User talk:TomStar81/Archive 22
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
moves
[edit]I'm no expert, but it looks like you moved everything to a /archive 21 sub-directory. If I'm reading it right you moved a page to :
- User talk:TomStar81/Archive 21/Archive 10
when you wanted it at
- User talk:TomStar81/Archive 10
am I guessing correctly? do you want me to put them back the way it was? — Ched (talk) 07:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- nevermind - looks like JJMC89 is taking care of everything. — Ched (talk) 08:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yep, all sorted now. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi TomStar81. I wonder if you would consider restoring this article. Its history has been a battlefield but it is important to know the background. Varma is both an Indian surname and a Finnish given name, and the given name has been repeatedly dragged into the continuing problems with the article on the Indian name. Varma (given name) was separated most recently when the main article was rewritten, for the umpteenth time, to refer only to Indians. Without Varma (given name) there is no coverage at all of the Finnish name, which seems unnecessary, especially as the article - unlike many name articles - is referenced. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
[edit]Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Kyliegh Curran
[edit]Hi Tom, any reason you deleted this page rather than participate in the talk page discussion? I'd rather discuss this here than on the Admin page. Your choice. Rklawton (talk) 21:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Further discussion of your comment at ANI
[edit]Maybe I should just leave this be, but I feel you still don't understand why your complaint doesn't make much sense to me and I think some of the other uninvolved parties. And I hope if you choose to read it, this will help if not reduce your concerns, at least give you something to think about in future cases.
"In this case I could understand why the nominator wouldn't alert us if he didn't know about the deletion review
". The problem is, as I pointed out, the nominator participated in the deletion review, so they were surely aware of it. In fact as I also pointed out, only one person who participated in the AFD was potentially unaware of the deletion review and it was not the nominator. So there is zero reason to focus on one editor if you believe some major wrong was done in not notifying. It's entirely reasonable to expect any one of them to notify if you feel that should have happened. The one with the greatest expectation would arguably be (although IMO it's only a small amount more) the nominator User:SportingFlyer.
But therein lies the problem, either you're accusing them of not actually wanting it deleted, an incredible bad faith accusation, or you have to accept that they weren't doing it because they were trying to "hide" the discussion.
Nil Einne (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- BTW, SportingFlyer explained why they didn't notify here User talk:SportingFlyer/Archive 2#ANI where I mentioned you. I can understand their rationale even if I don't entirely agree it was better not to notify. Notifying previous participants is not the norm, but IMO if you mention you have done so, and ensure you notify everyone it's fine. And in a case like this where the the DRV was so close to the AFD, it's probably better. Still even if there was nothing wrong with notifying them, some people may still be unhappy. So if you think enough people will participate anyway it may seem better to avoid that. And in any case, with no requirement, it's difficult to fault anyone even if you you didn't understand their rationale for not notifying.
Perhaps you could say that if the likely perception was that it would make deletion more likely, then it's better for someone who !voted keep to notify to reduce canvassing concerning. But that still leaves 2 (as it seems only fair to include User:Levivich since they did end up !voting keep) other editors besides User:Oakshade. And one option would have been to bring up notifying before it's done explaining why you feel it would be better, as if others agree it less of a one sided thing. In other words, however you spin it, I see no reason to concentrate on Oakshade being the main one at "fault" for not notifying even if we put aside that there wasn't any "fault" to begin with.
The Signpost: 29 November 2019
[edit]- From the editor: Put on your birthday best
- News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?
- In the media: You say you want a revolution
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases
- Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker
- Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things
- Gallery: Winter and holidays
- Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews
- Essay: Adminitis
- From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
[edit]
|
Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 03:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC) |
File:O'niel Cylinder.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Season's Greetings!
[edit]
|
Faithful friends who are dear to us | |
| ... gather near to us once more. May your heart be light and your troubles out of sight, now and in the New Year. |
.jpg) |
Feliz Navidad!
[edit]Feliz Navidad to you and your loved ones my old friend. It's been a long time, way too looooog since we've last interacted in Wikipedia. May God cover you and your loved ones with many blessings this coming year. Your friend Tony the Marine (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2019
[edit]- From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again
- News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages
- In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?
- Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki
- Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December
- Technology report: User scripts and more
- Gallery: Holiday wishes
- Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary
- From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report
Happy New Year!
[edit].jpg) George Bellows, North River (1908), Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. |
Best wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2020. | |
| Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
Arbitration
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
Miscellaneous
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2020
[edit]- From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium
- News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia
- Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta
- Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019
- News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations
- Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015
- From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]
Arbitration
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Combined drive
[edit]Hi! I was wondering if there's been any progress toward a joint drive, per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators § March Madness 2020? – Reidgreg (talk) 19:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
March Madness 2020
[edit]G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
[edit]- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
Technical news
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Please add notices
[edit]Hello, TomStar81, thank you for adding editnotice for the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. But please add fifth notices for editors that stats that:
- This article uses British English and spellings such as "colour" should not be changed to American English spellings such as "color".
So the editnotice must be revised to:
 | Please read before editing:
All editors are asked to observe the following when editing this article:
|
So, The aim for adding fifth notice is to notify the editor of clear and explicit rules regarding spelling. 36.68.165.222 (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Clarification request: Acupuncture closed and archived
[edit]The clarification request regarding the arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Acupuncture has been closed and archived to Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Acupuncture#Clarification request: Acupuncture (March 2020).
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Scar (FMA).JPG
[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Page protection
[edit]This was exceptionally punitive for something that really didn't seem to be having any problems. Can you please at least drop it to semi-protection (which at least makes some sense)? —Locke Cole • t • c 04:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Consensus lists should protected in this manner
Perfect, I must have missed that guideline or policy. Can you direct me to that? Thank you so much! =) —Locke Cole • t • c 17:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
[edit]- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
Technical news
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Miscellaneous
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
"Wild Dog (Comic book charactor)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wild Dog (Comic book charactor). Since you had some involvement with the Wild Dog (Comic book charactor) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Request for administrator access
[edit]hello sir, Shohreh Ghamar's page has been deleted 4 years ago, but after 4 Years, Her resume is more complete, and I think, I can improve her Page. Please give the access to me for editing her page.Firstofficer (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Help Requested
[edit]It has been brought to my attention that the Timeline of asexual history page was started by JaneSwifty, who apparently was a sock of Dante8. I did not know this. Clearly this page is important, as are all the pages that user created. Clearly, though, this is a classic example of WP:EVASION. So, since I don't want this page to be swiped down in what would be a completely justified deletion, per EVASION, would you mind preemptively deleting the Timeline of asexual history page and I will come in right behind you and recreate the page myself with all the same information so that it is not an EVASION?
I know this has been done before in rare instances, but I put alot of work in this one and I don't want to see it all lost because of a sock from 3 years ago. Thanks in advance for your help. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:55 on April 17, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome
Deletion review for Singapore Miracle
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Singapore Miracle. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
I am not the person submitting the DRV but merely fixing the nomination on behalf of 192.38.10.18. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
COI discussion
[edit]Hi. I stumbled across a recent COI discussion and was surprised at some ruminations in two posts there. I'm posting the first diff here (and discussing that), and second diff in a paragraph below: [2]. In the first post, it was very much casting aspersions toward another editor and there seemed to be a question that this person should prove their identity. I think this was really bordering on an attempt to OUT this person - or and attempt to necessitate that this person reveal more information than they already have.
I notice you have been editing on Wikipedia since 2004 and you are an admin, so I am guessing you know policies really well. So, I'm not going to try pointing to policies or anything like that. I just want to give you a heads up that most of that post is probably considered unacceptable on a Noticeboard or any kind of Talk page.
Also, I found the subsequent response to be disconcerting. [3]. I don't think saying "...our editor here has been swinging wild the last few days like a fish on a line" is an appropriate metaphor for an editor and that editor's plight. This editor is a human being like you and me. Then there is, "...I have uranium pellets... but do I have enough for a self sustaining reaction?" What exactly does that mean? It sounds like we're about to sustain a nuclear reaction. This seems to be magnifying a situation.
