User talk:TipsyElephant/2021

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, GAR, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Neologisms & Recognizability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC is not a queue

If not clear, AfC's backlog is not a queue. Reviewers look at the list and select what they want to review next. I know it is frustrating. The risk for moving a draft to mainspace is that a new article reviewer may decide to start an Articles for Deletion. I advise waiting on AfC. If, in time, you have a string of successes without any of them being declined, then you may decide that you are competent enough to send your new efforts direct to mainspace. David notMD (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage is WP:ROUTINE. Announcements of nominations and the like are not enough to denote notability. We need to see coverage of the subject beyond just naming people who won or were nominated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage is WP:ROUTINE. Announcements of nominations and the like are not enough to denote notability. We need to see coverage of the subject beyond just naming people who won or were nominated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage is WP:ROUTINE. Announcements of nominations and the like are not enough to denote notability. We need to see coverage of the subject beyond just naming people who won or were nominated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, List articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Come-to-papa-original-cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Come-to-papa-original-cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mystery-of-easter-island-cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mystery-of-easter-island-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Future Notability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Talk header, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fantasy podcast has been accepted

Fantasy podcast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Craig Davison (talk) 22:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Moving a discussion, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reference Type and Reference Quotes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Come-to-papa-original-cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Come-to-papa-original-cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Come-to-papa-revised-cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Come-to-papa-revised-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Redirects and Categories, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Make new article from section of another article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Upload Image from Mobile, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Jack Justice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Mobile Edit Functionality, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, MOS, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music podcast has been accepted

Music podcast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Iffy★Chat -- 14:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of fantasy podcasts has been accepted

List of fantasy podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 12:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TipsyElephant/2021. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by βӪᑸᙥӴ • Talk • Contribs 17:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notability based on one or two sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of science fiction podcasts (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This might as well be a category.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of science fiction podcasts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of science fiction podcasts, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 19:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of science fiction podcasts has been accepted

List of science fiction podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah ^💬 18:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Cover Art Vs. Logo, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikimedia Commons Images, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Viking Youth Power Hour

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Viking Youth Power Hour, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 02:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, External links, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Sherman has been accepted

Nick Sherman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Links, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Vandalism, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dirty Diana (podcast) has been accepted

Dirty Diana (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JSFarman (talk) 15:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QAnon Anonymous logo

Hi, can you please explain why you have removed the logo from this article? It is used in a limited capacity and you have not explained your decision to remove it, and thus I am going to put it back in, pending a discussion about its usage. --Jwslubbock (talk) 20:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I think that was a mistake on my part Jwslubbock. Feel free to add it again. I was just going through and cleaning up articles about podcasts, which mostly entails cleaning up the infobox, adding categories, converting links to templates, and adding maintainence tags. Sorry again. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I just got a bot notification telling me that the logo would be deleted as it was not being used on any articles, but I've put it back in. All the best.--Jwslubbock (talk) 12:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quanah Style (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no evidence of importance of any of the works, or the career as a whole--refs are mainly notices nad press reeleases

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quanah Style and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quanah Style, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art Napoleon (Artist) has been accepted

Art Napoleon (Artist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 21:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Niska Napoleon

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niska Napoleon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse thread has been answered

Hello, TipsyElephant/2021. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

NightWolf1223 (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:General Intellect Unit

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:General Intellect Unit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Indian & Cowboy Podcast Network

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indian & Cowboy Podcast Network, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:General Intellect Unit

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "General Intellect Unit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IHeartRadio Podcast Awards has been accepted

IHeartRadio Podcast Awards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of podcasts for kids has been accepted

List of podcasts for kids, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Anarchyte (talk) 11:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indian & Cowboy Podcast Network

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indian & Cowboy Podcast Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 08:12, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Theology and socialism

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Theology and socialism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Religious Socialism (podcast)

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Religious Socialism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Science fiction podcast has been accepted

Science fiction podcast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of horror podcasts has been accepted

List of horror podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaret Goes To The Movies

