Messages from 2021 (>)

Note: If you are wondering where all the old 2020 messages went, please click the arrow above.

"TrapMusicHDTV" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect TrapMusicHDTV. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 7#TrapMusicHDTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:CroppedImageOfAmericanProducerDJSuede.png

Thanks for uploading File:CroppedImageOfAmericanProducerDJSuede.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Use of non-free content on Wikipedia needs to meet all of the non-free content criteria. In particular, this image contravenes policy point 1 which covers replaceability. From the guidelines, "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." -- Whpq (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, question; is it acceptable to keep the file if the subject approves of it? I mean, that would make sense, right? TrevortniDesserpedx (talk) 10:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. Approval of the subject for a non-free image does not change things. If the copyright holder releases this image under an acceptably free license, then the image could be used. Note that the copyright holder in most cases is the photographer and not the subject of the photo. -- Whpq (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Lewis Road Creamery, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate butter

You added an {{under construction}} template to Chocolate butter. Are you actively working on expanding the article? Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 09:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CroppedImageOfAmericanProducerDJSuedeTheRemixGod.png

Thanks for uploading File:CroppedImageOfAmericanProducerDJSuedeTheRemixGod.png, which you've attributed to Vague terms per C:COM:CONSENT.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ə XPLICIT 23:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marking edits as minor

Hi. Please stop marking large additions or removals of content as minor. None of these [1], [2], [3] are minor edits and should not have been marked as such. Minor edits are usually small fixes of typographical errors, not for additions of chart positions and such. For what constitutes a minor edit, please see Help:Minor edit. Thanks. Ss112 20:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christina Pastor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Pastor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Pastor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Primefac (talk) 12:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dindu Nuffin (song)

A tag has been placed on Dindu Nuffin (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

redirect originally to a non-existant section and now to no target

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Single cover for Best Friends by Sophia Grace.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Single cover for Best Friends by Sophia Grace.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ian Jeffrey (internet personality)

Hello, Trevortnidesserped. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian Jeffrey (internet personality), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Where Did it All Go Wrong? (DG song)

Hello, Trevortnidesserped. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Where Did it All Go Wrong?".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not using reliable sources (Me at the zoo)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ohnoitsjamie, thank you for the heads up! I checked my sources and realized that the user who first made the claim was well known for spitting out lies and tricking the YouTube community. I started writing a justification beforehand so it's a relief I don't need to bother with that anymore, and I'm glad I found this out before I made it worse by re-editing. TrevortniDesserpedx (talk) 03:22, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:DGWhereDidItAllGoWrong.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DGWhereDidItAllGoWrong.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ian Jeffrey (internet personality)

Hello, Trevortnidesserped. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ian Jeffrey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at James Charles (Internet personality). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please don't make edits like this without sources. —valereee (talk) 04:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, you may be blocked from editing. MPFitz1968 (talk) 11:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The talk page topic you created at Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones#For MPFitz1968, relevant to the warning I issued above, has been moved to my talk page. If you have any further response to the edit dispute at the article addressed in the warning, please continue those at my talk page. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hot Demon B!tches Near U!!!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agata. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Cheater (song)

Hello, Trevortnidesserped,

Thank you for creating The Cheater (song).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

As it stands it fails WP:NSONG, if reliable sources can be provided that the song charted then this should be enough evidence to establish notability. Needs to be rewritten to conform with Wikipedia standards at the moment contains substantial original research without any inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dan arndt}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Trevortnidesserped! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Practically an article request, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CoverForVictorLundbergSingleAnOpenLetter1967.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CoverForVictorLundbergSingleAnOpenLetter1967.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Trevortnidesserped! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Rowspan template, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Trevortnidesserped! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Marilyn Monroe gold dress, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chocolate butter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chocolate butter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate butter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PictureOfMexicanActressChristinaPastor.jpg

The file File:PictureOfMexicanActressChristinaPastor.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Christina Pastor. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:59, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mill Valley (song)

Hi, have located details and added journal citations for Life and for Rolling Stone. Have left the text as it is for now. Life can be viewed at Google Books and written up; a resource request can be submitted for Rolling Stone. See talk page for a link to resource requests. Regards, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 15:34, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NOW! That's What I Call Music! in the US

@Trevortnidesserped: Not sure if you still look at your page but I have a question about an edit to the NOW! albums. You said that NOW! 90 was the final album in the series. Where exactly did you hear that? Arjoccolenty (talk) 07:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Arjoccolenty! I originally suspected in late July that the series had concluded after noticing that the cover art was nowhere to be found online. Cover arts for the NOW albums are usually released about 4-8 weeks after the release of the previous NOW album, and this was the first time in at least 10 years since the series was introduced to the internet that the cycle was broken. Additionally, it was noted by members of the NOW community that the official NOW social media accounts have gone completely silent since June, which still holds true today. I even asked Jeff Moskow (we've been in contact since the Rolling Stone article was published, but only talk on rare occasions) when the next album would come out, and whether there would be a NOW 91, and he said he "had no idea." All this, combined with the fact that sales for compilation albums are at an all-time low, are strong evidence that point towards the conclusion of the series. They don't necessarily have to make a public statement confirming our suspicions, and no other country's NOW series (Canada, New Zealand) has done so either. TrevortniDesserpedx (talk) 01:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK that makes sense and thank you for getting back to me on it. I have noticed that over time the NOW! albums have been losing their popularity. I have never got over them dropping 4 songs for bonus tracks by new artist which except for three cases I can think of (Hot Chelle Rae, Capital Cities and MTKO) haven’t really taken off. Now I think that it’s because the popular songs of today are so short that there aren’t as many hits on them as there were. I was really hoping that at some point they would start putting 20 songs back on in addition to the bonus tracks. Arjoccolenty (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]