User talk:Rgowran

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rgowran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No valid reason for block. I was only arguing the right to post and entry. Unblock ASAP

Decline reason:

This does not address the problems with your conduct identified in the ANI discussion. See WP:GAB. In particular, you have no "right" of any kind to make edits to Wikipedia. Sandstein 08:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rgowran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only defending my position. Did you see the bombardment I was getting from all sides. Again. I was only defending my issue, since I know it passed the policy requirements, but several users/administrator would not let me just speak my piece and move on. They constantly sent back messages about how wrong I was. I should not be blocked because they kept me going. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

I am declining this on the grounds that you are *still* asserting you are right and have paid no attention to the countless other editors who have tried to help you understand what is wrong with your edit. While you wait for this block to end I suggest you read and take on board what others have said, read the policies pointed out to you and move on from this. Constantly asserting that you are right when all evidence points to the contrary will not win you any friends. ♣ Ameliorate! 09:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have readded these again. During your block, you are Not allowed to remove declined unblock requests. Further attempts to do this and you will have your right to edit this page revoked.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 23:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rgowran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe block can be removed. No outrageous or bizarre edits were made by this editor. This editor was blocked due to continuous pleas for edit to be approved/denied by administrator. Editor now understands based on WP:Undue Weight that edit needed to be removed. This was brought to editor’s attention on discussion page of Jack Van Impe article.

Decline reason:

I'd be willing to assume good faith, but given that you have admitted to using multiple accounts here, I can't in good conscience. You'll have to convince the people at the unblocking email list (unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org) to unblock you, because you're no longer able to use this talk page. Blueboy 96 03:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.