User talk:Sietecolores

Welcome!

Hi, Sietecolores. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hitro talk 18:59, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sietecolores, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Sietecolores! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Armed resistance in Chile (1973–90) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aysén

Battle of Loncomilla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pipiolo

Occupation of Araucanía (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Campesino

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mapuche uprising of 1881, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campesino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Contaco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outflow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Academic imperialism

I've expanded Academic imperialism, thank you for starting it. I presume you may know more about this (I just learned about this yesterday). If you'd like to expand it further within the next few days, it would be eligible for featuring on Wikipedia main page as WP:DYK. I can take care of the nomination if you would take care of the expansion. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do not have much information right now, but Im glad you have expanded it. Sietecolores (talk) 14:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of personal unions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Stuart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Academic imperialism

On 29 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Academic imperialism, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that imperialism also happens within academia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Academic imperialism. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fennia (journal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Research paper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chilenization of Tacna, Arica and Tarapacá (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tarapacá

War of the Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tarapacá

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Diaguita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Identity

Mapuche history (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to La Frontera

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Mapuche page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sietecolores. You have new messages at Talk:Eighty Years' War (1566–1609).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

80 years war and dutch revolt - question

Hi! I saw the new "80 years' war" page in the category "missing header section" and looked to create a brief heading. I find in looking at the article, there is a similar period of time and some similar content in the page titled Dutch Revolt. There is so much info in each page though, and Im unfamiliar with the history, I wasnt sure how they might be related to each other. Would you be able to see if any of the content can be merged/harmonized, or if the pages should cross-reference each other? Thanks! January2009 — Preceding unsigned comment added by January2009 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes these two articles (Dutch Revolt and 80 years war) are so similar that they could be merged. I will take a look at that. Regarding the lead I have fixed the problem with a provisional lead. Sietecolores (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on contributors

Please refrain from commenting on other contributors as you did here, the article talk pages are to discuss the editorial content of the article. If you have an issue with an editor, their history, or whatever, there are noticeboards and processes like WP:DR to use. Focus on content. Thanks! Dreadstar ☥ 05:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Just FYI, you're mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Balaenoptera_musculus#Comments_by_other_users.

Balaenoptera musculus (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sietecolores. You have new messages at Talk:Eighty Years' War (1566–1609).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ricardo Villalba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendoza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consequences of the War of the Pacific

I marked Consequences of the War of the Pacific as reviewed, but you need to edit War of the Pacific to summarize the new article. We're not supposed to have articles that duplicate already existing articles. If it doesn't grow beyond a copy-paste, the new article could be speedy deleted. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Sietecolores (talk) 13:27, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox 1851 Revolution

Template:Campaignbox 1851 Revolution has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 09:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Real name

I am using this username for a reason. I urge you not to call me by my real name in discussions, it is unnecessary. Küñall (talk) 19:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You will understand that when WP:COI is a concern in a discussion (like this) it necessary to make it clear who-is-who. Sietecolores (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You made it clear in your nomination and it clear too in my comments that I was related to the subject. It's unnecessary that you do it again (and, besides, in past discussions you've done the same.) Küñall (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because to me its clear you have plenty of conflicts of interests regarding Pichilemu. It is not surprising at all, anyone writing extensively about his tiny hometown will have such conflicts. But the last article you had created, Memoria Pichilemina, about your own webpage is "the drop that made the water glass overflow". Sietecolores (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Editorial Universitaria

Hello, Sietecolores. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Editorial Universitaria, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 17:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Editorial Universitaria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Editorial Universitaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editorial Universitaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amortias (T)(C) 18:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Trumao, Chile

Hi, I'm Jamesbushell.au. Sietecolores, thanks for creating Trumao, Chile!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The spanish version of this page has some information that may be incorporated here by a bilingual wikipedian

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 23:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colonial Chile

