User talk:SigPig

This user may have left Wikipedia. SigPig has not edited Wikipedia since 8 July 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello SigPig.

You have been invited to contribute to the Design portal, a joint undertaking of WikiProject Industrial design and WikiProject Graphic design dedicated to improving access to design-related resources on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in or edits within the scope of the portal. If you would like to help out a bit, please visit the portal and add your name to an activity of the to-do list.

You may also wish to add to your userpage:
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Industrial design/Userbox}} or
{{Template:User WP Graphic design}}
Know someone who might be interested? Please pass the message to others by pasting this in their talk page:
{{subst: Template:WikiProject_Industrial design/Portal_welcome|~~~~}}

Thanks, AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 06:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes). (If you find you just want add to a previous edit, you can add a new time with ~~~~~ {5 tildes}.)
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk

Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk to me

List of Redundant Expressions

Just a ping to let you know I responded to you, on my talk page. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] - 05:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "either and/or both: "Either and/or both of these reports (depending on the number of class hours missed) must be submitted within seven days of the absence." — Division of Nursing: NURS 4321 Professional Nursing with Groups/Populations, Summer 2006 Course Syllabus, West Texas A&M University, retrieved 10 July 2006" - nice find! :-) — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 10:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Breaking the list into A, B, C, etc.: I knew that needed to be done but had been putting it off and procratinating (again and again). — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 12:23, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		For the tedious chore of alphabetically separating the List of redundant expressions into separately-editable sections — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 12:34, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RCA

Greetings, SigPig: Thank you for adding the Order of Precedence for the RCA. I made some minor corrections to it (refer to RCA Standing Orders) and replaced the specified armoured regiments with the armoured branch in general. This was for the sake of uniformity and to alleviate having to change it again should another armoured regiment be established in the future. Cheers. - Capt B.W. Woods, CD, RCA

Hello SigPig! Interesting idea you had about making a List of athletes by nickname. I have been very busy making a list of NHL players by team and when checking double redirects and other bad links, I happened to run across your list when I went to "what links here" for Gump Worsley. Two suggestions: firstly, set up the table of contents similar to it is on List of Montreal Canadiens players so that your list is all alphabetical. Secondly, I noticed that nothing actually links to your list. There is no way to actually find your list from other pages. Masterhatch 16:32, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Military History Task Force

hi, I just wanted to bring your attention to the Canadian Military Task Force at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. We're currently looking for the task force people to joint so that we can start to develop and organize Canadian Military history content on the 'pedia.Mike McGregor (Can) 14:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 11% for major edits and 7% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:16, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from The Man With No Name

"Hi. Just a quick question: does your username mean "The Man With No Name" in Gaelic? Thanks. SigPig 07:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)"

Hello Sig. My username can be broken down as follows: fer=man; gan=without; anim=name. The usual translation is given as nameless man but I thought that this twist was just as cool! If you added the prefix "In" or "An" before it, it would then indeed be best translated as The Man With No Name. I did'nt make it up; it was quite a popular name in late medieval/early modern Ireland, and wrongly rendered in English as Ferdinand. Why the interest? Thanks for dropping by, Fergananim 15:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Malachi Barrie

Oh, that's a speedy delete, under re-post of AfD'ed content. Next time just tag such articles with {{deleteagain}}, and a fellow sysop will settle the rest. - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 02:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Wars in Ireland

I've being doing some long-overdue edits to Edward Bruce, particularly under the headings "The Invasion of Ireland" and "Arrival and the Campaign of 1315". I began it because the original article was hopelessly wrong in many places, but am now wondering if what I am writing would be better suited as an article in its own right on the Irish Bruce wars? Fergananim 19:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why oh why, the "Sea To Die"?

Wrote most of my reply on my talk page; had a look at the refs and OK, I can live with it then; I still ahve my doubts as to wehther it's legitimate slang or media-hyep slang; further comment to what else is there is I vaguely remember the Province or BCTV coining the term, but we never used it and considered it only a media neologism; but one tag line gets repeated over and over, finds its way into magazines thanks to earnest reporters who think that BCTV-coined terms are what people actually us, and the word/phrase becomes a convention ("we"=Whistlerites and others in the corridor) felt it artifically-tabloidish and viewed it as a media neologism meant to scare the gorbies (tourists; 'gorbys not exclusively a Canadian slangword or I'd have put it in the list...unless it's there already I haven't looked). OK, it's the nature of the Beast; media slang is pop slang nowadays; no matter how tacky....Skookum1 17:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Qor/Kor/QOR

Sorry about the redirect mixup. Your edit was what I had intended. Thanks for clarifying things.

Neelix 20:49, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle Honours and Order of Precedence

Says You:"Where are these pages? Love to look at them."

Says I:"Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Canadian_military_history_task_force#Project_References" Mike McGregor (Can) 07:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

It probably wasn't intentional, but (Forage cap? - The Forage Cap Flap) struck me as incredibly funny. T e ke 19:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, "infoboxcutters" is a good one too. Have a smile.

