User talk:SharadSHRD7/Archive 1

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cr-IPL

Template:Cr-IPL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Human (talk) 06:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

I don't know why you keeps fighting with me everytime. Do you have any personal hatred towards me? SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United Progressive Alliance. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Indian National Congress, you may be blocked from editing. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at United Progressive Alliance. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 07:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry for my mistake. Hereafter I'll be careful. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 07:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please stop edit-waring at 2019–20 Super Smash. Take a look at the 2019–20 Bangladesh Premier League, 2019–20 Big Bash League season, etc, for lack of flags. Thank you. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

See 2018–19 Bangladesh Premier League for usage. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for starting discussion. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cripl/doc

Template:Cripl/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Spike 'em (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Cricketer inboxes

Hello. Please read the documentation for infobox cricketer. Of note is that per the infobox documentation we only add teams when the player has actually played a match for them. That means we don't add them if they were just in a squad or if they might play for them in the following year.

As an example of why this is important, players may be injured prior to a tournament and be unable to play in it. Or the tournament may be cancelled entirely.

Please ensure that you follow the requirements of the infobox documentation Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your clarification. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 10:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vivo IPL 2020.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vivo IPL 2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naagin S04 Title Card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naagin S04 Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Dream 11 IPL 2020

Upload the new logo Saidur Mursalin (talk) 08:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done SharadSHRD7 (talk) 03:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Saidur Mursalin (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Request

Can u please update the loksabha map, as there r two vacancies now Nahtrav (talk)

Colour Box

Hi, Recently i have noticed that , you have added colour box here. It looks good. Mr.Mani Raj Paul - talk 08:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for appreciation. The main purpose of these colour boxes is to identify the respective teams easily. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 10:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dream11 IPL 2020 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dream11 IPL 2020 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Sports India logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Sports India logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naagin 5 - Title card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naagin 5 - Title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Test championship

You can't move a page and then stick a delete template on it, which will lose the page history and then recreate somewhere else as a copy and paste. Please discuss these moves before trying them again. Spike 'em (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry for my mistake. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I was trying to WP:AGF but I see you are just ignoring the attempt to discuss the moves and going ahead with doing it your self. I will no longer engage with you if you refuse to do this properly. Spike 'em (talk) 13:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I won't going to do edit war with you. Hoping for the discussions in the tall page to be completed soon. I tried my best to explain as per WP:AGF. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Please read WP:BRD : you have been bold, I reverted and attempted to discuss, but you are just going ahead with your edits yourself. you need to form WP:CONSENSUS to change the page, which you are failing to do. You claim not to be edit warring, but I started a discussion, whichyou seemed to take part in, but then went and redid all your edits again. Spike 'em (talk) 13:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry but the template I added about requested move keeps removed by rmcd bot. I don't know the reason. I request you to add that template. SharadSHRD7 (talk)

I've already told you that you can't move a page by copying and pasting text, so please stop doing this Spike 'em (talk) 08:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

@Spike 'em:, I can't move the page because of your previous moving. I request you to understand and follow the consensus made on the discussions. Pages can be moved earlier if consensus is extremely clear as per WP:SNOW. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 08:51, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

If you simply copy and paste the text you lose the page history, which is required by WP:C Spike 'em (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

@Spike 'em:, Thank you for the explanation. I can't move the page because you already moved it before, using the requested technical move. There is no reason to start a discussion again (for template) as there is already a discussion on ICC T20 Championship talk page with clear consensus in support of the move. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Tamil Nadu Premier League

Hi @Selva15469:, I request to see the title Tamil Nadu Premier League 2021 which i thought that some mistake were not addressed so far.(Fade258 (talk) 02:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

It's the official title. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 03:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Selva15469 Thank you but If we look back to last 4 seasons there were another title why ? Can i add schedule of Tamil Nadu Premier League 2021.(Fade258 (talk) 03:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Now I noticed the wrong placement of year in the title. It have to be placed at beginning of the title as per the usual common way in Wikipedia. 2021 Tamil Nadu Premier League is the correct title. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 03:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Can we place it in its correct place without duscussion.(Fade258 (talk) 03:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Sure. The discussion is not needed for absolute technical moves. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok Please move it without redirect.(Fade258 (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Sorry because I don't have that right. Also I think there is no problem to keep that page as redirect similar to Indian Premier League 2018. SharadSHRD7 (talk)