You were right about Taltal which was not founded until the mines opened. In my haste I had misread the Spanish, which using other sources, meant that the southern boundary of the grant of Nueva Toldeo (Chile) was at the same latitude as present-day Taltal. So not Nueva Toldeo in TalTal, but the southern boundary at Taltal. --Bejnar (talk) 23:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As to "black people", the term really isn't appropriate in this article. We should use an accurate descriptor, the actual Spanish term, or the name of the article that discusses them. As to historical terminology, do you have an objection to "blacks and mulattos" instead of "black people". --Bejnar (talk) 23:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These are good questions you ask. Essentially I don't really really understand why the term isn't apporpiate, albeit I know issues of blackness can be sensitive. Spanish sourced often uses the term Negros which is not charged as the English word "Negro". If you think "blacks" is better than "black people" then go for it. But using "blacks and mulatos" instead of black/negro/black people/African is a distortion (or original interpretation) since the sources of the article largely talks about negros. Sietecolores (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Sietecolores. Thank you. Blackmane (talk) 02:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Te felicito por tu oportuna observación en el caso. Hay varios artículos de Pichilemu que son realmente innecesarios en la Wikipedia inglesa. --Keysanger (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias Keysanger, no se si te animas a involucrarte tu también. Diego Grez se lo esta tomando muy a pecho y piensa que esto es una cruzada personal contra él. La verdad es increible que todo ese material irrelevante se halla mantenido por tanto tiempo en la Wikipedia. Sietecolores (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mi opinión personal es que cualquier tema, persona, lugar, canción, libro, etc., que exista y que tenga referencias confiables (obviamente considerando caso a caso con objetividad), debe tener un artículo en Wikipedia. Tengo el derecho a tomármelo personal, porque, ya, te creo uno, dos... pero cinco, es otro tema. Pichilemu, al igual que Punta Arenas, Mulchén, Tongoy o Cochrane, tiene derecho a tener sus contenidos aquí. Que estén los artículos en inglés, yo creo que da lo mismo. (En este sentido, esta Wikipedia ha sido siempre más abierta que la española. No hubieran durado más de un día... jajaja) --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 03:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately we must get involved in this question. I will take a look in the Category:Pichilemu in the next days. --Keysanger (talk) 11:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Diego, you are authorized to take it personally even if this detrimental both to you and the project. What you cannot do is to impose your personal opinion above Wikipedias ordinary rules and principles. Sietecolores (talk) 08:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete bogus notices. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 19:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Nomination of Hernán Trizano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hernán Trizano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hernán Trizano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Land of poets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Land of poets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Land of poets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alberto Edwards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alberto Edwards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto Edwards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tomás Guevara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomás Guevara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomás Guevara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ricardo Villalba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Villalba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Villalba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ricardo E. Latcham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo E. Latcham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo E. Latcham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leopoldo López Escobar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leopoldo López Escobar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leopoldo López Escobar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luis Marileo Colipí for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luis Marileo Colipí is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Marileo Colipí until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Venacio Coñoepán for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venacio Coñoepán is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venacio Coñoepán until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franz Kindermann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franz Kindermann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Kindermann until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mañil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mañil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mañil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mapuche language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lago Ranco, Río Bueno and Los Ángeles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas T. Veblen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas T. Veblen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444^Talk 08:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas T. Veblen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas T. Veblen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas T. Veblen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas T. Veblen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 10:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Carolina Villagrán

Hi, I'm WikiEditCrunch. Sietecolores, thanks for creating Carolina Villagrán!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more content

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. WikiEditCrunch (talk) 11:13, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Domeyko Fault, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malden and Potrerillos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Globalise tag at fault (geology)

Hi Sietecolores, I've started a discussion following your addition of a 'globalise' tag to fault (geology) on the article's talk page. Mikenorton (talk) 11:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating

Thank you for your participation in the Women in Science Virtual Edit-a-thon, 8 to 29 November 2015, hosted by Women in Red together with Women scientists. It was held in parallel with a meet up at the New York Academy of Sciences on 22 November. In addition to improvements, we created well over 300 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated!

Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon from 5 to 15 December.--Ipigott (talk) 12:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cordillera Blanca Fault Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fault. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Beltanelloides) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Beltanelloides, Sietecolores!

Wikipedia editor Kitcher45 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment on Kitcher45's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Andean orogeny at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Sietecolores, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Salto del Fraile Formation. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 01:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cinna Lomnitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Andean orogeny

Sorry about that. I looked at the date and I must have thought it was 2005. RockMagnetist(talk) 21:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RockMagnetist, I was a bit alammed by your edit as I thought my nomination had gone wrong. I am also editing other articles in an effort to improve the coverage on the geology of South America you are welcome to improve them or give some commentary. Sietecolores (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andean orogeny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Coastal Batholith of central Chile