Can we please discuss in further why our podcast wiki page was deleted. We are traveling and was unable to edit the page until we returned home. Please email us at jaretgoestothemovies@gmail.com to resolve this page deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilentSean316 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SilentSean316, would you mind discussing it here on my talk page where we can use wikilinks and the discussion is in a space with guidelines and rules on WP:EQ. My main concern with the article was that it did not meet the requirements of WP:GNG. If you're able to provide two or three independent and reliable secondary sources that have more than a trivial mention of the podcast I'd be happy to look into restoring the article for you. For instance, an article by a well known news source such as BBC, CBC, or NYT. Similarly, any published book (you can search Google Books) or journal such as JSTOR. If the podcast is mentioned in a physical newspaper you could have someone check newspapers.com for you. Even one good reference could make the topic notable, but it'd have to be a longer reference from a reputable source. If the podcast has won any awards you could claim the subject is notable according to WP:WEBCRIT. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - We had an article written up by the Dallas Morning Newspaper a few years back, here is a link to it Dallas Morning News. We normally do not get much attention via news outlets even though our host is a Grammy nominated musician. Please let me know if there is anything else we can provide, proving the validity of our podcast.

@SilentSean316: As far as I'm aware the notability of hosts or guests on a podcast don't determine the notability of the podcast itself. For instance, the President of the U.S. could have a podcast, but if there is no news coverage of the podcast as an independent subject then the podcast isn't notable by virtue of association. Similarly, the host of the podcast being nominated for an award in a different subject does not make the podcast notable. If you could provide at least one more nontrivial source or an award won by the podcast than I might be convinced of the podcast's notability. The source you've already provided is decent, but WP:THREESOURCES is generally expected to demonstrate notability.

As noted at WP:N, just because an article meets one of the two requirements of notability "This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." I would recommend using the source you've provided to create a section dedicated to the podcast on the host's page rather than creating a stand-alone article. I think that would be much more reasonable if you are only able to provide a single source. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant ok so essentially we just lose our wiki page because we have no printed news coverage on us?

@SilentSean316: Do you have non-printed coverage or non-news coverage of the podcast such as a well known website that isn't a news agency or a video/audio interview on a well known tv channel or documentary? These could potentially be used to demonstrate notability, but they would need to meet the guidelines of being independent of the subject and they must be WP:RELIABLE. I would like to note that editors do not WP:OWN a wiki page and that Wikipedia is not a means of WP:PROMOTION and it's WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. If "we just lose our wiki page" means that you are directly connected to the subject of the article I would recommend reading WP:COI. You could request that the article be WP:UNDELETE, but given the lack of sources it would likely be deleted after an WP:AfD. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant we do not have any coverage on any news site aside from the one i sent prior, we are not on a tv channel or documentary. we do host a live podcast occasionally from a local venue in Dallas where we fly in guests from a movie that we review and has a Q&A with them while we watch the film. We do not use Wiki for socials, we do not even have a link anywhere on our current socials that direct people to our wiki page. We mainly kept the page active for a record of previous episode with our famous guests. I guess I have no further proof to keep our notability

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of music podcasts (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

A list of music podcasts that isn't limited to podcasts that already have Wikipedia articles is going to be a complete nightmare. If you want to narrow to podcasts with Wikipedia articles, please do so and resubmit. Thanks!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of music podcasts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of music podcasts, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of comic book and superhero podcasts (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

Per my decline of a similar article, a list that isn't limited to podcasts with Wikipedia articles will be a total nightmare. And I doubt there are enough comic/superhero podcasts with articles to support a list, but maybe you can surprise me by narrowing and resubmitting?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of comic book and superhero podcasts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of comic book and superhero podcasts, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mystery of Easter Island (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Mystery of Easter Island and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Mystery of Easter Island, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bjelleklang - talk 19:32, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Cathi Bond

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Cathi Bond, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

