User talk:ST47/Archive13
This is an archive of discussions past. Please do not edit this page, and instead visit User talk:ST47 if you want to leave me a comment.
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47. |
 |
Contents
ARSbot[edit]User:ARSBot doesn't seem to be working. Is there something that needs to be fixed? -- Banjeboi 02:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Someone noticed[edit]
CSD Warn Bot too quick !![edit]Hi. I was attempting to go through the CSD procedure for an article, and had placed the 'db-xxxx' tag on the article. I had just placed the warning notice on the authors talk page, when I was informed of an edit conflict as your bot had added a warning for me. I'm not using Twinkle or any automated process, so it's slower, but the delay between tagging the article itself and getting the edit conflict was < 30 seconds. This then leads me to a problem - do I just stop adding messages to a user's talk page because the bot will tag them ? If there's any possibility that the bot may not catch the article (or not in a reasonable time), then I should, but obviously I don't want to go throught he process if it's being made redundant by the bot. Any thoughts ? CultureDrone (talk) 08:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
The Starlims Page you commented about[edit]I wrote a comment as instructed on the Starlims page. Just wanted to make sure you see it and hopefully you can help me in some way. Here is what I wrote in response to your comment: Yes, I did write this page on behalf of Starlims. Starlims is a Nasdaq traded company and I believe that this by itself warrants a Wikipedia presence. This article is written in a very impartial manner. I intend to write more pages for Wikipedia that are unrelated to Starlims. Choosing the user name Starlims was just pure inexperience on my part. I thought it would be symbolic to use this user name so I can always remember the first post I wrote. Please remove the warnings on the page or advise otherwise. I only have good intentions and understand very well the concept and the importance of Wikipedia. Thanks... --Starlims (talk) 14:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Editnotice[edit]I've moved your Editnotice from MediaWiki:Editnotice-3-ST47 to User talk:ST47/Editnotice. In the User: and User_talk: namespaces a special subpage /Editnotice (case sensitive) can be used instead of filling up the mediawiki space. I've left this page full protected, but you may want to remove that if you don't think it will be a vandal target. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 03:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC) CSDWarnBot destroyed existing talk page comments[edit]In this edit, it seems to have replaced the page with the warning instead of adding the warning to the page.—Kww(talk) 20:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC) CSDWarnBot image size issue[edit]It missed the size parameter, causing the image to be (by default) displayed at 620px × 620px. Any ideas? — neuro(talk) 15:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
whoops, I see people talking about it above. It looks crazy. Sorry for the extra section Alio The Fool 16:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Just a thought....[edit]I noticed that your bot's talk page notice includes a link to WP:WMD and I got to thinking that new users might think that means "weapons of mass destruction" (what "WMD" normally stands for off-wiki). Perhaps it would be wise to have it link to WP:WWMPD instead? It's not a big deal, but I think it may cause some unnecessary confusion to new users. (on the other hand, maybe they'll be more likely actually read the page thinking there's some way they can retaliate to whoever deleted their page. hmm... :P ) Thingg⊕⊗ 03:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.[edit]Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC) restoring images[edit]restoring image[edit]Hello, these images - one of which was deleted by you as the fu rationale was invalid, th other was ophaned - I would now like to use again. would it be possible for you to restore them, please? I would like to fix the rationale too. Image:Betty.jpg & Image:Bettyturpin.jpg Many thanks --GunGagdinMoan 17:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Assume this was in error?[edit][2] – iridescent 01:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
ArbCom vote[edit]I checked my edit numbers before I voted on the checker provided and it said I had enough before the appropriate date to vote. Please check again. If that checker is providing erroneous information, it should be removed. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 23:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