Additionally, when saying, "Nothing I've seen in my admittedly limited look through suggests the answer to my hypothesis above is anywhere near yes - at least not yet" it sounds like someone is conducting an investigation to OUT another editor or attempting to conduct such an investigation
This is firmed up when saying "at least not yet'? There's no way an editor can be expected to OUT themselves. Also, there was no acknowledgement of previously casting aspersions in the first post. Hopefully, this is helpful. I know it's easy for editors to forget themselves and respond to stress in a certain way, or say something they didn't mean and so on. And I may have misunderstood what you meant and I am open to that. Also, I apologize for feeling compelled to bring this up with you. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
[edit]- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
about Majid yousefy page
[edit]Hi, thank you for your explanation. My goal in creating Majid Yousefi's page is not advertising. He is the producer and owner of the TV health channel of Tub, which is not without merit, considering the health conditions of all countries, the introduction of such people who take a useful step in the path of health. If possible, turn the page so that I can improve it to stay on Wikipedia by making changes to the text. Somayye95 (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Carolyn Rodriguez Page Deletion
[edit]Hi, I was hoping that I could have another chance at creating Carolyn's page. Another user flagged it for deletion and I did not see this notification before you deleted it. They flagged it because of copyright where all of the awards I listed are the same awards as on the stanford website. I used that site as a guide but I cited each award from the original source and then listed the awards in chronological order as the stanford website has. If you have suggested ways to avoid this type of thing from being flagged or structure it in a way that is not infringing copy right, please let me know. In the meantime, would I be able to resubmit carolyn's page and make the required changes? Thank you! Microglia145 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Carmaker1
[edit]I hope that the ArbCom is right that arbitration is not necessary in this case. Maybe this time they are right. The last time that you asked them to look into a case involving a controversial editor, they thought that arbitration was not necessary, and, by the time the case came around a second time, more damage had been done. I hope they are right this time. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Arbitration case request closed
[edit]Dear TomStar81, the Arbitration Committee has declined the recent arbitration case request involving you. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 01:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
[edit]- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Administrator changes
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:22, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
[edit]- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
[edit]- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Eamon Rocky
[edit]I was in the midst of contesting the speedy deletion. There are some good sources, even if the language is too promotional. Warrants a deletion discussion really. Consider this please. ɱ (talk) 02:40, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Awesomeness
[edit]You protected the redirect Awesomeness as long ago as 2009 (and I can understand why without reading the history). Could I trouble you to tag it as {{R from ambiguous term}}, because it targets a DAB page? (That tag was created only in 2010.) Narky Blert (talk) 12:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Deletion of Kojo Yankson
[edit]Hello Tom,
Pleased to make your acquaintance. I am messaging about the deletion of the page "Kojo Yankson". I am new to Wikipedia and still learning the navigations of this platform so to be honest I did not really understand the reasons for deletion. Kojo Yankson is one of the most prominent radio hosts in Ghana and hosting one of the most listened to morning shows, The Joy FM Super Morning Show, which he has been doing for 4 years. The show has been running since the year 2000 and all the past hosts for the show have Wikipedia pages (Komla Dumor, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, Francis Abban, to name a few). He was also listed as of the 100 most influential people in Ghana so it surprises me that you say he is non-notable, maybe I just need to understand why you say so. There are radio hosts with much smaller shows and followings that have Wikipedia pages so I'm thinking that maybe I just didn't create the page properly. I also just saw that there were previous versions of this page that were deleted in 2015 on the same basis but I can understand that because it had only been a year since he began. In current times however, he has gathered a faithful following and is quite well known in Ghana. He also does news anchoring and reporting on one of Ghana's top news outlets, JoyNews. Currently he is one of the top paid journalists at Multimedia Ghana which owns Joy FM and JoyNews because he hosts their flagship show. However there are less known journalists of Multimedia that have Wikipedia pages. Multimedia Ghana owns many of the well listened to channels in Ghana (TV & Radio) and so Kojo Yankson being a top member shows the value the company places on him. This convinces me that it was probably how I went about creating the page that was the issue. I created a draft and submitted it for review and then when I learned I could publish after 4 days I went ahead and did. I didn't realize that that annoys the reviewers. My sincerest apologies for my novice behaviour. I would really appreciate your input and help on how I can retrieve this page and what I can do to prevent another deletion. I would also like for you to point out to me the specific points in the article that were considered non-notable so that I can correct or improve them. The interface of this platform still confuses me a little so I would really appreciate the assistance. Thank you so much for you help and patience.
