readership. (I am an ex-professional editor and once worked on a railway-related periodical, so you will understand why both queries were somewhat on my wavelength!)

I notice you have not flagged a third query on the HRD, "Who is the historian in this video?", from a not dissimilar IP: What distinguished this one from the previous two? {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.123.24.56 (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. The background to this user is at WP:LTA/VXFC, although that page could do with some updating. Basically this guy is a pest and I wish he would go away. He's been banned from using Wikipedia for life but because he uses a dynamic IP it's very hard to block him. As I wrote earlier today, WP policy is to delete his posts on sight, even if he asks interesting questions that could be of use or benefit to the wider readership. But if someone comes along and posts good faith replies before his post gets deleted, then we tend to leave the stuff up. Myself and a few other editors have become fairly adept at spotting his posts, which are easily recognisable once you know what you are looking for. Geolocating his IP address brings up various areas of north and east London, he has a pompous, self-regarding writing style and is obsessed with the minutiae of certain topics such as calendars and public transport. I wouldn't worry too much about recognizing and reverting his posts if I were you, others will normally take care of it. The IP who posted the "who is this historian" question was not from north-east London so it definitely wasn't the banned user. --Viennese Waltz 20:28, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. So its a combination of familiarity with a combination of style and subject matter (which I can understand from previous instances of other similar offenders), but also of actively monitoring abuser logs and checking IP locations. I'm not interested in getting involved with the latter, but it's good to know that others are. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.123.24.56 (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

why the delete of seemingly legit stuff?

I guess you have reason enough for this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff=913991387&oldid=913989605 But I cannot see it Gem fr (talk) 14:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Vote X?

Are you sure? What about the posts gives you that sense? I have developed a pretty good sense, over the years, of reading into Vote X's writing style and the way she interacts with people. That IP address made a single post to the ref desks, and I don't see anything that would lead me to believe it. Maybe I missed something... Can you point to what gave you that impression? --Jayron32 19:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)