I checked wannabe kate, I have more than enough[edit]Wannabe kate shows edits by month and says I have plenty of mainspace edits.--Ipatrol (talk) 01:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Report request[edit]Hi ST47, among all the wonderful data-gathering tools that you have, do you have anything that could issue a report on "inactive" voters who just emerged to vote in the elections? There's currently a discussion at WP:AN about some editors who emerged from mothballs (one who had been inactive for over a year!) just to vote, and there are concerns about canvassing and sockpuppetry. It would be really helpful if we could see a report that showed of all the voters, which ones hadn't participated anywhere else on the project in months, and where those voters were voting. Can you think of any easy way to present that data? Thanks, --Elonka 04:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Majorly NOK on AnthonyQBachler last edit before elections 2008-10-14T21:19:21Z Terence NOK on AnthonyQBachler last edit before elections 2008-11-01T10:02:43Z Mww113 NOK on AnthonyQBachler last edit before elections 2008-11-14T20:50:37Z Toffile NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-09-03T00:22:57Z ATren NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-11-09T19:05:07Z CreazySuit NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-10-10T03:40:12Z Zereshk NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-10-28T20:27:02Z Naerii NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-10-19T19:50:51Z Skinwalker NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-11-11T22:58:56Z Node ue NOK on Carcharoth last edit before elections 2008-11-14T21:29:39Z PseudoOne NOK on Casliber last edit before elections 2008-10-21T11:07:23Z Neokamek NOK on Casliber last edit before elections 2008-08-24T03:01:22Z MagneticFlux NOK on Casliber last edit before elections 2008-07-29T22:27:24Z Bunchofgrapes NOK on Charles Matthews last edit before elections 2008-10-09T21:20:04Z Coredesat NOK on Cool Hand Luke last edit before elections 2008-05-05T04:57:46Z 6SJ7 NOK on Cool Hand Luke last edit before elections 2008-10-16T10:51:01Z Samir NOK on Jayvdb last edit before elections 2007-10-29T19:55:11Z Armatura NOK on Jayvdb last edit before elections 2008-10-15T22:02:09Z Lakinekaki NOK on Jehochman last edit before elections 2008-09-22T22:19:54Z Yamakiri NOK on Kmweber last edit before elections 2008-11-02T00:30:03Z Glacier Wolf NOK on Kmweber last edit before elections 2008-11-04T18:01:42Z Marcsin NOK on Kmweber last edit before elections 2008-10-15T15:22:08Z Rockero NOK on Rlevse last edit before elections 2008-11-12T07:55:39Z Reneeholle NOK on Rlevse last edit before elections 2008-11-13T12:25:10Z
Image request[edit]Hi, it's me again. :) On your fantastic graph Image:ACE2008.jpg, which I am now using on my User:Elonka/ACE2008 page, I see that Caspian Blue at one point uploaded a slightly different version that had bolder colors, and also lined up the names with the actual lines.[3] Would this be easy for you to emulate, or if we want those colors, would it be something that Caspian needs to do manually each time? --Elonka 18:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
indenting[edit]Just had that pointed out to me - fixing it.--Tznkai (talk) 03:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Feature request for CSDWarnBot[edit]CSDWarnBot just edited my talk page with a deletion tag warning, and that is fine - it was very useful :-). It would be better if the edit summary included a link to the section created (a "→") so users can quickly navigate to the section created. On another issue, I don't really understand your comment on this talk page "ATTENTION! IF YOU ARE REPORTING AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF MY BOTS... Visit /dev/null...Don't come back." If you mean you don't care/want comments on bots, you could possibly make that more explicit, or direct people to a subpage where others, like me, will help answer questions for you.--Commander Keane (talk) 09:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Re:ArbCom vote[edit]Hi - thanks for the notice. I had registered on October 18, but misunderstood the second criteria. Thanks for making the correction, Shiva (Visnu) 17:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Missing candidate[edit] I think you've missed a candidate off the 13:31, 6 December 2008 version of Image:ACE2008.jpg. Carcharoth (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Graph colors[edit]Hello, ST47. Thank you for sharing the good info with the community, but could you use bolder colors than the current neutral colors in order to clearly distinguish candidates? Thanks.--Caspian blue 02:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Arbcom voting table[edit]Hi ST, thanks for taking the trouble to design a table for the election. I'm just wondering though, is there any reason why the table listing defaults to percentages rather than aggregate votes? If I'm not mistaken, Jimbo's usual practice is to promote those users who get the most aggregate votes, in which case (for example) Vassyana will miss out, since although he has a better percentage his aggregate is well below that of some other candidates. Gatoclass (talk) 05:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
ST47's email address?[edit]Hiya. I've an email thread sitting in my inbox that I want to forward to you. Could you drop a note to agkwiki The matter is regarding Mervyn_Emrys (talk · contribs), an editor who has voted but has no suffrage; only some of his votes have been indented, and I was hoping you could nuke his contributions with your vote delisting tool Thanks, AGK 16:46, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
I have something similar here. Do I have your permission to carry on with it? --Dylan620 Contribs Sign! 13:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
