Jump to content

User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2010/6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Move needed

Hi, Tim. Would you move Have a nice day (expression) to Have a nice day? I can't do the move because the redirect has several revisions under it. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done Tim Song (talk) 22:46, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! I now sincerely (or insincerely?) wish you have a nice day. ;) Cunard (talk) 22:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

User Stupidus Maximus ban from wikipedia as a sock.

Tim, how are you? Trust all is well. I am dropping at your talk page, because I believe that you made an unfair call to ban user:Stupidus Maximus as a sock of user:Guildenrich (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Guildenrich/Archive). There was a long sock investigation case there, and you closed it based on the only evidence that once Stupidus Maximus had edited from the same Internet Cafe as Guildenrich.

I know well Tirana, Albania. There aren't many internet cafes there. The fact that these two users shared (not at the same time, but almost one year later) an Internet Cafe to edit isn't proof of being a sock. I found the harassment that was given to this user way out of line by all the parties involved to get him banned as a sock.

Delanoy's finding was that They both edited from the same internet cafe (static IP) at one point, and to me, it seems somewhat unlikely, but not impossible for two separate people to do this.

The unlikely is a strong word. He didn't exclude it, but he found it unlikely. Now the Greek pushed with behavioral evidence, but I already debunked that. See my response to FPaS for the use of the Present Tense. The Greeks continued to push and probably tired the admins. As a result you decided to have some peace, but what you are doing is simply raising more eyebrows on the Albanian side, that sees that half of their users are banned as socks of Guildenrich and Sarandioti.

It's just not possible that these two guys, Sarandioti and Guildenrich, are this stupid and continue to enter and be the socks of themselves. By the way, I have looked at Guildenrich's edits and his English is far better than Stupidus Maximus'. You are preventing Albanians who have the same ideas as Guildenrich and Sarandioti from editing. The fact that they continue to edit on topics that are dear to Albanians such as Fustanella and Southern Albania stuff, doesn't make them socks of one another.

This investigation was far from being a true Checkuser investigation. I will ask you to reconsider Guildenrich's edits and Stupidus Maximus edits and see for yourselves, because having edited in the same Internet Cafe of a city like Tirana to me is no proof.

Best. --Sulmues Let's talk 14:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

I asked several other clerks to review before I made a block; it is true that each piece of the behavioral evidence, standing alone, is insufficient to justify a block, but taken together, I find the probability that they are different people very low indeed. In any event, the use of Eftym (talk · contribs), who is a CU-confirmed sock of S.Maximus, is more than sufficient to justify a block. Tim Song (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: multiple notification

Could you perhaps unblock Erwin85Bot? That way I can just restart its jobs when I've had time to look into the issue with multiple notifications. Thanks. --Erwin (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done Tim Song (talk) 22:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Autoreviewer request

Mlpearc (talk · message · contribs · global contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · user creation · block user · block log · count · total · logs · summary · email | lu · rfas · rfb · arb · rfc · lta · checkuser · spi · socks | rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp | current rights · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) | rights · renames · blocks · protects · deletions · rollback · admin · logs | UHx · AfD · UtHx · UtE)

Hey Tim, Mlpearc here, after helping out in the AfC pending backlog I've realize I like reviewing these submissions, Not a good enough writer to start my own stuff, working these articles is satisfying and after being roped in by User:Chzz. I do have, I think above average grasp on WP:BLP, WP:Verifiability and WP:Notability. So I am asking for the Autoreviewer flag to continue helping the Wikipedia:New pages patrol and working the en-afc irc, and beyond. Thanks Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 00:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. The autoreviewer right only allows you to bypass NPP on articles you created, and does not help with AfC or your own NPP work. Tim Song (talk) 04:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Kidstart userfied

I can't believe the DRV had NO consensus?? I made it 5 overturns against 3 endorses?? There is clearly an issue here when there is such a division between the administrators. Something isn't clear in the guidelines and everyone's spinning their own interpretation of WP:GNG. With so much effort put into this article which has been wasted, i have completely lost my faith in Wikipedia. Even if i have a majority that agree with Overturning, it gets deleted. Also the AFD-DRV-AFD-DRV cycle is not relevant as the article got edited and it is clear on the 2nd AFD the administrators did not follow the guidelines set in Consensus as it was yourself that gave the article more time to get a consensus. I stated that i made edits and as Wikipedia states in the Consensus under the heading - Consensus as a result of the editing process, "If other editors accept your changes, then this silent acceptance is, itself, sufficient proof that your changes have consensus at this time. Consensus does not require either that you get prior "permission" to make changes or that the acceptance of your changes afterwards be formally documented. Edits that are neither changed nor removed are always presumed to have consensus until someone actually challenges them." So with no one challenging the new edits over the 7 days which you yourself gave for a concensus, then this should be excepted, and the article relisted at that point. Not for a closing administrator to overrule the Wikipedia guidelines and decide to have the final say with his own opinion. I understood it that the closing administrator was to take a neutral view, deal with the facts of the debate, ie work within Wikipedia guidelines, and basically not give an opinion (or am i wrong in this?). So with this amongst other things, I don't feel it should have even got to a DRV 2nd time round. So (with a heavy heart and a big sigh) please userfy the article as i may at some point come back to it, but currently my faith in Wikipedia is very low Emmamme (talk) 10:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Consensus is, as you know, not a headcount. I understand your frustrations, but too many discussions in a short period tend not to go well. I'd suggest working on something else in the mean time, and once the article gets more significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject it can be brought back. Tim Song (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Article: Where to go from here?

Hi Tim--

I'm not sure of the protocol here. I just noticed this deletion: [[1]]. As the creator, I'd like to have been part of the discussion but I guess I don't have a notification option turned on somewhere. At any rate, I believe that she can satisfy the notability guidelines, even if a few of the references don't. And the other areas that don't meet guidelines could certainly be made to do so; this was after all the first page I contributed. I was proud of that page and thought it a worthwhile contribution. Is there any way I can recover the original article and have another go, incorporating your feedback? Though I know her, I am not closely associated with the artist; I just knew a lot about her from her books and classes. I believe the edits she made were to correct something I wrote that was objectionable and to put a photo of one of her pieces into the public domain and add it to the article, at my request.

--Mike Jennings (Tymcode (talk) 07:23, 3 June 2010 (UTC))

You were notified on your talk page. The page has been restored and moved to User:Tymcode/Jane Ann Wynn. Please look over WP:Userfication; in particular, if you simply restore the page to mainspace, it will most likely be deleted. And it's not my feedback - it's the consensus in the discussion that determines what will be done to the articles. Tim Song (talk) 01:44, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Sock

Self explanatory [2]. Athenean (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

J.delanoy got 'em. Tim Song (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Suburbs (Arcade Fire album)

Apologies for the confusion. But if you had left an edit summary when re-opening it would have been clearer what your intention was. --JD554 (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem. It was intended to be a quick reopening to fix a problem with an IP removing two "delete" comments from the debate. Tim Song (talk) 19:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Please restore Larry Wardlow Jr

Mr Wardlow is on wiki unders maryland state election, I had a page for him which was deleted His administrtation notifies the media and I as a intern into the political would like a black republican doing something positive get recognize. I would like his page restored because there updating me each step up the way. He's the only black republican from Baltimore City to run (Trelan (talk) 01:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC))

 Not done. Perhaps contrary to popular expectations, this is not Mr. Wardlow's campaign site. Tim Song (talk) 01:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

What do you actually mean

Can you please help me understand. (Trelan (talk) 01:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC))

This site is an encyclopedia. Therefore, it is not a vehicle to "recognize" or promote someone, or a soapbox for those wanting to promote their views. Moreover, if you are interning for him, or someone affiliated with him, then you have a conflict of interest and should not be writing about him. Tim Song (talk) 01:49, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Trout

ouch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlevse (talk • contribs) 02:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

RevDel actions

Hi Tim. The revision deletions you did this morning on AN and ANI aren't within WP:REVDEL policy; RD3's definition of "disuptive" is for things like links to malware or browser-crashing sites, not for common vandalism such as was deleted here. RevDel is not expected to hide all unconstructive posts; only those that are the most damaging; it's also not really useful as a WP:DENY tool at the moment because it's still new enough to attract 'lulz' when it's used. Cheers, Happy‑melon 10:06, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I took them to fall under the "grossly inappropriate threats or attacks" part of RD3, but YMMV. Feel free to restore them. Tim Song (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you!

