User talk:Shyamsunder/Archive 6

Relation between Hathigumpha inscription and Ancient Tamil Nadu

Before you do any modification in an article better read details and know the fact and add information. Adding absurd think which has no link with one article is stupidity and proves how immature you on knowledge are.I have removed Ancient Tamil Nadu from category list of article Hathigumpha inscription and put History of Odisha instead.User:diptiprakashpalai

Category:Education in India by district

Category:Education in India by district, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of Bollywood films

Category:Lists of Bollywood films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that only 314 editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

. Buster Seven Talk 21:00, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User: Buster7 Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 00:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhiwandi Rural...

This] edit I'm undoing because the constituency covers areas of both Palghar and Thane districts, because Palghar was carved out of Thane district after delimitation of the constituency occurred. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 11:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no issues. Thanks. Shyamsunder (talk) 20:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits around Udaipur Topics

Hi,
I noticed your edits regarding the articles about Udaipur, including new categories Category:Buildings and structures in Udaipur and Category:Sport in Udaipur. I also believe that such updates will move the topic towards better categorization, so thanks for doing this. To fasten up the process, we might refer to the Udaipur Template. Each row in this template might correspond to a category, so we might require categories for few other rows like culture. Also, we might need to create articles for several other topics about Udaipur (like Swaroopsagar Lake), which are still missing on Wikipedia. Hoping for a good helping hand on that front as well. Vishal0soni (talk) 08:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this note and appreciate your work. Cheers Shyamsunder (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your contribution to India related topics and for having made more than 100000 useful edits. Rayabhari (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Rayabhari. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. . Shlok _{talk .} 12:41, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Sachinvenga Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Academic journals published in India

Category:Academic journals published in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sumaira Abdulali

You are invited to join the discussion at Draft:Sumaira Abdulali. Thanks. . Shlok _{talk .} 14:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am suggesting you to review the article-- . Shlok _{talk .} 14:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Udaipur-Support Needed

Hi Shyamsunder, Thanks for your efforts for improving the Udaipur related articles. Taking it one step further, we have initiated a dedicated wikipedia project for this beautiful city of lakes. To get started with this, we need your support in terms of approval for this project. We are required to provide approval/support in an ongoing discussion at the below link: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Requesting_dedicated_project_for_Udaipur_.28WikiProject_Udaipur.29. Your support would be of great help for this project. Vishal0soni (talk) 04:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article suggestion

Hey Shyamsunder, doodleblue is a technology company in Chennai, India. It is involved in lot of innovative technology projects. It would be helpful if we had an article about it on Wikipedia. Since I am new to posting contents on wilipedia, I am not very sure of the process. It would be nice if you could help me out with it.

Thanks, --Veena Thangavel (talk) 07:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Veena Thangavel[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Hi, thanks for your tireless work in categorisation department of the article. I see no India related article on which you don't have any edit. Moreover, your dedication towards India related topics and overall Wikipedia is really inspiring for every Wikipedian. Thanks. --Human3015^TALK 20:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Human3015. Appreciated. This motivates.Shyamsunder (talk) 20:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Godrej family

Hello Shyamsunder! Following a request for help at User talk:Suvidhagp that I responded to, I'm fixing links to the dab page now found at Pirojsha Godrej. Could you help me with making a call on what to do about Naroji Pirojaha Godrej? Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the redirect tentatively to Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej, correct it if needed. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For all the effortless contributions to Wikipedia community. Vishal0soni (talk) 10:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Vishal0soni .Shyamsunder (talk) 11:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of palaces in India

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of palaces in India, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlhuHC74Vfc.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Shyamsunder. You have new messages at Template talk:Ten largest towns in Hanumangarh district.
Message added 06:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vin09 (talk) 06:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Acts of the Parliament of India by year

Category:Acts of the Parliament of India by year, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coimbatore-Salem MEMU for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coimbatore-Salem MEMU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coimbatore-Salem MEMU until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mangal Pandey (Bihar politician)

Shouldn't this be moved to Mangal Pandey (politician)? 220 of ^Borg 11:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it should be.Shyamsunder (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.slideshare.net/KotakSecurities/all-about-uday-ujwal-discom-assurance-yojana.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Preventing possible vandalism of content in the article

Hi Shyamsunder,

In the National Herald Case, here the duplicate and unnecessary content has been added by the user "Rao_Ravindra" who is going in edit war, old content deleted without any proper reason. It seems that the media highlights of the case in India makes it bit sensitive. I and user "Capankajsmilyo" have been able to restore the content as much as possible but again the same issue. My request is that please look into the unnecessary edits going on ASAP and if possible add to it "semi-protected" sort of mode for a particular time to prevent it from vandalism. I had contacted others editors, but i didn't get any response.