T e ke has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

Crescent Town

Thanks for the help, I had forgotten about it actually. I moved it to Crescent Town (Ontario) and did some wiki work, I got to strike it off my list. Happy editing! _{Tips Forage Cap} T e ke 20:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue III - May 2006

The May 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of idioms in the English language - Rake/Haul over the coals

Thanks for re-adding 'rake over the coals'. I think we may have an example of things getting mixed up here - although 'haul over the coals' is not listed in the same dictionary you cite, it's certainly used extensively - as is 'rake over the ashes'. I suspect the phrases may well have got mixed up/blended - especially as there's also the sense of rake as in 'raking someone with withering fire' from a machine gun. To me, hauling over the coals makes sense, as I certainly wouldn't want to be pulled over burning coals, whereas raking over the ashes or embers is what you do when looking for something. However, I well recognise there could well be usages coming into vogue that are not historically correct - the language does develop after all. One of these days I'll stop shuddering over people mixing up 'lose' and 'loose'. Regards. WLD 22:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006

The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Kirill Lokshin 05:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rank

No prob Sigpig. Thanks for the friendly apo.See you around! Motorfix 23:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - July 2006

The July 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Coordinator Elections!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 11!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 19:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Army Brigadier General.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Army Brigadier General.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Domestic Operations

Good start...I added Operation PEREGRINE, and started the artical just tonight. mind giving it a once over for me? Cheers! Motorfix 03:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick review!

Motorfix 04:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election - vote phase!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will select seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of eleven candidates. Please vote here by August 26!

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot - 12:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue VI - August 2006

The August 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 12:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff "Incubus" Adams

I found the information about him from here: http://www.crimezzz.net/serial_killer_statistics/nicknames_name.htm According to this http://www.crimezzz.net/serialkiller_index/index.php, he was an American from California who killed 3 people. I'm sorry that I don't have more info to give you. Asarelah 02:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regimental Sergeant Major

Hi SigPig

I had alphabeticized the list of countries in the Regimental Sergeant Major page. I did leave the UK at the top, though. That's because it is the root of all the other Commonwealth countries. Do consider moving it back to the top. If not, maybe you can take a look at the paragraph and rephrase it now that it is no longer at the top. --Rifleman 82 18:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter 7

Hello Nice to see that some new faces have recently become interested in commenting on the article. However, I am interested to know how you became involved with the page? It would seem that someone came along and changed the title without any discussion. Then someone started a debate about a different title. A number of people I have never seen comment on a Harry Potter page then opposed the proposed further move. This is quite extraordinary attention for a HP page.

No one has yet explained the grounds for changing the page from its original title. Can you explain why this was done? It was also done by someone who had never edited the page before and was pretty inexperienced. A justification was given, but not explained. Then an anon deleted the debate. Also very strange. Why would anyone do this? Sounded like someone wanted to avoid discussion. While I do not think it likely that people would have opposed the page title change if it is satifactorily explained, this has still not been done. I do not see how any change of title can be discussed or considered unless someone explains why it needed to be moved in the first place. Sandpiper 07:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for getting back to me. I do finally understand what was going on. No one had yet explained to me that a formal procedural debate was going on about moving the page. I think, though am not sure, the name was changed twice immediately before this debate by independent users, which all added to my confusion. Sandpiper 19:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CAPITALIZATION of Operations Names

In operations orders and some other formats, operation names are capitalized in all NATO countries. (Place names are also capitalized in these usages.) In everyday writing, they are not. It is a minor Convention around here we do not set operation names in all-captials. We must ask ourselves, what would a user enter into the search function, how can we help a user find what he needs? Esoteric spellings do not help. I will change HARMONY back to Harmony, although I will use a redirect page to help users who use all caps. Paul, in Saudi 15:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concurrence. Paul, in Saudi 17:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history Newsletter - Issue VII - September 2006

The September 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by Grafikbot - 20:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diagnose

My Concise OED (1991) says "make a diagnosis of (a disease, a mechanical fault, etc) from its symptoms". What was the problem with the entry at List of English words with disputed usage? Rentwa 19:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which Oxford when lists 'Jane was diagnosed..'? Mine makes no mention of the usage you cite or anything similar. The word is a back formation from diagnosis, and the same dictionary's entry for diagnosis has '1a the identification of a disease by means of a patient's symptoms. b an instance or formal statement of this' with 2a, 2b and 3a, 3b being the analogies for mechanical faults and biological specimens respectively. Thus I can find no evidence supporting the other usage in British English. Rentwa 10:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 11th Edition, 2004. Entry under "diagnose" is as fols:

v. make a diagnosis of (an illness or other problem). > identify the medical condition of (someone): she was diagnosed as having epilepsy.

The > symbol above represents an arrowhead symbol in the text, which the dictionary states "introduces each subsense". --SigPig 20:59, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then it's become current between 1991 and 2004, and by the link on the talk page is certainly disputed. The entry must stand, if you want with a note that it's disputed only in British English. The remark about selecting evidence is justified since you routinely quote US dictionaries and use only these as grounds for deleting entries. If you found the remark uncivil then I apologise, but the criticism was fair. The article does not specify US English, so you must take into account all major dialects when deciding what belongs there. Rentwa 13:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, then, in the interests of covering the major varieties of English, I will ensure the opinions of Concise Oxford are included as well. I prefer OED online, as it was far more detailed; however, as my school no longer has a subscription, I no longer have access.

