User talk:TeaDrinker/Archive9

Ecology

Hi TeaDrinker! Not to be personal, but it's been a while and I hope you're well. I thought I might point out that I've made some changes to Ecology (see here and also [[Ecology (disciplines)], and even created a Quantitative Ecology stub). But the big papa Ecology was in really terrible shape, and its a tricky subject to present fairly, and some feedback or second pair of eyes would be really helpful. That is, if you can be dragged away from your policing duties. Best, Eliezg (talk) 13:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, I will be leaving the land of coffee and beer for the land of coffee and beer this summer. Hopefully we can interact in the flesh! Keep up the good work on la littérature québécoise. Eliezg (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Eliezg and TeaDrinker, your devotion to tackling these most vexing challenges is an inspiration (and a cause of wonderment as to how you have time for anything else). When you find yourselves back in the land of coffee and beer and Quantitative Ecology, let me know. -IGTaylor (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Robert V. Gentry

An article that you have been involved in editing, Robert V. Gentry, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert V. Gentry. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Borock (talk) 06:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Patricia Cornwell image

Hi TeaDrinker thanks for getting back to me. I am told that PC owns the copyright permission for the image now. Do I still need to proceed with getting her permission to post the image even though I am representing her? Thanks! Peppermint62 (talk) 13:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Ebola test

TeaDrinker,

Thanks for the note. I wasn't testing anything. I attempted to remove vandalism. The attempt failed and thus may have appeared like someone goofing around.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ebola&oldid=287177212

Go to "Recent cases" "Research at the University of West Georgia shows that the ... "

Cheers

74.59.35.239 (talk) 19:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Hi there, i am really sorry for my mistakes.. but i still love you xxx Adam (Manors) 13:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Vietnamese New Native Language

Thanks for the speedy protection :). Ironholds (talk) 11:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

It's unreasonable for wikipedia to have such a bullshit article! It's both original research and self reference created by some insane kid. He's the true "vandal" here. I'm sorry if my words are bit harsh, anyway. Oaioai (talk) 14:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding and politeness (even though my previous post is not very gentle :))! Actually, I am new to wikipedia (as a contributor, I've been reading it for a while) so I've just been reading the policies. I surely will try to help more in future. Good day to you. Oaioai (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Art, Truth and Politics

Hello, TeaDrinker. You have new messages at NYScholar's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NCNOTL

First, I apologize for reversing your change re: the speedy deletion request; I somehow missed where it says you're an administrator when I checked your talk page.

Second, thanks for restoring Sarek's deletion which I'd restored mistakenly. Chuck Hamilton (talk) 21:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Perkons

Hello. I'm trying to create a page for Martins Krumins but I'm not sure if I'm doing it correctly. Is there some way you could check out my sandbox to see if it's going OK?

Perkons —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perkons (talk • contribs) 20:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Teadrinker!

I think I've finished the article on Martins Krumins and would like to move it into the main article space. Your offer to do this for me is appreciated, especially since my mind is kind of zonked with all the Wikipedia "hoops".

I don't think that an infobox is necessary because the article is cluttered enough.

In-line references? What exactly is that? Is it when certain words are linked to other sites? Also, I'll try to add links to and from other Wiki articles.

Thank you for your encouragement.

Perkons (Daina Krumins) (Perkons (talk) 00:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC))

Hello Teadrinker!

It seems that someone wants to delete the Martins Krumins article again because of "lack of notability". A person can only be "notable" within a culture and if they get stranded between cultures and belong nowhere, then "notability" is not likely to happen.

When Martins Krumins came to the US he, and other artists, were "out of synch" with the culture. They didn't understand American society and had no means of "becoming notable". On the other hand, the culture (Latvia) in which they would have become notable no longer existed. The Soviets took over and established the "tractor style" and in any case because Martins had joined the Latvian regiment that was supported by the Allies (The White Army), he could not remain in Latvia when the communists had full power.

I think that the work itself is what establishes "notability".