Ok Thank you for your cooperation.Can you tell me how to upload any cricket team logo with fair use?(Fade258 (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Steps:

• Go to Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Now click upload a non-free file.
• After choosing the file and providing the description, go to step 3 and choose This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use..
• Now you have to mention the name of the specific article in which the file is going to be used.
• Then choose This is a logo of an organization, company, brand, etc.
• Now you have to provide the source and click the check box.
• Then put 'n.a.' in the box named 'In view of this, please explain how the use of this file will be minimal.'.
• After following all these steps, click upload. Now the file will be uploaded successfully. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 04:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

@Selva15469: I clicked to Upload a non-free file but nothing is happen.Is this can be done with mobile.(Fade258 (talk) 05:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

@Fade258:, Direct link: [[1]]. Yes it can be done with mobile. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

I click to Upload non-free file but page doesn't open.(Fade258 (talk) 06:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Sorry, I can't find the reason. The page opens for me without any error. You may ask administrators about this. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Can you send me the screen shot of that page?(Fade258 (talk) 06:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

I think users can't send screenshots on Wikipedia. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

If you didn't mind then can you send me my email.(Fade258 (talk) 06:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Sorry, I can't send my personal information here. I'm an ordinary user. Ask help to a Wikipedia administrator who will surely help you on this issue. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok Thank you ! (Fade258 (talk) 06:28, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

This Wikihow article explains how to upload a file in Wikipedia (with screenshots). Hope it helps. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your kindness towards me .(Fade258 (talk) 15:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Tamil Nadu Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salem. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

You are edit warring again

In case you hadn't noticed, the page mover changed it from an "About" hat note to a redirect one. Please leave it there, it is still valid and necessary. Spike 'em (talk) 05:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

It's only necessary if the title of the page is ICC Test Championship. It's no more a valid title, so there is no need for disambiguation. I request you to understand and stop the edit war. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

It is still necessary. The page mover converted the "About" hatnote to a "redirect" one. It is still valid and necessary so that anyone who follows the redirect created by the page move knows that they are at the correct article. You have exceeded the 3 revert rule and unless you change it back, I will report you. Spike 'em (talk) 05:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Spike 'em:, as per user guidelines in the Wikipedia:Disambiguation It is usually preferable not to add disambiguation hatnotes to a page whose name already clearly distinguishes itself from the generic term. The article clearly distinguishes the former title as (Formerly known as). So there is no need to add disambiguation. I request you to understand. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

and WP:HAT explains {{redirect}}, or a related template, can be used when an ambiguous title is redirected to an unambiguous title or a primary topic article. This is a valid and necessary redirect hatnote, and you are still breaking the 3 revert rule. Spike 'em (talk) 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Spike 'em:, This is invalid and unnecessary hatnote and I request you to understand this. There is no reason to add a disambiguation hatnote for this page. It's required only until the title change. Now the title is moved to ICC Men's Test Team Rankings. So it's better to add disambiguation hatnote to the ICC Test Championship page (as per your opinion). Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

It is necessary and you can't add it to the Test Championship page as that is a redirect; hence the reason that the {{redirect}} template is being used instead of the {{about}} one. You are still in excess of 3RR. Spike 'em (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Selva15469 reported by User:Spike 'em (Result: ). Thank you. Spike 'em (talk) 06:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Come back

Take some time off. Hoping to see you around soon :) SUN EYE 1 10:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naagin 5 - Title card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naagin 5 - Title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cabinet of Jeanine Áñez, 2019-2020

Template:Cabinet of Jeanine Áñez, 2019-2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ICC

Hello. ICC has confirmed that there won't be a next edition of the Super League and the status of the lower divisions are unclear. Please refrain from adding unsourced material to the tables. And I have no idea why your user page says you are permanently retired. You are still quite active. Thanks Human (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for clarification. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 12:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Your edits regarding 1 & 2 Corinthians

Hello, SharadSHRD7! I noticed that you have inserted material into a few articles regarding the authenticity of St. Paul's First and Second Letters to the Corinthians. I believe that you are genuinely trying to help improved these articles. However, these edits have been reverted by myself and other editors multiple times because they are rather problematic for a few reasons.