Tim Song - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you!  7  23:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Clarification for "Keep" decision

Recently you determined the result of the Articles for Deletion discussion on the page "Puggle" was Keep. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Puggle

I can't see the rationale for this. The consensus was clearly to delete or to merge. Would you let me know the basis for going with the minority opinion, and keeping this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoKing (talk • contribs) 23:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The firm consensus among established editors is to keep the article. Tim Song (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Tim, see Wikipedia:Help desk#How to protest decision.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:24, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

AA2

Hi!
As an admin, you're sometimes active on AA2 enforcement cases; in this regard, I think you should be aware of this.
Personnaly, as an admin on WP:fr, I think it's very interesting.
Regards,
Sardur (talk) 23:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Sock

Yet another one: [3]. Thanks, Athenean (talk) 17:24, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Tim Song (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Karunyan

Hey, thanks again for the range blocks. It looks like he set up some named socks before that, though. See my update at the ANI thread -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Commented there. Tim Song (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

RevDelete

Hi, I had asked another admin to revdelete this revision but they do not regularly handle BLP issues, so they had suggested that I speak to someone else more familiar with the tool about it, and I have noticed that you have been using it. This looks to me to be R2 or 3 and is beyond the general "He is an idiot" type of comment that I would just revert and move on. Thanks, --Terrillja talk 18:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Revisions deleted. Tim Song (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

thank you.....

for protecting the Internet in South Korea article - this might force/persuade everyone to get on the discussion page and work this out. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

SPI

Thanks. I'm sorry. I've used checkuser a bit, mostly for ArbCom things, but I'm trying to pitch in on SPI. I would like to become a regular there, and some of the subtleties are foreign to me. Please continue to give me tips whenever I need them. Cool Hand Luke 02:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem, thanks a lot for helping out! Tim Song (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Another possible sock

Hello Tim, could you please check up on Latkadir (talk · contribs), I have strong reasons to suspect a possible relation with another sock Latukadir (talk · contribs) and the master Her631 (talk · contribs), both of which were checked & blocked by you. Thanks! --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 03:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Nine-dimensional space

I notice you've closed this debate as a redirect, but deleted and recreated the article. It would have been better I think so create the redirect without deleting, to preserve the page history, especially in case an editor wants to use it to create another article. Would it be possible to do this, i.e. to remove the new redirect, undo the delete then replace its contents with the redirect ? Thanks,--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 07:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

It's really "delete, and I will create the redirect as an editorial action", and unless someone actually needs the history I'd leave it as is. Tim Song (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Character Assassination (comics)

Please be aware that per the AFD relisting guidelines, an AFD should only be relisted if there are only one or two commenters, or a rationale should be provided as to why the debate was relisted despite this. Please keep this in mind for future reference. Stifle (talk) 11:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I almost have to agree with stifle on this one. For a "low risk" article such as this one, barring SPA participation, the number of comments were likely enough to make a call. Plus, if "Joe Chill" says "keep", it's usually a "keep". :)
However, if an admin looking to close an AFD as "keep" instead !votes "delete", that would give me pause too. I might have relisted it for that reason. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
My thoughts are basically the same as RR's. Tim Song (talk) 15:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

GreenGov2010

After you blocked him for a username violation (found on the edit war board last night), GreenGov2010 (talk · contribs) picked up a new account at GreenIn2010 (talk · contribs). However, they went right back to reinserting the David Duke material that led them to be reported for edit warring in the first place [4]. They also appear to have readded it here [5] as an IP. Counting his two IPs, that's 8 reversions in less than 48 hours. Thanks in advance for your help. Take care! Dayewalker (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours. If he comes back as an IP, let me know and I'll semi the article. Tim Song (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Reason(s) enough for RFCU/SPI?

Hello Tim, just some FYI... a few days ago on the article page of Philippine Air Force, I have removed some bits of WP:Copyvio images uploaded into commons by LightAj (talk · contribs), but today JackHannen (talk · contribs) re-introduced the same copyvio images. Since then, I have once again removed those same problematic images and then tagged JackHannen with a being a possible sock of LightAj. My question now being, what do I do from here? Could you advice further or help me with this matter as to how best to steer this matter? Regards. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 16:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

 Quack quack. Blocked. Tim Song (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Archived Sock

Hello. Can I ask you why you so hastily archived this sock case? Yes, I know there’s a pending ANI and the two issues are related but they're also mutually exclusive. We have several issues here that include sockpuppetry, edit-warring and WP:CIVIL . Is it improper to have two concurrent probes at the same time?--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong per se with having both an ANI thread and an SPI case, as long as forum shopping is not involved. In this case, however, there's no sockpuppetry as users normally do not have much control over what IP address they use, unlike the case with accounts, and we can't really block someone merely because they decided to, say, edit at work one day instead of at home. Thus any action taken as a result of the SPI would be because the edits themselves were disruptive, something that's best addressed at ANI. Tim Song (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to disagree. This is not a case where someone simply uses an IP from home and then goes to work and uses the computer there. The Diffs show that multiple IPs were used within a very short span, editing very specific articles (i.e Caroline Glick and Gaza War) and apparantly done in a manner designed to circumvent 3R. The evidence also suggests someone very familiar with wiki syntax. In any event, the complaint filed at ANI seems to have disappeared from the boards.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 03:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The pages have been protected; that's the only thing that could be done anyway, since these IPs are impossible to block effectively. Tim Song (talk) 03:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
It appears that multiple editors are logging out to avoid 3rr and a 1rr restriction mandated by arbitration in the topic area. Previous discussions mentioning the possibility of a checkuser request can be seen at Talk:Richard Goldstone#semi-prot and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive63#Wikifan12345 et al. If this happens again, what would your recommendation be? I personally don't mind the pages being on semi-protection indefinitely but that does go against many editor's views on allowing anyone to contribute. I do think that any user bucking the system like this is should be prevented from continuing to disrupt a topic area that is already so contentions that AE is required. Can a checkuser be considered if there is evidence that editors are using IPs to avoid scrutiny in the future or is that inappropriate? Cptnono (talk) 04:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
CUs typically do not link users to IP addresses for privacy reasons, so semi might be the only solution. Tim Song (talk) 04:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Ahhhhh. So such a case would basically out the user. Well I can't log out and break the rules since I have not logged in enough times that it would be easy to track down my IP. I recommend JJG does not do it either simply because it is bad form.Cptnono (talk) 04:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
No need to worry. I play by the rules even though I have to deal with fluctuating IPs and "legitimate" editors who frequently tag-team. Respectfully,--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
No I wasn't being too serious with that last sentence (even though it would be bad form and I wouldn't really do it anyways). I didn't expect you to really even consider it.Cptnono (talk) 06:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

Deletion of Articles

Can you please tell me why you deleted my articles on mixing? (TheodoreNg (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC))

Hi Tim,

This is Suzanne Kresta speaking, Theo's supervisor. I am co-editor of the Handbook of Industrial Mixing. A number of us (mixing professionals) found the Wikipedia entries on industrial mixing earlier this year, which were both lacking important information and misleading. My final year chemical engineering students undertook to write accurate and informative articles for Wikipedia, which went through an extensive review and editing process and we are now trying to post them on line. We have had some difficulty getting through the process for mounting images, but are trying to work through that, so we have received numerous messages about those images - all of which we are working on.

From the latest comments around deletion of these articles, I can understand that the articles sound like a handbook, but can assure you that they are original work. Since the articles have been written by senior year students, and edited by a handbook editor, it makes sense that they read well.

Theo and I are quite concerned that he not be blocked from Wikipedia for very legitimate activities, and I am quite dismayed by the deletion of original articles in what I understood was a free forum for information.

Please advise as to how we should proceed, and if appeal to some other "reviewer" is possible.

Sincere regards,

Suzanne Kresta

Professor of Chemical and Materials Engineering

co-editor, Handbook of Industrial Mixing, Wiley, 2004

President elect, North American Mixing Forum (www.mixing.net)

(TheodoreNg (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC))

Wow, this is rather complicated, and I'm sorry to know that you got caught into our complex maze of policies and guidelines. Several things:
  1. If your students wrote the articles, then the copyright situation is complicated. This is because our licenses (CC-BY-SA and GFDL) require attribution to the copyright holder, which in this case include the students. (Normally, for school projects, the students register their own accounts and do the work on Wikipedia directly, which removes the problem.) It's probably best for you to contact our volunteer response team at permissions-en@wikimedia.org to work out the issue. Once the copyright situation is sorted out, I can restore the articles.
  2. Our policy requires one account per person. Thus, Prof. Kresta should post from a separate account and not use the TheodoreNg account.
  3. In the future, it might be best to follow the process outlined in Wikipedia:School and university projects, to avoid confusion and unnecessary work.
Feel free to contact me if you need further assistance. Tim Song (talk) 20:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Lisa Dietlin

Tim:

Good morning! I would like to re-add Lisa Dietlin's page to the Wikipedia site. She is a notable person worth including in Wikipedia, and I would be happy to discuss with you further reasons she is notable and adding that to her page.

Please contact me ASAP to inform me provide guidance on how I may work to have her page added to Wikipedia.

Thanks,

Kristie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpenp324 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand what you are advising at this point. I can put together a list of sites that demonstrate notability for Lisa M. Dietlin and fulfil some of the AFD points. Will this help? Do I post this information here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpenp324 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
It definitely would. Posting it here is fine. If you can overcome the points raised in the AfD, I'll be happy to restore the article for you. Tim Song (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Extended content

<copyvio removed>

Nationally Recognized as Philanthropy Expert Ms. Dietlin’s has been recognized nationally as a philanthropy expert, working with organizations around the United States in various fields including health, hunger, and education. Below is a listing of current and previous clients to illustrate Ms. Dietlin’s presence around the country.

