User talk:Sahil1894

Welcome!

Hello, Sahil1894, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Aquevix, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aquevix

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aquevix, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 06:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello Sahil1894. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Aquevix. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sahil1894. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sahil1894|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure Regarding Aquevix

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Aquevix for their contributions to Wikipedia. The company is registered under Indian company law with registration number: 156270 and CIN: U93090DL2006PTC156270.

So please allow me to edit the article namely Aquevix. Sahil1894 (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have a conflict of interest with the article and should not write or directly edit it. If someone who does not work for the company writes an article based on sources that are unaffiliated with the company, you can request edits on the article's talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to conflict of interest I was asked to write a disclosure. I have disclosed affiliation of my company, if any other thing needs to be done or if I had done in an incorrect manner, just tell me about the same. So that I can continue with my article. The guidelines of Wikipedia are so confusing. Secondly the thing is that I don't want anybody else to write article about my organisation. And if it is possible than tell me the correct my so that my article get published on wikipedia. Sahil1894 (talk) 05:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to our rules on paid editing and conflicts of interest, you should not write or edit the article. Also, you do not own Wikipedia's article on Aquavix, the Wikipedia community does. If you do not want someone else to write it or edit it, you should just hope that we never have an article about the company. You were told that you need to write a disclosure, which you have since erased. You were also told that because of your conflict of interest, someone else would need to write the article.

If your only purpose here is to promote your company, you should leave. We can and do block editors who are not here to build an encyclopedia, especially if they are here to promote something.

You are welcome to edit other articles. However, until someone else writes an article about Aquavix, I recommend giving up on it. Even if someone else does write an article about Aquavix, you should only make requests on the article's talk page instead of editing it directly. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating Talk:Aquavix. Leave the disclosure on your user page. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YES!

Osama Chandio Art Aquevix
Sahil1894 (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i can help you

do you have multiple accounts? if having write link so i accept your draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.38.41.148 (talk) 10:41, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier i created which was blocked... now i dont have multiple account... what can be done? Sahil1894 (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquevix (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Editor has conflict of interest. Already deleted 3 times in mainspace.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aquevix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 15:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sahil1894, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 15:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquevix (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ian.thomson was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to cite sources that are specifically about the company. Not vendor directories disguised as "top ten" lists, affiliated sources, or sources that do not even mention the company. This article also needs to be made by someone who does not work for the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aquevix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ian.thomson (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to give up on the Aquavix article

If you are not here to work on the encyclopedia but only here to promote the company you work for, we will block you. You've been given plenty of opportunity to change by a lot of people.

Now is the time to stop working on that and work on something else. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aquevix

Hello, Sahil1894. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Aquevix".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 13:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]