User talk:Suvidhagp

Hello, Suvidhagp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Ðℬig XЯaɣ 10:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Ðℬig XЯaɣ 10:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Suvidhagp, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Godrej Horizon Pune

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Godrej Horizon Pune requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 12:41, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Godrej Platinum Mumbai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Godrej Platinum Mumbai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 12:47, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Godrej Horizon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godrej Horizon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godrej Horizon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dwaipayan (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Godrej Serenity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godrej Serenity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godrej Serenity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dwaipayan (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Godrej Platinum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Godrej Platinum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godrej Platinum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dwaipayan (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your images may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since August. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Godrej Properties Limited

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, Would like to know that on my wikipedia page it shows "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (October 2012)". I would like to know has there been any recent review to my page as it still shows year 2012?

Hi, Suvidhagp; I've read over the article and cleaned it up a bit. You may find WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP to be helpful reads. In essence, however, unsourced promotional claims, or promotional claims from primary sources (which we try to avoid on Wikipedia) are frowned upon. If you have any further questions, please let me know on my talkpage. Cheers, Kevin 12xd (contribs) 12:58, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How to Change the Display URL of my Wikipedia Page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, Have tried to use the template to change the URL of a company person from Pirojsha Godrej to Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej but it does not show any changes after using the template of {{DISPLAYTITLE:PirojshaBurjorjiGodrej}} Could you let us know the solution to this problem as it is being pulled up in the search engine results and showing for the current MD Pirojsha Godrej who is still alive.

Suvidhagp, per WP:COMMONNAME, it should just be Pirojsha Godrej with no middle name. If there were more than one, then the middle name would be fine, but it is unnecessary at this point. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There is a page for "Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej" who is from Godrej Family but has passed away in 1972. However, the URL it is using here is of "Pirojsha Godrej" who is currently an MD of Godrej Properties. As, these are 2 different people with the difference of only middle name and we were trying to change the URL for the Senior Pirojsha to Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej & assign the URL Pirojsha Godrej to actual person, it is not allowing us to do so. Please suggest.

Suvidhagp, at the moment there is no page for the son, so renaming the current page is not necessary. Please create a draft using the Article Wizard about the younger Pirojsha, and when/if it is accepted then the reviewer will move everything to its proper place. As an additional note, please make sure you sign all of your talk page messages with ~~~~ so that we know who wrote the comment. Primefac (talk) 09:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, We have added a draft for Mr. Pirojsha Godrej in the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Adi_Godrej. Please review the same and let us know if we can get the Article URL as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Change Needed for the Pirojsha Godrej Article URL Hi, We have added a article draft for Mr. Pirojsha Godrej (Existing MD & CEO of Godrej Properties Limited) under the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Adi_Godrej as it says that Pirojsha Godrej is already taken. Please review the same and let us know if we can get the Article URL as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej instead because the one currently existing belongs to the ancestor whose name was Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej and not Pirojsha Godrej (as displayed in the URL). Suvidhagp (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

I have moved Pirojsha Godrej to Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej and created a disambiguation page on the former. I'll add hatnotes in a few minutes. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sam Sailor, Thank you for the changes. Now, we cannot access the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej. Further, the link has not been allocated yet, so could you move the content from Pirojsha Adi Godrej(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Adi_Godrej) to Pirojsha Godrej(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej) as that will be the correct URL for Mr. Pirojsha Godrej (Since it is only Pirojsha Godrej). Suvidhagp (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi Sam Sailor, Thank you for the changes. Now, we cannot access the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej. Further, the link has not been allocated yet, so could you move the content from Pirojsha Adi Godrej(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Adi_Godrej) to Pirojsha Godrej(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej) as that will be the correct URL for Mr. Pirojsha Godrej (Since it is only Pirojsha Godrej). Suvidhagp (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

No. Pirojsha Godrej is correct as a disambiguation link which on the page links to Pirojsha_Adi_Godrej. Mkdw ^talk 13:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Need the correct Article URL Hi, Could you assign the correct URL for Mr. Pirojsha Godrej (MD and CEO of Godrej Properties Limited) to be visible as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Godrej since the existing one (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirojsha_Adi_Godrej) is not correct. His name is only "Pirojsha Godrej" (the URL with "Adi" is misleading) with no middle name. Suvidhagp (talk) 05:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

I have moved it to Pirojsha Godrej (businessman). Since there are two articles with similar names, Pirojsha Godrej must be kept as a disambiguation link. Mkdw ^talk 08:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please Review the Profile of Pirojsha Godrej

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi,

Could anyone review the profile of Mr. Pirojsha Godrej (businessman) & validate it as the citations have been added wherever needed.