Client List ABJ Community Services Chicago, Illinois

Aetna Healthcare Chicago, Illinois

AIDSCARE Chicago, Illinois

Alpena Community College Foundation Alpena, Michigan

Alzheimer’s Association Chicago, Illinois

American Library Association Chicago, Illinois

America’s Second Harvest Chicago, Illinois

AnotherLook Evanston, Illinois

Asian and Pacific Islander American Scholarship Fund Washington, District of Columbia

Athletes Against Drugs Chicago, Illinois

Attachment Parenting International Nashville, Tennessee

BBB Wise Giving Alliance Arlington, Virginia

Between Friends Chicago, Illinois

Bridge Communities Glen Ellyn, Illinois

Cabrini Green Legal Aid Clinic Chicago, Illinois

Cancer and Leukemia Group B Foundation Chicago, Illinois

Casa Central Chicago, Illinois

CASA of Cook County Chicago, Illinois

Center for Economic Progress Chicago, Illinois

Chicago Bar Foundation Chicago, Illinois

Chicago Foundation for Women Chicago, Illinois

Chicago United Chicago, Illinois

Chicago Youth Development Program Chicago, Illinois

Children’s Trust Fund Lansing, Michigan

Citizens for Harper Huntley, Illinois

Columbia College Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Community Action Partnership of Lake County Waukegan, Illinois

Community Housing Association of DuPage Villa Park, Illinois

Connecting Cultures Through Understanding Winnetka, Illinois

Coordinated Advice and Referral Program for Legal Services Chicago, Illinois

Creating An Environment of Success, Inc. Nashville, Tennessee

DanceArt Chicago, Illinois

Daystar School Chicago, Illinois

Delnor-Community Health Care Foundation Geneva, Illinois

Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, Changing Keys Chicago, Illinois

Earth Share Bethesda, Maryland

Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Eleanor Foundation Chicago, Illinois

Eubie Blake Jazz Institute and Cultural Center Baltimore, Maryland

Evelyn D. Ward Santa Fe, New Mexico

Federation of Virginia Food Banks Norfolk, Virginia

Feeding America Chicago, Illinois

Foundation for Education and Musculoskeletal Research Morton Grove, Illinois

Geneva Lake Conservancy Fontana, Wisconsin

Girl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana Chicago, Illinois

Golden Apple Foundation Chicago, Illinois

Guild for the Blind Chicago, Illinois

Harper College Palatine, Illinois

Harper College Educational Foundation Palatine, Illinois

Harris Bank Chicago, Illinois

If the Bough Breaks Baltimore, Maryland

Illinois Council of Trout Unlimited Oak Brook, Illinois

Illinois Legal Aid Online Chicago, Illinois

Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy Aurora, Illinois

Illinois Network of Charter Schools Chicago, Illinois

Kenneth Young Center Elk Grove Village, Illinois

Lakeview Pantry Chicago, Illinois

Library of Congress Washington, D.C.

Loyola University Chicago Family Business Center Chicago, Illinois

Maple Pointe Senior Center Chicago, Illinois

March of Dimes Illinois Chapter Chicago, Illinois

Mary Queen of Heaven Cicero, Illinois

Merrill Lynch, The Voit Group Chicago, Illinois

Monkeys and More Exotic Animal Rescue Chicago, Illinois

Musicians with Dystonia Minneapolis, Minnesota

National Center for the Laity Chicago, Illinois

National Fellowship of Catholic Men Gaithersburg, Maryland

North Texas Food Bank Dallas, Texas

Payton Investments, LLC Deerfield, Illinois

Porchlight Counseling Services Evanston, Illinois

Respiratory Health Association of Metropolitan Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Riders for Health (II), Inc. Chicago, Illinois

Santa Fe Community Foundation Santa Fe, New Mexico

Second Harvest Food Bank of Middle Tennessee Nashville, Tennessee

St. Ignatius College Prep Chicago, Illinois

St. Stanislaus Bishop & Martyr Church Posen, Illinois

Symphony II Evanston, Illinois

Teen Living Programs Chicago, Illinois

The Center for Religious Architecture Chicago, Illinois

The Children’s Place Association Chicago, Illinois

The Food Depot Santa Fe, New Mexico

The LaSalle Foundation Chicago, Illinois

The Library of Congress Washington, D.C.

The Ramsey Lewis Foundation Chicago, Illinois

University of Baltimore Baltimore, Maryland

University of Baltimore Educational Foundation Baltimore, Maryland

University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Business Administration Chicago, Illinois

Whitney M. Young Magnet High School Chicago, Illinois

Women Alive Chicago, Illinois

YWCA of Metropolitan Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Lisa M. Dietlin is bringing Philanthropy to the forefront of America’s attention Ms. Dietlin has spent over 25 years working with entrepreneurs and nonprofits to strategize, create and assist transformational acts of philanthropy, or those that change both the donor and the recipient. Ms. Dietlin’s work is the subject of her book, Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits. The book is being listed in international stores such as Barnes and Noble and Borders, as well as available on Amazon.com. It is also being added to the curriculum of colleges and universities with entrepreneurial programs or nonprofits programs, such as Michigan State University.

Below is a listing of Ms. Dietlin’s published articles and citations, followed by speaking engagements on television, radio, and presentations at conferences, workshops, and meetings around the country.

Published Articles and Citations The Lumberjack Link, “Alumna Returns to ACC for Book Signing” (Winter 2010)

The Major Gifts Report, “Nonprofits Should Focus on Individual Donor Prospects” (February 2010)

The Chronicle of Philanthropy, “Donations to Haiti Will Not Harm Giving to Other Causes, Experts Say” (January 2010)

The Major Gifts Report, “Keep Eye on Headlines, Community to Identify Entrepreneurs” (January 2010)

The Major Gifts Report, “Locate and Attract Entrepreneurs to Your Organization” (December 2009)

The Major Gifts Report, “How to Approach Entrepreneurs About Supporting Your Cause” (December 2009)

The Chronicle of Philanthropy, “Why Fund Raisers Should Focus on Seeking Out Entrepreneurs” (September 2009)

Alpena Community College Annual Report 2007-08, Recognition for 2008 Alpena Community College Foundation’s Distinguished Graduate Award

Santa Fe New Mexican, “Economic Downturn has Nonprofits Preparing for Scary 2009” (December 14, 2008)

The Major Gifts Report, “Cost of Raising a Capital Campaign Dollar” (December 2008)

The Chronicle of Philanthropy, “Priorities for a New President” (November 2008)

The Lumberjack Link, “How to be Charitable during Tough Economic Times” (Summer 2008)

The LumberJack Link, “Lisa M. Dietlin Named Distinguished Graduate for 2008” (Summer 2008)

North Park University’s School of Business and Nonprofit Management Newsletter, “Adjunct Faculty: Lisa Dietlin named CBS-Channel 2 ‘Charity Contributor’” (May, 2008)

The Alpena News, “Dietlin Receives Distinguished Grad Award” (May, 2008)

Chicago Nonprofit E-Newsletter, “CNP Hero Profile: Lisa M. Dietlin” (May, 2008)

The Major Gifts Report, “Alter Cookie-Cutter Approach When Soliciting Entrepreneurs” (May 2008)

The Major Gifts Report, “Skills to Form an Entrepreneurial Relationship” (May 2008)

Successful Fund Raising, “Commit to Three Calls a Day” (February 2008)

The Major Gifts Report, “Periodicals Serve as Great Resource for Potential Prospects” (February 2008)

The Alpena News, “AHS Graduate Makes a Difference Through Philanthropy” (December 2007)

The State News, “MSU alumna dedicates life to aiding others in giving, receiving charity” (October 2007)

Advancing Philanthropy, “Another Walnut Plaque?” Creative Stewardship Ideas (January/February 2007)

The Axelson Review, “The Win-Win Relationship” (December 2006)

Successful Fundraising, “Encourage Board Giving” (October 2006)

The Major Gifts Report, “Time Your Asks” (October 2006)

The Chronicle of Philanthropy (August 2006)

Bank of America Corporate Communications Newsletter, “Philanthropic Perspective: Tips for Servicing Wealthy Entrepreneurs” (April 2006)

Successful Fund Raising, “’Free’ Event Helps Make New Friends, Generate New Gifts” (April 2006)

Advancing Philanthropy, “Courting Wealthy Entrepreneurs” (November/December 2005)

Courting the Wealthy: 101 Ways to Cultivate Major Gifts, “#39 Eight Ways to Attract Wealthy Entrepreneurs” (July 2005)

The Major Gifts Report, Consultant Profile (June 2005)

The Major Gifts Report, “Eight Ways to Attract Wealthy Entrepreneurs” (June 2005)

Today’s Chicago Woman (January 2003)

