Talk:Michelle McCool/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on October 24, 2009. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.

Reviewer: Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Michelle McCool first came to World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) as a competitor in the 2004 WWE Diva Search, losing to Christy Hemme. No need for "Michelle McCool", it can just be "McCool".
Melina defeated on June 30. Did McCool beat Melina or the other way around?
While in DSW, she was hospitalized after taking prescribed medication and was temporarily sidelined to recover. Firstly, it should be a prescribed medication and secondly, can you elaborate on this. Did she have an allergic reaction? A bad combination of pills?
On November 28, McCool was hospitalized with an enlarged kidney, a broken sternum, and an electrolyte imbalance. How'd she break her sternum?

Manual of Style compliance:

~~The lead should be a bit longer and should cover the entire article.~~

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

~~Images are missing WP:ALT text.~~

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

I'll place this on hold to allow for the changes to be made.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.

Alt text added, but I've never done it before; let me know if it isn't descriptive enough.
All the prose problems are fixed, except for the last one. She didn't know she had a broken sternum because she injured her back during an oversees tour, and the pain from that injury masked the broken sternum. When she went to the hospital for the other issues, she found out about the sternum injury, as well. Do you think I should explain all of that in the text? Or maybe in a footnote? Nikki♥311 20:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed up the alt text since, it shouldn't mention the subject by name.
A footnote could help since otherwise I'd have no idea why, a long explanation could disrupt the flow.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Nikki♥311 02:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed you finished up, nice work I'm now passing the article.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]