Since my reason for deprodding is that I found coverage of her book (two reviews that meet WP:BOOKCRIT) I am open to the idea that it's really just the book which is notable, and the information on Bond should be moved to an article about the book. But I prefer an article on Bond because I think it's more likely that a Bond article could improve over time. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LEvalyn, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll keep the WP:BOOKCRIT criteria in mind for future AfDs. Sorry I opened an AfD for Cathi Bond, I thought the G&M article was not independent but I should have checked more thoroughly before opening an AfD. Although, opening an AfD appears to have gotten the article enough attention from other editors that it has gained sources from more difficult to obtain sources. I'm guessing the article will be kept based on the new finds and then the article should be safe from deletion based on WP:NOTTEMPORARY. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TipsyElephant, no worries about the AfD. I think NBOOK is unusual among the special notability guidelines for being so clear cut: if a book has two book reviews, it’s notable. It’s a pretty low bar but you’d be surprised how many articles get made and deleted about books that can’t meet it. Importantly, Bond herself isn’t notable under NBOOK —- I wasn’t sure myself whether it would make more sense to have an article on Bond or just one on the book. I think it was helpful to have some more eyes on it and some more work on the article itself. And since most of the sources were in ProQuest, which requires a subscription, it makes sense that your WP:BEFORE didn’t turn up much. That’s a long way of saying no hard feelings, thanks for doing your bit to make Wikipedia better. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TipsyElephant. I've seen a few PRODs, AfDs, and RMs on the Podcast alerts page, and thought I'd drop a line. This section seemed somewhat relevant, so I'll add here. While WP:GNG is the overall guideline to use, I wanted to point out that there are several WP:SNG (specific notability guidelines) as well. I'm not sure if you were aware of those. Podcasts fall under WP:NWEB, I guess, but more importantly, WP:BLP articles fall under WP:NBIO and its several sections. You'll probably most frequently see WP:CREATIVE. Sometimes people don't even have much content, just their body of work (e.g. Ryōhei Arai, which I once nominated). Also, some of the radio shows/programs that double as podcasts likely fall under WP:NMEDIA at WP:RPRGM evaluations... though NMEDIA is a tricky one—it's important because media outlets often don't cover other competing media, but it's a "probably notable" recommendation. Just wanted to drop this in case you didn't know about those other guides. Keep up the good work! -2pou (talk) 18:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2pou: I was vaguely aware of some of them, but I've noticed most of them seem to still rely on having at least a couple sources that cover the topic in some detail. So I've been unsure when these even apply. For instance, the WP:WEBCRIT in the context of articles with very little or no coverage in reliable and independent sources (i.e. The Signal (podcast)). There are some borderline cases I've come across where there are a few sources that might barely meet the minimum expectations of WP:100WORDS, but the article has an award. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Business Daily

I am leaving this message to let you know that the article Business Daily that you tagged for Proposed Deletion was removed by another user, and they failed to leave a note on your talk page about it. They also appear to not have given any reason for doing so (see the articles edit history). As you were not informed, I have taken it upon myself to leave this here so you may consider perusing Articles for Deletion instead, as adding a new PROD is not permitted. Kind regards, --Tautomers_{(T C)} 08:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tautomers: thank you! I went ahead and opened an AfD. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imaginary Worlds (podcast) has been accepted

Imaginary Worlds (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Being Human has been accepted

This Being Human, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clear friend a ^💬 16:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Science in Action (radio programme)

I am leaving this message to let you know that the article Science in Action (radio programme) that you tagged for Proposed Deletion was removed by another user, and they failed to leave a note on your talk page about it. They also appear to not have given any reason for doing so. This can be seen in the articles edit history. As you were not informed, I have taken it upon myself to leave this here so you may consider either perusing Articles for Deletion, or improving and tagging the article with Edit Templates as adding a new PROD is not permitted. Kind regards, --Tautomers_{(T C)} 20:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Canadian Voices Podcast Banner.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Canadian Voices Podcast Banner.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs

Hello, TipsyElephant,

I've been looking over some articles you PROD'd and I just wanted to remind you of two things:

a) WP:THREESOURCES is an editor essay, not Wikipedia policy or guidelines so you shouldn't have expectations that all articles should abide by principles laid out in an essay
b) Please check to see if the article is a stub article. The expectations are different and stubs don't necessarily have the level of sourcing that regular articles are required to have.

Thank you for your work. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: hello! I'm aware it's an essay, but WP:GNG states that "multiple sources are generally expected." I was just using WP:THREESOURCES as a rule of thumb. Generally I wouldn't consider an article to have significant coverage or WP:SUSTAINED coverage if there is only a single source with very little prose dedicated to the topic. I've noticed a few people have immediately responded to my PRODs or AfDs by pointing out that this is an essay so in the future I'll make sure to simply quote WP:GNG. Would you mind pointing me toward policies concerning the expectations of a stub? I see WP:NOPAGE and WP:STUB, but the these both seem to come to the conclusion that if a stub can't be expanded it should be merged or deleted. For instance, WP:STUB states that "If a stub has little verifiable information, or if its subject has no apparent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article." I also went ahead and removed my references to essays in any AfDs I currently have open and replaced them with quotes or paraphrasing of WP:GNG. I'll go through the PRODs as well. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:15, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I post a lot of these messages on editor talk pages and you have really taken my comments to heart. That doesn't always happen. I read over WP:STUB before posting this message, hoping to find a passage I could quote to you in my comments but, you're right, it's vague and unspecific. I don't know of any pertinent policy pages that are more helpful in answering your questions.

