User talk:Squeeps10

This is Squeeps10's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

VPI discussion "Creation of a CSD criteria for articles and drafts with no encyclopedic value" moved

Hey there, just a small heads-up, I moved the discussion you initiated to Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Creation of a CSD criteria for articles and drafts with no encyclopedic value which is the proper venue for such discussions. Regards So Why 17:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the heads up SoWhy. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 19:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malinda Kathleen Reese - draft

Hi, thanks for your recent edits on Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese! I notice you’ve put it on your list of drafts you’re working on- anything that can help get the article in shape for a successful review is very much appreciated! Mojo0306 (talk) 10:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mojo0606, I'm not much of a writer, but I'll do what I can! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 21:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong ping, I meant Mojo0306. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 21:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated! Mojo0306 (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, let me know if there's anything else I can do for you User:Mojo0306! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 22:57, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you have probably seen, the article was rejected on the basis of apparent lack of notability. If there are any reliable sources out there that I haven’t included in the article that help to build further notability, then they would be most welcome! Mojo0306 (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look when I get a chance. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 23:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for resubmitting for review! Hopefully it’ll be accepted this time! Mojo0306 (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully! {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 17:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Refdesk reply

Hi, I've seen your answer at WP:RDS regarding UV radiation! Thanks! On the mentioned site of FDA I've also noticed a sentence re the "limited published data" regarding the subject. How can this aspect be dealed with to get more info from ongoing research projects and testing labs?--86.124.193.84 (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the most qualified person to ask, I'd check with the refdesk again. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 02:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Re the ping, I do not quite understand how it works.--86.124.193.84 (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You just type {{u|Example}}, replacing "Example" with the username of the person you want to ping. Since you're editing under an IP address, not an account, you can't be pinged, but I believe you can ping other people. If you want to receive pings, you'll have to create an account. Let me know if you have any more questions. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 17:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malinda Kathleen Reese (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malinda Kathleen Reese. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Redesigning the featured, good, and article assessment icons. Pbrks (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 24#Trevor Lawrence (disambiguation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Modern Rogue

Hello, Squeeps10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Modern Rogue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging CSD G13s

Hello, Squeeps10,

I don't know if you'll be doing much tagging of stale drafts, but if you live in the U.S., please be aware that the U.S. is on Daylight Savings Time now but six months ago, it was on Standard Time. So, there is a one hour time difference between the time schedule for today (July 7th) and that of six months ago (January 7th). That means that a draft whose last human edit was 4 pm, January 7, 2021 can be tagged for speedy deletion at 5 pm, July 7, 2021. And this arrangement will be switched around in the fall when the U.S. goes back to Standard Time. There is really only a short period of time in the year when the time schedule for the current day is the same as it was six months ago.

The reason why observing this difference is important is that there are probably a dozen editors and admins who actively work with expiring drafts and it's important that everyone is on the same page. Wikipedia is on UTC time so it can help if you have the current UTC time displayed on your Wikipedia menu. I'm not sure of the script or setting but I'm sure someone would know at the Teahouse. Also, if you make use of SDZeroBot's G13 lists, they are displayed on UTC which doesn't change over the course of the year so that is a way you can check if you're tagging drafts too early or an hour late. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Ah, I thought it was weird that the bot hadn't added those to the category yet. I forgot about the time difference. Though quite frankly I doubt an hour will make a difference for a draft that no one has touched in some 4,392 hours. I've set Wikipedia to display local time for convenience reasons and have no plans to change it back. That being said, the setting is buried somewhere in the Preferences menu.

We have had discussions like this before, I believe they can be found further up on my talk page or one of the archives. {{u|Squeeps10}} {Talk} Please ping when replying. 00:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Modern Rogue (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Modern Rogue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Modern Rogue, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squeeps10! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 08:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent revert on Tommy Johansson (musician)

I noticed that you recently reverted two changes made by user Shust17. As the user is new to Wikipedia, would you mind leaving a brief explanation of the revert on their talk page? Roper Klacks (talk) 11:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lirim Hajrullahu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Zuerlein.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2025 Albuquerque mayoral election

Hello, Squeeps10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Albuquerque mayoral election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Modern Rogue

Hello, Squeeps10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Modern Rogue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2025 Albuquerque mayoral election

Hello, Squeeps10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2025 Albuquerque mayoral election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Elway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Paton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Lawrence Clarke, 7th Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of museums and cultural institutions in Albuquerque

Hello, Squeeps10. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of museums and cultural institutions in Albuquerque, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of museums and cultural institutions in Albuquerque

Hello, Squeeps10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of museums and cultural institutions in Albuquerque".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nella Domenici (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see evidence of notability at the moment. If she wins the election then she may be notable under WP:NPOL, but until then she has to meet the general notability guideline. Please expand the Yahoo News links into proper references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nella Domenici and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 05:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]