Jump to content

User talk:StAnselm/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     2021   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  11 -  12 -  13 -  14 -  15 -  16 -  17 -  18 -  19 -  20 -  21 -  22 -  23 -  24 -  ... (up to 100)


Orphaned non-free image File:The Conversation website logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Conversation website logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Pixelnacht" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pixelnacht. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Pixelnacht until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 05:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harlee Santos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harlee Santos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harlee Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bible and Spade.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bible and Spade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ugandan Anglican bishops has been nominated for merging

Category:Ugandan Anglican bishops has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harlee Santos.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harlee Santos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BIshop of Newcastle

I didn't create any of those three pages. They already existed. I just altered the redirect addresses on two of them, and didn't even amend the other one. Bahnfrend (talk) 10:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Henry Lowther Clarke.png

Notice

The file File:Henry Lowther Clarke.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

JPEG version now available at File:Henry Lowther Clarke by Walter Stoneman.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supercoach screenshot.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supercoach screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Costa Group logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Costa Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Costa Group logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Costa Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rod Dreher

I just came upon the article and wow, dumpster fire. I see you were active on the talk page last year. I have made some initial edits and tagged the page, as well as posting on the article's talk page. Would appreciate your thoughts if you have the time and inclination. Marquardtika (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:News Weekly October 2010.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:News Weekly October 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:16, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crispix box cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crispix box cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 11:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Hi! For your excellent work on expanding the article for Herbert Hambleton. Thank you. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jane Franklin Hall logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jane Franklin Hall logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australian College of Theology logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australian College of Theology logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criswell College

Hey. I reverted your edit to Criswell College. If you'd like to discuss it more you can feel free to use my talk page or the article's talk page. I'm open to hearing your thought process, and maybe you'll change my mind. RFZYNSPY talk 04:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ex Auditu cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ex Auditu cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Reverse racism

Greetings. I've undone your edit to Reverse racism. Categorization must be strictly neutral, because categories are presented without any context. Nor is "racism" a defining characteristic according to the sources. It's a bit like putting Moon landing in Category:Hoaxes because a belief exists that the moon landings were faked. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Youn Chul-Ho

Shalom, I need your help. The text above has been declined severl times. Would you correct it? 칼빈500 (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Christ Church (Moscow, Idaho)

I have partially undone your revert to Christ Church (Moscow, Idaho). I left out the wording "Extreme" and "treating women like slaves", but I left in the issues that are explicitly discussed in the cited sources. Moreover, these are not "opinion pieces", the Guardian article is in the news section, not the opinion section, and the Vice article is an investigative piece. As far as any issues of undue weight in the lead, views such as these and certain actions by its members are the issues that have garnered the church the most mainstream media attention. That being said, if you feel Vice's investigative reporting on the church is inaccurate, we can discuss that. According to the article in Vice, the teachings referred to in the lead are taken directly from Wilson's book Father Hunger, so unless they are taking the quotes out of context or completely fabricating them, there should be no problem. If you believe that this is what they are doing, that is an issue that should be raised at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.--Tdl1060 (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's a lot better. The thing is, Oxford University Press published a book this year that is largely about the church (Crawford Gribben, Survival and Resistance in Evangelical America: Christian Reconstruction in the Pacific Northwest) which is not mentioned in the article at all, and which has a very different view to that of the two newspaper articles. So it means the article is rather imbalanced. StAnselm (talk) 14:18, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I added that book as a source in the article, as well as a few things about the church that are mentioned in it. If there is anything else in that book, or any other source, that you think would provide balance, feel free to add them.--Tdl1060 (talk) 01:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the future

I'm planning on a discussion (maybe RFC) concerning those categories. But, will consider it on a later date. PS - There's inconsistencies among all of governors-general categories. GoodDay (talk) 22:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, fair enough. My position is that we should not take an official position on it here at Wikipedia. StAnselm (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I may open an RFC on in next month, concerning all the commonwealth realms that have governors-general. GoodDay (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, wow! I've just discovered that Barbados became a republic today! StAnselm (talk) 22:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There maybe hope for Australia & Canada, yet. GoodDay (talk) 22:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, an RFC was held in 2016 (which you were a part of) & the result was that the Australian monarch is the Australia's head of state. So, your revert went against that RFC. GoodDay (talk) 22:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. But GGs remained in the HoS category, where it had been since about 2007. StAnselm (talk) 22:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, they should be removed in compliance with the 2016 RFC. Are you gonna be difficult about this 'again'? GoodDay (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, but I think another RfC would be appropriate. Five years is a long time to wait to follow up an RfC. StAnselm (talk) 22:33, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have a feeling the GG website has changed from five years ago. It now says "The Governor-General of Australia is Her Majesty The Queen’s representative. In practice, they are Australia’s Head of State and have a range of constitutional and ceremonial duties.". StAnselm (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant. The GG website could claim the GG is the King of Australia or President of Australia. The website changes nothing. The Australian monarch is Australia's head of state. GoodDay (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think @Peter Ormond: & @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz:? -- GoodDay (talk) 22:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...for your past participation in checking and maintaining the Wayne Grudem page. I wanted to let you know that I did a major edit today, to (one hopes) stimulate its continued movement toward compliance with WP referencing guidelines. I would love to see someone such as yourself, with greater theological interests/training, to help move it away from having most content non-independent or unsourced. Note, the amount of unsourced material was, and despite my effort, continues to be egregious. Good holidays coming. Cheers. 2601:246:C700:558:C0AF:65B0:4E1:45E8 (talk) 23:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, welcome! I'm not sure how long you've been editing Wikipedia, but I would encourage you to open an account. To be honest, that makes your edits much more likely to stick. That's not the way it's supposed to be, but it's the reality. You added a lot of tags to the article - some of those unsourced claims can just be removed straight away. And it's kind of ironic that you're asking me for assistance, since you deleted my most recent addition to the article (that of the Festschrift). Why did you do that? StAnselm (talk) 17:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Calvinism

Do you think the lede on this article is fair, given it's sourced from criticisms, rather than what mainstream Calvinists reject (fatalism)? On another note, I'm wondering if a new article should be created (or expanded in existing articles) focusing on Calvinists who reject covenant theology such as John Macarthur? —Confession0791 talk 04:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't it's a good lead - I've never been happy with these recent changes, but I wasn't sure what to do about it. I think the first step is to see what Olsen actually says. StAnselm (talk) 04:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Who's Olsen? —Confession0791 talk 04:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, that was a typo - Roger E. Olson was referenced in the lead as saying that New Calvinism's distinctives were "fatalism, Lordship Salvation, and subordinationism" - but I think someone just made that up. StAnselm (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it needs to be changed. I do want to expand on dispensational Calvinism, since it's pretty prevalent and doesn't neatly fit under "new Calvinism". So if you have any ideas, let me know. —Confession0791 talk 04:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Textual differences in the Bible" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Textual differences in the Bible and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 26#Textual differences in the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 14:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jessica Adams.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jessica Adams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StAnselm/2021&oldid=1114436968"