The bot-generated report[edit]I left a comment at User talk:ST47/ACEE. My comment on the main page got wiped out by the update. I think some of them could be easily fixed - eg. add a link to Rspeer's user page for the one that appears to have no user. Carcharoth (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Merry Christmas[edit] DavidWS (contribs) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy holidays! DavidWS (contribs) 19:46, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Teh votebot[edit]Hi ST, can you bump up the update frequency for the ACE2008 bot to every two or three minutes? (And fer gawd's sake, don't go eat a sandwich or anything right now! :) Franamax (talk) 23:46, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar time[edit]
More thanks[edit]For keeping tally of the ArbCom votes. I am sure you know how much EVERYONE appreciates it, I just wanted to thank you personally. Slrubenstein | Talk 00:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Anon blocks[edit]Hey -- are you intending to be doing those IP blocks with talk page editing disabled? That's normally only done if someone has a history of talk page abuse. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Superscript text Happy ST47/Archive13's Day![edit]
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC) User:judyrenouf[edit]This edit by judyrenouf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is actually Ok as it does point to an official website of Anna Wallner. This editor appears to be connected to Anna Wallner and her partner and was apparently just trying to update the articles she edited. Fred Talk 02:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC) Re your block of Judyrenouf[edit]Hey ST47, User talk:Judyrenouf has appealed your block of her and I'm rather confused by what has happened there and why she has been blocked. I see she had several "vandal" warnings on her page which she says she didn't see them until after she was blocked, but I really don't understand why her edits were deemed "vandalism" in the first place, ie "intentional unconstructive edits" and I was hoping you could explain? She has a conflict of interest but I believe she is well intentioned. I don't think those edits were vandalism as defined by policy and I would like to unblock her under an agreement that she will abide by COI and discuss her edits with other users as necessary. I also don't understand why you disabled her ability to edit her own talk page? I would appreciate your advice on this matter. Cheers, Sarah 02:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
talkin' to a bot...[edit]Your bot took a dump on my talk, and although I thoroughly enjoy talking to a bot... Anyway, the page ref'd wasn't my page - I'm the one who reverted the vandal move and left the stupid redir there so the vandal couldn't repeat the nonsense w/out getting it deleted. I don't give a rip about that redir - just thought you might educate your bot 'bout leaving a dump on admin talk pages. Am I grippin', naw, keep up the good work. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 00:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC) Chloroform entry vandalized again[edit]and it was just after you (or was it a bot you run?) undid a previous vandalism. I undid them, hope I did it right... Benbradley (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiCup[edit]Might I ask why? I'm sure it's a demo for something, or something... Garden. 13:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas![edit]
socks[edit]There are a large number of Bambifan101 talk talk pages that need to be deleted for the same reason as the user talk pages you're deleting now. Please consider this. 68.220.175.142 (talk) 01:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Would it be possible to add a {{NOINDEX}} and an explanation of the page's purpose at the top, or could it cause problems for the bot? —Snigbrook 16:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
What is this page? Gwen Gale (talk) 21:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC) I, too, came here to ask what this page is and why my user name appears on it (which I was just advised of by an anonymous editor). I see no explanation on your bot's user and talk pages. —David Levy 22:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC) I see that DragonflySixtyseven just moved the page to User:STBotI/LEFT-NOTE-FOR-USER. Am I to understand that you (via your bot) have been deeming someone a "bad user" whenever your bot has notified that individual of an image that wasn't properly tagged? User:STBotI/BADUSER is still up (I think because the bot updated it). Gwen Gale (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
You all couldn't manage to wait for 50 minutes for me to get back online before you moved the page, twice, and deleted it, and blocked the bot for doing its job? ST47 (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