WRT "diagnose", however, as Concise Oxford lists the "diagnose a patient" sense without comment, and without any tag such as "nonstandard" or "informal", I cannot conclude that Oxford sees it as anything other than standard English. If we could find out which particular edition of Oxford first included this, we could say that "This usage has only been mentioned in the Concise Oxford since 19--" or whenever.

WRT Mr Cochrane, if he's a language or grammar expert, by all means reinstate the entry and add him in as a cite to the contrary position. --SigPig 19:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it would be good to see some entries from respected usage guides (Fowler et al); the dispute seems to arise between the prescriptive (dictionaries) and the descriptive (usage guides/grammaries). Whether or not the word "foo", say, can be used in a particular context ("Foo all the elephants!") may be seen by some to be undisputed if there is consensus in the dictionaries; on the other hand, if Fowler states that "'Foo' is an intransitive verb and never takes a direct object", well, we have our dispute then, don't we? It was your mention of Cochrane that twigged me to that; I did a little checking on him Googlewise (the be-all-and-end-all of computer-based research), and it mentioned he was an editor with some 30-odd years experience (although he is not without his detractors, even in the linguistics community).

And as for selection of dictionaries, I apologize if you thought I had a hidden agenda to propagate American English usage (as a Canuck, heaven forfend!): M-W, AHD, and RH are available online and more readily accessible when I'm typing away; so please do not attribute to disingenuousness that which could more be accurately described as a slight (and somewhat embarrassing) lack of diligence. Cheers. --SigPig 19:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Martin

Hi SigPig- I like your userboxes. Hope you don't mind input--I think you want to say "de bons copains" (we are good friends) instead of "des..." (we are some good friends) -Eric ^(talk) 13:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, my friends and I have hung on to a few of those ourselves. For us, it was "Papa, mangeons dans un restaurant ce soir!" "Oui, Papa, dînons en ville!" For some reason it really sticks, that 70s interactive multimedia experience. à+ -Eric ^(talk) 16:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page boy

Hello. I had a suggestion for the Page boy article and wanted to see what you thought. L0b0t pointed out that there are other defintions for the term "page boy", so we thought a disambig might be more appropriate than deletion. I have created a draft of one at User:Satori Son/Sandbox and would greatly appreciate your opinion. Thanks for your time, Satori Son 16:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. Thanks. --SigPig 16:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC) [reply]

pre-DEU

In February 2006, you used the expression pre-DEU in the sentence "In the Canadian Forces, there's generally 3 different designs of mess dress floating around: the dinner jacket and accoutrements (must-have for regular force officers, optional for everyone else); the "Mess CF" drss (the pre-DEU midnight-blue tri-force mess dress); ... " What does pre-DEU refer to? Bejnar 19:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Distinct Environmental Uniform from your edit of DEU. Bejnar 19:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for fixing my formatting on the Warrant Officer article. I hadn't looked at MoS quotation guidelines, yet. (note to self: RTFM!) --Born2flie 15:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:EME badge.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 09:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Two Pints...

The BBC TV show is indeed called "Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps". The One hit wonder article concerns the SONG, which is called "Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps Please". Proto::► 01:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo! Proto::► 09:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Using English

Hello - I'm contacting you because of your involvement with using English instead of foreign terms in articles. A few are trying to "Anglicise" French terms in Wiki articles according to current guidelines but there is some resistance (eg/: "Région => Region"; "Département => Departement"). Your input would be appreciated here. Thankyou. --Bob 16:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:RM

Would you care to express your opinion in this ongoing discussion? Thanks. [1] --Poeticbent talk 03:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Moving Cdn Regiments

Thanks for the heads-up - I'll follow your advice on procedure. I started a discussion here for policy clarification. Sorry if I've caused any problems - RJASE1 23:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast reply and awesome references - I thought you came across just fine. I'll use the reference and fix what I unknowingly screwed up earlier. I just wish there was some way to fix the automatic categorization caused by the project banners - i.e. if you look in Category:Canadian military history task force articles, The Kent Regiment gets filed under 'T' instead of 'K'. Similar things had annoyed me enough to send me on this crusade to start with. - RJASE1 00:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know how to use the pipe for manual categorization - I was talking about the automatic categorization done by Template:WPMILHIST. - RJASE1 00:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again - as a way of making up for what I did, I'll verify that the Canadian regiment articles are correctly task-force-assigned and assessed as I work my way back through them. Have a good one! - RJASE1 01:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Scuse me butting in (I came over here to read the rest of the conversation you were having with Lima about bible translations), you may be able to fix this problem with {{DEFAULTSORT}}

Popping by with a helpful solution is never butting in. Thanks for the heads up. Cheers! --10:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Abbé Pierre

By all means, do continue to help; it's not a job I have the time to do alone. Andrew Levine 18:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

French Wiki said "official bio", I assume that refers to 2002 Je voulais être marin, missionnaire ou brigand - but you're correct in that it is only an assumption... Tazmaniacs 17:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation filed. Please sign.