• Firstly, when you cite a book, please include the page numbers to make it easier for others to verify what they actually say.
• Please read Wikipedia's policy on reliable sourcing. One of the sources you cited for the article Pauline Epistles in this edit was a forum post. Granted, a forum post in which a reliable source appears to be cited, but still a forum post, which falls under the "Self-Published Sources" section of the guideline I just mentioned. You can't just cite whatever happens to come up on a google search.
• You seem to be misunderstanding the word "authentic." In this edit, you tried to claim that 2 Corinthians is "inauthentic" (i.e. not by Paul) because it is a combination of multiple letters of St. Paul.
• Lastly, please read Wikipedia's policy on Original Research (see especially this sentence in the first paragraph: This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources.). You claim in this edit that 1 Corinthians does contain many passages that are widely believed to have been interpolated, but you cite four different authors arguing that four different passages are interpolations. It does not follow from these sources that these passages are "widely believed" to be interpolations, just that each of these authors believes that a different section is an interpolation. If you want to claim something is widely believed, you need a source that explicitly says that.

Your edits have been reverted by multiple editors. Please gain consensus on the talk page for these edits, and make sure your contentions are actually claimed by reliable sources. Otherwise, you may be taken to WP:ANI. 98.173.0.114 (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

2024 Lok Sabha

@SharadSHRD7 I have given a citation where delegates of cpim 23rd party congress had given support (final seal) for formation of left democratic alliance. The parties of the alliances like NDA, UPA and LDF are added according to Next Indian General elections in various states articles of wikipedia. For example, JD(S) is part of LDF in Kerala, LDF in Maharashtra and Loktantrik Morcha (led by CPIM) in Rajasthan and was part of LDF Manipur which is now known as MPSA after inclusion of Congress, so it is added to LDF. I have given citation where it is mentioned that CPIM has come to alliance with BRS to fight central government. Your all citations have contained speculative materials and possibilities. (https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/politics/150222/kcr-uniting-regional-parties-in-fight-against-bjp-modi.html) This article does not say about any federal front except in the title. Inclusion of SP in FF is nowhere written. So please do not add federal front now. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Please don't confuse state-level alliances with national-level alliance. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Delegates of cpim 23rd party congress had given support (final seal) for formation of national level left democratic alliance. Please do not contest in edit warring.

https://www.sangbadpratidin.in/india/kerala-cpm-lobbying-for-making-front-against-bjp-with-congress-in-party-congress/ XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

JD(S) and BRS are not part of LDF. Their alliance with LDF meant for state-level only, not national level. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

I am saying about speculative federal front. Do not add it now. XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

JDS and BRS are state parties only. They are not national party. XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

NPEP contested against BJP in Arunachal Pradesh in 2019, but it is added to nda as it is part of nda in most of the states where it is active. XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

If Federal Front is speculative, LDF (national level) is also speculative because there is no clear source about the official alliance. LDF currently an alliance only inside Kerala, Tripura and West Bengal. JD(S) and BRS are not part of LDF. Their alliance with LDF meant for state-level only, not national level. Deve Gowda confirmed JD(S) to be part of Federal Front.[2] SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Please do not add regional alliances. LDF (Kerala) was added at a time (when these new citation were not there). User talk:Dhruv edits told not to add regional alliances. Please do not do that. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

If you have any sort of doubt, you check edit summary. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Kindly start a new discussion before reverting my edits. I have followed Wikipedia:Be Bold principle and added reliable sources also. Please stop edit war. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7 I mentioned about the changes in the page on Ok123 talk page. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok123 also said that MGB, SPA, MVA should be in UPA section. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 14:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