In the case of Lucia Peka, which is similar, it is important to remember that her work was "in synch" with the culture of the U.S. and Canada because she was educated here. Martins Krumins was of a slightly older generation and was educated at the Latvian Art Academy and influenced by Vilhelms Puvitis... and entirely different aesthetic, a different "school of art". Would it be possible for any artist who gets caught between cultures, to be on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perkons (talk • contribs) 00:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Daina Krumins (Perkons) (Perkons (talk) 00:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC))

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for reverting my user page. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 04:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Olivia Munn

TeaDrinker,

Why is it that you do not approve and keep removing the image of Olivia Munn with Kevin Pereira hosting the G4tv show Attack of the show?

69.120.189.34-Culkin Edits

Hi there, this user is continuing his vandalism of the Macaulay Culkin page...help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ildirector (talk • contribs) 22:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

JEWISH NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS

Did you even bother to read the discussion page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Jewish_Nobel_prize_winners? Jinfo (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

What do you know about Ratamons?Why did you try to edit the article Ratamons?

You know nothing about ratamons then how could you even try to edit Ratamons........... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratamons (talk • contribs) 09:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you very much for reconsidering and taking my concerns seriously.Jinfo (talk) 10:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

thanks & request

Thank you for your rapid deletion of Cerebroretinal vasculopathy. Could you also look at Hereditary vascular retinopathy? Thanks in advance PizzaMan (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

That was very fast. Thanks again. I made two redirect pages: Rvcl and Retinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukodystrophy that are dead links now. Will they be deleted automatically, should i tag them, or can you just delete them per this request? PizzaMan (talk) 14:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting these also. PizzaMan (talk) 11:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks teadrink for cool talk page! Friendly thing=good, nice, cool.Smithsoni0201 (talk) 02:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Turkish Exonyms

Hello,

I came from Turkey. You deleted "Turkish Exonyms" as I saw. Why did you delete ? Did you bend the neck to the Greek lobby ? Please, you answer. Also, other exonyms of city and island names are not interested in Turks. I offered 2 choices. Either other exonyms will be deleted or Turkish one will be refunded. Decision is yours.--Cemsentin1 (talk) 13:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Most of Turkish exonyms are remained from archives of Ottoman Empire. You know Ottomans managed current South of Slovakia, Northeast of Slovenia, South of Ukraine and Russia, Hungary, Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria, Makedonia, Greece, Serbia, Montenegro, Algeria, Libya, Egpyt, Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Eritrea, North of Ethiopia (Harar region), Sudan, North of Somalia, Djibuti, West of Oman, Quwait, Iraq, West of Iran, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. Also Seljuks, who was predecessors of Ottomans, managed Iran, Syria, Jordan, Syria, Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Oman, Pakistan and Ghaznavids managed Afghanistan, Pakistan, Northern India. These countries were part of Turkish World. Also relative sizeable Turks live in USA, United Kingdom and Germany. These are not counted as null. Please, you revise your decision. Sincerely,--Cemsentin1 (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I recreated this subject with references but you deleted again! Why ? I wait an explanation.--85.103.157.199 (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Gdgt

Sorry to disagree with you but where in this article does it indicate any notability or importance? It simply doesn't. – ukexpat (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Seattle Publishing

Hello, you deleted my page about Seattle Publishing saying that it did not meet the standards required for a Corporation article. Well, I checked the guidelines and if all you need are sources that verify the importance of the comanpy, here are 3: http://www.dmnews.com/Seattle-Bike-Supply-Accelerates-Production-Cycle/article/91906/ http://www.dpsmagazine.com/content/ContentCT.asp?P=135 http://www.filemaker.com/solutions/customers/stories/2057.html These are reliable sources that can be found by anyone on the internet. I believe this presents a solid case for my article and that you should allow it back on wikipedia. I believe that you did not even consider the points I made in my argument as well and I hope that you read these articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpatera (talk • contribs) 15:49, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Eastern Virginia Hockey League

Teadrinker, I think the update version of this article was more in line of what you were looking for. The league still has a link from the List of Ice Hockey Leagues, so I added the league with more content, adding the mission statement, references, a little history. I'll continue to expand it in the future. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawarren (talk • contribs) 16:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

List of Jewish Nobel Prize Winners

Someone has removed the possible copyright violation notices from the above webpage. They have also edited the discussion page and removed all of my comments. I'm requesting that this individual be banned from further Wikipedia editing.Thanks. Jinfo (talk) 12:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

David Auerbach

Why was this article restored? It's a word for word copy of http://www.betshira.org/auerbach.asp--RadioFan (talk) 15:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

I have, I think, got to the bottom of the problems I was having with my account and the removal of my page. A long story which I'm sure you don't have time for. However, just to say a friendly and helpful message from someone within Wikipedia was most welcome. Thanks. Keep drinking the tea... (Creationist32 (talk) 16:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)).