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/St. Florian's Gate, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/St. Florian's Gate.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 16:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby/Football/Rugby Football

SigPig: Saw your motion re: Rugby football on the move page - no preference personally right now, but I thought you might get a chuckle over this and this, steming from this initial edit by an anon. (Or perhaps a wince at the thought of what might come your way!) Cheers! --Ckatz^chat _spy 08:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune

"As long as you don't try to move My Mother."

Wouldn't even think of touching her ;-) Chris cheese whine 09:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States

This message is regarding your edit to Talk:United States. You gave the talk page a header wanting a move to United States of Alberta. What is this name?? Nobody uses it. I voted just after you put the header on. Georgia guy 00:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ellroy20

Thanks for the AIV report on User:Ellroy20 - I've bocked him for 48 hours for the fairly painful streak of vandalism and I'm looking through the history now to see about the probable sock puppeting... The style is pretty much dead on - did you happen to see any exact overlaps (i.e. the exact same nonsense edit)? Kuru ^talk 03:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three Little Words

Re - your question about how to say "I Love You" in Guernesiais - I am not a fluent speaker, just know a few phrases - unfortunately ILY is not one of them. I suggest that you try the Norman language wikipedia - there are a number of people there who I am sure will help you. footie 18:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Riksrådet / Statsrådet

If you wish, please comment further on this topic here. ~ AjaxSmack 07:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Canadian Infantry Corps

I've been changing the listings on the Canadian infantry regiment pages to "Royal Canadian Infantry Corps", because this brings them into line with the entries for infantry regiments of the British Army (which have the relevant depot listed) and Australian Army (which has listed "Royal Australian Infantry Corps"). Hammersfan 17/02/07, 16.10 GMT

King's Division, Queen's Division, Prince of Wales' Division, Guards Division are all depots for British infantry regiments. The King's Division would not actually be deployed in battle. They operate in the same way as the Royal Canadian Infantry Corps, Royal Australian Infantry Corps etc, as overriding administrative apparatuses, because there is no single "British Infantry Corps". Hammersfan 17/02/07, 17.05 GMT

As Royal Canadian Infantry Corps is, so are the various infantry depots in the British Army - they are simply personnel admininistration formations. It's just that they are responsible for a specific group of regiments. Let me put it another way - you wouldn't be able to deny that a Canadian artillery regiment can legitimately be described as being part of the Royal Canadian Artillery, or an armoured regiment as not being part of the Royal Canadian Armoured Corps. In the same way, while it may not serve an actual operation purpose, beyond the administration of personnel, Canadian infantry regiments are part of the Royal Canadian Infantry Corps. While I am aware that the organisation of an infantry battalion is more than just the infantrymen who form its core, the regiment is made up of those who wear the regiment's cap badge. Those support personnel who serve with the infantry are not part of the infantry, they are part of whichever corps the badge of which they wear. To answer your second question, I would put the Service Battalion as "part of" whichever corps/branch it belongs to. Hammersfan 17/02/07, 18.00 GMT

Brandon Routh

I've temporarily protected the article to deal with the ongoing vandalism as you reported on WP:ANI. Since you are keeping watch over it, I'd like to ask you to remove the protection banner off the article once the protection is no longer in effect in case I forget to do it. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:United Kingdom Security Service

Hi SigPig! Just thought I'd ask if WP:UE was really the page you wanted to link to in the discussion on the UK Security Service talk page. Doesn't seem to really fit in with your comment, that's all! ConDem^Talk 18:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, just thought I'd give you a heads-up! ConDem^Talk 18:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

name of article

hello there, I noticed your comments on this talk page of South Tyrol. What do you think about this one "Autonomous Province of Trento". I made a Google search, and when you type in "Trentino" instead, there 25,400,000 hits as opposed to the 40,300 for the current name. What do you think? You can also email me with the function on the left if you prefer. Gryffindor 15:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it is better to keep your discussions offline. :-) Gryf, don't forget to fill in SigPig with how you got us all where we are at now. :))) Anyway, I think Province of Trento and Province of Bolzano should be fine. They fit with what is done with basically all the other provinces in Italy on Wikipedia. Go figure. Taalo 20:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Is This Your Account?

No. Its probably a vandal who thought they'll escape trouble by imitating me. Could be the same user as User:Kzrulzuall36. See this sockpuppetry case for more information. Thank you for notifying me of this. --K.Z ^Talk ^• ^Vandal ^• ^Contrib 05:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Canadian parties

I noticed that you supported some of my requested moves about Quebecker parties. In my opinion the problem is much bigger, indeed most articles about Quebecker parties have French titles, see Category:Provincial political parties in Quebec. I can't understand why we have all the articles about Italian, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, etc. parties with English titles and why Quebecker parties have a different treatment. What do you think about it? --Checco 20:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fill in the polls mr. pig

please. :-) Taalo 01:53, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible renaming of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints

It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian saints. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, here. John Carter 17:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted articles

I'm very sorry, I missed your query on how to search AFD discussions. There may be a better way, but I typically use Wikipedia's built in search. Just put something in the search box and hit the 'search' button (not the 'go'). Then down at the bottom of the useless results, there is a list of 'namespaces' you can search in. It defaults to just the mainspace - to look for AFD's just click on the 'wikipedia' or 'wikipedia talk' namespaces. Hope that helps. And again, sorry for missing the question. Kuru ^talk 02:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bible versions

