User talk:Stikkyy/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Stikkyy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your GA nomination of USS Bismarck Sea
The article USS Bismarck Sea you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:USS Bismarck Sea for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kges1901 -- Kges1901 (talk) 11:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject Military History
In recognition of your improvements of escort carrier articles. Kges1901 (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Liscome Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Liscome Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Ommaney Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 09:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Salamaua
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Salamaua you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Salamaua
The article USS Salamaua you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Salamaua for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 07:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Takanis Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Takanis Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Takanis Bay
The article USS Takanis Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Takanis Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Takanis Bay
The article USS Takanis Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Takanis Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 16:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Makin Island (CVE-93)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Makin Island (CVE-93)
The article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Makin Island (CVE-93) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Makin Island (CVE-93)
The article USS Makin Island (CVE-93) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Makin Island (CVE-93) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Ommaney Bay
The article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Ommaney Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Ommaney Bay
The article USS Ommaney Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Ommaney Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 22:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Your tags to the page Mokihana
Which sentences do you think use "wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information."? I have deleted some sentences and moved others into the Reception part of the article, which should contain critic, which is always subjective. I corrected the grammar and spelling that I could, as I am not a natural English speaker I do not know what else is wrong. Anywayway thanks a lot for your patients. Dynara23 (talk) 08:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Dynara23: It seems better now, although it could still need some work. I don't like the wording in the plot, but that doesn't singlehandedly torpedo an article. Also, is this article some sort of collaborative project? It just seems a bit odd to me for two brand new accounts to make their first edits on said article. Stikkyy t/c 16:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. I don't know how to use other wordings for the plot. The plot is very simple, for small children. The text is just describing the pictures and the author tries to make a plot out of the pictures. The most important thing in the book were the big photos. The whole book series Children's Everywhere is famous for its photos not the plot. At the time these books where published most people neither had television nor traveled a lot, so these photos opened up a window to a new world and different countries or cultures. That is why they were so famous in the 1950s and 1960s and were translated into so many different languages. Maybe nowadays the plot is more important, since writers like Astrid Lindgren wrote for the series and we have a lot of photos or videos of other countries. No, it is not a collaborative project. I don't know any of the other accounts. I did this on my own and on Wikipedia I just use this account. I might sometimes edit with just an IP address (not recently though) but I won't make any other accounts. Yes and it seems odd to me too that the new users just appeared on this article. Maybe they got there by reading your user talk page. At least this was what I thought when I saw the edits and the edit summaries, furthermore, they edited the article after I wrote you on here. Anyway have a nice week and thanks a lot for your answer and the help! --Dynara23 (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Dynara23: Fair enough. I should clarify that my viewpoint on the wording is that of personal preference, and that I really don't have any suggestions as to how to improve it. If you want help, I'm sure that there are plenty of other people who are more qualified than I am. Cheers, Stikkyy t/c 04:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. I don't know how to use other wordings for the plot. The plot is very simple, for small children. The text is just describing the pictures and the author tries to make a plot out of the pictures. The most important thing in the book were the big photos. The whole book series Children's Everywhere is famous for its photos not the plot. At the time these books where published most people neither had television nor traveled a lot, so these photos opened up a window to a new world and different countries or cultures. That is why they were so famous in the 1950s and 1960s and were translated into so many different languages. Maybe nowadays the plot is more important, since writers like Astrid Lindgren wrote for the series and we have a lot of photos or videos of other countries. No, it is not a collaborative project. I don't know any of the other accounts. I did this on my own and on Wikipedia I just use this account. I might sometimes edit with just an IP address (not recently though) but I won't make any other accounts. Yes and it seems odd to me too that the new users just appeared on this article. Maybe they got there by reading your user talk page. At least this was what I thought when I saw the edits and the edit summaries, furthermore, they edited the article after I wrote you on here. Anyway have a nice week and thanks a lot for your answer and the help! --Dynara23 (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Good Article corrections
I just wanted to let you know that the corrections I've made to your Good Article submissions are not a reflection on you. You've done a great job to some articles that I had every intention to work on but just didn't have the time. I corrected a few things that I feel were missed during the GA review, minor things that I feel should be consistent with other military ship articles. I hope this explains my actions. Let me know if you have any questions. Pennsy22 (talk) 15:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pennsy22: You've done great work. I don't see where you got an impression that you needed to explain anything. Stikkyy t/c 18:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Saginaw Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Saginaw Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Kadashan Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Kadashan Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 20:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Steamer Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Steamer Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 20:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
Hi, could you please review the request you have made for the User:RoundSquare account. I am a bit confused. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:32, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Notability
Hi - would you be prepared to explain why you think HMS Cadmus is notable? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'd just like to get your perspective. I haven't done a full-on BEFORE, but on a brief search I wasn't able to find any more sources on this particular ship (note that there appear to have been several ships of this name), aside from the source already used in the article which appears to be a self-published research blog. Thanks GirthSummit (blether) 10:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: The other corvettes have been expanded via this, so I would presume that if one had access to it, they could probably provide better sourcing. Stikkyy t/c 16:13, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Stikkyy, OK, fair enough, that makes sense - if this is a subject area you're familiar with, I'll trust your judgement on the tag. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 17:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Mission Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Mission Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L293D -- L293D (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Mission Bay
The article USS Mission Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Mission Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of L293D -- L293D (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Saginaw Bay
The article USS Saginaw Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Saginaw Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)