Entrepreneurs and Philanthropy: Giving patterns and trends at Michigan Technological University (July 1999)

The Chronicle of Philanthropy (September 1999)

The Chronicle of Higher Education (January 1999)


Speaking Engagements – TV and Radio:

  • links to CBS appearances are available upon request

Smart Women Talk Radio with Katana Abbot and Jill Jordan – Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits, Contact Talk Radio, Seattle, WA (December 15, 2009)

Better TV: Focus – Philanthropy and Entrepreneurs, Better TV National Affiliates (November 16, 2009)

CBS 2 Chicago: Interview with Vince Gerasole - Charities Turning To Social Media for Donations, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (October 29, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Autism Awareness Month, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (April 19, 2009)

Better TV: Focus – Careers in Nonprofit, Better TV National Affiliates (April 6, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – National Child Abuse Prevention Month, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (April 5, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Diabetes Awareness, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (March 22, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Girl Scouts Anniversary, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (March 8, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Heart Disease Awareness, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (February 22, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Black History Month, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (February 8, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – National Mentoring Month, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (January 25, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Job Hunting at Non-Profits, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (January 11, 2009)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Year-End Giving with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (December 14, 2008)

Oprah & Friends: Interview with Jean Chatzky – Ways We Can Give to Charities in this Tough Economy, XM Satellite Radio 156 (December 5, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Shopping and Giving with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (November 30, 2008)

KSFR Santa Fe Public Radio: Interview with Bill Dupuy – How Nonprofits Raise Money During Tough Economic Times, Santa Fe, NM (November 19, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – National Philanthropy Day with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (November 16, 2008)

KTVU FOX 2 – How to Help Nonprofits in Down Economy, KTVU FOX 2-TV Oakland, CA (November 13, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – American Diabetes Month with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (November 2, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Eye on Charity – Breast Cancer Awareness Organizations with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (October 19, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Seeking Help In Struggling Economy with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (October 5, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Hispanic Heritage Month with Lisa Dietlin, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (September 14, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Immunization Awareness Month, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (August 24, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – America Donates $306 Billion to Charities, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (August 10, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Charity Walks, Runs and Rides, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (July 27, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Voluntouring and Do-Good Vacations, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (July 13, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Easy Ways to Help Thank the Troops, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (June 29, 2008)

Seeds for Success: Interview with Dr. George Watts and Carolyn Gable – Various Philanthropic Topics, WCPT 820 AM Radio (June 29, 2008)

Better TV: Focus – Giving in Tough Economic Times, Better TV National Affiliates (June 27, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Actors Fund Provides Services to Entertainment Industry, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (June 15, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Going Green for Charity, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (June 1, 2008)

Insights: Focus – Go Green in Philanthropy and How to be Charitable in Tough Economic Times, WBKB Channel 11 Alpena, MI (May 11, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Honoring Mom Through Charity for Mother’s Day, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (May 11, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – How to be Charitable in Tough Economic Times, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (April 13, 2008)

Better TV: Focus – How to be Charitable in Tough Economic Times, Better TV National Affiliates (April 4, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Donate from Home or Work with Virtual Volunteering, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (March 9, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Getting Your Workplace Involved in Charity, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (February 10, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Clearing Up Misconceptions About Jobs in Charity, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (January 13, 2008)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Charitable Gift Catalogs, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (December 16, 2007)

Oprah & Friends Radio: Interview with Jean Chatzky – Holiday Donations, XM Satellite Radio 156 (December 10, 2007)

Better TV: Focus – Year-End Giving, Better TV National Affiliates, (December 10, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – How to Pick Your Holiday Charity Donations, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (December 2, 2007)

Insights: Focus – Charitable Year-End Giving, WBKB Channel 11 Alpena, MI (November 23, 2007)

CBS 2 Eye On Chicago with Antonio Mora: Focus – Advice for Holiday Giving, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (November 18, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Make Giving a Year Round Family Event, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (November 18, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Attending Charity Galas, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (November 4, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – La Salle Bank Chicago Marathon, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (October 7, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Making a Difference with Your Donations to Charity, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (September 2, 2007)

Oprah & Friends: Interview with Jean Chatzky (Re-aired) – Giving to Charity, XM Satellite Radio 156 (August 17, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – You Can Serve as a Charity Board Member, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (August 5, 2007)

Oprah & Friends: Interview with Jean Chatzky – Giving to Charity, XM Satellite Radio 156 (July 27, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Ensuring a Successful Volunteering Experience, CBS Channel 2 Chicago, IL (July 1, 2007)

CBS 2 Morning News: Focus – Charity Walks, Runs and Rides, CBS Channel 2, Chicago, IL (June 3, 2007)

First Business Morning News: Feature – The Business of Charity, WCIU Channel 26 Chicago, IL (December 2006)


Speaking Engagements - Presentations

Minnesota State Community Colleges and Universities Development and Alumni Relations Workshop, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – St. Paul, MN (June 3, 2010)

Advisors in Philanthropy Conference, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Chicago, IL (April 23, 2010)

CASE Conference for Institutionally Related Foundations, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Bonita Springs, FL (April 14, 2010)

Association of Fundraising Professionals, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Baltimore, MD (April 12, 2010)

Entrepreneurs’ Organization Conference, Social Entrepreneurship Panel – Dana Point, CA (April 9, 2010)

Alpena Community College, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Alpena, MI (November 24, 2009)

University Prep Science and Math, “Nonprofit Service 101” – Detroit, MI (November 13, 2009)

Children’s Trust Fund, “If Only I Could Get a Story on the Front Page of my Newspaper” – Lansing, MI (November 12-13, 2009)

Children’s Trust Fund, “How to Raise Funds in Tough Economic Times” – Lansing, MI (November 12-13, 2009)

Children’s Trust Fund, “Building Better Boards” – Lansing, MI (November 12-13, 2009)

Archdiocese of Chicago, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – River Forest, IL (November 11, 2009)

Here and Now Conference, “How to Cultivate New Funding Sources” – San Francisco, CA (November 3, 2009)

Merrill Lynch – The Voit Group, Fall Client Event – Chicago, IL (October 14, 2009)

Union League Club, Book Tour Launch, Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits – Chicago, IL (September 14, 2009)

Bernstein, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Chicago, IL (June 8, 2009)

Here and Now Conference, “How to Cultivate New Funding Sources” – Los Angeles, CA (May 27, 2009)

Autism One Conference, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Chicago, IL (May 22, 2009)

United Way, “Transformational Philanthropy: Entrepreneurs and Nonprofits” – Washington, D.C. (May 14, 2009)

Illinois Community College System Foundation, “The College and the Foundation: Strategic Partners for Philanthropic Leadership” – Oakbrook, IL (March 12, 2009)

CASE V, “Campaign Repair: Troubleshooting Common Issues” – Chicago, IL (December 16, 2008)

Katten Muchin Rosenmann LLP, “Nonprofit Service 101“ – Chicago, IL (October 21, 2008)

Association of Fundraising Professionals, “Diversity + Diligence + Donations (D3) = Success ” – Chicago, IL (October 28, 2008)

Children’s Trust Fund, “Building Your Organization and Philanthropy” – Lansing, MI (October 15, 2008)

Midwest Brain Injury Clubhouse, “Fundraising Essentials for Board Members” – Chicago, IL (June 7, 2008)

Chicago Nonprofit Volunteer Fair, “How to be an Effective Board Member” – Chicago, IL (May 30, 2008)

Autism One Conference, “Philanthropy: Building and Supporting Your Organization” – Chicago, IL (May 25, 2008)

Northwestern University Panel Discussion, Bringing the Nonprofit and For-profit sectors together – Evanston, IL (November 6, 2007)

Center for Spiritual Living, Creating a Strategic Fundraising Plan -- Chicago, IL (October 14, 2007)

After School Matters Panel Discussion, Women Entrepreneurs – Chicago, IL (July 2007)

Bank of America, Private Wealth Client Group – Chicago, IL (May 2007)

DLA Piper Board Service Training – Chicago, IL (February 2007)

“Annual and Major Gifts Fundraising,” North Park University, Chicago, IL (Oct – Dec 2007, Oct – Dec 2006)

Merrill Lynch Symposium – Chicago, IL (October 2006)

Michigan Chapter of Prevent Child Abuse America Annual Conference – Kalamazoo, MI (October 2006)

Arts & Sciences Advancement Professionals 2006 Conference – University of Santa Clara, San Jose, CA (September 2006)

10th Annual Grief Symposium – Chicago, IL (June 2006)

Athletes Against Drugs Board Retreat – Chicago, IL (June 2006)

Casa Central Board Meeting – Chicago, IL (June 2006)

“Capital Campaigns for Nonprofit Organizations” – North Park University, Chicago, IL (March – May 2007, March – May 2006, March – May 2005, June – July 2004, March – May 2004, March – May 2003)

Earth Share of Illinois – Chicago, IL (March 2006)

Dollinger & Co. Not-for-Profit Conference – Chicago, IL (March 2006)