For my part, I think a reader should be allowed to choose what Bible translation to consult and even, if he wishes, to compare different translations. (When I really want to understand a New Testament text, I look at the Greek; but I admit that not everybody reads Greek.) That, as I see it, is the advantage that {{bibleverse}} has over the other ways of enabling the reader to get to a passage in some translation of the Bible, and that advantage is nullified by limiting his choice to a single translation. I also think that it is especially wrong to make all Bible references in an article point to one single translation, all the more if that translation is, it seems to me, little used outside of a single country, and even in that country it is, I think, used only by Catholics there. I would have preferred to leave in the article the direction to a particular translation in those cases where exact words were quoted between inverted commas, but I decided not to reinstate the reference to the translations from which those quotations was taken, to avoid giving the impression that I preferred those translations to NAB.

You may well disagree. If you think it worthwhile to find out what is the general view, you can raise the question publicly on the article's Talk page. Lima 08:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not mind satisfying your curiosity, but I doubt if my response to your question will be helpful. I suppose I largely use whatever version is in the lectionary of the country in which I am living (and for that reason only use Greek in my notes). In the English-speaking countries in which I have lived, that has been the Jerusalem Bible. In English, I also read the Revised Standard Version for its straightforward and accurate language, and the New Jerusalem Bible for its excellent explanatory notes. I do not use the Douay version, although I was, so to speak, brought up on it. I am not a fan of what is called inclusive language, but which really ought to be called exclusive language, since it attempts to attach to words only an exclusive meaning, without ever using them in their inclusive sense. It gives rise to unnecessarily complicated phrases. Much worse, attempts to use it sometimes distort the meaning. Perhaps the worst case is the New Jerusalem Bible translation of Genesis 6:5 - "Yahweh saw that human wickedness was great on earth and that his heart contrived nothing but wicked schemes all day long." I suppose the text once had the word "man"; with that removed, whose heart is said to have contrived nothing but wicked schemes all day long! (The Jerusalem Bible had the word "man" and so could rightly say: "Yahweh saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that the thoughts in his heart fashioned nothing but wickedness all day long.") Lima 15:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that the main modern translations can be accused of pushing an agenda. Take the RSV. What you heard of a Catholic edition of it refers either to an edition not shorn of the deuterocanonical books or else to an edition that was brought out when RSV was still new and that added some notes (extremely few, just enough to cover the then requirement that Catholic editions of the Bible should have notes) and in an extremely few points, much less than 20, I think, chose a different equally valid translation, with which Catholics were more familiar, of a word or phrase. But the unaltered RSV was soon issued in printings that carried a Catholic bishop's imprimatur. And what you heard about liberal or conservative translations almost certainly applied to language, not to theology, with "liberal" meaning a free or loose, not a literal, translation, in line with present-day English idioms, and "conservative" meaning keeping old-style expressions and wordings that remain close to the idioms of the original languages. Lima 17:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC) An example of such an idiom is the one you mentioned as appearing in 1 Kings (it appears in more than one passage of the Bible): it just means "a person of male sex". Lima 17:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just found that Wikipedia has an article on Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition, which indicates that this version is alive and well and (further altered) living in the United States. I don't think it is much known elsewhere. Lima 04:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the bee

The Bee refers to the name of one of the chapters in the Quran. In the edit, it says The Bee 16:115. So actually it means, The Bee is the name of the 16th chapter and the verse quoted there is Verse 115. To avoid confusion, many has rather quoted Quran 16:115 or Quran 16 (The Bee):115 (rather than what it shown in the article). I will change it when I have time. By the way, the chapter is named that way because in the chapter there are some verses talking about the benefit of the bee's honey (I think, i might be wrong though :p). But generally, some names of chapters in the Quran do not reflect the entire content of that chapter, but rather it reflects an event (maybe important) in that chapter. Hope that clears up your confusion --Zack2007 22:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, there is an article about Quranic chapters, look up at Chapter 16 there. Cheers --Zack2007 04:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pokemon with Anger Issues

Thanks for the reply. I was half-expecting something on the talk page, so a personal was kinda nice. (905 pages? You're insane. ;D I have enough trouble with 105, & I'm only serious about 10 or so.) Thanks, too, for creating the list of athletes. I found it useful, even if others didn't (seems some people can't abide lists), & (as you probably noticed...) made a few contributions. I wondered what you thought of adding footnotes to all the nickname list pages; some of them are pretty obscure, to me. (Of course, would you necessarily recognize Fireball Roberts or Smokey Yunick?) If you've got ideas there, I suggest you put them up on the list talk pages; let somebody with more time to spare (or less sanity...) take it on. As for the lettered footnotes, that's one for somebody else, too; I haven't figured them out, yet. Trekphiler 12:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