To put my comments in more context, I was responding to seeing you do some PRODs (which is just fine) and looking at one in particular, Robynn McCarthy, that was just a stub although it had more content than a typical stub does. But I did delete the page and my words were meant to be more in the line of "In the future, could you please...." rather than imply that there was anything wrong with your work. You clearly have read up on policy matters and I appreciate your responsiveness to my comments. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: you're welcome! I'm sorry more people aren't responsive; I try to follow the guidelines and policies so I don't end up in a situation where I get burned. To clarify, are you suggesting that I open AfDs for articles that are larger than a stub because the deletion is more likely to be controversial (especially if I base my reasoning on an essay)? I haven't previously considered the size of the article before opening a PROD because I was mostly going based on the available sourcing, but I could definitely see how a longer article would be more controversial. I'm working on cleaning up the WP:PODCASTING WikiProject and I've been going through the pile of less notable articles to verify notability so I'll keep that in mind for future deletions. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of music podcasts has been accepted

List of music podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:38, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of comic book and superhero podcasts has been accepted

List of comic book and superhero podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:39, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Newsjack

I am leaving this message to let you know that the article Newsjack that you tagged for Proposed Deletion was removed by another user, and they failed to leave a note on your talk page about it. They also appear to not have given any reason for doing so. This can be seen in the articles edit history. As you were not informed, I have taken it upon myself to leave this here so you may consider either perusing Articles for Deletion, or improving and tagging the article with Edit Templates as adding a new PROD is not permitted. Kind regards, --Tautomers_{(T C)} 23:22, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is starting to become a regular occurrence, thanks for letting me know! I'll go ahead and open an AfD. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Considering that, I will share with you an ineffective conversation I had with the deprodder (he deleted the conversation following my last remark) that might provide some insight. --Tautomers_{(T C)} 03:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tautomers: dang, that's discouraging. They seem pretty stuborn about the whole thing to the point of absurdity. They've been showing up in AfDs and always cites the same SNG to justify keeping the article so it's kind of strange that they're unwilling to simply link to that guideline in the PROD rather than waiting to do so in an AfD. I'll watch out for any further deprodding, espcially if I PROD any more BBC content. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC Business Daily Podcast Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BBC Business Daily Podcast Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Alien Adventures of Finn Caspian has been accepted

The Alien Adventures of Finn Caspian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intimate Judaism (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intimate Judaism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intimate Judaism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 21:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judaism Unbounded (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judaism Unbounded and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judaism Unbounded, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 04:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Unorthodox (podcast) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unorthodox (podcast). Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 05:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unorthodox (podcast) (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia articles require independent secondary sources with in depth coverage of the subject. Most of the references here are interview-based sources (which are not secondary) and/or do not have in depth coverage of the podcast.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unorthodox (podcast) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unorthodox (podcast), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for moving files

I noticed you had some trouble finding the right template. You found the right template, but for files it's supposed to be used on the file description page, not the talk page. You can request moves with WP:Twinkle or the more specialized userscript LuckyRename, both can take care of these things for you.— Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 09:06, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quanah Style (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quanah Style and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quanah Style, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Responses on Trash Taste AfD