STBotI using a non-existant template[edit]STBotI seems to be tagging images with a non-existant template: {{notagr}}, for example [4]. --Carnildo (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: Redirect of Benjamin farmer[edit]Hello! My name is Gopal81. you made this edit to my talk page. However, I just moved the page. I knew it was not going to last. Just informing you. Gopal81ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC) A more benign problem[edit]Thanks for dealing with the BADUSERS thing. Now, in the process, I've noticed a more benign problem that you may want to fix, although on the other hand it may not actually affect anything. You've got encoding errors in the list of usernames on User:STBotI/Notified users. It seems that you read UTF-8 off of Wikipedia, treat it as Latin-1, and then submit those Latin-1 strings back to your log on Wikipedia, where they show up as UTF-8 gibberish. Whatever your bot is supposed to do with its list of notified users, it may not be working correctly for users with accented characters in their name. rspεεr (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Gotland flag[edit]A year ago, you removed the link from Template:Country data Gotland to a non-free image. The image has now been replaced by a GFDL version, so I have restored the link for the games variant only. The only use I have found is in International Island Games Association#Members. Please feel free to revert (and purge) the template if you disagree. Certes (talk) 22:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Suevisiot.jpg[edit]Hi. Your bot said about copyright status to Suevisiot.jpg. I can tell you, the name in the middle, titled Andrew Racklyeft, is ME. This is no word of a lie. That is the unofficial album cover for "Suevisito", a song I hope to release in 2009. So that picture is totally mine. It does not need the tag on it. Thanks. Koshoes (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Happy New Year![edit]
Happy New Year![edit]Dear ST47, Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both. Kind regards, Majorly talk 21:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Big thank you for the little "The Victorious Opposition" book cover hoo-hah[edit] Hi, ST47. Big thank you for all your help and guidance with the fair use non-free image hoo-hah. As per WP:Marsupial Mole I must consequently award you the extremely rare Southern-Marsupial-Mole-Shaped Barnstar of guidance with the fair use non-free image hoo-hah (pictured there in its natural sandy habitat). ----Shirt58 (talk) 13:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009[edit]Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC) CSD of canoeing category[edit]Thanks for reminding me of this. This should have been done last month, but I forgot. I put in a db-author as well to help it along. Chris (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Bot request[edit]This bot request may interest you. It is very similar to the WikiCup that your bot is updating. Would appreciate if you can add your comments to the bot request page. Thanks, Ganeshk (talk) 03:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC) beautifultorneValley.jpg[edit]Hi. I have been trying to get this self taken photo of the building I am compiling a history of approved. I have tried numerous ways by reading the guidelines and still am unsuccessful. Its name is the Joseph T. St. Lawrence Center in Hillburn, NY and I am a staff member there. It had been used on our town website previously [5]. I would like to release the photo to the wikipedia public with limited protection (basically no one says there building is ours). Looking for some aid in this process if you can. Thanks.Saintstaff (talk) 01:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Error with Bot/WP/EN/Daniel/MediationBot1/1.2[edit]Bot/WP/EN/Daniel/MediationBot1/1.2 needs to be logged in! 91.198.174.201 (talk) 11:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC) User talk:Encyclopediaofalabama[edit]Hi, why delete User talk:Encyclopediaofalabama? This was a useful record of Wikipedians' responses to a new editor who was facing difficulty in contributing. DuncanHill (talk) 11:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure three months is sufficient time to allow, before deleting the user page of a blocked user. If the page is going to be deleted while the user remains blocked, at the least a note should be placed on the page indicating that the account is blocked, to prevent confusion. Otherwise, editors ending up at the page via links from other pages and their edit histories may not be aware that the account has been blocked and is no longer active. Is there a policy or guideline that authorizes and governs deletion of old user pages? If not, there should be. --Srleffler (talk) 01:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Brendo619RulzBest[edit]I noticed the following entry in the logs: "(Deletion log); 06:43 . . ST47 (Talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:Brendo619RulzBest" (Temporary page, too old)" How can the user talk page have been too old? That user account was just created a month ago. Deleting the talk page was confusing. I put a vandalism warning there today, because I noticed that the account's contribution history contained a lot of vandalism and it did not appear that anyone had warned the user to stop. In fact, it was just that you had prematurely deleted the talk page. If you undelete the page, feel free to just overwrite the warning I left there today. I presume the deleted page must contain a record of other warnings.--Srleffler (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC) ok[edit]Maybe by next election. Alio The Fool 21:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Chee kufta[edit]I noticed you removed my Chee kufta 5 points for DYK. Yes, I haven't had the talk page notice yet, but you can look on the main page and see it's there.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 00:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
BHUMIKA FILM FESTIVAL[edit]why my article BHUMIKA FILM INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL is been deleted by an server...