About Mate

I do agree on the fact that languages adapt the way of spelling thing from other languages, but there are certain words left as they originally are. Of course, mate has been adapted into maté, but I do actually think the english dictionaries should have found another way of expressing the pronounciation of the "e", since people would suppose the syllable with the "é" is the most pronounced one, while it would sound very awkward. No, I do not want people to say "mate" instead of how it should be pronounced, but people could get an idea about how it is pronounced by just reading the small pronounciation part included in all introductory definitions in Wikipedia.
And another thing: Do you really feel it is incorrect to question bureaucracy? If people hadn't questioned what they thought wrong, then we'd still think the earth was flat and lying on turtles. I think the way mate is written in English should be altered because I think that mate is a word that should be written as it is written in the spanish language. Slartibartfast1992 22:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Women's Army Corps

I have made a couple of small changes to the article that you worked on, which has been a orphan for some time! I'm going to try and improve it if I can and thought you might be interested. Best wishes - Kim dent brown 16:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Granville Woods

I suspect that this edit was an edit conflict and not a factual change, since the rest of the article describes Granville as a railroad engineer. If I have erred, let me know. -- nae'blis 18:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Bluenose.png

Hello, SigPig. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bluenose.png) was found at the following location: User:SigPig. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Christian Brothers Logo.png

Hello, SigPig. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Christian Brothers Logo.png) was found at the following location: User:SigPig. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JamesKirkTiberious.jpg

Hello, SigPig. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:JamesKirkTiberious.jpg) was found at the following location: User:SigPig. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 09:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of North American football nicknames

No, I didn't get hacked, I was using CorHomo (a semiautomated bot) to disambiguate links, and there must have been some serious technical hiccup. I have very rarely seen some inexplicable results, and this is probably the scariest. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll fix the link by hand, and will try to keep an eye on CorHomo. Happy editing! Chris the speller 19:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:54, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Corps of Military Staff Clerks

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Corps of Military Staff Clerks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.145.80.134 00:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: El momento de la verdad edit

Thanks for pointing out my error. I've added language tags to the text so that I won't 'correct' that again. Thanks Rjwilmsi 17:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Non-commissioned officers

Hi SigPig thanks for correcting me about New Zealand NCO's. Could you please correct this page: New_Zealand_military_ranks ?

Cameron Bruce

Hi, I have tried to request protection of the Cameron Bruce page but it's too hard, I can't find how to do it, and this idiot user called 'Cameron Bruce' is consistently vandalising the page, adding in offensive and inappropriate material. Can you please protect the page or something? Sorry to ask but my knowledge of wiki only goes as far as editing pages, anything else and I'm hopeless. Please let me know if you do anything. Thanks, Rusty8.

I wouldn't worry about it just yet. That user's last vandalism was 2 days ago, and (s)he has been warned since then. As for protecting a page, I can't do that -- only an administrator can, and I'm just an editor like yourself.

This is what you can do in the meanwhile, though. Should you come across anything that looks like vandalism, here's what you do:

First, assume good faith. The edit may be an honest error on the editor's part. I once referred to one such edit as vandalism, and it turned out to be an honest mistake from an experienced editor. So basically, I ended up being the bad guy, not the other editor.
Revert the edit. You can usually do that right away by clicking on the "undo" button for that edit (see the example of your message to me here.) When you click it, Wikipedia will tell you whether or not that edit can be undone that way. If so, then just save the way you would any normal edit.
If it is obvious vandalism, such as inserting nonsense, profanity, racist or homophobic content, etc, or blanking whole or parts of the article, then give a warning to the user. You'll find these warnings at WP:VANDALISM. They are usually applied starting at the first or mildest level, then with increasing severity for subsequent vandalism. But don't feed the troll. Do not call him/her names, be snarky, or use profanity, and especially do not do so on that user's User Page. That last act in itself is usually considered vandalism, and it lowers you to the vandal's level. Besides, oftentimes vandals vandalize to get a rise out of someone; nothing pleases them more than knowing they have p*ssed someone off (pardon my Anglo-Saxon) or upset them. Don't give them the satisfaction; it only escalates the situation, and they'll come back for more. The WP vandalism warnings are polite and neutral, with increasing firmness. It shows the vandal that their actions are little more than minor temporary annoyances, easily brushed aside with the click of a button, that ultimately their attempts will fail and they will be blocked, and the rest of us will just shrug and carry on as if nothing happened.
If, after numerous warnings, the vandalism has not abated, then go to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, and state your case there, following the instructions on that page. The admins can take it from there; they have the proper tools for dealing with vandals who won't go away.
Protection and semi-protection are usually only done on articles that attract a high level of attention, often on articles about religion, politics, race and culture -- you know, the stuff that causes fights in bars.
Don't forget to sign all your edits on talk pages etc with four tildes (~~~~) after each.
Again, in all your dealings, try to be calm, cool, and professional. It's hard, and God knows, I've failed on occasion. But, one tries to rise above it. And when one consistently answers abuse or vandalism or nastiness with calmness, reason, and politeness, well, it usually pays big dividends both in terms of one's own reputation and in the inevitable retreat of the trolls, either through going to look for someone more rewarding to provoke or being blocked for disruption.

Sorry if I'm being too wordy, or coming off as being preachy: that's not my intent. I just happened to notice that little edit just before your question to me ;). It's obvious you care about the project, so it's important then that you don't become a casualty -- especially a self-inflicted type! :D

I hope I've been some help; if there's anything here I need to clarify, or anything else you want to ask, give me a shout. There are many other experienced users -- editors and admins alike -- who would be only too glad to help out a new editor like yourself. You may want to check out Wiki-adoption -- it looks to me like a good system, and I wish I'd known about it when I joined.