Would you stop being a jerk. There is no reason for you to act that way unless you are pushing the person to remove their response in the AfD and it is pissing me off now. It is fine to respond, but then you discredit the person because they have a strike against them on something else and then you add the assumption the person is suggesting I own the article. I do not like the fact you pushed this article up for deletion, but you should not be acting this way either by discrediting others and making assumptions. --WashuOtaku (talk) 12:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry the deletion process is making you angry. However, I'm not insulting you or the other editor and I'm very clearly citing Wikipedia guidelines. If you would like to keep the page you will need to demonstrate that it meets Wikipedia's WP:N guidelines. As far as my comment concerning the other editor WP:DISCUSSAFD explicitly says that "Unregistered or new users are welcome to contribute to the discussion, but their recommendations may be discounted if they seem to be made in bad faith (for example, if they misrepresent their reasons)." Similarly, WP:NPA seems to indicate that personal attacks are more along the lines of insulting someone based on their identity or beliefs while also stating that "discussion of a user's conduct or history is not in itself a personal attack when done in the appropriate forum for such discussion." Granted, I'm not sure if the AfD was the appropriate forum or not, but it seems relevant to an AfD if someone is canvassing for that AfD. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be related to an earlier AfD the user is involved in, not this one. Obviously this conversation is not relevant to the AfD, thus your talk page, but it needs to be said that you should not be discrediting others in the discussion, just because you believe their opinion is valued less for being unregistered, new user, or other. --WashuOtaku (talk) 13:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice Liz, I was able to get IHeartRadio Podcast Awards published so I'm not to worried about loosing this one. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judaism Unbound (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judaism Unbound and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judaism Unbound, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 07:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sh*tty Christians

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sh*tty Christians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Faith and Capital

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Faith and Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Play.it prod

Hi, just letting you know I de-PRODed Play.it and instead redirected it to Audacy, Inc.. Some pages still link to Play.it, plus this preserves the page history for anyone who wants to expand the Audacy page. Thanks – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 19:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Know Your Enemy (podcast)

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Know Your Enemy (podcast), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blowback (podcast) has been accepted

Blowback (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:As It Occurs To Me Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:As It Occurs To Me Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Magnificast

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Magnificast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Friendly Anarchism

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Friendly Anarchism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TipsyElephant/2021. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Qwerfjkl talk 18:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Good Muslim, Bad Muslim has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Good Muslim, Bad Muslim. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Muslim, Bad Muslim has been accepted

Good Muslim, Bad Muslim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 19:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sh*tty Christians

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sh*tty Christians".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Faith and Capital

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Faith and Capital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Know Your Enemy (podcast)

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Know Your Enemy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Magnificast

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Magnificast".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: How to Be a Girl (podcast) has been accepted

How to Be a Girl (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 10:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Friendly Anarchism

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Friendly Anarchism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Liz, is there something I should do with old drafts like these? I think I remember there being a way to request the deletion of one's own sandbox subpages and wonder if there was a way to do that for old drafts I created so you don't have to keep coming back to delete them. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: There Goes the Neighborhood (podcast) has been accepted

There Goes the Neighborhood (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 10:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geekshow Podcast has been accepted

Geekshow Podcast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Salimfadhley (talk) 11:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alone: A Love Story has been accepted

Alone: A Love Story, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 15:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chat Chow TV Podcast Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chat Chow TV Podcast Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CommandN Podcast Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CommandN Podcast Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This Feels Terrible.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This Feels Terrible.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TipsyElephant! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Merging Drafts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hidden Brain has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hidden Brain. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hidden Brain has been accepted

Hidden Brain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stranglers (podcast) has been accepted

Stranglers (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 17:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: More Perfect (podcast) has been accepted

More Perfect (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 17:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tell Them, I Am has been accepted

Tell Them, I Am, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 08:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Penumbra Podcast has been accepted

The Penumbra Podcast, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 21:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Stakes has been accepted

The Stakes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam

Whatever the intention, pasting that template for using reviews from Podcast Review as a reference on various talkpages comes off as source soliciting per WP:Linkspam. Please edit the actual articles with relevant information rather than tagging 50+ articles with the same website on the talkpages. oncamera _{(talk page)} 18:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oncamera: sorry about that. I didn't realize that would be an issue or that there was a guideline prohibiting it. I had recently come across the website and asked about the reliability at WP:RSN, which seemed to indicate it was an okay source. I was mostly just happy to finally find a useful source for podcasts, but noticed that it doesn't show up in Google News searches and has rarely been cited by articles about podcasts. I thought it would be helpful to provide links to relevant reviews on talk pages as a reference idea. I'll refrain from adding anymore. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oncamera: are you planning on reverting all of them? Do you want me to help? TipsyElephant (talk) 18:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