United Progressive Alliance

You made good faith edits mentioning NCP Shiv Sena and DMK not allies of UPA in national level but the state level allied parties are also supporting UPA in the national level They are part of UPA directly or indirectly.For example refer: Therefore I say you to not remove them as UPA allies .The state level alliance are directly or indirectly supporting UPA in national level Thank You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover: Indirect support and official membership are not same. Only JMM clarified to be a member of UPA . There is no source to mention DMK, NCP, SS(UBH) as the members of UPA. Please stop adding them. You can start a discussion in the talk page of Lok Sabha. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajya Sabha. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I was forced to engage in edit war. I'm sorry. I've already started discussion in the talk page but the other user didn't understand about Wikipedia:No Original Research. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

@DaxServer:, I stopped edit war after your warning but the user "Chennai Super Kings Lover" started edit war again in Lok Sabha. Please warn him again and restore the previous version. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Last Warning

See Dear User:SharadSHRD7 In the recent UPA meeting DMK,NCP, Shiv Sena,JKNC attended as members of UPA Source: Days after West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's "no UPA" barb, former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister and National Conference (NC) leader Farooq Abdullah on Tuesday said that several Opposition leaders discussed strengthening of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) during a meeting with Congress interim president Sonia Gandhi in Delhi. These words was from Farooq Abdullah It is your final Warning if you again revert my sourced edits are you will be blocked Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: We can't assume discussions as official source. Other party leaders didn't say anything about this meeting. JMM and IUML (parties which are part of UPA) didn't attend this meeting. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

They did not attend it as they are not major parties of UPA By the way, this source is final Again if you want to revertfind source and tell User: Chennai Super Kings Lover

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:, Please cite a source in which DMK leader M. K. Stalin (after 2013) or Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackarey) leader Uddhav Thackarey tells that his party being part of UPA. There is no source. It's just a personal opinion of Farooq Abdullah. We can't know what topics were discussed in that meeting. I'll accept once you cite a clear, official source from each and every party which you claims to be part of UPA. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

It's official statement of Farooq Abdullah, the former Chairperson of UPA You must rely on it, like I relied when you give me a source stating Manipur NPF Minister's statement. Even administrators rely on the statement made by Offical Former Chairperson of an alliance. If you want to resolve this, You should accept this I had accepted NPF one ThanK You User: Chennai Super Kings Lover

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: Sonia Gandhi is the first and only chairperson of UPA (from 2004 to present). I've already accepted NCP is part of UPA based on official source. But DMK and SS(UBT) leaders never told that they're part of UPA. If you want to resolve this dispute, please stop engaging in continuous edit war and wait for the neutral opinion from other editors in the talk page/dispute resolution page. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I have found source of MK Stalin stating DMK as UPA member, refer:https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/politics/140519/dmk-says-no-to-federal-front-mk-stalin-wants-kcr-to-back-congress-led.html Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: Only According to sources. It's not official statement from DMK leader M. K. Stalin. Please find a clear, explicit source. For example, NPF member clearly give an official statement about his party's alliance with NDA in national level. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM DMK Rajya Sabha Leader, TKS Elangovan<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/loksabha-elections/news/dmk-firmly-with-the-upa/articleshow/69435620.cms|title=‘DMK FIRMLY WITH THE UPA’-DMK party Rajya Sabha leader and MP TKS Elangovan}}</ref> Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

with and in are two different words. Don't confuse them. @Chennai Super Kings Lover: SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

In my phone,It is working firmly

Check your network Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm putting this info in UPA, LokSabha and Rajya Sabha

Don't edit war again or else I will complain to administrator that you are too baised Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover: Discussion among only two of us will never solve this dispute. Please wait for other editors to give their neutral opinion. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/loksabha-elections/news/dmk-firmly-with-the-upa/articleshow/69435620.cms|title=‘DMK FIRMLY WITH THE UPA’-DMK party rajya sabha leader and MP TKS Elangovan}}</ref> Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I have proper source now Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

It's still not a valid source by the way. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

