This is an archive of past discussions about User:Valereee. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Indonesia report: Volunteers' meet-up; Wiki Cinta Budaya 2020 structured data edit-a-thon
Ireland report: Video tutorials; Celtic Knot Conference 2020
Kosovo report: WoALUG and NGO Germin call Albanian Diaspora to contribute to Wikipedia
Netherlands report: Nationaal Museum van Wereldculturen contributes to Wikimedia Commons again; Student research on GLAM-Wiki at Erasmus University Rotterdam
Serbia report: March Highlights - Everything is postponed
Sweden report: FindingGLAMs; Wikipedia in libraries; Art from the Thiel Gallery Collections; Kulturhistoria som gymnasiearbete
Thanks for uploading File:Independent Restaurant Coalition logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
On 24 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kitchen hack, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NPR called Robinson Crusoe the "patron saint of the kitchen hack" (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kitchen hack. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kitchen hack), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
On 3 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Feed sack dress, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an estimated 3 million women and children in the United States were wearing clothing made from feed sacks(example pictured) at any given time during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Feed sack dress. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Feed sack dress), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 4 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Goat tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many goat towers(example pictured) have become tourist attractions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Goat tower. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Goat tower), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Brazil report: GLAMce at Museu Paulista: making things machine-readable
Czech Republic report: WikiGap 2020 in Czech Republic; International event; support for Wikimedia community; edit-a-thon run with the US embassy and the Swedish Embassy
France report: Association des Archivistes Francais; Palladia, a museum collection portal based on Wikimedia resources
I hope this message finds you well and in good health during these trying times. Below is a list of some online activities that you may be interested in participating in.
The Wiki Global Check In has started! This initiative is gathering check-ins from Wikimedians all around the world, and asks for a photo that captures something related to life in your context or part of the world during the pandemic.
WALRUS (Wikimedians Active in Local Regions of the United States) is now hosting virtual meetings twice a month on Monday evenings. This is a place to discuss anything Wikimedia, as well as a place for Wikimedians to come together and mutually support each other. The next virtual meeting should be on Memorial Day, May 25th. You can sign up for the Wikimediaus-l mailing list to stay up to date on all WALRUS happenings and to receive meeting invites.
Wikipedians have been busy documenting the pandemic. In Ohio, we have articles on the pandemic in Ohio and in Columbus (the latter of which was written by our newest Ohio Wikimedians member, Ɱ!). If interested, you're encouraged to help update and expand these articles, or even consider creating articles documenting the pandemic in other Ohio metro areas.
If you miss visiting your local museums, don't forget that the Cleveland Museum of Art's entire collection is available online and in the public domain (when permissible). Our WikiProject Cleveland Museum of Art is currently tracking 44 English Wikipedia articles and 40,322 images, which are now acquiring over 2,000,000 views a month. If you're interested in contributing, there is still plenty of work to be done to expand and create new articles!
Movement Strategy
The finalized Movement Strategy Recommendations have been published! This is a clarified and refined version of the recommendations that were released in January.
The Wikimedia Summit 2020 that was to occur in April was canceled, and Wikimedia Deutschland will not be hosting a virtual replacement. In its stead, Ryan Merkley, members of the movement strategy core team, and external consultants are exploring options to move the contents of the conference into a series of virtual events.
Have something for the next newsletter? Add it to our June 2020 draft.
Thanks for uploading File:Kismet Press-logo-web-3e.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi Valereee, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
I went through Detroit twice a few months ago and not only tried the real stuff (plus a Detroit-style coney) but was able to buy some Wisconsin brick cheese so I could make the pizza at home. Wish I had the exact right pan, but I'm loathe to spend $40 on the authentic pan for something I'll likely make once or twice a year. Trying to convince myself a nice heavy pan is always a good addition to the kitchen :) —valereee (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Sharper, whoa, I was waiting for my watchlist to refresh and realized I hadn't visited a certain edit, and I clicked, and as it was mid-refresh I misclicke to (what I thought was) your edit, which wasn't what I was interested in, and I just shook my head, closed the window, and went back to my watchlist to try again. I didn't even realize I clicked revert, not just clicked to the edit, and my apologies, I didn't look at it closely enough -- I didn't realize I'd actually made an edit! Sorry, just a freak misclick! —valereee (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
An invention is a unique or noveldevice, method, composition or process, and the invention process is a process within an overall engineering and product development process.
The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
ThatMontrealIP, yes, that was my original understanding of 'the talk', too, and it's surprising we don't have an article for that, either. I was thinking The talk (racism) and The talk (sex) might eventually be the correct titles? —valereee (talk) 10:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! To tell you the truth, I don't know hat is the best solution. I do think that the (parenting) modifier is too definitive in that it leaves out the other meanings. I just wanted to make sure you knew about the other possible meaning of the phrase, seeing as this is global encyclopedia whose editors span many cultures!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm with you. I think I'll just leave it to the community. Someone will no doubt have a better idea. :) —valereee (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
I reverted one of your changes.
Hey, I brought the first sentence of George Floyd article to the previous version as the newer version seemed a little awkward to read. Hope that's okay with you. Regards, --Amazingcaptain (talk) 18:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
FYI, this edit request seems to be a common cut and paste from at least one (unreliable) website. I'm not sure if I'm going overboard with WP:BLP and revdel'ing it, but I wont that particular one as there's been quite a few intermediate edits after. Do you know what is common (not necessarily written) practice on highly visible BLP talk pages? Or what is your M.O for this page? (I'm too lazy to query at WP:BLPN or WP:AN.) Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 12:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
I've deleted BLP vios as I see them, leaving "<REDACTED>" if any of the request is worth salvaging. Copyvios I delete—also revdeling unless there's been major edits since.—Bagumba (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Pinging El C for their take too (hope you dont mind this on your page valereee), as they made a note about the film actor BLP issue.—Bagumba (talk) 13:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I looked around on some vegan related articles and see you have an academic interest and you are an experienced editor and have done good edits. I have proposed a a wikiproject on veganism and vegetarianism, I would be interested in knowing if you have any thoughts about the matter, you can leave comments on the proposal page if you are interested, thanks. Psychologist Guy (talk) 21:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Netherlands report: Analysis of Dutch GLAM-Wiki projects in relation to the Dutch Digital Heritage Reference Architecture, Content donation from Utrecht Archives, Detecting Wikipedia articles strongly based on single library collections and Collection highlights of the KB
Sweden report: Free music on Wikipedia; NHB webinars; Wikipedia in libraries – Projekt HBTQI
Hey Valereee, I wanted to ask about your edit on the Howard Brennan page: do you really think that is necessary? We take on the eyesight issue elsewhere in the article. Thanks.Rja13ww33 (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Brennan has said he had "super" eyesight for things at a distance (he was farsighted). (Prior to the post-assassination sandblasting accident.) Maybe I'll add a quote from him on that at some point. Thanks.Rja13ww33 (talk) 16:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
We can argue how best to use the sources if the article survives AfD. The point of pulling up additional sources, even if they're simply additional sources for what's already there, is to show that there is significant coverage in reliable non-primary sources, which is the rationale the nominator used for AfD. Prove the article is worth keeping first. Then we can argue about details. :) —valereee (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Detroit-style pizza for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
; see Talk:Detroit-style pizza for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
Lee Vilenski with 869 points, 
Hog Farm with 801, 
Kingsif with 719, 
SounderBruce with 710, 
Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and 
MX with 515.
.svg){kind=small}
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Miscellaneous
_(cropped).jpg)
CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
Arbitration
