User talk:Ari89

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ari89! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 100 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Maurice Casey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Jewish Christian Gospels

Hi Ari. Re your suggestion Talk:Jewish-Christian_Gospels I'm not sure that all 4 articles should totally be merged, but looking at them I agree there is a massive amount of duplication. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should have listened more carefully to what you were saying. See Talk:Gospel of Matthew In ictu oculi (talk) 05:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not sure what you are talking about! --Ari (talk) 12:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John gee

Hi Ari89. I have left a comment at Talk:Mithras in comparison with other belief systems‎ which may concern you.-Civilizededucation^talk 00:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have been around on Wikipedia after I left this message, but ignored to respond. Does that mean that you cannot defend your edits, does that mean that you may have crossed some rubicons?-Civilizededucation^talk 05:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Like everyone else in the world, responding to the queries of User:Civilizededucation is my number one priority™ in life. I clearly have nothing better to do with my time so I am currently petitioning the gods for forgiveness. You have forced me to re-evaluate myself and I have decided to take applications for a PA. Only with this assistance will I continue to keep you number one™ and ensure this injustice never occurs again. --Ari (talk) 09:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, you seem to have taken my comment to heart. Maybe I did go overboard unnecessarily. As such, I have striked it out.-Civilizededucation^talk 09:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In hindsight, my response would have been better with your username in colours. We all learn. No hard feelings from me ;) --Ari (talk) 09:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invite

Hi, i invite you to a dicussion. here. Thanks Someone65 (talk) 14:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sandboxes in mainspace

I'm pretty sure that sandboxes are not allowed in mainspace. If that's still the case, then Talk:Jesus myth theory/Sandbox needs to be deleted (regardless of whether it was created by an admin. • Ling.Nut (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello There

Hi Ari:

I haven't seen you do anything lately on Wikipedia. Are you still active, or on "vacation"? I haven't been doing much myself due to common life issues. At any rate, I hope everything is going well with you. Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 02:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just had the most random urge to check my talk page to find this very recent comment. I may resurface depending on my urge to cross editors that have made history based articles their pet projects to a standard deserving of severe ridicule. I am great. How about yourself?

Do it. It needs to be done. SpigotMap 22:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe God is trying to tell you something.

And stop whining about the jerks out there in Wiki-land. Yes, they're annoying, but remember what the prophet Yankovic said:

So don't be vain and don't be whiny, Or else, my brother, I might have to get medieval on your heinie.

At any rate, I'm doing well, except for the fact that I've been working a lot in the last few months—either at my job or in my backyard or in my garage. Or for my significant other who is frequently disobedient.

Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 23:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Icthus

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Ari89! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evg logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Evg logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:25, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lake old new.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lake old new.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ari89/Christmyth

User:Ari89/Christmyth, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ari89/Christmyth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ari89/Christmyth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Doug Weller (talk) 13:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!