Good luck, and happy editing. I'm sure I speak for all Wikipedians when I say we look forward to a long and prosperous collaboration with you. Cheers! --SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 18:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re New Zealand Non-commissioned officers

> Hi SigPig thanks for correcting me about New Zealand NCO's. Could you > please correct this page: New_Zealand_military_ranks ?

I did it myself in the end. Thanks anyway.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Your edit to The Ritual of the Calling of an Engineer

Thanks for correcting the spelling in this article, however the subject of the article is a Canadian ritual and the word you changed was spelled correctly in Canadian English. I have reverted your correcion. BigNate37_(T) 00:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me!

Yes your right that isn't something I do. I usually keep my computer on all the time and I had people over last night I guess some jerk was screwing around with it. ThanksJmm6f488 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invariably

Why did you remove the entry on 'invariably' on Disputed Usage? You have messed with every entry I've made - do we have to go through the same nonsense with 'invariably' now? Who put you in charge of this article btw?

Which edit(s) are you talking about? It would help if you linked to them. I have looked at the List of English words with disputed usage for months back, and I can't even find an entry on invariably, let alone find an edit of mine removing it. And I have no idea who you since your question to me is your first and only edit so far under that particular IP. A little more info, please? --SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 18:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"List of English words with disputed usage"

Deleted text:

"Invariably - means 'always', not 'usually' ('in' - not, 'variable' - changing)."

Revision as of 16:17, 26 October 2006 (edit) (undo) SigPig (Talk | contribs) (rm Invariably; not in dispute, just incorrect)

Sorry, was I being a little cryptic?

You also deleted 'diagnose' which any educated speaker of British RP would know was wrong. What are your credentials in this subject? 217.42.114.219 09:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ref. October '06? I obviously did not go back far enough.

As for having "messed with every entry [you] have made", I cannot address that unless I know who you are. With whom do I have the pleasure of corresponding?

Invariably was removed because, as my edit summary indicates, there is (apparently) no dispute over the use of that word; its use in any sense other than "always" is a misuse. Since this is an article about words about which there is some dispute (which would be indicated in usage notes in dictionaries or entries in grammar or usage guides), invariably does not belong here. If you can find evidence of such a dispute, please reenter the word, and cite your facts.

WRT diagnose, it is still there, not deleted. It is stated in the entry that Cochrane declared the "diagnose a person with a disease" usage as incorrect, and that neither Chambers dictionary nor Random House entertains that usage either; but it also shows that Merriam-Webster and American Heritage show that usage without comment, indicating its status as standard American English. That Concise Oxford has only included it in its latest editions, and Random House not at all, indicates this acceptance is fairly recent. Hence, the dispute. And for your "any educated speaker..." comment, well, this isn't the "RP Wikipedia". Unfortunately for some, Canadian, Australian, and yes, even American English have equal status with the Queen's.

No, I am not "in charge" of the article, but I shall edit it because it's on my watchlist of interesting articles, and when the mood strikes me, I break out my dictionaries and Fowler's, and have at 'er.

And my credentials are not relevant, even should I trot out my PhD in Thinkology and Big Words from Egghead U, especially since the whole Essjay affair. The key here is verifiability: the edits to which you refer are supported by sources. And should Messrs Fowler and Fowler rise from the grave arm in arm with Dr Johnson and start editing WP, they would still be required to cite their sources, too. --SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 12:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have any qualifications in the subject you shouldn't be editing the article in such a cavalier manner. In particular, if you aren't a speaker of British RP you should not pontificate on it. Native speakers have an instinctive feel for right and wrong usage (ie they will know a usage is right or wrong without having to see a source, as is clear from the text at the start of the article on language as an attribute of social class). RP stands for 'Recieved' Pronunciation ie 'accepted', or what is current among educated or non-dialect speakers - you should leave it up to such people to edit entries on British RP, since you don't seem to have any instinct for it.

I can't find any guidelines on the distinction of 'disputed' and 'misused' - bringing in this ditinction unilaterally is typical of your cavalier manner. However, here is a link to msn encarta which defines 'invariably' as 'always or almost always':

http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861622196/invariably.html

86.150.24.79 13:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You really should read the rest of the guidelines and policies that govern WP. WP:V and WP:RS are a good start. Merely stating that as a speaker of a particular dialect one has an "instinctive feel for right and wrong usage" is all well and good, but WP requires sources. If you wish to state that there is a dispute as to the usage of a word, then the onus is on you to provide evidence of that dispute using reliable sources; that normally comes in the form of usage notes in (mainly descriptivist) dictionaries, or or entries in (mainly prescriptivist) grammar and usage guides.

I fail to understand how you cannot see a distinction between "disputed usage" and a "misuse". If no reliable source indicates a particular usage for a word or phrase, or if the only mention of that usage in said sources is to prohibit it, then it is obviously a misuse. If one or some works oppose a usage, and others support it, then there is a dispute.