How, It is Official Statement of DMK Rajya Sabha Leader Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: The statement only reads with the UPA. Supporting an alliance and being part of it are two different things. That's why DMK leads a separate alliance named SPA. Don't assume SPA as sub-alliance of UPA. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

You are too much baised to one side,

This is proper source of DMK Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: I'm not biased. I'm following WP:NPOV. Please discuss about this topic in the article's talk page not in the personal talk page because we need opinion of other editors in this content dispute. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 05:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: We are with UPA means supporting UPA in Lok Sabha as well as Rajya Sabha, You are twisting words as per your requirement

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:

Don't use personal talk pages to discuss content dispute because we need to hear opinion of other editors in a public discussion. Please participate in RfC discussion in the talk page of Lok Sabha. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 06

28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. And you said this is my version[3] , you can see here [4] , this is pre-disputive version SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover: No it isn't. Please don't engage in edit war. If you disagree with content, please engage in discussion in the article's talk page. We have to maintain collaborative environment in Wikipedia. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

2024 Lok Sabha

@SharadSHRD7 According to User:Chennai Super Kings Lover, a member of Wikiproject Indian politics, has said that LDF can be added with the six citations I added. User:Dhruv edits said me few months ago when all these citation were not there.Now all editors are saying not to add regional alliances. But to make a collaboration, I added MVA, UDF, SPA, MGB under UPA. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:, None of those six citations mention LDF as national level alliance. It's purely speculative in nature. Even the Wikipedia article about LDF mentions it as a regional alliance based in Kerala (not national level). Please discuss this in the talk page of respective article to pave way for more users to see your comments. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

See this citation. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:: Videos are not credible source(s).SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

There Sitaram Yechury clearly told that In 23rd Party Congress, a clearcut strategy was taken to increase independent stength of CPIM, stength of Left parties and to form an alternative Left Democratic Front. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

And do not only take LDF, see objections against adding regional alliances. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:: There is no reason for objection because regional alliances are official and confirmed by reliable sources and also have separate articles. But LDF is purely speculative in nature with no explicit source. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Other editors are saying not to add those regional alliances. You say collaboration when anyone is against you and does not want collaboration when ediors are working. I added those regional alliances under UPA in order to give value to your opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:: Where did other editors say not to add regional alliances? You're trying too much to add a speculative/unconfirmed alliance. Please follow WP:NPOV. We should not be biased. SharadSHRD7 (talk) SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Here Talk:Lok Sabha - Wikipedia XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

All editors are saying that you are changing the meaning of citations according to your biased edits. These citations also say that CPIM, CPI, CPIMLL, AIFB, RSP, SUCIC will fight together. Other editor also said that LDF can be added with the six citations I added. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:: I'm not interested to discuss with you anymore because you are not ready to understand. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

You cannot say against these two citations. Left Front is national level alliance in all general elections in India. Ok I am adding the parties and alliances section with such a way that no arguement will occur. The parties will be added at the eve of the election i.e., in 2024. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

{{ping|XYZ 250706}{: You have to discuss about this in the talk page of specific article. Removing a content suddenly because of dispute is not fair. Please don't engage in edit war. Also you're undermining regional parties in your edit. Your edit is against WP:NPOV. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

And Please do not interfere when I am saying something to other usr's talkpage. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:: When someone pings me, I'll reply. Wikipedia is public. You can't have secret discussions. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 16:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@Canterbury Tail:: Wikipedian administrators are being inactive and fails to resolve the content dispute and to prevent edit war. Since last 3 years, I've contributed as much as I can, for Wikipedia. Surely I won't comeback again because I think Wikipedia have lost its credibility. Now many editors will try to revert my past edits because of their disagreement, but I don't care anymore. Consider me as retired permanently from Wikipedia. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