CASE District Three Conference – Nashville, TN (February 2006)

CASE District Two Conference – Pittsburgh, PA (February 2006)

Oasis Productions/Spiritual Spa – Chicago, IL (January 2006)

“Designing and Implementing the Fundraising Program for Nonprofit Organizations” – North Park University, Chicago, IL (Oct – Dec 2005, Oct – Dec 2004, March – May 2004, October – December 2003)

The Asian and Pacific Islander American Scholarship Fund (APIASF) Board Meeting – Minneapolis, MN (September 2005)

University of Illinois at Chicago, Liautaud Graduate School of Business – Chicago, IL (April 2005)

Dollinger & Co. Not-for-Profit Conference – Chicago, IL (March 2005)

CRD Conference – Washington, DC (December 2004)

Center for Community Technology Services, University of Baltimore – Baltimore, MD (November 2004)

March of Dimes Illinois Chapter – Chicago, IL (November 2004)

National Association of Homecare and Hospice – Phoenix, AZ (October 2004)

Chicago Bar Foundation – Chicago, IL (September 2004)

The Northern Trust DreamMakers Forum – Santa Barbara, CA (March 2004)

March of Dimes Hispanic Initiative Group – Chicago, IL (February 2004)

AFP Eastern Iowa Chapter – Iowa City, IA (September 2003)

Resource Advisory Council for Attachment Parenting Intl. – Nashville, TN (March 2003)


Webinar References Stevenson, Inc. Webinar, “How to Start a Fundraising Program from Scratch” (October 14, 2009)

Stevenson, Inc. Webinar, “What You Should Know About Courting Entrepreneurs as Major Gift Donors” – (July 14, 2009)

Tpenp324 (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Kristie

Please don't post copyright violations. With few exceptions, our notability guidelines require coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Client lists, speaking engagements, etc., don't cut it, I'm afraid, as we are hardly qualified to assess them. Tim Song (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Advice needed

Hello Tim, I would really appreciate if you could provide some input/insight here → User talk:Plastikspork#218.186.0.0/16 rangeblock. Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 18:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Unilateral rename of Cement in Africa

I'm concerned that very shortly after his Afd failed, user:Snottywong proceeded to rename Cement in Africa anyway. He's since been busy snipping WP:REDLINKs from it, not per policy.

I'm considering renaming it back, but don't wish to receive his usual hauling off to WP:ANI with accusations of edit warring. I don't see that AfD as producing consensus for a rename and there did seem to be some support for expanding the article on the broad topic, not just reducing it to the barest and least useful list.

Thoughts? Andy Dingley (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, there's not much of a consensus to do anything in that AfD except that the page should not be deleted. I'm not seeing anything here that goes outside the normal editorial process (in particular, WP:BOLD) such that admin intervention is either necessary or appropriate. Why don't you try discussing with SW first? Tim Song (talk) 05:38, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked sock is back

You recently blocked My account now as a duck case of User:Nyannrunning at an SPI case. That user is back, using an 12.101.236.250 (talk) IP account at Talk:Richard Colvin Cox here. Note that he ignores my post, which was directly above this, addresses Crohnie with a "Hello again" from an IP that had never edited here before, which just happens to be from the extended Los Angeles area, where Dooyar/Nyannrunning are located (he travels around to use IPs in the wider area) and begins to go on about a book published by a vanity press company, arguing for its use. This is a very rarely edited article that is mostly hit by socks of User:Nyannrunning. He then goes on to bash me, pushes the book by Harry Maihafer and even makes reference to something that was said about Dooyar/Nyannrunning that he "obsessed about long dead persons". To me, a new editor making references to things said about a banned editor on an article that mostly only that editor targets, making statements to a wiki-friend of mine about me, with whom he has perpetuated many attacks isn't just a WP:DUCK, it's an elephant tiptoeing through the tulips. Can you deal with this as an obvious returning sock IP account? This guy is persistent on this extremely obscure article, plus his treatment of me and his reliance on that book are dead giveaways. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:50, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Tim Song (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. That's rather how it goes with that editor. "Dooyar splitting"? My eye!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Shuppiluliuma yet again

Another sock [6]. Note the identical removal of any mention of the Armenian genocide [7]. Something needs to be done, this guy will NEVER stop. Athenean (talk) 05:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. Might want to talk to someone about a filter. Tim Song (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

50 Cutest Child Stars: All Grown Up

The Ghost of Gary Coleman is NOT Happy! Oh well. It created way too much drama anyway.--Milowent (talk) 13:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Distasteful choice for picking such a username right now or just another sock?

On User talk:Natalie Ann Ciappa: Sheffield and I, we are both wondering who this Natalie Ann Ciappa (talk · contribs) might be? Any advice or help would be greatly appreciated. Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 17:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

J.delanoy got it. It's Jessica Liao. Tim Song (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I noticed and it's a good catch too! Frankly, I knew my gut feeling was correct right from the moment he appear at the List of Banned users but was contemplating my next move when Sheffield moved in to engage the "bandit". I guess we must thank the talk page stalker here for the help, eh? ;P Cheers~! --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 21:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

More socking by editor you blocked

Colon-el-Nuevo (talk · contribs) is also editing from an educational IP address 152.16.51.250 (talk · contribs), posting forum style edits to article and user talk pages, etc (although my main complaint is the use of an account and an IP address at the same time. You blocked him for using another named account fairly recently. I don't know if you think this is worth taking action and if so if you want to do it or if I should bring this up at ANI. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I've warned them. If they continue, then a block would be warranted. T. Canens (talk) 15:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 01:24, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Extended a range block that you issued in April (date-changing vandal)

Please see this ANI, to see if you disagree. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Looks good. Thanks for letting me know. T. Canens (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Persistent vandalism by Profitoftruth85

Can you kindly see that vandalism by Profitoftruth stops on Islam and Sikhism - I think he has had several warnings on his talk page but has conveniently removed them, if you could kindly explain the wikipedia on removing warnings from users, I would be grateful

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AProfitoftruth85&action=historysubmit&diff=367420490&oldid=367132336

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AProfitoftruth85&action=historysubmit&diff=367623446&oldid=367420490

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AProfitoftruth85&action=historysubmit&diff=367623446&oldid=367586684

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AProfitoftruth85&action=historysubmit&diff=359319935&oldid=359310429

Why is this kind of vandalism and false information allowed on wikipedia? Termo the feather (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of triband flags

Hello, earlier this afternoon, I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of triband flags as Transwiki to Wikicommons. I don't have the ability to do that. Could you help take of that action? ----moreno oso (talk) 03:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

You need to ask someone on Commons, I think. See m:Help:Transwiki and m:Help:Import. T. Canens (talk) 04:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocking Users

Hi Is there anywhere on wikipedia to ask for users to be blocked who are persistently vandalising wikipedia articles as I do not currently have the powers to block a user, but I think that there is a need for an IP address user to be blocked as he is using very innapropriate "humour" when causing vandalism to articles. Tomdresser27 (talk) 18:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:AIV for obvious cases of vandalism, otherwise WP:ANI. T. Canens (talk) 05:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

SPI

Hello, Tim! I left this message on another admin's page concerning the last case on the list. Should it not be moved down to the next category? It's been checked (with an AN/I attached) - shouldn't it have been moved after the CU? I think it would help with the backlog a little. Thank you for your time! Doc9871 (talk) 04:59, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

It really doesn't matter w/r/t the backlog, as we don't actually do cases in any order. T. Canens (talk) 05:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
It does belong in the next category though, right? The AN/I thread was archived without resolution, and it has received the CU. Cheers :> Doc9871 (talk) 05:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
It was done. Kindly disregard the above post. Cheers, Tim :> Doc9871 (talk) 05:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Hi I have given my answers on the sockpuppet accusations towards me. I hope we could get to some conclusion about this misunderstanding as soon as possible. So I can move on and continue to contribute to this wonderful Wikipedia. Cheers.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 12:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Please just put a small message on my talk page when closed.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 12:15, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Nimicitor

Hi Tim,

Did you block him for sockpuppetry, or for inserting copyrighted material, or for edit warring? If for puppetry (there's an SPI case already archived as WP:DUCK), could you change your block rationale so I can decline the unblock request for the "right" reason? If it's for inserting copyrighted material, it's not actually 100% clear he's wrong about this, and I'd like to unblock and continue discussion on the talk page, which were ongoing when the block was issued. If it's for edit warring, there are several others who engaged in the same thing. I'd given them all a pass and protected the page instead, but if we're going to go the edit warring route, he's not the only one. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Was my decline incorrect then? -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes, you can treat it as a sock block, too. I've noted the block evasion in the block log. I'm not getting the copyright part - I see no reasonable argument that the material is not copyrighted. Even assuming arguendo that it is not, I hardly think edit warring to remove likely copyvios and to add likely copyvios after being informed warrants the same treatment. T. Canens (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
(e/c) I think it was a copyright violation, but I believe Nimicitor honestly believes it isn't, and I started a conversation on the talk page before the block. However, while (unlike a lot of people) I'm willing to overlook 3RR violations as long as people stop going forward, I'm less willing to overlook sockpuppetry. So, IMHO, probably should stay blocked, but for a different reason. (and sorry for goofing up both your talk pages). --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
The page that the text came from (verbatim) (here) clearly says at the bottom that it is copyright to the BBC - no mention of images only. The general terms I linked to on the talk page covers the press packs too. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Ari