if any doubt plz refer to this link http://www.shemaroo.com/corporate/?pgtype=press_details&id=204 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranjit186 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Mfdbot[edit]Hi, have you given any thought to reviving Mfdbot? I'm getting tired of maintaining the page by hand. Thanks,--Aervanath talks like a mover, but not a shaker 19:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 20:22, 13 January 2009 (UTC) strange edit[edit]Hi -- this was a pretty strange edit for an administrator to make, since the result was to partially undo a vandalism-fix. Maybe you're working a bit too fast? Regards, Looie496 (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Sathya Sai article - inappropriate images notice issue[edit]Hi. The Sathya Sai Baba article is one of the very sensitive controversial article which went through 2 arbitrations and many of the pro sai and anti editors were banned to let other NPOV editors to contribute and improve it. After arbitration this article was maintained pretty well till January 07 2009. From January 08th 2009 a new user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:White_adept - hardcore anti sai activitist has taken over this article. His agenda is very clear from the talk page where he compares SaiBaba to Osama Bin Laden. He has completely rewritten the article in an anti sai perspective in a matter of 10 days. Just on Jan 12th 2009 he made 35 edits to the article. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sathya_Sai_Baba&dir=prev&offset=20090111045336&action=history. The article which had been maintained for the past 21/2 years is completely rewritten in a matter of 10 days in the most negative perspective and does not have single positive incident about Sathya Sai Baba. He has also added offending images which are against criteria for non-free content. You had also added a comment in his talk page to remove those images. So far I have added 2 warning messages. Inspite of removing those images he still keeps adding them. How can this be stopped!!. Can something be done to stop this?. If he still continues to add those images after the 3rd warning can he be blocked?. Please advice.Thanks. RadiantEnergy 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 01:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Comment on CSDWarnBot[edit]According to the documentation, disabling the CSDWarnBot for a page is as simple as adding: <!--User:CSDWarnBot--> to the page. Is there a reason why the bot doesn't recognize the {{nobots}} template too? ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
CSDWarnBot too enthusiastic[edit]The bot left me a notice to let me know that Mistress Fortune has been CSD (redirect to a deleted article).[9] Since I agree with the deletion (as I'm the one who AfDed the original article), I removed the notice as read.[10] Six minutes later, the bot reposted the notice[11] which I again removed. Twenty minutes later, it was back again with the same notice.[12] I removed yet again, and six minutes later...[13] Does it not have any way to know it already left a message on an article? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Note about your bot[edit]I left a note on the bot's talk page here. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC) United Studios of Self Defense[edit]ΚΈΓΓΆΜ ₡₢₡$ I Heard You keep the copies of the deleted articles. I would like to see the article of United studios of Self Defense Please. I dont thinks this is asking to undelete i would just like to see it again. I think thats an okay signature. Can you email me @ mjfan2389@yahoo.com
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delivered at 05:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable) WikiCup FP points[edit]Durova has offered to have her FP points docked to 15 to encourage competition. Would this be possible for the bot to implement? Thanks, Garden. 21:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
My Uploaded Photo[edit]Pardon me, your operated bot, STBotI gave a speedy deletion tag on my uploaded file File:Majalah Tempo (Februari 1999).jpg. I was imported it from id.wikipedia.org, please check it out. C H J L Discuss 10:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
