Jump to content

User talk:StAnselm/2018

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     2018   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  11 -  12 -  13 -  14 -  15 -  16 -  17 -  18 -  19 -  20 -  21 -  22 -  23 -  24 -  ... (up to 100)


Reported for Edit Warring

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Bacondrum (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:StAnselm reported by User:Bacondrum (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christophanies in the Old Testament has been nominated for discussion

Category:Christophanies in the Old Testament, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supercoach screenshot.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supercoach screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SuperCoach

Greetings StAnselm, I noticed you reverted changes I made to the SuperCoach wiki page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercoach My amendments are correct given this page is not a SuperCoach AFL page nor a SuperCoach NRL page. It describes SuperCoach as a franchise which is both NRL and AFL run by the Daily Telegraph and Herald-Sun. Given there is also an SuperCoach NRL both are relevant to the wiki community. The SuperCoach AFL should have its own page. This wiki page should be reverted to the amendments I made as they are more accurate that the current page.

best regards Peter

I don't see the need for a page about the franchise - we have articles on the two competitions. IF you really feel the need for a franchise page, start a new article. StAnselm (talk) 00:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the page is not SuperCoach AFL though. It is SuperCoach, which is not correct. The overarching franchise is SuperCoach and the two games that sit below it are SuperCoach AFL and SuperCoach NRL. Therefore "Supercoach" as a wiki page is incorrect. SuperCoach AFL needs its own page. Not the other way around. Peter

Fair enough - I moved it to AFL SuperCoach. StAnselm (talk) 03:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great - thank you. I agree there doesn't need to be three wiki pages. Peter

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Journal of Comparative Psychology.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Journal of Comparative Psychology.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Florida Christian School logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Florida Christian School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seabrook Christian School logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seabrook Christian School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mohit Ahlawat

Hi, do we usually have dab lists when there are only two entries, eg: here. Both of those appear in Ahlawat now and I have a vague feeling that we should use one of the "other uses" templates as a dabhat at the top of the two bio articles. I may be wrong, though! - Sitush (talk) 20:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm - I think we normally do. I don't think it's worth redirecting Mohit Ahlawat to Ahlawat. StAnselm (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I've tried CSD G6, as you now see below. No idea if it will do the job because this is new to me and it has an incoming redirect from Mohit Ahlawat (disambiguation). I think the redirect can be CSD'd as orphaned if the G6 works. - Sitush (talk) 07:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohit Ahlawat

A tag has been placed on Mohit Ahlawat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sitush (talk) 07:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finbar Kenny

Hahaha! I totally missed the potential to create a new article out of him! Well done! :)

Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Craic.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Craic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Second son of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Second son of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Since you had some involvement with the Second son of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Melinda Gordon.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melinda Gordon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tuscon

The other problem with having Tuscon is there are only two entries. See WP:ONEOTHER. It is strongly discourage to have a dab page with only two entries. And be honest, over 99% of the people looking for Tuscon are looking for the city, not an obscure convention. We can drag it to an RFC but honestly, this is a text book case of why we don't do dabs with two entries, particularly since one is more obvious than the other. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew Bible

Hebrew Bible was recently merged into Tanakh. Do you agree that there is consensus to do so? Editor2020 (talk) 02:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking over the discussion again, my assessment is that there is consensus for a merge, but not what the target should be. StAnselm (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll hold.Editor2020 (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PCV crest in colour.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PCV crest in colour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crosstalk book cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Coyote Kings of the Space-Age Bachelor Pad.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Jesus

Hi Anselm, I left a message for you at Talk:Jesus - sorry I can't ping you, I've forgotten how it's done. Anyway, I'd value a discussion of this.PiCo (talk) 07:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
For writing the wonderful article Coinage shapes, keep up the good work. Donald Trung (talk) 11:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Union School of Theology logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Union School of Theology logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ozark Christian College logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ozark Christian College logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of attribution

I noted a comment you made while bringing a concern about another editor's conduct to the Administrator's Noticeboard. To be clear, the concern was with another editor, not you. I simply noted your concurrence with an issue on the relevant article's talk page so it's clear I'm not bringing idiosyncratic positions to bear. I thought it appropriate to advise you for your awareness only, but if you'd prefer I remove your user name from the notice, I'll certainly do so with my apologies. Thanks for your time. --Airborne84 (talk) 14:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amanda from Nikita.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amanda from Nikita.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Methuselah

Hi again! We worked well together on the Delilah article. I just nominated Methuselah for GA; would you like to review it? It's (inevitably) very short.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 03:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

It looks good! However, I haven't done a GA review for years, so I think I'll pass. StAnselm (talk) 04:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waverley Christian College logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waverley Christian College logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Message

I replied to your message on my talk page. 66.180.180.73 (talk) 13:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Australia's head of state, again

Howdy. An rfc at Monarchy of Australia has opened, concerning the topic head of state. GoodDay (talk) 20:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel

Does the sentence which you restored make sense to you?:

"Daniel and the twelve "minor prophets" – were written between the 8th and 6th centuries BC, with the exceptions of Jonah and Daniel" Dimadick (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StAnselm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback

Hi. I am trying to improve my skills as a WP editor. For over a decade, I've been an avid user of Wikipedia for over a decade, so I've seen good and bad articles. I decided to challenge myself by rewriting an article lead in a field that isn't my specialty. Sometimes WP can lead you to strange tangents ... and while reading about something completely unrelated, I came across the article "Martyrdom of Polycarp". The article lead left me confused and knowing nothing new. I note you have written and edited an enormous number of articles relating to Christianity, so I am hoping you could provide me with an appraisal of my edit, particularly style, readability and the like. Honestly, any feedback would be gratefully received, but you are entitled to refuse or ignore my request with no hard feelings. Prime Lemur (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Servetus

Hello StAnselm. I note that you have reverted my good faith addition of the category Giftedness to the article Michael Servetus. I accept your reversion. However, just for the record the category Giftedness ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Giftedness ) is defined as "Articles related to intellectual giftedness or the condition of being a polymath" and my addition of that category was based on the following sentence in the Servetus article: "He was a polymath versed in many sciences: mathematics, astronomy and meteorology, geography, human anatomy, medicine and pharmacology, as well as jurisprudence, translation, poetry and the scholarly study of the Bible in its original languages." Perseus25 (talk) 21:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the category is for the condition of giftedness, not for gifted people. That would be hard to define and could potentially include thousands of people. StAnselm (talk) 01:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mount Pisgah Christian School logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mount Pisgah Christian School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abel-beth-maachah

Hello I did an edit of the subject page on 10 june 2018, "sculpture of a king’s head found". You deleted my edit.

Okay, my edit was sloppy. It was my first edit! I'm not adept at this. I got very excited to see some news, and I just pasted the whole news piece onto the wiki page.

So, my edit as it was, SHOULD have been deleted; but if so, oughtn't you replace with a concise statement of the news I included, which was relevant and important?

Thanks for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkrum (talk • contribs) 19:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Yes, the discovery could well be included in the article - feel free to add in a concise statement like that! StAnselm (talk) 19:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

George Pell

Saw your understandable reversion of the edit re George Pell being a convicted sex offender. A younger "nerd" in my house tells me it's actually true, and well covered internationally, but there is a massive suppression order in place preventing coverage of it in Australian media. This includes websites visible within Australia, no matter where they are published. That would explain the disappearance of the contents of the link used in the aforementioned edit.

To me, the complete absence of reporting on Pell here in Australia in recent times is a bit of a hint that something is going on.

I won't try to guess any more, but do you have contacts in other parts of the world who could confirm whether there is coverage of this elsewhere? 203.214.42.58 (talk) 09:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chelsea Roffey

Notice

The article Chelsea Roffey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:05, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edinburgh Theological Seminary logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edinburgh Theological Seminary logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Idea.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Idea.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry-picking (ie making it look as though an author supported an idea he disagrees with) at Theory of Phoenician discovery of the Americas

This appears to be a major example of cherry-picking a quote. You quote John Denison Baldwin as saying:

The known enterprise of the Phoenician race, and this ancient knowledge of America, so variously expressed, strongly encourage the hypothesis that the people called Phoenicians came to this continent, established colonies in the region where ruined cities are found, and filled it with civilized life. It is argued that they made voyages on the “great exterior ocean,” and that such navigators must have crossed the Atlantic; and it is added that symbolic devices similar to those of the Phoenicians are found in the American ruins, and that an old tradition of the native Mexicans and Central Americans described the first civilizers as “bearded white men,” who “came from the East in ships.”[1]

But that's completely out of context. His next paragraph states:

But if it were true that the civilization found in Mexico and Central America came from people of the Phoenician race, it would be true also that they built in America as they never built any where else, that they established a language here radically unlike their own, and that they used a style of writing totally different from that which they carried into every other region occupied by their colonies. All the forms of alphabetical writing used at present in Europe and Southwestern Asia came directly or indirectly from that anciently invented by the race to which the Phoenicians belonged, and they have traces of a common relationship which can easily be detected. Now the writing of the inscriptions at Palenque, Copan, and elsewhere in the ruins has no more relatedness to the Phoenician than to the Chinese writing. It has not a single characteristic that can be called Phoenician any more than the language of the inscriptions or the style of architecture with which it is associated; therefore we can not reasonably suppose this American civilization was originated by people of the Phoenician race, whatever may be thought relative to the supposed ancient communication between the two continents and its probable influence on civilized communities already existing here.

Your quote makes it looks as though he is arguing for the idea. Doug Weller talk 17:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Religion Dispatches logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Religion Dispatches logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Baldwin, John D. "The Phoenician Theory". Retrieved 29 January 2013.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StAnselm/2018&oldid=918736729"