Tim, Ari keeps "refactoring" the talk page at Gospel of the Hebrews. Could you restore some order. 207.81.154.64 (talk) 06:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

You received your last warning a [final warning for your disruptive behaviour by an administrator http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A207.194.164.93&action=historysubmit&diff=367730340&oldid=367496078] (nice of you to use dynamic IP addresses to avoid being held accountable for your disruptive behaviour.) But don't fret, your personal attacks against numerous editors have been forever saved on the talk archive page.
If you spent less time attacking users and more time discussing radical changes that have been pointed out as purely POV, we may get somewhere. Waiting at the talk page for you. --Ari (talk) 06:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Re my "final warning": the Admin later admitted it was a mistake -- 207.81.154.64 (talk) 02:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

CYANsocialmedia

Hi. With reference to CYANsocialmedia, please see that user's copyvio spam article California Youth Advocacy Network. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 17:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting it!   — Jeff G. ツ 18:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Please also consider the bottom request at User talk:CYANsocialmedia summarized in these edits. Thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 01:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Greetings and thanks...

Greetings Tim Song – thanks for sorting out my botch job with the Jessica Halls. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 07:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Sig

You might want to add a small (Tim Song) in your sig for a little while so people connect your new sig with your account name. Fences&Windows 17:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

More socks of blocked editor

Rangeblocked 1 month. T. Canens (talk) 22:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

ARBPIA general sanctions

Hi, could you please officially notify User:Physchim62 of the general sanctions? Thanks, No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Could you at least tell me if you're not going to do it so I can ask someone else? No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry I missed this. What did Physchim do that triggered the need for the notification? T. Canens (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Nvm, I'm now convinced that a notification is appropriate.  Done. T. Canens (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Glad to see I'm not imagining things. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

Courtesy

Since I've quoted you here, I wanted as a courtesy to let you know. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Keegscee

Rlevse had rangeblocked the ranges used by Keegscee, but I don't think they got them all. Seems he broke through the block. I notified Rlevse of this, but he appears to be offline, and since you closed the SPI, I am bringing this to your attention. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Scratch that, as soon as I went back to my watchlist from posting this he had taken care of it. Oh well. Thanks anyway :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 01:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer

Yes, I realised, but the account was on my list, by the time it hit me, I already had Special:UserRights open, so I went ahead and flagged it. Courcelles (talk) 04:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

T. Canens (talk) 04:46, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Jim Bender

Mr. Song, I'm writing to you about your deletion of the Jim Bender page. Honestly, I see no reason why this page should have been deleted. As mentioned in the discussion page, is broke no rules or guidelines whatsoever. The "issues" section (childishly called the 'election manifesto' section by one of the deletion advocates) consisted of nothing more than facts about the candidates positions on several issues, and involved no bias or "advertising" of any kind. Furthermore, such a section exists on another candidate's page (found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Binnie). Mr. Binnie is an opponent of Mr. Bender in the NH senate race and if his page is allowed to exist then the Jim Bender page should as well. The Jim Bender Wikipedia page is the opposite of "spam" as it was referred to in the deletion discussion. It was a short, simple article providing basic information about a notable person as described in detail in the deletion discussion. Please respond to me and help me understand why this article was killed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulMRichard (talk • contribs) 17:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

No. And you are lucky you are not blocked for canvassing or sockpuppetry. And Wikipedia is not the place for "leveling the playground". T. Canens (talk) 23:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Bruce George Peter Lee

How come this got redlinked? Cheers. Weakopedia (talk) 09:31, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

It's a redirect to a poorly sourced BLP that claims someone to be an arsonist. T. Canens (talk) 16:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Where is that poorly sourced BLP? Bruce George Peter Lee doesn't exist, nor Bruce Lee (arsonist) nor Bruce Lee (murderer), and Peter Dinsdale redirects to the redlinked Bruce George Peter Lee. Considering there are reliable sources confirming the arson charge, those claims of him being an arsonist might not have been so far of the mark. Weakopedia (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
It used to be at Bruce Lee (arsonist) before it was deleted. T. Canens (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
The deletion rationale for that page is "page that serves no purpose but to disparage or threaten its subject or someone else". Was the content about Peter Dinsdale? If so, I can't seem to find a reliable source that doesn't disparage him in some way, as he seems to have quite some notoriety, which may be deserved as he was convicted of 15 deaths. Given the reliable sources that discuss Dinsdale, was the content of the article such a BLP violation as to require speedy deletion? Is there an option to userfy the deleted page for the purpose of making it encyclopedic? Weakopedia (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Twinkle's default rationale for G10 is a bit off; it should have read "poorly sourced negative BLP" or something similar. I can email the content to you if you want, but I don't feel like userfying something that is a BLP violation. T. Canens (talk) 18:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Alright, thanks. How do I get my email address to you. Weakopedia (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
You need to specify a valid email for your WP account, and then I can use Special:EmailUser to send an email. T. Canens (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Done that, I think. I am sure an article can be written about this subject, but I am not promising it will be me who writes it. If I do I will let you know before it goes live. Thanks again. Weakopedia (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
And  Done. T. Canens (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Dbartolacci.jpg‎‎

Hi, Thanks for letting me know about the wrong venue. Where shall I propose deletion of the aforementioned file? Mootros (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Probably WP:PUF. T. Canens (talk) 16:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. Mootros (talk) 19:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Sophie Anna Everhard

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sophie Anna Everhard. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Moorsmur (talk) 23:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas tait

Please userfy the deleted article Douglas Tait to me at User:MichaelQSchmidt/workspace/Douglas Tait. I wish to work on it in toward a possible move to WP:Incubation for review and input. Thank you. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done T. Canens (talk) 23:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
My thanks. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello Tim, I don't understand how Douglas Tait's page was deleted. Below are articles listing films he stars in. He even has his own Star trek Wiki page [[8]] Can somebody please review. I have passed through actors pages that havent had a 3rd of Taits credits and are still up. Can you please explain? Knights Of Badassdom [[9]] [[10]] One by One:Deaths Door (2010) [[11]] [[12]] The Hunchback (2010) [[13]] The Season (film) [[14]] [[15]] [[16]] Bloodlines (2007) [[17]] [[18]] 

(Trekkieman (talk) 23:24, 16 June 2010 (UTC))
As the closing Admin, he evaluated the arguments at the AFD and followed consensus and guideline. Don't sweat it being deleted... if we can make it better, it may be allowed back. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Albert Ramos Jr (Football Player)

User:Black Kite erroneously thought that the sockpuppeteer in this case is User:The-Pope and created a cat for his "sockpuppets". He also tagged an unregistered account's userpage as a sockpuppet (User:User:The-Pope). Can you please delete the two pages created an error? Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. T. Canens (talk) 00:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI

I brought the case here. Ionidasz (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Shuppiluliuma sock

For the nth time: [19]. Same pattern. Creates as a sleeper account, makes a few edits to random articles, then begins the hardcore POV-pushing, e.g. the trademark removal of any mention of the Armenian Genocide on Trabzon, and the WP:OWN behavior on Turkey (reverted back to "his" version [20]). Who can I talk to about a filter? This is really getting old. Thanks a lot, Athenean (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Blocked, and I've semi'd the article for a week. Maybe Shirik (talk · contribs)? He's like the resident edit filter expert at SPI. T. Canens (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

CBS Logo on WP:Reviewing

Just an explanation. The logo you corrected was being used as an example of how the "Reviewers" logo looks like the CBS logo. It wasn't there to be a fair use vio in anyway, just a visual example for people outside the US (who may not know of the CBS logo). I would ask that it be put back up in some form for the duration of the discussion, but in a form that doesn't violate fair use. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure how that could be done, perhaps with a link? Displaying the image, however small, outside the mainspace is a WP:NFCC vio... T. Canens (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Even a different image? There are several (or were at last check) CBS logos (which have all looked alike since the 50s) on the CBS page. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:29, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Most of them are non-free, though. Perhaps File:Ed sullivan theater.jpg? T. Canens (talk) 17:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
That would work if we could crop it and host it temporarily (we would only need it for the duration of the discussion and then it could be deleted). - NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the copyright aspects of cropping, though - right now the logo is de minimis, but it's not going to be that if it's cropped... T. Canens (talk) 17:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Damn :S I am just afraid without some form of the logo there international people will miss the idea as CBS is a US only network....I like the File:Ed sullivan theater.jpg image, but it is too busy and people will kinda miss the point. Hmmmm.....would an affiliate logo be NFCC too? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:42, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Almost all logos are copyrighted, so probably... T. Canens (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
The best one I could find (in the short time I looked) was File:CBS6Albany.png. Oh well....guess people will have to guess what it looks like. :( - NeutralHomer • Talk • 17:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Stephens City, Virginia