Did you ever find a response to this question? I wouldn't know the answer but I am about a month behind reading the archives.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vchimpanzee: thank you for following up! I never did get a response, but I tried again the following day and some reason it worked. Any idea why that error would've occurred? TipsyElephant (talk) 01:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is something I know nothing about. After looking at the question a second time, I think WP:VPT would be the place to ask.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The United States of Anxiety (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In general, listicles are not considered to provide in-depth coverage, especially if their reference to a podcast is a paragraph long. Additional sources are likely required to pass WP:GNG; this would likely be either redirected or merged if it were to go to articles for deletion in its current state.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The United States of Anxiety and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The United States of Anxiety, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TipsyElephant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Mikehawk10 (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Taylor (drummer)

I appreciate your considering the article i created for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chad_Taylor_(drummer). re WP:NMUSIC I don't really see how you can dismiss allaboutjazz.com as a a legit ref. It is certainly not a self promotional website. There is an editor and journalists (many are in the JJA) are hired to review and preview albums, projects , artists etc. Chad's work as a leader/drummer cites include the chicago reader and an interview about his trio on NPR. I will continue to seek more refs like the chicago reader. But if you took into account the AAJ articles would the piece meet wiki's requirements? Those both along with the other cites seem enough to prove notability. Re WP:INHERIT doesn't his lineage as a Chicago artist performing with a master like fred anderson confirm that? While I agree most of his work is in collaborative ensembles, he is also a leader in his own right. Thanks! Mistephake (talk) 15:58, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mistephake: sorry for declining the draft. I know that can suck. So my main concern was that most of the articles you cite barely mention Chad Taylor and definitely don't provide useful information for writing a biography. The interviews are fine, but they don't help demonstrate notability because they are primary sources--they come directly from Chad Taylor. To demonstrate notability you need secondary sources. As far as inheriting notability goes, it doesn't matter if Chad Taylor played music with Miles Davis or John Coltrane it does not make Chad Taylor notable. The president of the United States is notable because there is a significant amount of news coverage about the president. If the president was in a band or hosted a podcast it would not make the band or podcast notable. You still need significant coverage of the band or podcast in reliable secondary sources. The band or podcast very well could be notable, but not because the president is in the band or hosting the podcast.

The reason I was hesitant about the All About Jazz sources was because it appears that anyone can join the staff and write articles. For all I know Chad Taylor wrote those reviews under a different name (probably not, but it's possible). I also have no idea whether the title "editor" on the staff page even means anything, especially when one of the editor's profile pictures is a plastic pair of glasses and nose disguise and the site owner's title is the "Publisher Guy". The authors of the All About Jazz are worth looking into as well. For instance, Jakob Baekgaard does not have any staff title (other than "reviewer") and has only written two articles, both of which are on Chad Taylor. Mark F. Turner has only written a single review and, again, only holds the title of "reviewer" and doesn't have a real profile picture. John Sharpe and Mark Corroto are listed as "Contributing Writers", which WP:RSP and WP:RSN regularly mention as a redflag (i.e. WP:FORBESCON and WP:WHATCULTURE among many others). I'm not super familiar with the process at RSP/RSN and AAJ is not listed at either one so maybe opening a discussion there about the site's reliability might result in different opinions on the reliability.

If the All About Jazz sources were deemed reliable and the Jazz Times article contained some good content I would accept the draft. I was unable to read the Jazz Times source because it's paywalled. If it's a really in depth source about Chad Taylor I might consider accepting the draft based on the minimum expectation of two reliable secondary sources dedicating more than a trivial mention to the subject. Does the Jazz Times article dedicate at least 100 words of non-repetitive content to Chad Taylor specifically? TipsyElephant (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your considerate and informative response. I must admit the wiki requirements are a lot to take in and I still have much to learn. I also cant access that jazztimes article in full but looking at the intro i dont think it's going to be enough to get him accepted. Meanwhile i did find a new source re Chad Taylor trio (cite 22) and a downbeat review of that album. Your right in that he doesn't have many secondary sources to support this article. I'll keep working on it. Mistephake (talk) 20:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does it help our case that he already has an article here? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_Taylor_(Schlagzeuger) Mistephake (talk) 20:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added what i believe is the necessary citation referencing moderndrummer. it is a feature article on taylor. I also added a cite from the village voice that focuses on taylor's work as a leader. I hope these and any other improvements i've made help support the article to qualify for approval in my resubmission. Mistephake (talk) 16:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've worked on reducing the un cited refs and reformatted any of the correlating subjects. for ex most of his early life is covered in one article.Mistephake (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brains Matter Podcast Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brains Matter Podcast Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knifepoint Horror has been accepted