I do not see how expanding a particular entry to include reliable sources or removing ones that do not even indicate the existence of a dispute would be considered "cavalier". I also do not see any tag or note indicating that the article or any of its entries are restricted to British Standard English. If you wish to make the case that any articles dealing with English language and grammar should be restricted to British English, then you should take that up with the powers that be here at Wikipedia.

Now, if you feel you can improve the project, why not get yourself an account, and start editing? However, if you feel that we should instead trust your expertise in English grammar without having to use a citation -- indeed, you have an instinctive feel, no? -- then perhaps Citizendium is your best bet, since they rely more on experts.

In any event, please take your condescension elsewhere. I find it tiresome. And that is NOT in dispute.

Cheers. --SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 14:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language, in particular usage in dialects is not a matter of simple fact checking as suffices for many WP articles. I am not suggesting that the views of a native speaker should be authoritative on their own, but that those editing entries on a particular dialect are at least native speakers of that dialect, as per my remarks on instinctive feel. This is common sense whether or not you find my pointing it out tiresome, and justified in the light of edits you have subsequently had to reverse.

You declined to claim any credentials above, but on the discussion page you said:

..as is attested by Random House[6], American Heritage[7], and Merriam-Webster[8].

It's amazing what you find out when you start citing your work. :) --SigPig 22:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Are you claiming to be an editor for one of the above dictionaries? If so, please elaborate. If not, please explain the remark. 81.154.209.252 15:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Wandalstouring 10:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 01:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks!

Hahaha, thanks for fixing the incorrect Christian persecution link on the Roman Catholic Church article. When I revised the history section, I completely missed that. Stanselmdoc 16:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burma

Hi I was/am very strongly in favor of the move, but i think the name in the top right corner underneath the Burmese name probably has to be the official English name, which is the name dictated by the junta. We probably need two entries there marked "official" and "commonly used in English". --Espoo 13:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, only the official name goes there. East Germany and North Korea. --Espoo 13:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Regarding The Queen

Thank you for the clarification. Your point is well taken. Bsherr 20:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of oxymora

An editor has nominated List of oxymora, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of oxymora (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 16:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 21:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nun

Hi. I noticed your previous work on the article Nun. We are trying to build consensus as to whether or not the article has NPOV. One editor has placed a neutrality tag on the article and objects to its removal. Would you mind having a look at the article (Nun) and leaving your opinion on the talk page (Talk:Nun#Neutrality_Tag). Thank you! Dgf32 (talk) 01:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Is it possible to find some more sources of information on this topic Royal Canadian Postal Corps? It is tagged with a notability tag, and there are currently 31 articles in the scope of wikiproject Canada which are tagged with notability concerns, so I am contacting all the article creation editors to see if the quantity of notability concern articles can be reduced, and quality increased. For more help see this note. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 18:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello SigPig!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:CADPAT_MCPL.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:CADPAT_MCPL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Ribic's mistrial

I notice you were the one who added the info about the mistrial of this man's 2002 case. I thought you might be interested that he was retried and this time convicted. I added a new paragraph to the article explaining this along with sources. Tyciol (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Carruthers

I see you're a past editor of Sigs articles and of the Bruce Carruthers page. Just to let you know that I've created a proper bio page at Wallace Bruce Matthews Carruthers. Please feel free to comment there or on my talk page if you have questions/concerns.J Costello (talk) 01:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:42, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PC Party old logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PC Party old logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of songs in English labeled the worst ever

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of songs in English labeled the worst ever. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in English labeled the worst ever (5th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of firsts

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of firsts, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of firsts. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ecphora (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies ^talk 19:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:EME badge.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EME badge.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010)

Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial

Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms"
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of nicknames of historical personages for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of nicknames of historical personages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of nicknames of historical personages until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires
Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan
Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine
Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power
Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wulfila Picture

Dear SigPig,

on 17th of January 2007, you removed this picture of Wulfila from the English Wikipedia Article “Ulfilas”. Can you tell me, what was wrong with the picture? I’m currently trying to find out about its origin. It seems to be still very common in the internet, but nobody names its source.

Best Regards,

Robert Pfeffer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.202.230.237 (talk) 19:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing
Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:46, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars
Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein
Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 21:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books
Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator
Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books
Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 10:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books
Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 02:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces
Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content
Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War
Interview: Article writers discuss biographies
Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 15:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of sportspeople by nickname for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of sportspeople by nickname is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sportspeople by nickname (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NovaSkola (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bluenose (stamp).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puggaree listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Puggaree. Since you had some involvement with the Puggaree redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SigPig. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scottish regiments has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scottish regiments, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 18:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SigPig. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SigPig. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Nomination of List of sportspeople by nickname for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of sportspeople by nickname is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sportspeople by nickname (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 15:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
[[User:SigPig|'''Sig''''''Pig ''']]|[[User talk:SigPig|SEND - OVER]]

Fixed signature:
[[User:SigPig|'''Sig''''''Pig ''']]|[[User talk:SigPig|SEND - OVER]]

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Unforms of the canadian forces" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Unforms of the canadian forces has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 12 § Unforms of the canadian forces until a consensus is reached. —Alalch E. 03:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Former infantry regiments of Canada

A tag has been placed on Category:Former infantry regiments of Canada indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]