your bot CSDWarnBot[edit]Hello, I recently put a speedy on what appears to be a copyright violation. I was in the process of putting a notification on the user's talkpage who uploaded the image but was unable to do so because of an edit conflict; your bot beat me to the punch. I respect the fact that your bot will notify users when other users fail to do so but perhaps you might consider giving me a little more time to put the notification up? I appreciate you considering this, thanks. Naufana : talk 00:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC) WarnBot deleting messages[edit]CSDWarnBot blanked this user's talk page before adding its own message. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Another bot error:CSDWarnBot[edit]CSDWarnBot placed this CSD warning on the talk page on my Bot, when my bot had done nothing else than WikiProject Tagged on the article talk page ( not an article contributor/creator) . Kindly look . Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 11:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Delta waves[edit]Just noticed your bot put a message on my talk page regarding speedy deletion of Delta waves. I've no idea what that page had on it and pretty certain I did not create the article or edit it. Please can you explain how you came up with my user id for this article? Muntfish (talk) 16:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Jim Killock undeletion[edit]As you are listed in Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles, I would be very grateful if you would userfy Jim Killock (that I created in 2005) to User:Joeblakesley/Jim Killock. I wasn't notified of its deletion at the time, but did agree that the subject lacked notability. However, I now think the subject is more notable, so would like to improve the article in my user space to demonstrate this, before moving it to the main namespace. —Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 03:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
CUOS elections[edit]Do you have a tool available to check voter eligibility?--Tznkai (talk) 06:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Regional Science High School for Region III is not a nonsense because I'm still patrolling that article against vandalism. Please, cancel the CSD. I hope that it will not continue the CSD unless I'm watching that article. Thank you! GPI-MediaWiki Union (talk) 09:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Please[edit]CSD is needed for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teknologi_Industri_Pertanian_Angkatan_2005 - when they add the educational institution ads (they are literally) it seems to be some game - I have left a basic indonesian message for 'get lost' but politely, i hope you are able to do a csd - the point of translation of ads for tech colleges seems to be pointless at the mo considering how few active eds at the indonesian project there are - cheers I havent checked either the web or wp in to see if its a lift or not SatuSuro 10:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Thank you or whoever did it SatuSuro 14:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC) RE:Duplicate File:WhiteHeart1970.png Bot notice[edit]There image does not meet F1. It was/is not an unused image or other media file that is a redundant copy, in the same file format and same or lower quality/resolution, . The was a mis-tag. Please restore. (CC: OrangeMike) Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I didn't want to edit that myself, but do you think you could put a hatnote at the top pointing back to the CU/OS elections themselves? If that will mess up any pages where the results are transcluded or otherwise be difficult, don't worry about it (But using the back button is so hard!). Thanks for making the results list! Protonk (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC) CSDWarnBot user talk page editing error, blanked page![edit]Per this diff [[14]] CSDWArnBot blanked SIX recent warnings off of a users talk page, in order to issue a single new warning, that duplicated 1 of the pre-existing warnings. Leaving new message = Good. Issuing duplicate warning = Not so good. Blanking page first. = BAD. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009[edit]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Don't ever apologize[edit]ST47, whatever you do, don't ever apologize for your mistakes or the tone of your messages to others. Never. You rule! Mervyn Emrys (talk) 02:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC) I moved to another admin. thanks (DeSauer (talk) 11:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)) Question about my fairly stupid idea[edit]I was looking at User:ST47/CUOS 2009 just now, and I'm just curious. My dumb idea here, with that simple formula for weighting results based on the averages... how hard would that be to bot up, or stick out at the end? I'm curious to see if my formula sort of works through two elections, since I 538'd the AC elections based on the data in your AC09 table. :P rootology (C)(T) 06:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/CSDWarnBot/2.0.1[edit]Bot/WP/EN/ST47/CSDWarnBot/2.0.1 needs to be logged in! 24.0.68.110 (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Portal edits in the Wikicup[edit]Hi, would it be possible for you to add portal edits to the mainspace edits counted by the bot for WikiCup points? I raised the question here, and there was a good amount of support for the idea. The judges said on IRC that they were happy for the edits to be added. J Milburn (talk) 11:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009[edit]From the editor — A new leaf