Thanks,

Work2win (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Shyamsunder (talk) 13:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhopal BRTS

Please revert the category for Bhopal BRTS from Proposed bus rapid transit in India to Bus rapid transit in India since Bhopal BRTS is already operational and it is branded as MyBus Bhopal [1]

I know the article is outdated, and it needs to be completely rewritten. I'll do it soon (consider tomorrow) along with new article Indore BRTS.
Wiki.Gunjan (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Wiki.Gunjan.Shyamsunder (talk) 03:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Publications Division (India)

I have done some copy edits to reduce the overlap with the source page, http://www.publicationsdivision.nic.in/About.aspx, which is marked as being under copyright. — Diannaa (talk) 23:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Diannaa. Shyamsunder (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asha Kumari (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalhousie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly help with removal of the cause of death from the article; removed once but was restored by the originator of article Lavkumar_Khachar. Note I have a lot more info that needs to be worked into the article at User:Patelurology2/K.S._Lavkumar_Khachar_of_Jasdan since 2010.

Thanks.

Kindly help with removal of the cause of death from the article

Kindly help with removal of the cause of death ( which is personal ) from the article; removed once but was restored by the originator of article Lavkumar_Khachar. Note I have a lot more info that needs to be worked into the article at User:Patelurology2/K.S._Lavkumar_Khachar_of_Jasdan since 2010.

Thanks.Patelurology2 (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Crime in Hyderabad, India has been nominated for discussion

Category:Crime in Hyderabad, India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 22:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ila Pant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ila Pant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ila Pant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pradeep Kumar Banerji

Please do not blank pages, as you did to Pradeep Kumar Banerji, whatever the reason. Somebody will come to Wikipedia, find a blank page and wonder what on earth is going on. If an article is a duplicate of another, then redirect it. If you feel that an article doesn't belong on Wikipedia, then look at the deletion policy. If it indeed meets the criteria for deletion in your judgement, then nominate it as appropriate. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 15:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go away. Shyamsunder (talk) 22:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great Work Mate !! Psomu800 (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Psomu800.Shyamsunder (talk) 19:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Government of Visakhapatnam

A tag has been placed on Category:Government of Visakhapatnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is no such government exists, only the Government of Andhra Pradesh is the state government(parent)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vin09 (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of article Karaikal Union territory struggle group

Hello Shyamsunder! Instead of nominating the article for deletion, you can improve the article or can leave me to improve it. Karaikal Union Territory Struggle Group, the article which can provide lots of information about Karaikal's problems being under the control of Puducherry U.T, oppurtunities given for puducherry and karaikal. if you nominated and deleted this article, many info about the proposed Union territory's problem and struggles will be unknown to everyone. Kindly think and get a good decision. Sorry, if anything written harsh.--wiki tamil 100 12:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki tamil 100 (talk • contribs)

Category:Lists of shopping malls in India has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lists of shopping malls in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:India-focused charities has been nominated for discussion

Category:India-focused charities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Food industry in India has been nominated for discussion

Category:Food industry in India, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 20:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Flora and fauna of Rajasthan has been nominated for discussion

Category:Flora and fauna of Rajasthan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 10:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zafar Ali Shah

The article Zafar Ali Shah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable under WP:SOLDIER. Awarded India's third highest wartime gallantry award only once. No references as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 10:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rafiq Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rafiq Khan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 10:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indian film score composers

Please see my proposal to rename/upmerge: Hugo999 (talk)

Category:Marathi film music composers to Category:Marathi film score composers

Category:Malayalam film composers to Category:Malayalam film score composers

Nomination of Rafiq Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafiq Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafiq Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 13:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

I wanted to bring to your attention the issue of copyright violations. While doing some work here, I came across Tourism in Rajasthan. Almost all of the text in the article was a copyright violation, taken from various different websites without permission. I can not overstress this; you do not have permission to take materials from other websites and post them here. This is quite serious, and continued breaches of this will likely result in your being blocked. I've reviewed some of your other article contributions and have found a troubling trend here. Please, stop copying from websites. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Osama Chandio Art and Aquevix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahil1894 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename category

Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Indian companies by year of establishment to Category:Companies of India by year of establishment per C2C (see Category:Companies by year by country) Hugo999 (talk) 02:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

don't make unrelevent changes

pls dont do changes in List of tourist attractions in Surat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annki777 (talk • contribs) 06:11, September 20, 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	I award you barnstar for your service of more than 10 years in wikipedia Anoptimistix (talk) 10:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Anoptimistix. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haj Committee of India

The article Haj Committee of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A page on an unremarkable governmental committee that does not cite any 3rd party sources. Significant RS coverage cannot be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Indian 500 and 1000 rupee currency demonetisation

An article that you have been involved in editing—Indian 500 and 1000 rupee currency demonetisation —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. AdityaChanana (talk) 12:02, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

new page.

sir. first of all i m giving thanks for editing the page i hv created. please help me out to establish the page of west bengal legal service. this is a well known gr A service of the state of west bengal and in support of the page i sited some link and proper evidence. all these are government website link. due to lack of editing knowledge i could not make it perfect. thanks in antecipation. Pinaki1983 (talk) 07:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khodeswar Ran Shelter

I don't understand why you have removed the previous categories from this article - including even [[Category:Wildlife sanctuaries in Rajasthan]], which since this IS a wildlife sanctuary in Rajasthan seems an odd move on your part. Can you explain your edits? Eustachiusz (talk) 12:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shyamsunder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas 2016

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Tito Dutta (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Tito Dutta (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Murdeshwar

Respected Sir, I saw on Wikipedia Murudeshwara page that you had earlier participated in editing my hometown Murdeshwar. I request you to revisit the page and provide your expert comments about my new posting on the talk page of Murdeshwar. I am new to Wikipedia and do not know how to contact members for getting help. It is my earnest request to all experienced members of Wikipedia to help me in getting back the correct spelling of my home town. In my humble opinion, a mistake made by the first author should not be allowed to carry forward. Please take some time out of your busy schedule and help us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murudeshwara — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.218.204.92 (talk) 23:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

meaning of article title and the category tag correlation

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_wheat_industry_regulation_in_Australia&curid=36943875&diff=762074065&oldid=754392227

Wheat industry - is not necessarily anything to do with the wheat category - wheat as a category does not necessarily = the industry in australia, literal interpretation of an article title and a corresponding category is not necessarily how the most appropriate categories are allocated JarrahTree 14:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Salaries of the office-holders has been nominated for discussion

Category:Salaries of the office-holders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shriprakash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shriprakash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HapHaxion (talk) 09:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017–), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahendra Singh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suburbs of Perth as part of economy?

Sorry, you have lost me completely - I fail to see how a suburb with a range of activities and functions actually is part of the economy of Perth - please explain JarrahTree 08:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JarrahTree, I read the following on Welshpool, Western Australia page." The area is considered to be one of the main industrial areas of Perth, along with Kewdale, Kwinana, Henderson, Malaga, O'Connor, Canning Vale and Osborne Park".If any suburb named here is not industrial area of Perth please fee free to undo my edit(s).Shyamsunder (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also 'economics' attached to 'activities' in Australia - categories and project tags can be very overdone, there are some classic examples where editors add almost every conceivable category or project tag, and it shows up as 'over-associating' and hardly a balanced understanding of a subject - I am not saying you have got to that point, but you have to be very aware that some 'readings' of meaning and context require a very judicious balance between over-done and adequate coverage / spread - it is not every editors judgement, but between the category creator and the potential CFD - where a word or meaning needs to be considered carefully. I cannot claim to have achieved it in my edits, but ... for a start I would never trust an articles content as a full guide without knowing it first in real life - (as in your reply above) the opportunity for mis-inertpretation is ripe... JarrahTree 07:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

example from another 2 projects that this one is "typical"

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AGeology_of_Australia_by_state_or_territory&type=revision&diff=773598420&oldid=650617003

I know professional a couple of geols and geographers who would want to take you outside and have an earbashing on that one :) JarrahTree 11:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It follows from the fact that Category:Geology of Australia is a sub category of Category:Geography of Australia . Shyamsunder (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not a good precedent, apologies

I should have asked more clearly, maybe the US https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Geology_of_the_United_States or one of the south american projects https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Geology_of_Argentina would be better removed and to see what happens there -

ok my bad :( - apologies for the intrusion - they all do it JarrahTree 11:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

your edits literally fill my watch page as I see you doing a very good job (so few eds seem interested in getting categories fixed from a proactive perspective) however every now and then some jump out at me and I think, oh hell do I need to query that one or not?