Got a question for ya. A couple users have said that the word "semiquincentennial" or 250th anniversary isn't a word. This word is mentioned on Anniversary (gotta scroll to 250th anniversary) and on other websites, but no dictionaries. Should I remove the word altogether or what? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 06:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

IMO if the city used the word themselves in the celebration, I don't see a problem; otherwise it looks like a neologism and probably should be removed. T. Canens (talk) 08:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Wasn't used by the town, we just called it the "250th anniversary". I think that is how the papers reported it too. I just added the word as I was trying to make a complete article. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 08:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

sock

Shuppiluliuma again: [21]. I talked to Shirik about a filter, but in the meantime could you block, revert, ignore this one as well? Thanks, Athenean (talk) 02:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Would you also consider semi-protecting Turkey? Virtually all the IPs editing that article are him. Athenean (talk) 02:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Done and done. T. Canens (talk) 04:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Yodel Australia

Hello Tim Song, A few weeks ago, you deleted my article on Yodel Australia. This was my first attempt at writing an article and I was unaware of all the rules and requirements in writing an article. Since then I have re-written the article, with some help of other Wikipedia users and would like to request you to please review it once again. The article has been written to be unbiased, well-sourced and provide genuine information about Yodel. Currently the updated article is on my user page User:Natkolk/Yodel_Australia. Could you please review, and let me know what you think. I am happy to perform the appropriate changes. Thanks Natkolk (talk) 04:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Subway station moves

Hello, Tim. First, it was great to meet you in the meetup. But I am writing in response to the cut and paste repair a few weeks ago.[22] I was not expecting that the page histories would effectively be swapped. Rather, if I did not seek admin advice, I would have just copy and pasted the merged article to the article at the correct link. I do get a little confused sometimes when exactly I should request WP:REPAIR, so if you could explain to me when to use it that I'm misunderstanding, please do. I was also confused with your comments to go to WP:RM, since there was a discussion at WT:NYCPT about this. So if you could clear up my concerns, that would be great. Tinlinkin (talk) 06:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

If you copy & paste the merged article to the new title then you'd have to somehow attribute that to the user who actually did the merging...it's going to be messy regardless. Basically, as explained in WP:Parallel versions, history merge is useful only for repairing copy-and-paste moves, not c&p merges from multiple pages, as that would mess up the page history. The most that can be done in the latter case is to merge the history of new article with one of the old pages (assuming disjoint history, of course), and then manually attribute the remaining pages. Use WP:RM if you need a page deleted to make way for a move (in two of those cases it's a useless dab page); use WP:REPAIR only if you think the page histories should be merged together. T. Canens (talk) 06:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA

Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

EunSoo

Yikes, I said "might" be InkHeart, I don't really know it. :)
Amalthea 17:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I have to say, nice find. At first I didn't understand you wanted to check the filer. wiooiw (talk) 17:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Heh. The move was sort of my idea, Amalthea.
Both Inkheart and EunSoo have a common interest in Korean actors and singers (e.g. Lee Jun Ki, Kahi (entertainer), Donghae (singer), etc). They both operate using proxies, and I'm guessing that per your comment there was some similarity in an IP used by both of them. As such, seemed that per the fairly convincing behavioural evidence and the apparent technical evidence they were most likely the same person. I'm happy to reverse if I've made a mistake. :)
Warmest regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 17:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
No, I don't have any hidden cards here. I really can't say, and the latest confirmed InkHeart match was too long ago to have any data on him anymore.
If there's doubt I'd rather keep them apart, for clarity. I haven't looked at the InkHeart contributions long enough to judge whether there's doubt.
Amalthea 17:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Also see : Special:Contributions/222.124.178.98. Maybe a proxy? wiooiw (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm confident they (Inkheart and EunSoo) are the same person, and have no doubts about it, the behavioural evidence alone is convincing enough for me. But if anyone else does have doubts, as I said, I'm happy to undo my changes. Just let me know (or feel free to do so yourself). Kindest regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

76.31.217.148

Sorry if I stepped on your toes a little rolling back 76.31.217.148's edits. I get into a mode and start clicking, I get kinda fast. :) All are now reverted per PMDrive1061's request. Good work! :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Ross22

Hi I'm not sure if this is what I'm meant to do to contance you, so please correct me if I'm doing it wrong. The Matthew Fabien thing was vandalized by some kid first, and wrote it to make it sound like himself. I only added the other stuff to teach him a lesson. Please know that it deeply hurts me to be accused of being defamatory.Ross22 (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Is it worth raising an SPI case for this?

Hi. See User talk:ChasseConsulting#Sockpuppetry - note to reviewing admin. My question is, with an open-and-shut case like this where the parties are already blocked, is there any point creating an SPI case just to archive as documentation? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Not really. T. Canens (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

the professionalism of this project and its volunteers

Thanks for that [23]. I continue to be impressed by the professionalism of this project and its volunteers. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrewshapter‎

Thanks for your edits and help. It's been about two months since I last did a SPI. ----moreno oso (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision deletion for an edit

Could you please look at this DIFF and see if it qualifies for revision deletion? TIA ----moreno oso (talk) 05:58, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Revdel'd as copyvio. T. Canens (talk) 06:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your recent assistance. Gonads3 (talk) 21:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank You...

Tim, I wanted and tried to reason with this editor long before her community ban, and had hoped at least some "time off" would have encouraged future collegial editing from her. The socking was just so obvious, however (I was 100% sure): and I appreciate your closing this case. Cheers :> Doc9871 (talk) 04:28, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

P.S. - I would add this here also. Closure: I'd do it myself, but... Doc9871 (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Meh; we normally tag the user page only, in part to avoid clogging up the sockpuppet category... T. Canens (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Gotcha - thanks, Tim! BTW: is she "banned" or "blocked"?[24] There is a little "ban" template I've seen for the talk page if it's the former. Cheers, Tim... Doc9871 (talk) 08:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Technically, banned for a year, and blocked indefinitely, since a single admin cannot extend a ban. But really, this thing is quite academic... T. Canens (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Will it be the blue pill or the red pill?

Mr Tim, the matrix has you again. Seriously, your help is urgently needed to RFCU on Chewygum (talk · contribs) whose edits (and copyvios per discussion on Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Chewygum) overlaps that of a banned editor LightAj (talk · contribs). Note: 21:18, 22 June 2010 Moonriddengirl (Talk | contribs) blocked Chewygum with an expiry time of 72 hours (account creation disabled) ‎ (ES:copyright block. Shorter block not likely to be helpful). Thoughts? (P.S.:Where's the rubber ducky?) --Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 19:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Chewygum is a pretty old account (from 2005), and editing times do not seem to match. I doubt they are related. Of course, I didn't compare their edits, so if you find edits that suggest a link (beyond the common interest and copyvios) I'll be happy to reconsider. T. Canens (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

TheDarkLordSeth

Hi Tim. Given your past experience with the editor, do you think that you can take a look at this sockpuppet case, [25]? Thanks in advance. Best, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 00:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Seems to have been dealt with. T. Canens (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

little confused

Recently I have been going through the recent changes and found that Mad Max universe had been under an edit war for quite some time I think it needs a rollback. I tried to fix it but may have just messed it up further -_-' So I figured I better find an admin. Here is the link [[26]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewerd (talk • contribs) 03:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

It was never good to begin with, so I just redirected it to the franchise article. T. Canens (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Cordelia Mendoza deleted article

Hi, Tim. I built the page Cordelia Mendoza, which you just deleted after an AfD discussion. I have found stronger archived articles, which I was about to add before the page was deleted, that are solely about that person, which MelanieN, the nominator, stated was needed. Per Wikipedia guidelines, I made a lot of changes per the nom's concerns, but she only commented negatively during the AfD discussion about some of the changes I made, yet she didn't address the improvements. I also messaged her once on her talk page, but she didn't respond to that either so I didn't message her again. The goal, as the discussion progressed, appeared to be to delete rather than improve the article, which I thought was Wikipedia's goal, to improve. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz recognized the notability of the person, saying the article "clearly meets the 'GNG.'" Also, someone who appears to be possibly related to MelanieN (Rnickel) wrote an article that cited the Peninsula Beacon newspaper, even though MelanieN for the Cordelia Mendoza article said, in her opinion, the Peninsula Beacon wasn't a reliable source, stating one of the reasons was they use freelance reporters along with staff reporters. The Peninsula Beacon was good enough for the Bennie Edens page but not good enough for the Cordelia Mendoza page? I looked up the Peninsula Beacon and their reporters all appear to be on-staff writers (no "special contributors" in the lot). I thought that on Wikipedia those who suggested "keep" or "delete" couldn't just throw out a reason without explanation as to, even briefly, why. One user, who goes only by an IP address, said the fundraisers Cordelia Mendoza headed were "run-of-the-mill -- he/she just tossed that out, like it was a fact. After the user posted that, I looked up Wikipedia's definition of "run-of-the-mill": "common," "ordinary," that do not "stand out from all the rest." According to newspaper reports about these events, which I will include in a new and/or revised article, her annual fundraisers for national groups each year raise five figures. I didn't press these issues further in the AfD discussion other than my short comments, addressing only some of them, because I didn't want to get off topic or sound argumentative. I would like the opportunity to cite stronger reliable sources. How would you like me to approach this? I can completely rewrite the article to Wikipedia standards and guidelines citing those reliable sources. Do you suggest using a Special:MyPage? Or would you be able to bring back the article to afford me the opportunity to improve on it, per the nominators concerns? Also, you didn't give a reason for deleting the article. My understanding is that AfD discussions aren't votes? I'd like to know the reason as a guidepost as I rewrite the article. Thanks very much for your time. It's much appreciated. --AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