Thank you for your swift action

It's reassuring to see this article is so closely monitored, and by such attentive people. I can obviously see that my inaccurate post would represent such a prospective problem. It's reassuring to see that the issue is monitored 24/7 and is considered a serious issue, here on Wikipedia. Such a speedy response and so much text. I'm sure you're aware that your response is unlike that of most admin's that I'm aware of, and that's good to see, and I noted that you passed your exams as a grad (that you refered to) some time ago. Belated congratulations. I'm sure you're doing well. It's highly informative to know that Wikipedia is in safe hands. Wiki User 68 (talk) 00:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Tea

...Earl grey or Orange pekoe? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.53.212.70 (talk) 00:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

78 Violet

Hi, I noticed you reverted the requested speedy delete back to the redirect. I have a RS at MTV which I would have added to the article once I had moved it. Please reinstate the {{db-g6}}. Thanks. Astronaut (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Move done. I found a second reference while waiting. Astronaut (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

List of Jewish Nobel prize winners

Hi. :) After consulting with Mike Godwin and allowing contributors time to salvage what they could or work things out, I've deleted this one. I've left the talk page for now, since it contains the reasons for deletion. Given all the disruption here, I would pretty much expect continuing drama. I've salted the page for three days just to be sure that everyone gets a chance to read and understand why the list was deleted. Can you help keep an eye on the space for a while in case the problem returns? Or in case somebody wants it clear to create a clean? I'm going to be away from my keyboard (and in fierce withdrawal) for most of the 11th and probably all of the 12th (maybe not. Please not. :)) (And ha! My message bar lights up!) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Just for the record, this one was a bit beyond me, too. That's why I wrote Mike. I try not to harass the man except for very tough ones. :D --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

List of Jewish Nobel prize winners

I greatly appreciate your and Moonriddengirl's help with, and continuing attention to, this problem.Jinfo (talk) 03:40, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Barnsboro Hotel

Teadrinker,

I am curious why you have removed the copy for Barnsboro Hotel (now Barnsboro Inn) as it is officially listed the the National Registry, the original structure was built as a log cabin in 1720, was first licensed as a Tavern in 1776 (pretty significant year)and has been continually licensed as a Tavern ever since (except for Prohibition). Although I did not contribute to the copy and hadn't read it, your comments are insulting. I own this property. If you have questions or suggestions for improvement, I'm listening. Otherwise, please restore the page. I've had several "complaints" from readers objecting to your arbritary removal of copy you clearly don't understand. Thank you.Tfbudd (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Bill Nye as Jewish

Sorry I don't know where I got that, although I vaguely recall adding it. I seem to remember a reference to him being a Jew in the article, but that's the best that I've got... —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

No objection Unsourced material should be tagged and if no source is found after a reasonable amount of time, deleted. Since there is no citation for him being a Jew, any references to him being Jewish should be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:41, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

The significance of Inclusion of the Cambridge Analog Technologies page

Dear TeaDrinker,

I just realised that the webpage for Cambridge Analog technologies was deleted, and I thought it best to send you a message. Cambridge Analog Technologies is primarily significant because of its contributions to field of semiconductors in general and circuit design in particular. This company has invented a (proven) revolutionary new method of designing analog circuits that are 10x lower than what is traditional. It has 30 patents worldwide, this company also received a NSF award for this work, the paper on this technology has also recd numerous other awards incld the best paper award @ ISSCC.

Sometimes certain organizations get intertwined with certain innovations that are so fundamentally disruptive that it becomes generally relevant for average folks but certainly those in the field.

These innovations will be detailed with this company with citations etc.

You do have other companies such as TSMC, ARM, Chipidea, MIPs. The last three companies are in the business of semiconductor Semiconductor IP business as well.

Wikipedia is an excellent source of relevant past and contemporary information; this page certainly is an excellent candidate for inclusion precisely because of its scientific contributions. While I may be seen as someone who has reason to be biased, I would not be providing this information did I feel this was not the case.

