User talk:Stikkyy/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Stikkyy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Duplicate
Hi. I see you redirected the article Raihanuddin to Raihan Uddin. These are two different persons and their named are spelled differently despite being. This can be seen in the sources. Thanks. Human (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Munda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
The article USS Munda you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Munda for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
The article USS Munda you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:USS Munda for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 21:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Stikkyy, I'm not sure whether you noticed, but when this review was opened back on February 23, there was a significant comment that needed to be addressed by you: The detail with regard to Typhoon Cobra reads as WP:UNDUE to me. I suggest you cut it back to focus on the effects of the typhoon on Kwajalein and leave the other details to the typhoon article.
Do you plan to work on this issue? If so, the review will continue on. If not, the nomination will be closed as unsuccessful; it has waited over three weeks already. Also, if there is no response within seven days, it will probably be closed at that time.
I hope we hear back from you before seven days have passed. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Apologies, real-life circumstances got in the way, I've addressed the GA. Stikkyy t/c 17:47, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Fanshaw Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Fanshaw Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Fanshaw Bay
The article USS Fanshaw Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Fanshaw Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Fanshaw Bay
The article USS Fanshaw Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Fanshaw Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 14:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Bougainville (CVE-100)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Bougainville (CVE-100) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Bougainville (CVE-100)
The article USS Bougainville (CVE-100) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Bougainville (CVE-100) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Bougainville (CVE-100)
The article USS Bougainville (CVE-100) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Bougainville (CVE-100) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Admiralty Islands
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Admiralty Islands you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Admiralty Islands
The article USS Admiralty Islands you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Admiralty Islands for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Admiralty Islands
The article USS Admiralty Islands you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Admiralty Islands for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Savo Island
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Savo Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Savo Island
The article USS Savo Island you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Savo Island for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Savo Island
The article USS Savo Island you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Savo Island for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Kwajalein
The article USS Kwajalein you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Kwajalein for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gatoclass -- Gatoclass (talk) 08:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Kwajalein
The article USS Kwajalein you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Kwajalein for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gatoclass -- Gatoclass (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Rudyerd Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Rudyerd Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you
|
WikiProject Ships Barnstar | |
| For all of your work bringing the Casablanca-class escort carriers up to GA status. Pennsy22 (talk) 14:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of USS Rudyerd Bay
The article USS Rudyerd Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Rudyerd Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Rudyerd Bay
The article USS Rudyerd Bay you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Rudyerd Bay for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Windham Bay
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Windham Bay you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Windham Bay
The article USS Windham Bay you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:USS Windham Bay for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 00:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)