Hi, I'm Jamesbushell.au. Sietecolores, thanks for creating Coastal Batholith of central Chile!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This would be improved by linking to the other geological features in Central Chile (so people can link what they know to this information) and also from explaining a little more about what the technical geological terms are.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Choiyoi Group

Hi, I'm Jamesbushell.au. Sietecolores, thanks for creating Choiyoi Group!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This might benefit from a rewrite to explain the content in more plain english. Thanks for the contribution!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 04:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frontal Cordillera

added links pointing to La Rioja Province and San Juan Province

Choiyoi Group

added a link pointing to San Juan Province

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Andean orogeny

On 14 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andean orogeny, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Andes have risen significantly in the last 30 million years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andean orogeny. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

	Thanks!
	Just wanted to thank you for the nice message! CaTi0604 (talk) 13:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Víctor Alberto Ramos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sietecolores. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sietecolores. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2011 Puyehue-Cordón Caulle eruption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Canopy

Huilo-Huilo Biological Reserve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Campesino

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 08:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resistencia Ancestral Mapuche

The issue has already been discussed here. Cambalachero (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sietecolores. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RAM

Hola, sobre el vandalismo en el artículo, habría que denunciar al usuario sin más, pero no conozco bien el procedimiento. Saludos Agustin6 (talk) 17:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cambalachero (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of the Maule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concepción (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boletín americanista

Come on, you've been here long enough to know that you shouldn't create unsourced stubs. And putting a "references needed" tag on it yourself is even worse. Please have a look at our journal article writing guide and my own user page, where you'll find all kinds of tips (including pre-formatted references) that you can use to create a meaty article on this journal in half an hour tops. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Sietecolores, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! - TNT ^💖 21:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plants by country overcategorization

Please stop making categories such as Category:Pinales of Argentina; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Probable WP:OVERCAT situation & Wikipedia:Overcategorization. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 19:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New article created

Hello SieteColores

Can you help me in carrying out this article please Thank you --Historiadormundo (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

The article I asked for your help is ready, this article

Please can you take out your templates, Thanks You --Historiadormundo (talk) 19:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sietecolores

Can you help me in carrying out this another article please Thank you --Historiadormundo (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sietecolores

Can you help me in carrying out this another article please Thank you--Historiadormundo (talk) 01:10, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sietecolores

Can you help me in carrying out Can you help me in carrying out Thank you--Historiadormundo (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sietecolores

Can you help me in carrying out Can you help me in carrying out Thank you--Historiadormundo (talk) 13:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canellales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Canellales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proteales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Proteales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asterales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Asterales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Myrtales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Myrtales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pinales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Pinales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Myrtales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Myrtales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proteales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Proteales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asterales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Asterales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fagales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Fagales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Laurales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Laurales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Oxalidales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Oxalidales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canellales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Canellales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fagales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Fagales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Laurales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Laurales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Oxalidales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Oxalidales of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pinales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Pinales of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Magnoliids of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Magnoliids of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Magnoliids of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Magnoliids of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Asterids of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Asterids of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rosids of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Rosids of Argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Origin of the Mapuche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ainu and Amazon

Mapuche history (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ainu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar for you!

		The Geography Barnstar
		Dear colleague, Thank you for all your contributions to our encyclopedia, especially in the field of Geography, where you expanded so many articles on the subject of exploration and expeditions. Keep up the good work! With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 23:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pdebee., thank you so much! I'm glad to see you appreaciate my work. Sietecolores (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Antonio de Vea expedition

On 20 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Antonio de Vea expedition, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 17th-century Antonio de Vea expedition to the fjords and channels of Patagonia was triggered by false rumours about English settlements? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antonio de Vea expedition. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Antonio de Vea expedition), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colonial Chile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Serena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, feel free to add your articles to this! † Encyclopædius 21:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas T. Veblen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forest Research Institute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:18th-century Roman Catholic church buildings by decade

A tag has been placed on Category:18th-century Roman Catholic church buildings by decade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 14:50, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of yerba mate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendoza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frontier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tehuelche.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cougar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Córdoba Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Orientia tsutsugamushi into Orientia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mapuche polygamy

Hello! Your submission of Mapuche polygamy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diego Díaz Island

The article Diego Díaz Island has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. A web search, using both the English and Spanish names, returns only the Wikpedia page. The location can not be found on google maps.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 81.131.132.199 (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diego Díaz Island for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diego Díaz Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Díaz Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GenQuest ^"scribble" 20:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Myrtales of Argentina