It is not the job of administrators to resolve content disputes, that's the job of editors and article talk pages. Administrators job is this case purely to stop disruption and take action and make guidance to prevent it from happening. Canterbury Tail talk 17:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@Canterbury Tail:: I had worked for many hours to gather citations for 2022 Rajya Sabha elections and updated it, but the User:Ku423winz1 reverted my contribution in a second without any valid reason. User:Chennai Super Kings Lover reverted neutral edit on Lok Sabha and tried to close Rfc discussion on his own. I request you to review and take action on these users. User:Chennai Super Kings Lover also involved in numerous edit wars but never got a block. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 12:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I gave sources,[5] [6][7],And I stopped edit war as I got message from Administrators who said that edit war is a form of vandalism, You said that you are done with Wikipedia and you are retired, you also blamed the administrators for it,you also said Wikipedia is not reliable, And now you are back in Wikipedia, you don't have value of your own words. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover: There is discussion going on in the talk page of Lok Sabha. Why are you so much eager to impose your own edit? Wikipedia is not a game. It's based on colloborative environment. Few users also supported removing alliances from Infobox because it's unnecessary. And you have reverted my edits on 2023 Rajya Sabha elections without any reason. Please understand that I'm also a human being like you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

On 2023 Rajya Sabha elections, I only changed the template,from Infobox legislative election to Infobox election,as it is not a legislative election of state,and I apologise for Lok Sabha edits and self-reverted it. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Canterbury Tail:: Please note the words of @Chennai Super Kings Lover: in this comment. He is hurting me just because of disagreement. @Chennai Super Kings Lover:: Please read Wikipedia: Civility. I value myself, my words and my hardwork. That's why I come back from retirement to retrieve my contribution. I spent nearly 2 hours to add citations and switch into new Infobox but you've reverted it in a second. Image-based Infobox are not useful and biased, because not only BJP and Congress, many other parties won seats in every Rajya Sabha elections. SharadSHRD7 (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: What is the legislative body of India? The Parliament of India is the supreme legislative body of the Republic of India. It is a bicameral legislature composed of the president of India and two houses: the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and the Lok Sabha (House of the People). Rajya Sabha is a legislative body. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 13:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC) Sorry, If I hurt you , I take my words back, I changed it because, there are many multiple party system in the world,ex:Next Pakistani general election, there photo based Infobox are given. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: There are also many parliamentary elections which use legislative template. See Next United Kingdom general election, Next Dutch general election, Next Irish general election, Next Danish general election. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7:, the examples you are giving all are future elections, see those elections that has already took place. Everywhere is Template: Infobox election, and 2022 Rajya Sabha election has been ended already, all the results are out, it's not a future event. Hence I reverted it.Ku423winz1 (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: please compare my previous version of 2022 Rajya Sabha elections with current version of User: Ku423winz1. I spent many hours for this version and added useful citations for each and every results. But the user suddenly reverted my contribution and also removed all citations without reason. In the previous version, viewers can see the election results very clearly (no. of seats won by every parties with +/- column to indicate gain/loss of seats). In my opinion, there is no valid reason to ignore this useful template. It explains the summary of election results clearly. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7:, the problem is not how many hours you spend. If its not right then it should not be used. Infobox is not to show results for every single party, as the parties participating in the election can extend upto infinity. For standard situation, the top two-four parties are added only. Using Template:Infobox election is appropriate for parliamentary elections. Every single election page of rajya sabha election, lok sabha election, or any other parliamentary or presidential election in world , this infobox is used. Ku423winz1 (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1:: The list won't consists of infinite parties because only less than 100 seats will be up for Rajya Sabha election every two years. Sometimes election will be only for 10-20 seats. Please understand. And also you've removed all citations without reason. It's a vandalism. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: I request you to give your opinion on this issue. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1:, opps,,, I didn't saw the citations. I am restoring them. Actually I was only concentrating on the infobox. But changing infobox is unesessary and not according to a standard election wikipage. Ku423winz1 (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1:: Please understand that no one can decide the rules on Wikipedia. It have to be based on Wikipedia:Consensus. As an editor of the article, I disagree with your edit on 2022 Rajya Sabha elections, because it's against WP:NPOV. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: If you think I am not right for using Template:Infobox election then you should first visit all the election wikipages and make the same statement in every each page's talk page. You should also put a request for the speedy deletion of Template:Infobox election because according to you this template is no useful and a burden. I am sure that then you will get the answer, because atleast I have no power to make you realise what is generally used, and what is not. Ku423winz1 (talk) 15:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1:: Please don't misunderstood my statements. Template:Infobox election is useful in the presidential elections (or parliamentary elections of countries which have two-party system). India has multi-party system, so this template is not useful and against WP:NPOV. There is already a discussion going on about this template in the talk page of Next Indian general election. You can express your opinions about this issue in that talk page. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: that's why I told you to request to remove infobox election from similar pages which you think. The way you are saying, if everything is neutral point of view then go and edit the 2020 United States presidential election, why they have two parties!! Many parties can contest it, and they even get votes!! Even if it is very small, hence in your Normal point of view they must not use infobox election, because they are all being biased to both Democratics and Repulics' . Go and ask them. Asking me is meaningless, I have no power to make you understand it. Ku423winz1 (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1:: Please don't confuse presidential and parliamentary elections. Many parliamentary elections of countries having multi-party system, use Template:Infobox legislative election. See Next United Kingdom general election, Next Dutch general election, Next Irish general election, Next Danish general election. I support this template and other user named Number57 also agrees with me on using this template. Please see the ongoing discussion about this template is in Talk:Next Indian general election. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: look I don't have time to repeat it again and again. I have clearly earlier said that those are future elections!! They are yet to be happened!! You can use it there but not in case of result declared pages. See the previous year elections of the same elections you have given. And parliamentary elections also occur in US but still they use infobox election. Ku423winz1 (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1:: The template is not only used for future elections. See 2022 Israeli legislative election, 2021 Dutch general election, 2022 Danish general election. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: but it is not used in Indian elections, including legislative assembly elections, general elections and local elections. And following this it should not be used in rajya sabha elections. Ku423winz1 (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Rajya Sabha elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanjay Singh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Request