Knifepoint Horror, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just in time for Halloween! Thanks for expanding Wikipedia's coverage on Podcasts. S0091 (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: thanks for accepting the draft! I know AFC is really backed up and I appreciate the time taken to evaluate the article. I nominated it for the WP:PODCASTING WikiProject's collaboration of the month and I was pleasantly suprised to see that multiple other users were interested in helping, which has been a rare occurance since the inception of the project. I was also happy to see multiple new articles published on the subject within the past year or so, which helped significantly in demonstrating notability. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of history podcasts has been accepted

List of history podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of book podcasts has been accepted

List of book podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– SD0001 (talk) 13:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Willis Tower Lunchbox Entrance

I dont understand what it is i need to do for the willis tower page. i have sites that arent deticated to that subject and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChiserYT (talk • contribs) 15:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ChiserYT, I'm sorry your draft was declined. My main concern is that the entrance itself is not independently notable. For instance, Willis Tower is notable because it has had news coverage in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, The Chicago Sun-Times, and BBC News among others. To pass the notability requirements outlined at WP:GNG you'll need multiple sources that specifically talk about the Lunchbox Entrance in some detail. For example, if you can find some sources that dedicate multiple paragraphs of information specifically to the Lunchbox Entrance then perhaps the draft can be published. Right now you've cited a WP:BLOG and an article that doesn't even mention the Lunchbox Entrance. The only source that contributes to notability right now is the first article from Curbed Chicago, which is not enough for a stand-alone Wikipedia page. If you have further questions let me know or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards

Hello, TipsyElephant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The United States of Anxiety has been accepted

The United States of Anxiety, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 23:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indivisible (radio program) has been accepted

Indivisible (radio program), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 23:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love and Luck (podcast) has been accepted

Love and Luck (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Princess of Ara 16:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of LGBT podcasts has been accepted

List of LGBT podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of health and wellness podcasts has been accepted

List of health and wellness podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Millennial.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Millennial.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of science podcasts has been accepted

List of science podcasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 02:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Man Laughing has been accepted

Red Man Laughing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 08:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tell them I am.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tell them I am.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2019 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards

Hello, TipsyElephant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 iHeartRadio Podcast Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Nicolas Nader Article

I have updated the Gary Nader article as best I could based on the feedback from you and other editors. Before I resubmit, I need to take care of some disclosures. As far as I understand, I can make disclosures on this page? Or am I supposed to make disclosures elsewhere? --GaryNNader (talk) 03:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GaryNNader, it looks like WP:DISCLOSE addresses this particular question. I would suggest disclosing any conflict of interest on your user page, which you can find here. For example, my user page includes a list of previous employers at the bottom. I would also suggest disclosing any conflict of interest on the talk page of the article in question, which would be here. TipsyElephant (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: (talk) 20241113015357

Hello TipsyElephant, thank you for providing the link and clear direction. I find myself getting lost in a regular basis and I travel down the rabbit holes trying to figure out the next step. I have added disclosures in both places as recommended, and plan to resubmit the article for review (after many corrections). I look forward to any other recommendations/corrections.