Hotels as residential? A region of Western Australia as an organisation?

Otherwise keep up the good work! At least somebody is doing what so few seem interested in ! JarrahTree 02:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone my edit now. Thanks for the note. Shyamsunder (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problems - some of the items make me very reluctant to point some out, as there can always be a 'grey line' on some things, and the last thing I want to do is be 'pedantic' and 'rules' oriented - there really are some things that can be left, as the bulk of your work is something the project has been needing for ages, dont let me stand in the way of good well thought out and definite improvements :) JarrahTree 02:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JarrahTree for appreciation. Shyamsunder (talk) 02:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

damn damn damn - I have been very rude to editors over this one - always non-native speakers do this - accommodation has no plural form!!! I have heard polish people, and other eastern europeans always add the 's' - accommodation is the same singular or plural... damm damm damm

please dont take personally - please leave as is - I have checked wiktionary and they claim it is valid (with no back up) - there seems to be a derived form supposedly from french - but in my english dictionaries ( checked 3) there is no sign of the usage... why it is annoying/damm is that the process of challenging validity in wiktionary and here in wp en is time consuming and soul destroying... not sure I want to challenge something like that at the moment it gets in the way of editing and so on... please dont take personally - leave as is... JarrahTree 03:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

grrr - it gets worse - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_February_17#Category:Tourist_accommodations a very very unsatisfying discussion - where there is no clear resolution of common sense in the argument, despite the numbers JarrahTree 03:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lost cause...checked with someone who should know from the us - not a brit or oz engvar - but an american usage... sigh JarrahTree 03:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did not think about that before creating the category. I just copied from "Tourist accommodations in the United States" . I have no issue if it gets corrected . Further I may make errors while ctaegorising articles . Please feel free to revert .Shyamsunder (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not your problem - taking the precedence from the states is vital for consistency across the whole project - nay flaying myself with irritation that the us usage got through on the cfd four years ago or whenever - it is not universal usage across all varieties of english. sorry I use your talk page as my worry bead/board. JarrahTree 10:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. You are welcome to use my talk page. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

state government instrumentalities

even though they have the word in their titles - they really are agencies that deal with protected areas/national parks - parks without a qualifier tend to be man made or urban oriented - national parks and the agencies that deal with them may have the word park - but double check i think you will find national parks and reserves a better clump of terms to check JarrahTree 12:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.Thanks .Shyamsunder (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NP just found the project WikiProject:Protected areas JarrahTree 12:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.Shyamsunder (talk) 12:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wrong

Category:Historic_preservation_organisations_in_Australia - nope the two western australian organisations - that is neither their prime function, scope or meaning - you got it wrong. need to be very careful about that :) JarrahTree 13:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone my edits. thanks .Shyamsunder (talk) 22:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

best to avoid

government departments or authorities of western australia over the next two to three weeks - there is about to be big shakeup and change of names - plenty of work after it has been done... JarrahTree 14:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Shyamsunder (talk) 12:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mineral field

is not the same as mine - it is an area which may have a collection within a defined area... not the same JarrahTree 12:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fremantle railway workshops

If the workshops still existed, maybe the cat your added, but there is nothing residual on the area where it was until 1904, actually still existing - until the category has text saying extant and demolished structures, I would be reluctant to let the category sit there JarrahTree 10:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries.Shyamsunder (talk) 10:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

very high powered government authority/instrumentality - NOT an organisation... Metropolitan Redevelopment Authority JarrahTree 12:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tense - you seem to have a problem with tense - the perth cable car is not current transport - it is a stalled proposal, there should be somewhere on wp en a category for proposed australian transport ideas - where the cable car ideas that are stalled might fit(there is also one for mount wellington hobart tasmania) - very bad idea to have proposed transport items as being in transport - I am sure there are cats for proposed items... somewhere JarrahTree 13:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How moving a Perth related article from the state category to the same category Perth city category tree is taken as my problem with tense.Shyamsunder (talk) 13:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Cable Car and the Mount Wellington Car are proposed transport items - they dont exist - seeing how adventurous you are with categories and their utilisation - Id have thought you might have understood what I was on about and looked for planned transport projects in australia or created it (I am sure there are such cats in other countries)

