Jump to content

User talk:Scythre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2 things.

[edit]

I've responded on my talk page. AdjustShift (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

[edit]

I have again undone your addition of non-free media to your userspace. Per WP:FAIRUSE, non free media files may not be used in your userspace. I would appreciate you not putting it back. Warmly, –Katerenka (talk • contribs) 21:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tania Doko

[edit]

Hello:

I have gone through almost two weeks of various editors revamping and giving me suggestions on how to fix any problems on the Tania Doko page.

It has passed those editors and all I am asking now is that this article be placed on the man page of Wikipedia.

It has undergone at least three different edits and this artist is not a non-musician.

I would appreciate your chaging the deletion recommendation on this page.

Sincerely, --Ussee (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by my delete. I only found 2 sources on her, and I doubt even those were reliable. --ScythreTalkContribs 06:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remati

[edit]

(copied from that users talkpage + additional comments just for you)

Him 'going against what you said' (at the AFD) is more likely that he feels his firm is notable enough to be included in the encyclopedia. Technically, he is 'going against what I said' as well but I assume good faith that he is participating in a discussion...not some kind of horse race. His borrowing of your signature formatting I can't speak to, tho I guess its because he liked how it looked. Poor choice of action in my opinion, but new editors often do a few odd things when starting out.

There is no basis in my opinion for an insinuation of sockpuppetry, and you are reminded to not bite the new editors. If you have some evidence that you feel is particularly compelling that you feel I have missed, feel free to bring it to my attention. Cheers. Syrthiss (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But it blatantly isnt though. All sources were self published and a ghit turned up nothing. I accused him of being a sock, as an editor I have been closely involved with has lately been revealed to be a sock, and I thought that he might be another sock of the puppet master. It just seemed a little weird, him copying my sig and everything... Regards, --ScythreTalkContribs 15:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tania Doko

[edit]

Mr. Scythre:

I am extremely curious as to how you did not find any references or two maybe as you mentioned. Did you view the references?

I would imagine that the credibility of various other editors whom did find the article ready to be placed on the main page is no less credible than yourself.

I am not in agreement with your decision.

--68.6.199.54 (talk) 22:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I only found 2 proper references, and yes, I did view the references. I never asked you to be 'in agreement' with my decision, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It can't be that good an article if its had an AfD filed for it? --ScythreTalkContribs 22:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you censor me?

[edit]

I was telling the truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.170.126 (talk) 22:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because The Supreme Court Of The United Kingdom exists in the Roman Empire, doesnt it? --ScythreTalkContribs 22:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.170.126 (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC) You see the United Kingdom is a by product of the Roman empire —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.170.126 (talk) 22:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you keep believing that ;) --ScythreTalkContribs 07:59, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Youtube

[edit]

I sure do :P

Mine:

http://www.youtube.com/user/mynameistrain

I'm part of a group that makes films but we havent done anything in a while......need to make some more movies XD

I AM LION:

http://www.youtube.com/user/iamlionproductions

mÆniac Ask! 15:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou. Will subscribe. Mine is http://www.youtube.com/user/RemixRewind --ScythreTalkContribs 16:29, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Coolies thanks :) I'll subscribe to urs too :) mÆniac Ask! 16:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 15:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Award

[edit]
The Exceptional Newcomer Award
Awarded to Scythre for for being an exceptionally good newbie--NotedGrant Talk 14:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou. --ScythreTalkContribs 14:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 13:23, 25 October 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Rollback

[edit]

Hi
This was a misuse of rollback, the edit was good-faithed, and factually correct. If you didn't agree with it you should have undone it with an explanatory edit summary.
Amalthea 16:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As were, actually, many of your other recent uses, like this, this, or this. Please make sure to only use it for blatantly unconstructive uses in the future, typically vandalism. As you know, misuse of that tool will lead to its removal.
Regards, Amalthea 17:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of post on Barbican Estate page

[edit]

Hi

i noticed that you deleted the link to my website barbicanmums.com on the barbican estate page. Can I ask why you did this? the site is run as a hobby to provide information for the parents living on the estate. i do not make any profit from it in fact it costs me money to run it. There is a link to barbicanliving.co.uk on the same page and this is run by a solicitor who deals with people buying property on the estate. His site is therefore run as a commercial interest as well as an information service. Why is his site suitable for inclusion but not mine? many thanks Kate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbicanmum (talkcontribs) 14:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the message. Can I ask what article you're referring to? --ScythreTalkContribs 21:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 10:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Hip hop WikiProject Roll Call

[edit]

Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 14:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 21:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 00:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 13:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 19:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)
The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Issue 2 (January 2010)

Previous issue | Next issue

Content

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 17:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 14:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Main Image of Penis Article

[edit]

What do you think about changing opening picture of the Penis article? Your opinion needed. Thanks! Yestadae (talk) 08:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 18:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 20:57, 15 March 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 15:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 17:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 13:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message

[edit]

It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving.
In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire.
If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list.
If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥NiciVampireHeart00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 10:11, 10 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Rescue

[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 14:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 18:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

[edit]
Delivered: 19:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

hello scythre, did you make changes on the artical st cummin wikioedia,in 2009.[user name pcummin 80.254.146.140 (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Scythre! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal

[edit]
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1229 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Appeal

[edit]
Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1229 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you (at least) autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver.

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial.

On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
AndrewN talk 23:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Backlog

[edit]
Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1229 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at User:Timotheus Canens/afchelper4.js which helps in reviewing in just few edits easily!

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project,
TheSpecialUser TSU

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1229 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.

PS: we have a great AFC helper script at WP:AFCH!

News

Good article nominee AFCH script improvements
  • 1.16 to 1.17
    • Batman still works!

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1229 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered 00:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

[edit]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject AFC needs your help... again

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.

Delivered at 12:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive

[edit]
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1200 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. --Mdann52talk to me!

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Ill Made Mute.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Ill Made Mute.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

[edit]

Hi Scythre,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

[edit]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]