Regards, KEA 593 (talk) 05:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC).
Thank you for declining the CSD and moving to AfD. I have no idea what the outcome will be. There are assuredly substantive improvements that can be made to the article. I've left a comment there thankkng you for your nimination. I will not opine to keep nor delete. Fiddle Faddle 07:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
It appears that you declined the A7 and instead tagged it for AFD. If my reading is correct,I agree. This was another example of an annoying practice by single-purpose accounts of creating an article in draft space, and then, after four days and having made ten edits either to the draft or of minor copy-edits, creating the article in article space. It then cannot be draftified because it is already in draft space, so I think that they then hope that it just matures in article space. I either decline or reject the draft along with a standard scolding message. I sometimes PROD the article. I've !voted to delete the crud. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Saw that you declined my G12 nom of One (Southeast Asian TV channel), so I thought you might take a look at this Tejas Thackeray article. The editor, appears to have simply cut and paste from several articles: this, this, this, and this. I was going to remove all the copyvio stuff, leave the references, and ask for a revdel, but in doing so, it pretty much removes the guts of the article. Based on the sourcing, the individual appears notable. What would you suggest? Onel5969 TT me 23:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello TomStar81,
Please do not delete the article for activist Lamont Lilly. He is a person of note and the references in the article are legitimate. What is the purpose of the deletion nomination? Tarcanes (talk) 02:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear TomStar81,
With due respect, I would like to draw your kind attention towards my article, i.e, Niraj Gera created on 13 October 2018, which has been removed by you on 15 August 2020. I know it is late to express my concern with you after the deletion of the article but it took time for me to understand why my page got deleted. It was the first article written by me on Wikipedia. As per my knowledge and all the resources cited in the article, the content presented in the article was indeed true. As per my understanding, the deletion reason mentioned on the page, i.e, (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion), maybe due to the tone used in the content of the article. I accept that my article was indeed might not be following all the norms and rules of the ideal Wikipedia page.
Also, I was not aware of the speedy deletion criteria and as soon as I could do something it was already deleted.
I humbly request you to kindly reconsider your decision and restore my article and allow me some time to make changes on it so that it follows all the rules and regulations of the Wikipedia articles of a living person.
I also request you to guide me on this issue so that it will not happen again in the future.
Thanks & Regards Jain chakshu (talk) 17:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
[edit]- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Lamont Lilly deletion discussion
[edit]Can the article Lamont Lilly be removed from consideration for deletion? More users in the table have requested that it be kept and the page has been thoroughly cited. Because it has been considered for deletion for so long it has been a target of vandalism. I urge you to go ahead and let the article be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarcanes (talk • contribs) 14:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- This user has been adding promotional language to the article (though I'm not sure they realize it) and has now twice accused me of vandalism. I'm the only one other than them who has been editing it during the deletion discussion, so the "target of vandalism" comment could only refer to me. An admonishment to not make personal attacks would be nice. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Tagging of Rituraj Suresh Jain
[edit]I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Rituraj Suresh Jain. I do not think that Rituraj Suresh Jain fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "He was elected as a Councillor in Meerut Nagar Nigam (1989–1994). He is also the former District President of BJP Meerut Mahanagar." are Claims of significance. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead, if this was an article, or another process such as MfD or XfD as appropriate. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
[edit]- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
g11 and biographies
[edit]I like to message users when I delete their creations, and I use User:Deepfriedokra/g11 where needed. But I'm seeing more biographies G11 tagged, and I feel I need a fresh message or an adjustment of the current one. Would you mind commenting at User talk:Deepfriedokra/g11#Adjusting for biographies to help me help them? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
- Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn- Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Six years! |
|---|
ANI
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:27, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
[edit] | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
Beautiful Main page today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
[edit]- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
General of the Armies
[edit]I wanted to reach out to you because I had undid the revisions for General of the Armies that you made, I'm assuming out of good faith. Myself, @Garuda28: and @Skjoldbro: discovered via the Talk:General of the Armies that there were multiple statements and images added to the article, that were added by OberRanks, that were intended to be misleading, and the sources provided, were researched by us and were discovered to not contain any mention of the statements. We also discovered that OberRanks was sanctioned several times for providing falsified sources and providing WP:OR as shown [here] and [here], especially on their contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. Their account was ultimately banned from Wiki as a result. We are still working on discovering which information is valid as which is not. Neovu79 (talk) 22:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Aleisha Allen