I hope this explains why we deemed it fit for inclusion in wikipedia. If you would like verification of its contributions, I would be happy to provide those to you.

I would ask that this page not be deleted; if it needs editing with further information, I would be happy to do so as appropriate.

Thanks and Best Regards, Kush Gulati Catwikionline (talk) 05:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Juanda International Airport

Lexmark585: hi there teadrinker at least 5 weeks ago on the news in Perth Western Australia the was a commencing flight goin to surabya from perth on jetstar i saw it with my eyes so i dont know who beleave cause there was a new flight from jetstar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexmark585 (talk • contribs)

I beleave u sent me a message well to tell the truth it is true that the flight will comence because it has been on the news in Perth Western Australia were i live. Unless u can prove that there isnt no flight —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexmark585 (talk • contribs) 06:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Feedback

I wanted to thank you for your feedback on my article on Seattle Publishing. I am in the process of rewriting in, so that it doesn't have as much similarities as the website for the company. I hope that when I am done, you can read it again and tell me what you think. Thanks again for keeping an eye on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpatera (talk • contribs) 16:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Recorded Sound Collections

Thanks for your detailed reply concerning our entries. As you suggest, we will first post proposed edits to the talk pages of records we wish to contribute to. Moreover, thanks for understanding that we're only trying to shorten the distance between users and primary source material. --Hoover.audio (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Beluga

Hi TeaDrinker, if you get the chance, could you help mediate a little dispute in Beluga (sturgeon)? There is a borderline "edit skirmish" over the following non-encyclopedic addition [1], and its somewhat stubborn contributor. See Talk: Beluga (sturgeon) Eliezg. Best, (talk)

You're are removing material without discussion. You are not suppose to delete material without discussing it first according to Wikipedia rules. You stated that your reason was it was non-notable. According to Wikipedia a topic can also be considered notable if it meets the criteria outlined in one of the more subject-specific guidelines: Academics, Books, Criminal acts, Films, Music, Numbers, Organizations & companies, People, and Web content. If a species is endangered and you kill it you are committing a crime. It is a Criminal Act and falls under Wikipedia's definition of notability.

Your next step should have been to discuss why you thought Wikipedas non-notable does not count as sufficent in this case but instead of following Wikipedia rules you deleted the posting again without discussion. You now are getting someone else involved when you have not even discussed it. If you look at the posting history you will see that Eliezq did not have a dicussion but in fact just continued to delete the material. This is not in accordance with how Wikipedia should work. --Juniorxin (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

TeaDrinker and Eliezq are not following Wikipedia rules. You are suppose to discuss why you want it deleted before you delete. Deleting it first without talking to the poster is rude and break every Wikipedia rules out there. --Juniorxin (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Whale expert

Hi TeaDrinker,

I have a favour to ask: Any chance you could grant Tbranch (talk · contribs) "confirmed" access? This page [2] says admins can do it. It would be good if he could directly edit semiprotected articles but I don't want to have to explain to him that he has to go make 7 edits in the sandbox first! Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 16:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Ooh, look who just edited Blue Whale! I'm so happy :) Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 06:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:Paid editing

Dear TD,

I very much welcome your comments on the talk page there, if you are serious about reflecting current policy and completing the job on that page. Otherwise, I might think it best to let that page die an obscure and somewhat disreputable death. I don't think current policy is so much made by Jimbo's comments on the RFC, so much as he reflected the spirit of Wikipedia and a policy that seemed so obvious it didn't even need stating.

But good luck, I may join in just for kicks, or especially if other serious editors join in (perhaps User:Will Beback)?

Sincerely,

Smallbones (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I agree with you, the policy/guideline should be made clear. I do think that folks on that page (they're back) have several different agendas. I was just finishing a comment when I got your note and wondering if it was too drastic. I'll go back and review it before inserting. Smallbones (talk) 03:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Prodigal Son Songs

Prodigal Son Songs keeps coming up on shortpages as a 9 byte article. I don't know what the deal is. Was there anything weird about that deletion? Gigs (talk) 04:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

It appears to still be there. [3] [4] It's not a huge deal, just a minor annoyance. Thanks for trying. Gigs (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome note. I've actually edited as an anon on and off for a while, but it is still appreciated. Iosefina (talk) 18:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Independent Bank Tag For Deletion