I had suggested that the fremantle railway workshop as a 1904 item that doesnt fit into current category, and the two items - things that do not exist being in categories that imply current existence - that is my thing about tense - non existing items either long gone or not appeared yet - nothing to do whether the actual edit you did - more trying to drop a hint than a specific reference to specific edit JarrahTree 13:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

slippery slope

also, when you create 'banking in tasmania', precedence says you really should have a similar category for each state for balance - but there is already 'banks' by state already, so the extra by state 'banking' category should in practice have over 10 or more components to it to be a viable category - but it is hard to have even 5 in the 'bank' or 'banking' category for tasmania (from knowledge of that sector in that state) - so there is the question - can the larger banking in australia adequately cover things without state subcats?

the slippery slope is the issue of creating categories that remain small due to the historical fact there were only so many banks in australian history - the state separation into banks, and banking might not just be necessay, really,... JarrahTree 10:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create it. I only categorised it.Shyamsunder (talk) 10:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough, np - maybe the usual suspects wont trip over it and want to revert back to a single banking in australia cat - there is always that chance, but in the circumstance - dont worry abut my obersvation, that is all it is... JarrahTree 10:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hahaha - have a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Banking_in_Tasmania&action=history - it probably should be deleted - I think the creator thought Tasmania was a separate country :) - there are no other categories in banking in australia against a state - JarrahTree 10:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.Shyamsunder (talk) 10:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It gets weirder and weirder - the creator was blocked in 2015 - I have put the category up for deletion, FYI JarrahTree 10:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Konkani Muslims

The article Konkani Muslims has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's pure defamation of all religions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Forgot to put name (talk) 10:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE BLANKED YOUR STUPID ARTICLE... — Forgot to put name (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. — Forgot to put name (talk) 10:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I haven't edited the page since June 2006. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

comment

Maybe, but Hobart Zoo shows you probably havent read that article since then either... it closed in 1937 and is not a tourist attraction JarrahTree 14:51, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I have reverted myself - well done in what you are doing - the bays/coves things worked out well! JarrahTree 12:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I need your help on Rajindar Nath Rehbar's Film/Album section. Annu1369 (talk) 09:49, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

strategy

strategy cycle might not interest you - but - any thoughts?

At this stage I am in process of writing a report about discussions in Australia about https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017 the cycle 2 of the broader wikimedia strategy -

You may well have responded elsewhere - but if you at all interested - not the slightest bothered if you are not - please feel free to contact on or off wiki - thanks JarrahTree 10:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry JarrahTree These things do not interest me . I am not that articulate as well. Thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for even answering - that is in itself a very useful response - never apologise - your contribution is valuable - despite your own self perception - so thank you for that - and keep up the good work ! JarrahTree 10:57, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

mines departments

Government departments are exactly that - not organisations JarrahTree 10:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	You are doing a great job Hemant (talk) 14:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hemant.Shyamsunder (talk) 11:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'bound/defined' vs open and global

In the Australian project there are qualifying things like states - which define where things are. By going into the 'unbound' city categories you are placing australian items into more global in almost every case very under-developed global unbound categories. In the united states where the 51 qualifying states - such categories are hardly if ever used... I would like in the most WP:AGF way ask you to stop creating further global by city categories for australian subjects - as they are of no practical use to anyone. A lot of people understand categories as ways to locate things - 'by city' with no state or country bounds is really unhelpful JarrahTree 10:19, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

which one you are talking about.Shyamsunder (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok got it. Will undo the edit .Shyamsunder (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no hang on - I am just concerned when you create un-defined city items - it is not as defined; 'in australia' they are fine... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Office_buildings_by_city - is a very limited and messy little collection - always better to have in australia for limits and to keep away from the very undeveloped things..

