User talk:Nae'blis
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Nae'blis has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
- For older messages, please see User talk:Nae'blis/Archive.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Kansas City
[edit]I added a new section to Wikipedia:WikiProject Kansas City. Please let me know what you think. -- Jreferee (Talk) 03:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Claremont Braineaters
[edit]You userfied the deleted article "Claremont Braineaters" for me most of a year ago. I've finally gotten around to working on it, and think it should be reinstated. What do you think— start a deletion review? Recreate the article and alert the users involved in the deletion debate? There's still a thread about this on my talk page. — eitch 14:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Somewhat-Belated RfA Thanks :-)
[edit]
...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.
I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.
If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me. (Oh, and if you hate RfA Thankspam, please forgive me. I promise I won't block you for deleting it ;-))
And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me climbing the Reichstag, now would you?
Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)
Eusebia naming query from the Llama
[edit]Hi David -- Here's what I wrote last night (and actually, I got a delivery-delay message, so I wonder if the mail ever got to you): In other excitement, having to look up the word Eusebia (Εύσέβεια) has had me on a mad, mad quest to document and disambiguate the word/name/placename in Wikipedia. The Greek concept still needs a lot of work, although I feel more ready to roll out some of the personal names, and have already incorporated the placename into an existing entry. Here's my current quandary (besides just needing mo' better sources on the Hellenic idea): what the heck do I call that entry? I'm pretty sure that "Eusebia" ought to be the disambiguation page. I can't quite figure out what to call the Greek ideal. At first I thought we were in "Eusebia (mythology)" territory, but that seems to be a pretty low priority -- more that there are occasional references to a daimon as a personification of a more important ideal. Any ideas for appropriate parenthetical clarifiers? Do you know if there's a list of clarifiers anywhere? The WP:NAME page didn't really cover that part.The disambiguation text along with several proto-entries are all crammed together in my user space: User:Kenllama/eusebia
Any ideas? Thanks! Kenllama/(talk) 16:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
Can you help me?
[edit]Catholic user Cuchullain continues to censure the article Religion in the United States. --Esimal (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- He censures also advices in his talk. --Esimal (talk) 19:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Copy of deleated article
[edit]I was in the process of creating a new article, an it got erased before I could finish. Could you email me the version of Lafayette Morehouse that existed before the initial erasure? Thanks. Zoticogrillo (talk) 07:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Kansas City skyline picture
[edit]As a member of WikiProject Kansas City you may be interested in a skyline picture debate taking place at Talk:Kansas City, Missouri. If you would like, please stop by and voice your opinion. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
My page was deleted
[edit]I would like to post a page on Wikipedia of my film review website and it was deleted before I could do much with it. How can I get this page to stick and will you help me? Please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Porkchop Express (talk • contribs)
- It appears that Nae'blis is away on a wikibreak, so I'll field this one. If you're referring to Henson Film Critique, it was deleted because it didn't claim to be notable - that is, it didn't make a claim of importance or significance. Please read our notability policy for more information. Having examined the article, I seriously doubt that you will be able to make it "stick" - it appears to be non-notable and further appears that it would be difficult if not impossible to provide sufficient reliable sources for the article. These are the primary concerns to bear in mind when deciding how to proceed. If you have any further questions, I would be glad to answer them on my talk page. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I was wondering if you'd be able to restore the file name File:Cbsdt.jpg, if i was able to place the appropriate fair use and copyright tags on it. RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 13:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Note to self
[edit]User talk:68.251.46.240 (edit history : : AFD : : VFD) - Wikipedia:OLDIP no longer holds consensus, this editor at some point added advertising to the wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=R%C3%B6mer&oldid=162321583) that took years to undo.
Template:Press has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Tfd log
[edit]
Template:Tfd log has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 21:56, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Nae'blis
[edit]Dear Nae'blis,
I'm reaching out to researchers and writers interested in the emerging, or re-emerging, movements inspired by ancient culture in the areas of religion/theology/mythology/culture...I spare-headed an artistic collaboration between a music professor, rock-vocalist and poet to create a modern multi-media experience of the cathardic journey inspired by ancient pagan poetic traditions; A romance to nature seen as a beautiful, divine and omnipotent woman.
It has singularly been my goal to respect tradition while allowing a free and spontaneous interpretation...I believe the utility of a quasi-rebirth of some aspects of the ancient religious tendancies would be achieved in an increase of tolerance, sympathy, and freedom of expression in our modern discoures on religion...so much needed. Until we have a cultural revolution tantamount to the politcal revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries [aiding the rebirth of a government of, by and for the people] in the area of religion, I will not rest. Until the rebirth of religions which are of, by and for the people, as fluid as art, as deep as mythology and theology and as powerful as culture, I do not believe we will be truly free no matter what economic or political conditions surround us. Democracy without a democratic cultural is as frustrating as it is ineffectual.
If you have a moment could you peruse the poetry project site. http://www.misbeliever.net As you are a worker in these areas, having ebhanced the Wikipedia, the world's greatest encyclopedia, I would be very honored with any remarks or critisms you could offer either me or my collaborators.
thanks much,
sincerely
Pdiffenderfer (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
paul m. diffenderfer
düsseldorf germany +49 (0) 178 178 2117 http://www.misbeliever.net pdiffenderfer@yahoo.com
Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted
[edit]I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.
Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.
Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumanah (talk) 14:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Notice of change
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
(delivered by mabdul 23:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC))
Template:Wotwiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
yo
[edit]Hey I really like your edits, I am a pagan that used to work at the Mummy ride in Orlando so you have worked on a lot of pages on things I am interested in. I dont really know how this thing works, I usually just read talk pages Revswim (talk) 05:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Help with improving business page
[edit]Hello, my name is Matt. Found you through the WP:KC page.
I work for Cerner and would like to try and improve the company's Wikipedia entry (update information, provide additional information). I'm aware of the COI policies, as well as the option of proposing new content via the entry talk page. Curious if that is still best practice for this scenario, or if there is another process I should follow.
Thanks for your input.
Mdd044 (talk) 18:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists!
[edit] |
Hello Nae'blis! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement! |
Upper Merion Middle School
[edit]Why did you delete the page about Upper Merion Middle School?
Nomination of Shades (2010 film) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shades (2010 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lanfear (band)
[edit]
The article Lanfear (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Absolutely nothing to suggest better notability and improvement here especially considering there's hardly much at the other two Wikis and my searches simply finding nothing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
The article Noisy Cricket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nothing that suggests this is independently notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTWIKIA.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Llewellyn Worldwide for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llewellyn Worldwide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wqwt (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
[edit] | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sicilian Mafia/Archive 1
[edit]
Hello, Nae'blis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Archive 1".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 05:55, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-blank1
[edit]
Template:Uw-blank1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –User456541 14:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
"Coronation chair" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Coronation chair and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § Coronation chair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
[edit]