A tag has been placed on Category:Myrtales of Argentina indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Myrtales of Chile

A tag has been placed on Category:Myrtales of Chile indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:48, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Neotropical temperate coniferous forests

Template:Neotropical temperate coniferous forests has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Japanophilia

I just want to clarify that I'm not responsible for any "massive change" at that article. It was an IP editor, who is now blocked, that added those templates yesterday. I reverted their edit because aside from it being exactly the sort of massive change that ought to first be put to consensus, they're also not relevant to the subject. While such statistics would be relevant in articles about Japanophobia, relations between Japan and other nations, or historical collective feelings of certain nations against Japan, they neither help nor clarify the subject of Japanophilia, which is a phenomenon that occurs among individuals regardless of their national origin (or their nation's historical grievances against Japan). Again, I'm not the originator of "massive change" at this article and I hope that your revert wasn't a belated response to that editorial disagreement we had last year. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of reduplicated Chilean place names

The article List of reduplicated Chilean place names has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN, not the subject of significant coverage as a group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

Hello there Sietecolores. I don't know you. I have never interacted with you. I don't know what's your motivation behind that request for investigation. I am not the person you are looking for. I removed such content from my Meta userpage because you made me think about privacy and I should be definitely more private; they are still findable in the history, and you have provided a link anyway; additionally, they are on my Spanish Wikipedia userpage and they're not going anywhere. You are making wrongful assumptions and I have nothing to do with everything you assume. Good luck, regardless, and have a good day. No hard feelings at all. --Bedivere (talk) 00:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diaguita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elqui Valley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hi Sietecolores! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mapuche silverwork that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sumanuil. 07:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sumanuil, thank you for the reminder. It was my error, albeit the edit was small in terms of characters it was an important change in meaning. Sietecolores (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 puma sightings in Santiago for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 puma sightings in Santiago is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 puma sightings in Santiago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 puma sightings in Santiago for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 puma sightings in Santiago is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 puma sightings in Santiago (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chubut River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaiman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strait of Magellan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huemul.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sacrifice zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Diario.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historians of Colonial Chile

Category:Historians of Colonial Chile has been nominated for renaming to Category:Historians of the Captaincy General of Chile. Please see WP:CFDS.– Fayenatic London 16:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction & Questions

Hello, it’s nice to meet you virtually! My name is Isabel and I’m a senior working on Wikipedia for my capstone project. In full transparency, I’m still learning the ropes and could use some guidance from Wiki experts.

I noticed you contributed to an article I’ve been working on adding new literature to — Food labelling and advertising law (Chile) — and I was wondering if you might be able to give me any input on improving my contributions? Or any advice you could share with a new member of Wikipedia? You appear to be really accomplished within the community which is no easy task. I look forward to learning from you. NUstudent1316 (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by NUstudent1316 (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian phytogeographers

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian phytogeographers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Wager Island

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wager Island, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GAN for 1960 Valdivia Earthquake

Hi Sietecolores! I've nominated the article 1960 Valdivia earthquake as a good article, and noticed that you also contributed significantly to it. If there are any fixes, additions, or removals you suggest, I'd love to work with you on them to make this article the best it can be.

Because it concerns the world's largest earthquake on-record, I think it would be great if we could get a DYK nomination out of it too. — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia

The article Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Protected areas disestablished in 2018

A tag has been placed on Category:Protected areas disestablished in 2018 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mamayuco per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dentren. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 22:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This gives me little pleasure. I was given the autopatrolled flag before I was an admin, and I know how high the bar is for it to be granted; I am also keenly aware of how badly this project needs volunteers who have the technical skill and the willingness to invest the time to do the work necessary to demonstrate their readiness for it. In other words, I have no doubt that you could be a real asset to this project. What you've been doing though - operating multiple accounts to edit the same articles, while blocked from your original account - that just isn't on, there needs to be a certain amount of trust and respect between our collaborators. I hope that you will be able to reflect on that, and someday find a way to be unblocked and to contribute in a manner that complies with our behavioural expectations. Best wishes. Girth Summit _(blether) 23:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Russian phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Swiss phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Swiss phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chilean phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Chilean phytogeographers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:48, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chilean books by writer has been nominated for merging

Category:Chilean books by writer has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Galician conquistadors has been nominated for splitting

Category:Galician conquistadors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]