Just trying to clean up by deleting the entry I made for Independent Bank, Ionia, Michigan, which I later realized was not significant enough of a business entity to have an entry on Wikipedia. Thanks, --Rgowran (talk) 04:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Permanent semi-protect

Our mutual friend from the Aktion T4 talk page is now busy expressing his views on Euthanasia device with warring. Can we get a perm. semi-prot. on that page please? My experience is that he will not stop until he cannot continue. Ta. ► RATEL ◄ 07:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

RfC

Don't forget to sign as a "certifier".   Will Beback  talk  06:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Help Re: Locus Technologies

Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia. I did see your note in the hangon you placed at the top of the article on Locus Technologies. Wikipedia gets a large number of articles every day which seem to be attempts to advertise the company. They are written in positive, even glowing terms (they are "a leader in their field" or their products are "revolutionary"). Since Wikipedia is written with a neutral point of view this is a problem. Moreover they are often written by someone with a conflict of interest in the content, and frequently fail notability guidelines. If the company has not been featured in numerous, independent publications, or would require a complete rewrite to be acceptable, we generally delete the article (by the criteria for speedy deletion article rule 7 or general rule 11). I hope this helps clarify why your article was deleted, and of course if you have any questions, feel free to leave a note on the bottom of my talk page User talk:TeaDrinker. Best wishes, --TeaDrinker (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Dear TeaDrinker,

Thank you for the note. I am relatively new to Wikipedia and my intention is to provide facts about the company that I founded 11 years ago in Silicon Valley that focuses on environmental data management (plenty of independent articles exist about the company that meet all of the criteria listed above). Could you help me start this or new page from scratch?

I noticed that you have an interest in mathematical ecology, marine ecology, and statistics. These subjects are dear to me and very close to my interest in factual environmental data and information. We are bombarded by daily articles about GHG, water contamiantion etc., but rarely are press articles backed by verifiable, validated, and accurate hard core data (e.g. analytical chemistry data for groundwater contamiantion or air emissions). I don't care if I start article on my company or general article on "Environmental Data Management." If you do Google search on "Environmental data management" you will see what I mean.

Thank you for your reply and potential help. Please let me know if you would be open to talk over the phone.

--Nduplan (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Going the wrong way

I understand your frustration re WP:Paid, but you are entering an unintended trap that will wipe out your efforts. I know exactly what you are saying because I have read all the boring details in real time, but the RFC is fatally flawed because the editors involved are extremely capable and know exactly how to work and how to edit. There is no hint of breaching 3RR or any other guideline, and every change has a proper edit summary and extensive comments on talk. You will never convince third parties that anything bad is happening. What third parties will see is a polite, hard working editor who is being ganged up on by others who think a 1RR would turn the dispute their way. And, that editor is being harassed with questions about their personal circumstances. For better or for worse, Wikipedia has certain procedures, and if the RFC and its talk page continue much longer, third parties will conclude exactly the opposite of what you hope.

The solution is simple: Withdraw the RFC, or let it stagnate. Work on the alternative text which is clearly labeled as a proposed policy. In a couple of weeks, think about whether the proposal is ready to be put somewhere else. Sorry to provide unwanted advice like this, but I want a strong policy restricting "bad" paid editing, and it's never going to happen the way things are going. Johnuniq (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

And I'm curious, TeaDrinker, about your interest in the edit history of my former User page (MyWikiBiz), circa October 2006. Care to talk about it? I'm available by e-mail! -- Thekohser 19:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

A belated response

Hi TeaDrinker, you left a note on my page some time ago that I forgot to respond to, then someone else posted about it today, which reminded me. I'm very sorry for the delay! I've posted my reply there, given that there are two interested parties now. See here. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 20:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Nutty Obama - Beluga Boy (i assume) keeps coming Back

... like one of those toys that won't lie down. The IP's are slightly scattered, but the latest one has been blocked in the past. A slippery fish, no doubt, but I have faith in your powers. Maybe a semi-protect of the Beluga (sturgeon) article would be appropriate? - Eliezg (talk) 03:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Might be of interest