@Robert McClenon:, @Canterbury Tail:, @DaxServer:: I suspect User:Chennai Super Kings Lover operates another account in the id User:Ku423winz1. Reasons for my suspicion: 1) Identical edits; (User: Ku423winz1 reverted 2022 Rajya Sabha elections in the same way User:Chennai Super Kings Lover reverted 2023 Rajya Sabha elections. 2) Strong support to other user without reason: User: Ku423winz1 recently commented in the Rfc discussion of Talk:Lok Sabha to show his support for User:Chennai Super Kings Lover without explaining any valid reason for support. I request to investigate their accounts. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: they can clearly find my location from my ip address. I am from West Bengal. Don't know about @Chennai Super Kings Lover:. Ku423winz1 (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm from Jorhat, Assam, Is @SharadSHRD7: kidding me? How can I run two extended confirmation accounts , I'm not that much free,You two can find it, I can swear to God that,Ku423winz1 is not my account, You being blocked has lost your mind, first I had sympathy with for your time lost in Rajya Sabha Election dispute, but now you are crossing your line. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: I just expressed my suspicion. It may or may not be true. But please avoid harsh words and read Wikipedia:Civility. I never referred you anywhere using such harsh words. But you keeps hurting me. We don't even know each other personally. Content disputes need to be discussed. Personal fights won't give any solution. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I haven't used any harsh words, but how can you say on the basis of same ideas as Sockpuppetry, I only blocked many sockpuppets vandalising Wikipedia pages, like:User:Politcs of Maharashtra,If had to not remove UPA tag from Lok Sabha, I wouldn't revert my edits,Unless You are unblocked, we can't disscus disputes, Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Retirement

Can I ask a question@SharadSHRD7:? Are you out of your retirement? Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover:: After seeing the blatant vandalism of my useful contribution in the 2022 Rajya Sabha elections by User: Ku423winz1, I had decided to cancel my retirement. Because I spent many hours for that contribution. The template I've used in that page clearly shows the election results with +/- column to indicate gain/loss of seats. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: what vandalism I have shown?? You have done vandalism everywhere. It was you who changed the infoboxes from their previous state, it was you who ruined the hardworks of years done by numerous users to build up the template infobox. You have done it without consulting. You have disturbed multiple users including me. You created dispute everywhere, everything was going well before. and you are telling me?? Ku423winz1 (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Ku423winz1: Removing all citations from a page is indeed a vandalism. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7: I have already self-restored the citations. And therefore what you have done to the previous template is also indeed a vandalism. Ku423winz1 (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Personal Attacks

