User talk:Remati

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Remati, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Antonio Villarruel

The article Antonio Villarruel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established. Possible COI as page created by user who has only contributed to this topic and Villarruel Architects, Inc

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Villarruel Architects, Inc

The article Villarruel Architects, Inc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reads like an ad. Notability not established. Possible WP:COI as page created by user who has only contributed to this topic and Antonio Villarruel

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Antonio Villarruel

A tag has been placed on Antonio Villarruel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Derek Andrews (talk) 16:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Villarruel Architects, Inc

A tag has been placed on Villarruel Architects, Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Derek Andrews (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Antonio Villarruel, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Antonio Villarruel, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Villarruel Architects, Inc

An article that you have been involved in editing, Villarruel Architects, Inc, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villarruel Architects, Inc. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Syrthiss (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me

Why did you steal my signature and go against what I said? I smell a sock... --Scythre ^Talk _Contribs 06:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Him 'going against what you said' (at the AFD) is more likely that he feels his firm is notable enough to be included in the encyclopedia. His borrowing of your signature formatting I can't speak to, tho I guess its because he liked how it looked. Syrthiss (talk) 12:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: discussion at my talkpage

Your best bet to have the article included in the encyclopedia is to establish notability according to WP:CORP using reliable references external to your firm's own website. If you have sources that establish the notability of your firm but don't feel confident in adding them to the article feel free to put them on the talk page of the article along with the specific information they are supporting and I can work to put them into the correct form for inside the article text. If the article is deleted, please don't consider it any slight to your writing or to your firm. Documenting notability is not always easy, regardless of how successful a corporate entity might be. Cheers! Syrthiss (talk) 12:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]