But hey no one else seems to be much bothered in the areas you are improving - however I am impressed - you must some day learn to do project tagging on talk pages - many have inadequate qualification of states - NSW and VIC very much so are just 'Australia' - anyways keep up the good work!!JarrahTree 10:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian politicians disqualified has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian politicians disqualified, which you edited and left a message on the talk page, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 17:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chitranjan Singh Ranawat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chitranjan Singh Ranawat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 02:40, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shivshankar Oraon

The article Shivshankar Oraon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This remains a one line article with a single source and no additions or edits of substance since creation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LUxlii (talk) 00:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elephant Nature Park

Hallo, I wonder if you can enlighten me, what kind of wildlife conservation does Elephant Nature Park involve in, according to you? Dan Koehl (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian subsidiaries of foreign multinational companies has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian subsidiaries of foreign multinational companies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mar4d (talk) 20:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 00:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please run at RfA

Hello first of all Thank you for your immense contributions to the Wikipedia, you are here for almost 12 years. I am thinking to nominating you for adminship, I also encourage you to say say yes as you have a strong content creation ,edit count as well as experience here. Please leave a ping to reply me.Anoptimistix (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC) Anoptimistix (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thought Anoptimistix. I am not inclined . I am happy with what I have been doing. Mnay thanks Shyamsunder (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarveen Choudhary

The article Sarveen Choudhary has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J04n(talk page) 19:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harsh Vardhan Bahuguna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harsh Vardhan Bahuguna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Vardhan Bahuguna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I am Quibilia. (talk) 02:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no

Advertising Standards Authority (New Zealand)
Advertising Standards Authority (South Africa)
Advertising Standards Authority (United Kingdom)
Advertising Standards Authority for Ireland
Advertising Standards Board of Finance
Advertising Standards Bureau (Australia)
Advertising Standards Council of India

are not advertising organisations by my understanding of english - they are regulatory authorities of standards advertising organisations would be more likely to be professional organisations of advertising businesses

Problem is the category tree and articles associated with regulatory terminology and bodies is totally hopeless... JarrahTree 12:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

organisation = law ?

Medicare is an organisation - how does law fit in there? JarrahTree 04:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dinesh Nandan Sahay

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dinesh Nandan Sahay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mark^Dask 21:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zebronics

Did you enter the Wikipedia-en-help IRC channel and ask about creating a article on Zebronics? Just asking, as someone did and said they were you. They did so using an IP address tha was blocked for sockpuppetry. Thanks, _{Adotchar| reply here} 12:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Shyamsunder.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 07:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shyamsunder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kantilal Ghia

Please quote your source. The page may be deleted.Xx236 (talk) 11:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Shyamsunder.

AfC submissions
Random submission

~6 weeks

1,014 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Douglas Arterial Road

An article that you have been involved in editing—Douglas Arterial Road—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Downsize43 (talk) 23:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For doing a wonderful job creating much needed categories. Keep up the good work and thank you. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Vinegarymass911.

Category:Telecommunications regulatory authorities has been nominated for discussion

Category:Telecommunications regulatory authorities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vithal Chavan

The article Vithal Chavan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

95% of this article is completely unsourced. The two sources offered briefly mention Chavan as being an MLA for the far-right regional party Shiv Sena and a "strongman". I could only find one more source by googling, https://www.countercurrents.org/sharan251010.htm, which also mentions Chavan (in passing) as an MLA for Shiv Sena and a mobster. No depth of coverage whatever anywhere, as per WP:BASIC. Bishonen | talk 21:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen | talk 21:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Regulation of non-governmental organizations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Regulation of non-governmental organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gulam Abbas Moontasir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulam Abbas Moontasir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulam Abbas Moontasir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sajjan Singh Cheema for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sajjan Singh Cheema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajjan Singh Cheema until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Surendra Kumar Kataria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surendra Kumar Kataria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surendra Kumar Kataria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

good to see you still at it

Hey I was in Delhi and Himachal Pradesh recently, for a while - doing some parts of the trips reminded me of you! JarrahTree 12:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you enoyed your trip. I hail from India however have been living in Australia .. for many years now.ThanksShyamsunder (talk) 12:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was great - even if you are Australian based - your edits always make me think of the challenges they create :) - it was interesting this time Delhi the air did not have the smell of 2009 - it was such a relief JarrahTree 12:21, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shadi Ram

The article Shadi Ram has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 13:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jhadoli. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Yanjipy (talk) 18:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please view history before putting such comments on my talk page. Shyamsunder (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I realise you tend to ignore me theses days

(I must say I do appreciate that you actually entered into conversations sometime some time ago) but the land management attribution to the former department in western australia is wrong. Nuances of english clearly still miss out with your categories, but well done for the hard work you put in any way - cheers If you want an explanation about the differences and th enuances, I can give it if you so wish JarrahTree 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]