User:SharadSHRD7, User:Chennai Super Kings Lover, User:Ku423winz1,User: XYZ 250706 - Haven't you learned anything yet? Edit-warring results in blocks, and personal attacks result in blocks. Either report sockpuppetry at sockpuppet investigations, or don't report it; don't make idle accusations. Accusing two editors of being sockpuppets can be a personal attack. Either report vandalism at the vandalism noticeboard, or don't report it. Read What Is Not Vandalism. The empty claim of vandalism is a personal attack. Civility is the fourth pillar of Wikipedia. Either discuss with civility, or leave each other alone.

I am still willing to mediate a dispute, but will not tolerate personal attacks. I will withdraw my offer to mediate if there are any more personal attacks. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice

Kindly join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 13:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

WP:CANVASSING concern

Hello SharadSHRD7. I am concerned about your messages from 24 January to the Talk Pages of 8 editors. This might be in breach of WP:CANVASS. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 20:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

@MrsSnoozyTurtle:, I requested editors to join the discussion about AfD. I didn't ask them to support me. As per WP:CANVASS, In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it be done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 00:42, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

What did you do to ensure that WP:APPNOTE was met? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

@MrsSnoozyTurtle:, Sorry, I did not know about this policy. Hereafter I'll be careful. Thank you for information. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 07:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for retracting the message, much appreciated. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

2023 Tripura Election

@SharadSHRD7 That link you gave is not officially given. The image of officially published candidate list in the twitter link given in this article (https://news.abplive.com/news/india/tripura-assembly-election-cpim-names-candidates-former-cm-manik-sarkar-missing-from-list-congress-1578022) says that the name of alliance is Left Front and Congress is designated as Left Front partner. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706: Congress is not part of Left Front. Congress and Left Front are part of DSA. The official tweet from CPI(M) proves this fact. [8] Other sources also proves it. [9] SharadSHRD7 (talk) 04:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7 DSA is nowhere mentioned. I also supported DSA till yesterday. Check the second image of your link. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I mean DSA is nowhere mentioned officially. User:Soman also said that in fact, not much evidence online at all regarding the supposed DSA. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

All sources clearly differentiate congress and left front. Please don't engage in edit war. You may call it as "Left Front + Congress" but cannot be called as LF. [10] SharadSHRD7 (talk) 04:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I am not edit warring, I am discussing only (https://twitter.com/cpimspeak/status/1618264282323615746/photo/2). XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7 We can add INC seperatly as CPIM is saying that it is seat adjustment. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:53, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Please wait for the opinion of other editors on this issue. Let's stop the discussion. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) SharadSHRD7 (talk) 04:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

CPIM is opposing the word alliance. (https://www.facebook.com/cpimtripuraofficialpage/videos/492999523014130/) XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7 Please check the edit of article properly before tagging it as vandalism. CPIM leaders including sitaram Yechury opposed the term alliance (https://www.facebook.com/cpimtripuraofficialpage/videos/492999523014130/). SDF is not an alliance, it is the oppostion parties which are against BJP government. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

http://www.uniindia.com/news/east/cpi-m-announces-seat-sharing-with-congress--motha-in-tripura-polls/2895230.html XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Sitaram Yechury is not the owner of Wikipedia. This site is not for political campaign/promotion. You need secondary sources for your edit. Don't msg me again. I feel stressful to discuss with you. Discuss this with other editors on article's talk page. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 08:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

http://www.uniindia.com/news/east/cpi-m-announces-seat-sharing-with-congress--motha-in-tripura-polls/2895230.html Sitaram Yechury is leader of cpim. Please follow civility. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)