User talk:Ari89/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Discussion about your edits ("Christ Myth Theory")

There is currently a discussion about edits you have made located here: Talk:Christ_myth_theory#Vandalism_by_User:Eugeneacurry_.28Relating_to_Holocaust_comments.29 –  TigerTails  talk  14:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Who do you think you are fooling by lying about the content of your edits? --Ari (talk) 15:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Nicholas Perrin

Would you kindly refrain from referring to my tagging of your article as vandalism? The article, as it stands, contains only references to Perrin's own work. To establish notability we need to know what others have written about him, hence the tag which will be restored shortly. Favonian (talk) 13:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

The article contains more references than those written by Perrin. --Ari (talk) 02:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

I also do not appreciate the message left on my talk page. Before reverting any more changes in this article, please take a look at WP:OWN. --RadioFan (talk) 13:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Glad you deleted your false warnings on my page. --Ari (talk) 02:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Nicholas Perrin

I'm having trouble understanding why these references are being removed from this article.--RadioFan (talk) 14:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Because 16 references on a single accepted and uncontroversial point is ridiculous. --Ari (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Why were they added in the first place?--RadioFan (talk) 14:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Because someone decided to swiftly tag it non-notable without doing their homework.--Ari (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Then may we also remove the bibliography section? 11 references there is also a bit ridiculous for a 3 sentence article.--RadioFan (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I cut down the bibliography to the most popular works (academic and popular). --Ari (talk) 14:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

I see now, you were intended it as a listing of books he has written, I misunderstood and thought it was another list of references. Makes sense now, looks much better.--RadioFan (talk) 03:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, so that is why your afd comment about him being his only reference made no sense. --Ari (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Editor attack

You left this on my page: Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: talk:Acharya S. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ari (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

As you will note, I left a run down of this page since it was started. A fellow Zarove was banned for doing what became a great issue of contention involving lawyers. The same issue is now being brought to the fore and you appear to be a part of it. I know some details about you and Eugene the pastor collaberting to attack the Acharya page. Don't be threatening me on my page.Skull (talk) 06:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't care about past issues, especially issues that I have nothing to do with. Now, stop the personal attacks against various editors, and threatening messages or you will join that guy who was banned. Now, you are rather paranoid if you think I have been collarborating with anyone to "attack the Acharya page." Think before you threaten. --Ari (talk) 06:52, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

3RR

I'm not going to template a regular, but I wanted to point out that WP:3RR states that a user who makes more than three revert actions (of any kind) on any one page within a 24-hour period, may be considered to be edit warring, and blocked appropriately. The important part is that the reverts don't all have to be the same content. So your reverts of Eugnostos plus your reverts of History2007 add up to breaking 3RR. Please do not make any more reverts in the next 24 hours, consider self-reverting, and for the future, please try to avoid edit warring, and attempts to force your preferred state of an article through multiple reverts. A self imposed 0RR or 1RR is always a good editing practice in my opinion. Good luck. If you have any questions about this, feel free to contact me, read up on the policy, or seek a 2nd opinion. -Andrew c ^[talk] 14:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. --Ari (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I reported us both for this on the Life-rebith page, I think we both violated this policy. --Ceezmad (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

As those who commented on your nomination noted, there was no breach of 3RR by myself. --Ari (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4