What's the link between Rnickel and MelanieN? If you think they are the same person, WP:SPI is that way; otherwise WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. You seemed to have conveniently forgot to mention the numerous editors commenting after HW that found her insufficiently notable for inclusion. Your argument about the ordinariness or lack thereof of the fundraisers are misplaced. It should have been raised in the AfD, not here, and in any event a five-figure fundraiser sounds quite ordinary to me. And in case you didn't notice, admins normally do not give rationales in easy cases, not because it isn't a vote, but because the result is obvious. If you want the page userfied, I can do it for you. T. Canens (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. Yes, I'd like the page userfied. --AuthorAuthor (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 Done T. Canens (talk) 02:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, Tim. I'll rewrite the article, and I'll take time with it, with her notability demonstrated by using stronger reliable sources. --AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppet accounts

I left a message here concerning possible accounts being used by User:Mynameisstanley. 72.74.201.106 (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.40.202 (talk)

Harmless mistake. Very sorry

Hi Tim,

Sorry to bother you on a Sunday. My name is Ryan Long and I am with a company called Roadwings Entertainment. Roadwings Entertainment is the a film distribution company that has taken on a few titles including Before thge Music Dies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_the_Music_Dies. Anyway, the other night we were here at the director (Andrew Shapter's) home and we discussed adding him to Wikipedia since his first few films have become some prominent and since he's taken on other projects like writing for The Huffington Post and directing the new Lollapalooza film.

We urged him to post his info on Wikipedia thinking that he would have a better chance that we would to get his name listed. That's where it backfired. We now know how that's considered a serious violation. He was just trying to help us get ready for an educational tour. Our apologies. You were right to delete and block.

With that said, his production company (FaronWest) is housed in the same office and after learning about the previous violation, we made a legitimate effort to post using FaronWest. I was careful and I re-wrote the bio entry and made it very short (in contrast to what the bot recognized as a copyright violation that was on his website). I even noted that i recognized the error in myTalk. That's when we started getting nasty notices and deletions.

I'm very sorry. I didn't know the damage I was doing and I won't do it again. I am new at FaronWest and my job is to promote Andrew on a U.S tour this Fall. His company is focused on music history and I'm afraid his user name is now blacklisted. Tim, I promise he's not out to do any harm to Wikipedia and I promise that posting his bio was not meant to do any harm either.

I work on the same IP server and I figured it would be best to write and honest note instead of trying to change my id or location. I tried to write you and appeal from FaronWest, but because you blocked and deleted it, there was no way I could respond. So now I'm on his guesthouse business email address.

All we were trying to do was get Andrew listed in time for his tour of U.S. Universities this fall. He's promoting music education and Wikipedia is a BIG part of that! http://www.hulu.com/watch/62945/before-the-music-dies

Is there a legitimate way to post a bio on Andrew without getting blacklisted because of my mistakes? If I started over and was careful with the rules, can I still post the bio? Or is his name now blacklisted forever because of our mishap the other night?

Thanks Tim. I appreciate what you do because it's much needed. I'm sorry for my mistakes. I was just trying to help Andrew.

Ryan Long Faron West Productions & Roadwings Entertainment http://www.roadwingsentertainment.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by CasaKenwood (talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision visibility?

I'm curious, what was the content of the invisible edit? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zythe&action=history -- was it offensive? ~ZytheTalk to me! 23:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Since it got oversighted, I think I can assure you that it was pretty bad... T. Canens (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again

Hi Tim. Thanks for your help again. Incidentally, when I tried using Twinkle to apply the SPI report to User:Mac's account, it failed to work. Which is why I flipped it and applied it, wrongly, to the suspected sock account. Was that just a fluke, or was there a reason Twinkle failed to load it the first time, you think? I prefer using the automated tools: is there a glitch that you're aware of when Twinkle is used to file an SPI with a pre-existing report page as the target, perhaps? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

IIRC there is indeed a known bug that has to do with the regex Twinkle uses to decide if a pre-existing page is "empty". You might want to file a report at WT:TW/BUG. T. Canens (talk) 22:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I checked it out and it's a bit daunting. I'm unclear on whether or not I'm to chose a new "bug number" if I don't think mine exists. I'll follow up when I can, thanks. Or I suppose I can just report in cases like this manually. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Just choose the largest + 1, so should be 384, I think. T. Canens (talk) 23:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Well, I tried, saved it and it... disappeared. I'm there in the edit history but my text is not there, at least not yet. We'll see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

AfC helper script bug

When the AfC helper script is set to auto-notify the submitter, please make it do that after the changes to the AfC page were successfully saved. More importantly, please fix the script so that the spam filter does not cause Edit failed and cause the loss of the "additional comment". Perhaps nowiki or omit the link if the spam filter catches a URL such as http://ezinearticles.com/?... or any other that is on the blacklist. Thanks, PleaseStand (talk) 17:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Red X Won't fix. This is such a rare scenario that it's not nearly worth the effort. You are told that the edit has failed (i.e., it does not fail silently, unlike, say, Twinkle), and presumably can fix the problem yourself. Since you would be fixing it anyway, I don't see a problem with it making the notification even in case of a failed edit, since it saves you the problem of redoing the notification, too. T. Canens (talk) 23:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I would like to see a more descriptive error message though. Thanks anyways for such a useful script. And AfC is severely backlogged. PleaseStand (talk) 01:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Giallombardo

Could you usify the deleted article to my userspace? I did a lot of work on him and if he becomes a soccer player will push it out when he is notable. ----moreno oso (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done T. Canens (talk) 00:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I was busy with another article that I wasted an hour on. ----moreno oso (talk) 01:08, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

About Cyrill Stachniss introduction

Dear Tim,

My name is Chen Baifan. I'm going to apply for translating the book "Robotic Mapping and Exploration" which is written by Cyrill Stachniss into Chinese. So I need the writer's introduction. But I found that you had delete it from wikipedia(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrill_Stachniss) yestaday. Could you email it for me? I'll preciate it. My email is <email removed>.

Best regards, Chen Baifan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.197.66.92 (talk) 03:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

You are probably better off checking his website directly, I'd imagine. T. Canens (talk) 03:29, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

Eric Frimpong

Dear Tim, do you think you might consider restoring this article? I missed the AfD due to being ill recently, but would have !voted Keep based upon the extensive news coverage. That would have made 5 deletes and 4 keeps, thus ending in no consensus. Thanks, Tim. Basket of Puppies 04:10, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

AFD templates

Thanks for your work closing AFDs, but please be careful to use the templates correctly in the future. In this edit [27], you copied the {{oldafdfull}} template for the 2nd nom from the one for the 1st, creating an unnecessary second infobox and resulting in the infobox for the 2nd nomination wrongly linking to the 1st nomination. Instead, you should have used the date2, result2, and page2 parameters, and made sure that the page2 parameter contained the correct link (as seen in the fixed edit [28]). Thanks, and happy future editing! —Lowellian (reply) 05:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Blame User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD :| T. Canens (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Request userfy

Hi,

You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mysterious Girlfriend X, would you userfy the deleted article into my userspace User:KrebMarkt/Mysterious Girlfriend X. Thanks --KrebMarkt 06:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done T. Canens (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you. (Appreciated.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

SPI for Yongle the Great

I added an IP address yesterday, and another account today. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Only a range block stopped him earlier from using sometimes several IPs/accounts a day. That really took a lot of time I and others can user more constructively. Dougweller (talk) 13:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Eric Frimpong

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Eric Frimpong. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Basket of Puppies 17:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Based upon the instructions here I respectfully request temporary undeletion and appropriate tagging of the article. Sincerely, Basket of Puppies 17:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

It also says that "violations of the policy on biographies of living persons should not be restored". Since it is deleted for failing WP:BLP1E, which is a part of that policy, I am not inclined to restore it. T. Canens (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Tim, the restore is only temporary, for a discrete period of time. I do not see a rationale of BLP1e in the closing statements, so I am sorry if I am confused by your refusal to follow the instructions. Basket of Puppies 19:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timotheus_Canens/Archives/2010/6&oldid=1188552726"