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Mustard Bath (film)[edit]Hi, I'm sorry that I kept making changes to the article, I'm new here and I find a lot of this stuff confusing. I think I got the hang of sandbox now so that I won't be making so many corrections to the actual articles that I hope to write. Besides the issue of the article containing spam (which I hope you now see that it does not) is there anything else I need to change to keep the article? Thanks for all of your help! Sandra Okland Content gets deleted on CSD of User Talk pages[edit]Often, spammers will put their spam on their talk page in addition to or instead of in an article. I typically use Twinkle to mark pages for CSD. A bug reported in Twinkle, which has been resolved, was that the warning placed on the talk page would obliterate the spam. It seems your bot is doing the same thing. --Tckma (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC) This is your 3rr warning. (seriously, what on earth)... oh, and thanks for maintaining the table whilst Tango and SQLBot are off in the Bahamas. — neuro(talk) 02:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
BAGBot[edit]Just cos I'm curious, where does it get its list of BAG members? Some bots seems to be in a trial without being edited by one, so I guess something's up. (I'm referring to BAG Status, btw). Cheers, - Jarry1250 (t, c) 14:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Madia Gond[edit]I had received a post on my discussion page that there was a deletion warning for Madia Gond. I checked the page there is no such warning now. What does that mean??? Yogesh Khandke (talk) 03:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Huh?[edit]It seems you just blocked yourself for vandalism twice. Is everything all right with your account? Is there sleep deprivation or an amusing story behind this? rspεεr (talk) 06:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Your RFA bot[edit]In Mfield's section, you keep on adding 1 to the oppose part. He has no opposes in the RFA. Malfunction? I had to revert this twice. SimonKSK 20:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Overly optimistic assumption on your part[edit]Hmmmm. What makes you think admins won't edit war with a bot? --barneca (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Error with Bot/WP/EN/ST47/BAGBota/2.0.1[edit]Bot/WP/EN/ST47/BAGBota/2.0.1 needs to be logged in! 24.0.68.110 (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Steward election statistics[edit]Could you stop updating m:User:ST47/SE 2009? Now elections are finished.--Kwj2772 (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Steward elections[edit]
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Hello, a number of the images tagged with User:ST47/notagr are showing in the non-existant categories called "Images with a rationale but unknown copyright status" (for example Category:Images with a rationale but unknown copyright status as of 31 December 2008 and Category:Images with a rationale but unknown copyright status as of 16 February 2009). Could you please retag them? Thanks. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
This is clearly broken. Please fix it and any pages it left messages on. Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Heroes template help please[edit]Just want to make sure I am not doing something against the rules. I have been trying to clean up the Heroes character articles and make them more encylopedic and save in-universe detail for the Heroes wiki. For years I have seen a wikilink template on Star Trek character pages to a Star Trek wiki so I figured that will provide the link to the Heroes wiki so viewers can go there for in-universe info. The template was maked spam by another user. I don't get it, why would the Heroes wikilink be spam but not the Star Trek wikilink? I copied the info. right from the Star Trek wikilink template too Template:Memoryalpha and pasted it to the page for the new template I created Template:Heroeswiki so these 2 templates are identical... did I screw something up here? Some of the pages even had links to the wikilink such as the Sylar page, so it was just adding the template instead. Why is this wrong? Also, I know you didn't delete the template and the other user nominate it to the bot, just wanted to get an admin's advice and saw u operated the bot so wanted to ask you. So just looking for admin advice here, I did read the notice you posted above and thats not what I am looking for, please advise, thank you. Ejfetters (talk) 05:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![[3]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/2/2c/20081204113540!ACE2008.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rezekne_1.JPG&diff=260385976&oldid=260385133){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
