User talk:V.P.knocker

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Ghatnandur train crash. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

It is wrong to change the names of articles associated with Aurangabad during a move discussion for that city.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello dear toddy1

I understand your opinion

And i am not change city name again till officialy Change name by government

Thanks V.P.knocker (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, V.P.knocker

Thank you for creating Digras (Beed).

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

try to add a ref from the 2011 indian census

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:40, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|MPGuy2824}} I was researching the more information about Digras. And off course I will referenceing more references on this article (one question- when this article has published by Wikipedia)

thanks V.P.knocker (talk) 04:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Digras (Beed), as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Digras (Beed), you may be blocked from editing.
Almost all of the sections are totally unreferenced, and your English is rather poor - Arjayay (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respected editor

Very very sorry sir. I don't do this again

I will try to create great page.

Thanks V.P.knocker (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Anushka Sen. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 06:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mayuri Kango. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change city names until it is officially changed. Kiran_891 ^(TALK) 11:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kasar community. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Kasar community has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Moxy- 11:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kalinka Devi Mandir moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kalinka Devi Mandir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 17:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalinka Devi Mandir (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scrooge200 was:

*The article suffers from structural problems; I advise you to read the Manual of Style, and consult other Hindu temple articles like Vinayaka Temple, Kanipakam and Mukhalingam for formatting and content ideas.

Some of the sources are duplicated; please read Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Repeated_citations
"How to reach" should be written in a more neutral tone, explaining nearby landmarks and cities.
The gallery section needs to be enclosed with <gallery> code, since right now, the images are piled onto the right side of the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalinka Devi Mandir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kalinka Devi Mandir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Scrooge200 (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, V.P.knocker! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Scrooge200 (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and/or Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. D.Y Patil Arts Commerce and Science College, Pune

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. D.Y Patil Arts Commerce and Science College, Pune requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Dr.+D.Y+Patil+Arts+Commerce+and+Science+College%2C+Pune&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moxy- 11:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:V.P.knocker

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:V.P.knocker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --V.P.knocker (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am V.P.knocker, I have modified this page. Now there are no self-promotions in this page.

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Hatkarwadi, Maharashtra

added links pointing to Marathi and Shirur

Bardapur

added a link pointing to Marathi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sagar Karande moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sagar Karande, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Os ari us 19:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sagar Karande (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sagar Karande and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Digras (Beed), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at De Dhakka 2. BOVINEBOY2008 23:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.

"No edit summary" is not a helpful edit summary – it doesn't tell your fellow editors anything about what the edit was about. bonadea contributions talk 15:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timepass 3

Before creating articles like Timepass 3, make sure that the film in question passes WP:NFILM, and include sources like in-depth movie reviews which prove notability. Without these sources, the film will likely be draftified, deleted, and/or redirected. This wastes everyone's time. Ovinus (talk) 17:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gauri Ingawale moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gauri Ingawale, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 21:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gauri Ingawale (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is claim to notability, as Wikipedia defines it – please see the notability criteria for actors and for biographies. Significant coverage in reliable sources is required. A search hits page such as this is not a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gauri Ingawale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Satyaprem Ki Katha.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Satyaprem Ki Katha.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited D. D. Dabke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Make Joke Of

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Make Joke Of requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ab207 (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using forum posts as sources

Hi V.P.knocker,

In Special:Diff/1107041952, you have cited an "indiaforums.com" forum post as a source. As forum posts are user-generated, self-published content, please do not use them as sources.

In other messages above, other users have complained about similar issues. You have not answered these messages, and as you have now cited a clearly unreliable source, I'm afraid that you might not understand Wikipedia's concept of reliability.

Please have a look at the huge, colored table at WP:RSP for a while. There is an explanation for each entry in the table. These may help you to understand why something is reliable, and why something else is not reliable. If you have questions about this, please ask, for example at the Teahouse.

I expect you to educate yourself about the reliability of sources before continuing to edit.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sagar Karande (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sagar Karande and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim (talk) 13:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sagar Karande has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sagar Karande. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion templates in infoboxes

- Please do not add conversion templates to the infoboxes of Indian films, as you did at Dagadi Chawl 2, since this is contrary to the consensus at WP:ICTF - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Wefffrrr per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wefffrrr. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I received your e-mail. The reason for the block is given in the notice above - I believe that you are evading an existing block on an earlier account. The instructions for appealing a block are at WP:GAB. Please don't e-mail me again. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 13:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

V.P.knocker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wrote 4 to 5 articles on Wikipedia which were also reviewed but suddenly I got blocked from Wikipedia.They think I am Wefffrrr by coincidencial evidences, this is not true. Actually I was started my account before two months as a fresherV.P.knocker (talk) 23:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request is almost incoherent and in any case, doesn't address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wefffrrr/Archive. Yamla (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.