[edit]Hello, I'm SomeBodyAnyBody05. You recently briskly deleted the page aleisha allen that was deleted two years prior that didn't fall under Deletion policy G4. The person of intrest seems pretty notable and doesn't fail WP:NACTOR. The actress had significant roles in televison shows and movies such as Are We there yet and and 130 episodes of Blue's clues between 1996 and 2004. She is also a registered pathologist. This was not fair because the admins aggresively attack this newly made article even though the admins on RFD encourage article creation. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_November_1#Aleisha_Allen for details. If you want me to find more sources fine, but it's unproductive to delete and especially speedy delete a page a semi-notable actress that quickly without a revised discussion. I want this page undeleted please. Cheers, ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 12:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Deletion review for Aleisha Allen
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Aleisha Allen. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Would like to discuss page deletion
[edit]Hello, I appreciate the review attention of you and other editors flagging the page I created for 'speedy deletion' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemplative_Higher_Education_Alliance_for_Research,_Teaching,_and_Service.) When I saw the original notice, I read the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Credible_claim_of_significance and attempted to make some edits providing statements of significance including providing news sources that documented some of the events of the organization. I am not sure if you saw those. I don't understand why what I added recently does not bring the article up to the criteria for "a claim of noteworthiness" - the Claim of significance page says it "need not be supported by any reference; the fact that such a claim exists, deems that the A7, A9 and A11 tags cannot be applied." Thank you for illumination. Sharp-shinned.hawk (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Deletion review for Inter Collegiate Prayer Fellowship
[edit]First of all, thank you for for reviewing the article Inter Collegiate Prayer Fellowship. I understand the Wikipedia:Copyright violations and wrote the article after getting the permission from the author of the website. Should I ask the author to send an approval mail to the permission mail or should I write a mail to the author and cc the permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org? Until then should I add {{OTRS pending}} to the article or leave it as it is and you do the part? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobinkoshy (talk • contribs)
Recreation of a page
[edit]Could you please recreate Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalu Rahim this page ? Initially it was with low coverages, but now it has good notability, Please see https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Shalu+Rahim%22 Manujanardhanan (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
G'day Tom, just a heads-up that USS Missouri (BB-63) is on the list (WP:URFA/2020) of old FAs that need checking ahead of a possible FAR. I had a quick look, and there are a few issues, but it wouldn't take much to bring her back up to solid FA. Given you were the major contributor, would you mind having a crack at it? I'd be happy to c/e after everything was checked/cited etc. Let me know? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:32, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
[edit]- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
RfC - scope and title for the American Revolutionary War article
[edit]I am forwarding this RfC notice to you, along with the ongoing Discussion Summary Chart because you are listed as a Military Project member interested in the American Revolutionary War. The RfC and discussion is found at Talk:American Revolutionary War. Please feel free to delete this notice if it does not fit your current interests. - TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 23:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
| A. "American Revolutionary War” | B. "War of the American Revolution" |
|---|---|
| - continuity - used at this WP article and sisters for 19 years - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America - participants British & US Congress with their respective allies, auxiliaries & combatants - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US: independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure - results - US independence & republic; Britain the biggest US trade partner & finances US expanding business & Treasury - reliable scholarly reference Britannica for the general reader - prominent adherents - 15 Pulitzer history winners |
- modern update - uses 'vast majority of sources' found in a browser search - scope - British-American insurrection in continental North America, Anglo-Bourbon (Fr.&Sp.) War-across worldwide empires, Fourth Anglo-Dutch War-North Atlantic, Second Mysore War-Indian subcontinent & Ocean - participants British & US Congress, France, Spain, Dutch Republic, Kingdom of Mysore - war aims -- Brit: maintain First British Empire with mercantile system -- US independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure -- Bourbons: Gibraltar, Jamaica, Majorca, expand Gambia trade, expand India trade -- Dutch - free trade with North America & Caribbean -- Mysore wider east-Indian sub-continent sphere of influenced results - Second British Empire, Spanish Majorca, French Gambia, further decline of Dutch Republic - reliable scholarly reference [world military dictionary] for the military specialist - prominent adherents - Michael Clodfelter, more to follow |
Horn of Africa
[edit]Hi there - I saw your posting at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests.