--GaryNNader (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GaryNNader: before resubmitting make sure to remove any external links to other websites from the body of the article (I see at least two). If you want to read up on the guidelines concerning external links read Wikipedia:External links. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can leave the external links in the publication list though, and if you want more details on how to format those you can read WP:WORKS. I'll go through and correct those though so you don't have to worry about them. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GaryNNader: actually, I'm having trouble finding ISBN or OCLC numbers or even Google Books, Internet Archive, or Gutenberg Project links for Latin American Masters and Marc Chagall. Can you find anything on those? TipsyElephant (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: (talk) 20241113015357: Hello TipsyElephant, Thank you for formatting the list of publications on this article, that was very helpful. I researched and found even more publications, and put together a full list along with all the OCLC links to match the formmatting. However, I think I might have messed up attributions to you because I copy/pasted the entire revised list over the existing list in the draft. Would it have been better to insert the missing publications between the existing edits, rather than copy over the whole list? I tried to go back, but I had already saved the edit by the time I realized my mistake. If it was an error, is there a way to fix it? Glassdaughter (talk) 18:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glassdaughter that's okay. I would focus more on trying to demonstrate that Draft:Gary Nicolas Nader is notable by Wikipedia's standards. I would recommend reading WP:N for standard notability guidelines and WP:BIO for notability guidelines specific to biographies. If you're unable to provide sources with in-depth coverage about Gary Nader then your article will not get published to mainspace. I would also recommend reading WP:RS because you don't want to just add WP:BLOGS or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS of Nader. TipsyElephant (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: (talk) 20241113015357: Thanks for the advice. I have edited the first section of the GaryNNader article to highlight aspects of him and his work that might be considered notable, along with citations. Could you review and advise if the article should be resubmitted at this point? I appreciate your input. Glassdaughter (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Glassdaughter: I would suggest removing the CV and the external link that is in the body of the article. I would also look for better sources. Most of what you've got are either not WP:RELIABLE or they are only WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. It's possible that Nader simply does not qualify for a Wikipedia article based on WP:BIO. If you can't find better sources I can take a look on newspapers.com and see if I find anything. TipsyElephant (talk) 22:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: I haven't been able to find anything better than what I've listed. I read WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS, I'm not sure I understand where a trivial mention ends and an acceptable mention starts. The example in the policy is rather short, like a sentence. I have at least two articles that are minimally a page long. When is a citation considered in-depth? Everything I have provided in the article is, I believe, not original research and a lot longer than the example given in the policy, including the full article by an art professor from a university who is very qualified to cover the topic. Is it the number of articles that is wanting? All my confusion aside, if you could check newspapers.com for something more substantial, that would be amazing! Thanks in advance. Glassdaughter (talk) 05:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Glassdaughter: I added the sources to the draft's talk page. I found quite a few from the Miami Herald. Based on the Newspapers sources and what's already in the article I would bet that Nader passes WP:BIO. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: That's amazing! Thanks so much, that really made my day. I have resubmitted the article now after working in some of the citations you found. Glassdaughter (talk) 01:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: Thanks for all your work and help in getting the GaryNNader article up to snuff. I guess there isn't anything I can do at this point to do any further cleanup to resolve the remaining warning message, despite having submitted a disclosure. But there is something I can do, please let me know. Thanks again! Glassdaughter (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: I mentioned the Gary Nader article to a friend of mine, and she read it, and pointed out to me the Controversies section as potentially defamatory. I think she may have deleted it, but it seems to still be there anyway. However, now that I re-read that part of the article, I don't recall labeling the section "Controversies" and to me, it does seem a bit of a misnomer (how is a theft a controversy?). The other sentence is about a legal dispute that ended up being in Gary Nader's favor (Miami Dade College ordered to pay Nader's legal fees). Again, not sure how that would be construed as a controversy. Am I missing something about controversies as a section label in Wikipedia? I couldn't find anything about that specifically. I didn't want to adjust the section title incorrectly. Thanks in advance for your input. Glassdaughter (talk) 23:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glassdaughter sorry about that. Feel free to change the section heading. I just couldn't think of a commonly used heading for an instance of theft and a legal case, but both pertained to legality so I figured they could be grouped together well. I would suggest reading up on WP:MOS for more information on this topic. To be honest, I'm more familiar with policies regarding the creation and deletion of articles and I have yet to dive into the process of turning a new article into a WP:GA. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TipsyElephant: No worries, I separated the theft and legal case (which also makes sense to do considering they happened years apart) and labeled the theft part as "Heist" which is usually used when art institutions are robbed, and "Legal" for the case Nader won. I also added a few more details to round out what happened (based on the cited sources). LMK if you have any other suggestions on the headings, thanks again. Glassdaughter (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caught: The Lives of Juvenile Justice has been accepted

Caught: The Lives of Juvenile Justice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All My Relations (podcast) has been accepted

All My Relations (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unorthodox (podcast) has been accepted

Unorthodox (podcast), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judaism Unbound has been accepted

Judaism Unbound, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 01:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DC Universe All Star Games has been accepted

DC Universe All Star Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 16:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bon Appétit Foodcast.png

The file File:Bon Appétit Foodcast.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficiently supported by critical commentary in context about the subject of discussion. Also, the article subject is the magazine, not the podcast based on the magazine. May fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]