You might check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sister Kitty Catalyst O.C.P. and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Pusspuss (2nd nomination), it's not pretty but certainly shows of pattern of COI. Digging into the cited off-Wiki sources shows plenty of potential for a Paid Editor specific COI. Smallbones (talk) 21:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:PAID

I think that the roadblock on progress at WP:Paid editing has been removed. The topic is still very important, and I'd love to get the proposed policy back on track. If you ever wanted to add something there, but haven't been able to, now is a good time to do it. Thanks for any input. Smallbones (talk) 16:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Mention at ANI

I mentioned you briefly at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#WP:Paid.2C_witch-hunts.2C_Wikipedia_review_and_general_moral_panic, where you may or may not want to correct me or respond. Fine with me either way. Smallbones (talk) 19:34, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi

Just passing by and wanted to say thanks for helping that editor in my absence. You handled it marvelously as usual:) Maybe see you next year.--Sandahl (♀) 18:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Zombie Hunter

• 04:43, 6 June 2008 TeaDrinker protected Zombie Hunter ‎ (Persistant pattern of tedious or disruptive editing from IPs (several articles and addresses) [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

That was 16 months ago. I'd like to review this to see if semiprotection is still considered necessary. This is part of my large scale review of longstandings indefinite semiprotections. Please see the discussion on talk:Zombie Hunter. --TS 10:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Admin tools

Based on our past disagreements I didn't think you were an admin. As it seems you are indeed one please refrain from using your tools in a dispute in which you are certainly involved. Although you likely believe you were acting in the best interest it probably would not seem so to those outside the situation looking in. -- Banjeboi 05:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Followup to Mary E. Black Article Deletion

In March of this year, I created a new article on a weaver called Mary E. Black. My inexperience resulted in a misunderstanding regarding the origin of the content. The content was originally from a brochure created by my weaving group and then subsequently included on a website that our group helped create <http://www.gov.ns.ca/nsarm/virtual/black/biography.asp>. The editor who looked at my article discovered what they thought was plagiarism and removed the article. I was advised to obtain permission to use that content.

It has taken some time but I believe we have resolved the situation. The original brochure is now available on our group's web site <http://www.parl.ns.ca/ash/pdf/MEBbrochure.pdf> with a note - "1999-2009 Atlantic Spinners and Handweavers; Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document". In addition, the Archives website has added a note "This text is used with permission from the Atlantic Spinners and Handweavers — http://www.parl.ns.ca/ash/".

So my question is, have I resolved the issue sufficiently to be able to resubmit the article? And if so, how do I proceed? Thank you.Weaverfran (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Action T4 and Euthanasia -- POV pushing problems again

Hi TD, we have an editor — Mamalujo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) — with a history of religion-centred edits to WP now POV-pushing on the above two pages. Would welcome your attention to this please. Problems are: (1) Euthanasia article does not need a long section on something that is not euthanasia, but murder (Action T4), and attempting to include it there is an attempt to denigrate euthanasia by (false) association, and (2) the Action T4 page has a section (partly composed by you, IIRC), that clearly distinguishes euthanasia from what the Nazis did, and he is trying to alter this by inserting the views of a euthanasia opponent (Ian Dowbiggin), while adding weasel words to the opinions of the existing experts there, if not deleting the opinions entirely. Thanks. ► RATEL ◄ 03:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Involuntary euthanasia

Hi TD. My breakup of Euthanasia into Voluntary euthanasia and Involuntary euthanasia seems to have stopped some of the disruptive editing, but the non-English speaking anonymous IP editor who warred Action T4 a while ago is back and now repetitively editing (badly) the involuntary euthanasia page. I'd like to ask for a long protection on that page against anonymous IPs. That was what was required to calm the situation on Action T4. Thanks. ► RATEL ◄ 23:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

As Ratel said in the definition of involuntary euthanasia it is refered to The Netherlands as the only country where involuntary euthanasia is allowed on new born infants, but also other forms of so called voluntary euthanasia. It is a fact that there, at The Netherlands: euthanasia hasn't be decriminalized nor legalized but it is illegal and defined in the Criminal Code as murder, although under certain conditions it is not punishable for the physician.[5]. Why does Ratel delete that fact and presume bad faith? 190.25.109.145 (talk) 05:02, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Please see my comment on the IE talk page. Your performance at Aktion T4 was enough for me. ► RATEL ◄ 10:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Ratel is saying that my source allegedly does not back up what I'm saying and that he doesn't understand properly what I wrote and that I'm talking rubbish. But let read the source:

"...The Committee is well aware that the new Act does not as such decriminalize euthanasia and assisted suicide...The new Act contains, however, a number of conditions under which the physician is not punishable when he or she terminates the life of a person"

UN - Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee : Netherlands.[6]

190.27.99.85 (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

• I'm really at a loss as to how to handle this IP editor, TD. He has repeatedly inserted an incoherent and off-topic paragraph into the Involuntary euthanasia page lede (para. 2). I've asked for page protection but was turned down because I'm only dealing with one editor. Stuck. ► RATEL ◄ 04:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Protecting Template:;

Thx, TeaDrinker! The offending personage actually has an account, User:LarrySmithMarconi -- could it have been a case of identity theft? Miranche (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't mention it. I agree with your call on Marconi. Miranche (talk) 02:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Service awards proposal

Hello, TeaDrinker/Archive9! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards. If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Liridon

The part that says that 'it's the only place in the world' is from the site directly. I can give you the link. I hadn't even started the page when you deleted it. That was from their history page. Also, Im sorry you believe that. http://xxliridon.freehostia.com/layoutthree.html is the link to liridon. It's an RPG = Role Playing Game. And Im new to doing wiki pages. So, Im sorry if you figured it didn't have enough stuff on it. I'd like to create the wiki page, so if you can help me do that, I got permission from the owners to make it. And it would just be really nice to have one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxsnackattack (talk • contribs) 03:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Liridon RPG

Listen, Im truly sorry that you seem to think that Liridon and this Kormada are alike. But if your not familiar with Beqanna and about a billion other rpg's there are alot that are similiar. I myself own my own rpg. It's based off of similar things from different rpg's including Liridon. So Im not to sure why you would go and ask for a speedy deletion of my page Liridon RPG considering I had just created it. The two sites are not the same. If Kormada allows free use of abilities that's not mine or the owners of Liridon's fault. Kormada does have a hell of a lot more rules than Liridon and I don't believe they've copied anything. I'd really like for you to explain further as to why you've done this.

p.s. I'd also like to know why you would use a website that sends people virus and trojans? I think you need to check your computer and leave me and mine alone.Xxsnackattack (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Lyndau

Hey TeaDrinker, a bunch of different IPs (I don't know if they are widely spread geographicall) with stupid vandalism an a long-inactive talkpage...strange. I don't see anything else like it on Recent Changes, but I've watched a few 4chan attacks go by and since then I'm kind of paranoid. Thanks for the protection on that talk page. Drmies (talk) 03:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Fire

I'm trying to get some people together to work on the Fire article - you interested? Any thought on some ideas here? MrBell ^(talk) 16:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Why did you previously delete the page "Lisa Firestone"

I'd like to create a page for Lisa Firestone, psychologist, but was wondering why it was deleted last year? Didn't want to make any mistakes by creating it! Bubbly1918 (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

No, that other username wasn't me. I'm starting to work on Wikipedia for the first time! If you could restore that page it would be great! Thanks! Bubbly1918 (talk) 00:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Narwhal

Would you be so kind as to semi-protect for a long time? Maybe indefinitely is too much to ask? It is a relentlessly pursued target of the most rarefied of inane vandalisms. I put in a request through the normal channels, but the protection lasted three whole days, and the onslaught resumed immediately upon its expiration. Thanks, and hope all's well. Eliezg (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi TeaDrinker, thanks for your response. One of your unquestioned talents is diplomatic understatement (though your forays into the vandalverse have surely opened your eyes to sights that have been spared from mere marine mammal stewards like myself, and it is possible that Narwhal is merely an "occasional target"). If I may provide an unsolicited datum for reference: in the span of thirty five days from Jan 5 to Feb 9, there were 84 edits to Narwhal, every last one of which was a vandalism or revert. And during 21 of those 35 days, it was a protected page. Best, Eliezg (talk) 00:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Janet Echelman Images

I'd like to re-upload the images using the correct copyright tag. As I understand it, it sounds like I should use the Template:Non-free_fair_use_in tag. My concern though is the criterion of replaceability. How does that rule usually apply to public art? Wonder64 (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Global warming

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Global warming, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 03:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

AN/I

Hi TeaDrinker, just thought I'd let you know that someone reversed one of your admin actions, and I brought it to AN/I.[7] Arrrghh. Take care, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. It does seem rather peculiar. --TeaDrinker (talk) 06:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Previous delete of A Knight in the Congo

• Hi TeaDrinker,

I was the original author of the article on A Knight in the Congo. I see that the page was previously deleted due to G12 Unambiguous Copyright Infringement. Following the link to the infringed page, I certainly did not copy from there.