Suvidhagp (talk) 11:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

Somebody will do that in due time. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page Review not showing for the month of November 2015

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, Would like to know that one of my wikipedia page Mr. Pirojsha Godrej (businessman) shows "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This biographical article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2015) This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. (October 2015) The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. (October 2015) This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (October 2015) This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (October 2015) This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2015) ".

I would like to know has there been any recent review to my page as it still shows October 2015? Suvidhagp (talk) 12:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

There are 5 million articles on Wikipedia. There are only a few thousand editors. It takes time to go through every page on Wikipedia, and there are older pages than yours that need looking at. As previously mentioned (multiple times), your page will be looked at in due time. Primefac (talk) 16:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Search Engine Results Inaccurate

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, Please check on the search results as shown in the link here. The search results for "Pirojsha godrej" is inaccurately pointing to Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej Wikipedia results. Could you check and provide us the solution as the search engine is connecting to the incorrect "Pirojsha Burjorji Godrej Wikipedia Page" instead of Pirojsha Adi Godrej. Google Search Link: Pirojsha Godrej Search Results on google Suvidhagp (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Suvidhagp[reply]

Hi Suvidhagp, and welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia doesn't control what search engines like Google display, and it can take a while for search engines to update old cached content. The best course of action is just to wait a while for the search engines to catch up. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 13:44, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Girish Shah. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). If you have any questions, let me know! :-) You can respond on my talk page, or here. If you respond here, please include {{ping|zackmann08}} in your response so I am notified. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC) Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:15, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Girish Shah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Girish Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional tone and content

Please be careful not to be promotional when adding content to Wikipedia. Do read WP:Neutral point of view. The article The Wadhwa Group was nearly deleted as spam following your recent additions. – Fayenatic London 03:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Nyttend were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. _Muffled ^Pocketed 17:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two separate issues: first off, you're often saying "we". Is this account being used by a group of people, or is there just one of you? Secondly, answering your questions: I understand that this person may well be important, and I would be quite hesitant deleting it under A7 (so you don't have to look it up, the criterion is for "any article about a real person...that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant"), but the article was quite promotional and very far from a neutral encyclopedia article; you're going to need to write an entire new page, so there's no reason to undelete. If you don't have access to the original page, you're less likely to include the same problematic content. Of course, if you want access to the sources you used, I'll happily copy them over here for you. Nyttend (talk) 04:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Suvidhagp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Suvidhagp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ziqitza Healthcare

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ziqitza Healthcare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lopifalko (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Radhika Batra Shah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Radhika Batra Shah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edwardx (talk) 01:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Reddy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rohit Reddy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The tone is also quite promotional. John from Idegon (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not notable please check again

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohit_M_Reddy

how is this notable sir ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.173.126.159 (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit M Reddy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rohit M Reddy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 22:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello Suvidhagp. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Rohit M Reddy, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Suvidhagp. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Suvidhagp|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Hello John, I am not being compensated for my edits in any form whatsoever. I have a keen interest in the real estate sector and even projects or persons associated with it, which is why I went on to create a page on Draft:Rohit M Reddy. I had previously edited a lot of real estate developers pages and even created pages of a few real estate developers and personalities from that industry. Had it been a paid article, I wouldn't have highlighted the controversy revolving around him. He is a known name in Hyderabad and among the real estate industry people in India. In fact, I didn't mention much about his paparazzi image here on the article to stick to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Also, I have tried to stick to Wikipedia:Reliable Sources for the article such as:

In addition to this, my purpose to create this page was to encourage the young entrepreneurs in the real estate sector to keep up with their good work despite a drastic slowdown in the sector, leading to less investments and halted projects across the nation. At such a crucial phase, his stand to develop remarkable projects can not be ignored. All I need is a support from the editors to refine this article to be suitable enough for the Wikipedia. Suvidhagp (talk) 08:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John,

Awaiting your response and guideline on it. Also, I have collected a few more references to support the content and would request you to let me know if I can go ahead and edit the draft now. Suvidhagp (talk) 07:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same concerns.

I suggest being far more careful to work from references that are both reliable and independent. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohit M Reddy (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dee03 were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rohit M Reddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rohit M Reddy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dee 03 16:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ziqitza Healthcare Limited concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ziqitza Healthcare Limited, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ziqitza Healthcare Limited

Hello, Suvidhagp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ziqitza Healthcare Limited".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 19:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rohit M Reddy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rohit M Reddy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://rohitreddy.co.in/about-rohit-reddy/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Signature Developers

Hello Suvidhagp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Signature Developers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]