- I am not very active myself these days and have had almost nothing to do with sock investigations for some time.
- Certain areas of Wikipedia are indeed inundated with socks, many of them clearly paid.
- On the one hand I have every sympathy with Arbcom members who volunteer for what are often very complex and difficult tasks.
- Nonetheless my limited experience of them in relation to both socks and other disuptive elements is that far too often they err on the side of caution, with predictable results.
In short I am afraid I don't have much to add to this specific debate. Ben MacDui 13:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Tom, I wasn't really sure what to make of your entries at WP:URFA/2020. I moved one of them to article talk as it wasn't clear if you were saying the article was at standard or not, but then I read your second entry and really didn't know what to do with them. The idea at URFA is to keep posts to one brief note, indicating whether the article is at standard or not, or if it has received a FAR notice or a ping for improvements ... scroll through the other entries to see that yours is the only one longer than a brief note. I was always confused because you indicated some dead links, but didn't tag them or indicate which they are on talk so that others might fix them. And, is there anything new that should be included (have the articles been kept up to date, are there any significant new publications)? And, over time, tons of images have been chunked in with very poor formatting and MOS:SANDWICH issues everywhere ... have all of those been checked relative to image policy? Overall, I wasn't sure if you were saying the articles are at standard, since you listed considerable issues there. The FA tools aren't good for much anymore; I don't think anyone has maintained them, and no one uses them as we used to. If there are issues in articles, instead of listing them at the URFA page, could you list them at talk, and then just give a diff back to the WP:URFA/2020page? We just need to decide what goes to FAR, what is being worked on, etc. We should at least identify the issues in case others can work to clean them up ... the image clutter is considerable, and if there are dead links, please identify them. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:23, 8 December 2020 (UTC)- Hey, Tom, responded at my talk ... hope you are staying well, bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
[edit]G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
USS Illinois scheduled for TFA
[edit]This is to let you know that the USS Illinois article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 15, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 15, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
UAE-Israel Business Council
[edit]Hi TomStar81, I understand that you deleted this article that I wrote. I am just letting you know that I have taken on the relevant feedback and am rewriting the article according to Wikipedia guidelines. I am a university student so am new to this. I received a notice before starting the article again that I should let you know. Thanks Madi2128 (talk) 04:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC) Madi2128
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Collapse of Arecibo Radio Telescope 01.webm, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Greetings of the season
[edit]| Happy holidays | ||
| Dear Tom, For you and all your loved ones, "Let there be mercy".
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Merry Christmas
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for all you do--Tony the Marine (talk) 04:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)(UTC) |
Happy New Year!
[edit] Walter Elmer Schofield, Across the River (1904), Carnegie Museum of Art. |
Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2021. | |
| Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Oneupsmanship: This painting turned the friendly rivalry between Edward Redfield and Elmer Schofield into a feud. Schofield was a frequent houseguest at Redfield's farm, upstream from New Hope, Pennsylvania, and the two would go out painting together, competing to capture the better view. Redfield served on the jury for the 1904 Annual Exhibition of the Carnegie Institute; at which, despite Redfield's opposition, Across the River was awarded the Gold Medal and $1,500 prize. It was not until a 1963 interview that the 93-year-old Redfield revealed the painting as the cause of the 40-year feud between them. Schofield may have painted it in England, but a blindsided Redfield knew that it was a view of the Delaware River, from his own front yard! |
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
[edit]- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
[edit]G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TomStar81/Archive_22. |