I read further up your talk page a discussion where pages can be restored. On that restoration, does the original history for the page show up? Could we then look to see who edited the page to the copyright infringing version? If so, I wouldn't mind an immediate redeletion upon finding this information (as the author of A Knight in the Congo was deleted for notability concerns).

I would like to watch the contributions of the contributor who made the bad edit to see if they are continuing to place bad content onto WP.

Thanks. --Dygituljunky (talk) 23:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

• TeaDrinker, thanks for the response. I agree that the final version before the delete was a clear copyright violation but I'm fairly certain that the original content was not close to a violation. What I'm really looking for is where the infringing edit came from. Is there anyway that administrators like yourself can review the history of a deleted page to see where the copyright infringement came from (since you seem to be hesitant to restore the page so we can revert to a previous version)? Can you then share the name of the user that contributed the infringing edit so that you and I can check into their edits further to make sure that they are not introducing copyright violations elsewhere? As I said before, due to notability concerns for the author of A Knight in the Congo, I'm not concerned with getting the content restored for the content; I'm interested in who made the bad edit. Thanks for your help. --Dygituljunky (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

• I think I see what has happened. Upon closer inspection of the "source" that you cited, I noticed that the block is ended with "[WP]." It seems that the author of that book, which was published in 2008, copied my original text verbatim or nearly verbatim and placed [WP] at the end to cite HIS source ... which was the A Knight in the Congo article. Can you tell me what the orignal creation date of the A Knight in the Congo was? Can you cross check that with the title page of the book you cited (note the copyright date and the paragraph which begins with "Passages attributed to Wikipedia)? Thanks. --Dygituljunky (talk) 06:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

• Hi, TeaDrinker. Have you had a chance to look into my last comment? I'm sorry if my tone sounded harsh or rude at all, I'm told I come off that way sometimes but I never mean it. I spent several hours gleaning information from my copy of A Knight in the Congo for the article you deleted and for the article I wrote about the bibliographic author (deleted for lack of notability). I find plagiarism detestable and copyright infringement dangerous and it bothers me to have content that I diligently handcrafted, however short, marked as a copyright infringement. Since I discovered the probable source of the confusion about the original source of the content in question (my Wikipedia article being the original source), I'm most interested in two things: clearing my name of the copyright infringement accusation and getting the content restored (to my userspace, at the very least, where I can work with it to get past any notability concerns). You seem to have a reputation as a diligent guardian of Wikipedia, which I applaud; this time, however, I believe you made an understandable mistake (since the citation of "[WP]" in the book on google could be easily missed) and I would like for that mistake to be cleared for both of us. Feel free to respond here as I have temporarily added your talk page to my watch list for the purposes of this discussion. Thank you for your time in this matter, Dygituljunky (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Michael Bostwick

Hi, on 17:25, 11 July 2009 you deleted Michael Bostwick's profile because it had already been decided (on discussion) that the profile showed "no indication that it may meet guidelines for inclusion", given that Bostwick had never played in the Football League – undoubtedly the correct decision to have been made.. Any chance you could restore the article now given that the player in question has just signed a new two–year contract with Stevenage – a football team now plying their trade in League Two. Would be much appreciated. SBFCEdit (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Russell Pearce - Mountain Meadows Massacre history

TeaDrinker, Concerned with your edits of the MMM history on Russell Pearce's history. How can family history not be relevant? Surely you must agree that history tends to repeat itself - much the way it is now. The fact that Russell Pearce's family had a MAJOR incident with immigrants (easily verified)is somewhat of a pre-cursor to his current war on illegal immigration. Unless you have something personal to gain, I cannot fathom why you would remove such a pertinent post??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seekveritas (talk • contribs) 02:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)